Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
We could've had Tom Brady.
![]()
I'm not gonna call him a bust already,but my film study of him are coming true. He has no cod and that's not call of duty either. He's a straight line guy. His quickness and burst are top shelf,but he can't transition from speed to power or vice versa. Look at guys like von miller,demarcus ware,and aldon smith and they were doing it as rookies. Merriman had it ,maybe it was the juice,but he had it. Kearse, had burst and his detrmination led him to sacks until he failed to have a counter. What I'm looking for in a pass rusher,he doesn't really have.
I won't give up on the Clown yet, because I think it's just too early. I think they need to place him out for the season if he is still not 100%. Let him heal up & rehab for next year! Sigh. (tough to be a Houston sports Fan)! Then Uncle Bob needs to fire Rick Smith. The guy is just not a good GM!![]()
If you were O'BRIEN & Rick gave you every thing you asked for; Mallett, Clowney, XSF, Fiedo, Blue, Nix, Dent, Bullough, Savage, John Simon, Big Grease.... would you fire him? Why?
If you were O'BRIEN & Rick gave you every thing you asked for; Mallett, Clowney, XSF, Fiedo, Blue, Nix, Dent, Bullough, Savage, John Simon, Big Grease.... would you fire him? Why?
Not another "Rick doesn't pick the players" theory. If he doesn't have any responsibility for picking the players on the team, then he isn't doing his job and should be fired for that. Why pay him for doing nothing?
What does he tell McNair during his yearly review? Something like, "I know they were bad players, but Coach wanted them so I picked them. Can we talk about a raise"?
Not another "Rick doesn't pick the players" theory. If he doesn't have any responsibility for picking the players on the team, then he isn't doing his job and should be fired for that. Why pay him for doing nothing?
What does he tell McNair during his yearly review? Something like, "I know they were bad players, but Coach wanted them so I picked them. Can we talk about a raise"?
If I'm McNair I'd have done fired him for wasting my money. The last demerit was signing Jj to the richest contract for a defensive player ever. I'm sure that's where we would have ended up next season anyway. But this past off season it was about the leverage we had... makes no sense to offer such a deal if we're talking about Max dollars.
Rick better stop giving away money like it grows on trees at the same time he better bring back KJ & Andre & find a number that makes sense for Jjo. If I'm McNair & I have to step in one more time, then yeah... might as well be doing it myself.
"Would you like to buy some nudies of your wife, Boss?"
Yeah, so at risk of derailing here, that mentality bugs the crap out of me. If you have the #1 pick, you should want to get the best player you can get. I understand that there's a sliding scale with positional importance, but nobody doubted Watkins would be a star. I still think he'll turn out to be the best WR in this draft class, and probably one of the top 3 or 4 for much of his career. Mike Evans is the only other guy from this draft class I'd put on level with him (and yes, I know what those other WRs have done). If we had the 2010 draft all over again, you damn well better believe it ought to be JJ Watt taken #1. But he wouldn't be, because people are fkn stupid enough to out-think themselves. The best player is worth the #1 pick. If you have two guys that are that close and one plays a critical position, OK there's your tiebreaker. But a DT like JJ Watt is better than a QB like Cam Newton. And a WR like Watkins is better than a DE like Clowney.
/end rant
I was encouraged by what little I saw of a healthy Clowney, so I'm not blasting the pick or the player, but I still would have taken Watkins.
Not another "Rick doesn't pick the players" theory. If he doesn't have any responsibility for picking the players on the team, then he isn't doing his job and should be fired for that. Why pay him for doing nothing?
What does he tell McNair during his yearly review? Something like, "I know they were bad players, but Coach wanted them so I picked them. Can we talk about a raise"?
Well, I will say that if we HAD taken Watkins, the whole, cut/trade AJ thought process would make a lot more sense.
That's where you're mistaken.
Everyone and anyone over on Kirby that will give you an answer when asked about the draft process from McNair to O'Brien to Smith all sing the same song.
It's a COLLABORATIVE PROCESS. They huddle up before the draft, evaluate their needs, get the reports from the scouting staff, put a "draft round grade" on the prospects that best meet the needs the coaches/coordinators have identified and use those evals to set up their draft board.
Why is it so hard to comprehend that a board room guy like McNair would do things by committee??
Why is it so hard to imagine that McNair was IN on the discussions where the draft board was being set up and therefore he already knows which coach wanted what player? ESPECIALLY the 1-1 pick. He knows. He was there. He blessed the pick just like he blessed the Mario pick.
Well, I will say that if we HAD taken Watkins, the whole, cut/trade AJ thought process would make a lot more sense.
Even if he's been hurt and less than 100%/limited, JD should make a play, do something more impressive than just 3 ordinary tackles in a whole game. Show us something JD !
This is ridiculous & anyone thinking this way shoul...
It's his third game. Even the best defensive player in the league did not look like a game changer after three consecutive games playing over 90% of the snaps.
I was on the Clowney bandwagon from Day 1, so I take no joy in saying I'm a little disappointed in "my boy" and I want to see something for my money already. And no I'm not calling him a bust, but I want to see JD flash, just once or twice this year, like he did in preseason. And the comparison to Watts rookie year is apples and oranges because Watt came out of college practically unheralded compared to our "generational player/talent".
***************************
The Texans offense hasn't been able to do much against the Bengals, but Houston isn't getting blown out by Cincinnati thanks to a pick-six by Johnathan Joseph.
During the third quarter, Joseph picked off Andy Dalton and took it 60-yards to the house for a score. The only problem is that the play probably shouldn't have counted because Jadeveon Clowney lined up offsides.
And we're not talking barely offsides, we're talking clearly offsides.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on...-clowney-offsides-on-texans-pick-6-vs-bengals
*****
And here's something else on JD and yesterdays game: looks like he could have been a real goat if he's flagged and JJoes pick 6 is nullified. He was a lucky boy.
So since it is a committee decision, the individual members of the committee have no responsibility for group decisions. Got it. That is easy to comprehend!
Does Rick just sit in the meeting and be a yes-man to Mcnair, or is he supposed to bring some expertise and input into the meeting? If it is the former he has a great job; if the latter I think it is fair talk about his competence.
I guess I still don't comprehend why the GM for the Texans doesn't have responsibility for the players on the team.
What about those of us who wanted someone different without necessarily putting down Clowney? I wanted Watkins then, I want Watkins now. Second choice was one of the tackles.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the notion that you had to protest the Clowney pick in order to credibly criticize Smith.
First of all, it is not the fans' job to accurately assess talent. The fans aren't privy to the wealth of information that a GM is, nor are they the beneficiary of the 7 figure annual salary that the GM is.
Further, this isn't a criticism on Clowney alone; this is a criticism on the collective job Smith has done, over the course of 2 separate coaching regimes. You could have been the leader of the Clowney fan band and still recognize that Clowney's performance thus far, in addition to the other drafting blunders we have seen, especially over the course of the past 2 years, and, in my eyes, credibly criticize Smith.
In fact, I'd go so far as to question the credibility of anyone not criticizing Smith at this point. His goose is cooked.
But, I agree. Watkins was my guy. Not only is he a supreme talent, he's a terrific scheme fit for this offense (what I'd give for that speed at this point...).
Just to be clear...... I was not on board with the Clowney pick, though I was ok with it after the fact. My biggest issue was that he was billed as a generational athlete at the DE position, but barely top 5 as an OLB, where we were going to put him.
I suggested we draft Greg Robinson & play him on the right side. I suggested we draft Sammy Watkins, the best player in that draft. I suggested we trade down..... even at the expense of adequate value for the pick.
Still I think it's too early to be down on JD Clowney. Were we winning, I'm sure it would be a non issue. But we're not... so I understand, we need a goat.
So since it is a committee decision, the individual members of the committee have no responsibility for group decisions. Got it. That is easy to comprehend!
Does Rick just sit in the meeting and be a yes-man to Mcnair, or is he supposed to bring some expertise and input into the meeting? If it is the former he has a great job; if the latter I think it is fair talk about his competence.
I guess I still don't comprehend why the GM for the Texans doesn't have responsibility for the players on the team.
Like Cak said, we don't know Smith's responsibilities.
But we do know the definition of a yes man and Rick Smith is the true definition of a yes man.
Like Cak said, we don't know Smith's responsibilities.
But we do know the definition of a yes man and Rick Smith is the true definition of a yes man. Sad thing is things will never change until the fanbase stops showing up at the stadium (Nrg name stinks) and stops buying Texans gear. But that will never happen, so expect more of the same. (Hey, McNair, are we still on the right track.
What does he tell McNair during his yearly review?
Family and business are a bad mix. Most of us learn that lesson the hard way.
Ummm, errrr?![]()
I'm not gonna call him a bust already,but my film study of him are coming true. He has no cod and that's not call of duty either. He's a straight line guy. His quickness and burst are top shelf,but he can't transition from speed to power or vice versa. Look at guys like von miller,demarcus ware,and aldon smith and they were doing it as rookies. Merriman had it ,maybe it was the juice,but he had it. Kearse, had burst and his detrmination led him to sacks until he failed to have a counter. What I'm looking for in a pass rusher,he doesn't really have.
Mario looked like an enormous bust his first year too (though he had a better one than Clowney). Sometimes it takes a year for coaches to get through to a guy that has been skating by on his natural ability since Pee Wee. Especially when he misses so much time.
Of the three QBs, Bortles is horse balls, JFF is riding the pine, though Teddy B is having a pretty good start. None of the tackle prospects have been great as far as the O-line goes. Watkins and Beckham look good, but they would still have Fitzmagic or Tommy Brady's personal assistant throwing them the ball.
Some of those players in the second paragraph will probably look a bit better if given the same "can't judge a rookie for one or two or three years" consideration we are supposed to give Clowney.
Can you imagine how much worse it'd be here had we taken a QB at 1 and he fell flat on his face like Bortles has. If you think people upset that Clowney has been injured and not productive, imagine what it'd be like after a Bortles 4 INT game. Heck is Robinson even starting yet in StL? Basically we were destinied to get no production from that slot.
We've lost to a lot of playoff contenders this season. The only game we lost to a bad team (record wise) was against a head coach and quarterback who are two-time Super Bowl champions. I don't know if I'm ready to throw in the towel for the immediate future just because we are 5-6 right now. I don't recall the last time we played a tougher schedule up to this point in the season based on our opponent's winning percentage. And it's not like we had a healthy Jadeveon Clowney all season long or else things could have been different.How the f'k does this keep happening to Houston where there is dubious or false/overhyped talent when we have #1?
Jadeveon Clowney will get a free pass for a disappointing rookie season just because he tore his meniscus in the second quarter of the first game.
I'm not going to label him a bust as I believe he's going to be a great player in the long run.
He better be in Blake Bortles face all day long's all I've got to say. I haven't been as harsh on him as others have so far, but the Jags have shown again & again they can't protect Bortles. I doubt that changes in the next two weeks.
If he's the guy the Texans said he is, he better make it a long, long day for Blake Bortles.
How the f'k does this keep happening to Houston where there is dubious or false/overhyped talent when we have #1?
How the f'k does this keep happening to Houston where there is dubious or false/overhyped talent when we have #1?
Charlie Palillo said that Clownee was offsides on the JJo pick 6, can you imagine the shitstorm if it would have been called?
How the f'k does this keep happening to Houston where there is dubious or false/overhyped talent when we have #1?