infantrycak
Hall of Fame
# People who hated the BOB hire from the beginning.
Nope. Liked the OB hire based on how he was described. He hasn't lived up to those descriptions.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
# People who hated the BOB hire from the beginning.
Well RS is the GM and his job is to construct the roster.
Jeff Christensen for OC. Staying on topic.
wasn't he OC for the Colts at 1 point? In any case, I can't see how a change at the OC position is going to help with the improvement of the o-line, the health of the players and roster depth.... which are the true enemies of this season.
Nope. Liked the OB hire based on how he was described. He hasn't lived up to those descriptions.
Revisionist history.
Care to provide some quotes?
I would have put new GM but we hit that topic every other threadwasn't he OC for the Colts at 1 point? In any case, I can't see how a change at the OC position is going to help with the improvement of the o-line, the health of the players and roster depth.... which are the true enemies of this season.
If you're asserting something different then that burden falls on you.
I would have put new GM but we hit that topic every other thread
Talking more Sh!t when called out.
They're your posts not mine # yopur words not mine, you look them up, or I will assume you're talking out your a** . (AGAIN)
Not surprising
BS. Been the convention around here from day 1. (Hardly shocking since it follows every debate/trial form around as the only logical way). You don't get to burden others to disprove your allegations. You don't want to back them up, it's on you.
Well a huge part of why we see things differently is b/c you along with others in here apparently thought BoB was some kind of offensive genius in the 1st place...I wanted him as the next HC, but at no point did I ever think he was that.
What’s really funny though is How folks pick and choose what they believe is true and what is false about what BoB says in these press conferences. When he was propping up Savage as being clearly ahead of Watson in TC, he was lying according to some here. The scheme is the scheme. Unless he’s truly running for his life and guys are breaking off routes and coming back to him..which wasn’t THAT often, He wasn’t doing it as often as most think he was. I posted film earlier in this thread that shows this. There were a few plays each game where he had to truly improvise, but hardly anything out of the ordinary from most other qbs in any given game. In fact, Most guys can and do improvise they just check it down or throw it away and live to fight another down....where everyone’s getting confused is in how electrifying the plays DW4 was able to make off his improvising..huge chunk plays and TDS..that’s truly abnormal & that’s what BoB was talking about.
Aside from that, No qb or scheme is ever going to be so good that a qb is able to sit in a clean pocket and execute like its 7 on 7 100% of the time. as I said, those other guys on defense get paid to move qbs off spots, disrupt timing and/or move qbs into a blitz....and yes, sometimes they even win..... So no I’m not implying BOB incorporated scrambling as part of his play calling, I’m implying that every qb in the game has to scramble...or at least attempt to scramble to get away from pressure and buy time at least a few times throughout any given game. So again, outside of the Pats game, Watson wasn’t really doing it that much more than most other qbs in the league from game to game....he just has a skill set that enabled him to make more out of broken plays than most. But again how does that reflect on BoB’s ability as a play caller? It doesn’t really.
The bottom line is that BoB is always going to be complimentary of his players and critical of himself and his coaches; that’s a prerequisite to being a HC. We can literally watch games and see guys on the field ******* up...it doesn’t necessarily mean that that’s on bob....what we do know however is what he’s going to say at the press conference though...”we just have to coach it better...”.
Leting RG3 do it his own way worked out well.
The Texans org isn't Patriots south.
They do almost nothing like the Patriots do when it comes to acquiring talent. Look at this offseason as an example.
Well RS is the GM and his job is to construct the roster.
Jeff Christensen for OC. Staying on topic.
All this for me is in the same vein as fans of T a&m football have been over the last few years dealing with Sumlin & how Texas fans will be in a few years with Hermann. A&M fans feel like b/c they have money, a great facility and a great fan base and recruit reasonably well, any coach should be able to win big there. Well when that doesn't happen their 1st reaction is to get rid of the HC b/c he's to blame right? Well not necessarily but b/c they need someone or something to blame for why that isn't happening.......
Let me ask you something simple: do you think Deshaun Watson would have looked good in any offensive system?
I do not have an agenda. I've said it before that I'm ambivalent about O'Brien. I could make a case to fire or keep him.
We've got four seasons of history with O'Brien now. And you are admitting that he's far from an offensive genius. Why not find a guy that IS an offensive genius when you've got one of the most dynamic young talents at QB?
Make a case for keeping O'Brien, because so far, I'm not convinced by any of the pro-O'Brien arguments as an offensive system. And he does not seem like the kind of guy that can handle being a head coach without having a finger in the offense, so you have to rule out getting an OC with a non-EP scheme while O'Brien is HC.
The main thing, though, is that he and Rick Smith are not a good team. One of them needs to be better to compliment the other, and we know that Smith is not going anywhere anytime soon.
DW4 is not RG3. He's much more talented, mature and smarter than RG3 could have ever hoped to be.
And RG3 should never have been allowed to play with an injured knee. That's on Shanahan.
Those things above combined with what has happened injury wise to this team this year, at the very least should get him a mulligan for next year. Sure the division was bad, but you know what someone had to win it and no one exactly penalizes the Pats, GB and Seattle for winning bad divisions.
Whether you acknowledge the above as a valid case is a different story all together.
yes I believe DW4 would look good in any offensive system...So would Brees, Rodgers and knowing the mentality of Brady, probably him too. BoB's no offensive genius, but who is in this modern day NFL? Most of these guys who've been dubbed offensive geniuses aren't really in the class of the true offensive innovators like Bill Walsh and Paul Brown. they're just good playcallers with good qbs that make their jobs easier. BoB is no different in that regard. That's why i kinda honed in on his playcalling b/c that's what all this comes down to and imo, once he got a premium talent under center, you saw how good BoB could be as a playcaller.
As for the case to bring him back, its right in front of everyone:
- 2 division crowns and 1 playoff win in his time here...with boo boo at the QB position leading his team.
- only 1 losing season in 4 years
- & he's finally got a guy who has the skill and mental make up for him to build around. It'd be a shame to bring in another HC with a different offensive system that everyone has to learn...which will take at least 1 year.
Those things above combined with what has happened injury wise to this team this year, at the very least should get him a mulligan for next year. Sure the division was bad, but you know what someone had to win it and no one exactly penalizes the Pats, GB and Seattle for winning bad divisions.
Whether you acknowledge the above as a valid case is a different story all together.
Bump Ryan the QB coach to OC then hire another QB coach
No I haven't heard anything. It was just a hypothetical.Did I miss something (entirely possible, I miss a lot of things) or has there been any indication that the Texans plan to hire an OC after the season? If that's not the case then I don't think they'll hire anybody and that's just the way it is so I don't see much point in throwing out my suggestion for Bill O'Brien & Co. to ignore. There are a bunch of different ways we could go but none of them are going to happen so what's the point?
I don't think he'll hire someone either truthfully. I at least wanted to give us new topic outside of RS but he seems to bleed into every thread lol(for good reason as he is the personnel guy but still....It gets old)If OB is still here, I don't see him hiring anyone to be more than an administrator of ta ta da dum "the system."
The job OB and Ryan did with altering the offense to suit Watson led to one of the top offenses in the NFL.What in the world makes him qualified as OC? I'd be more tempted to fire him and bring in a more qualified QB coach.
He can take the day to day pieces off O'Brien's plate with any title they care to give him.
As for the case to bring him back, its right in front of everyone:
- 2 division crowns and 1 playoff win in his time here...with boo boo at the QB position leading his team.
- only 1 losing season in 4 years
- & he's finally got a guy who has the skill and mental make up for him to build around. It'd be a shame to bring in another HC with a different offensive system that everyone has to learn...which will take at least 1 year.
I want this to happen so badIf he stays, I think he should devote himself full time to being a HC and delegate OC duties so he can look big picture at both team development and overall game management
I want this to happen so bad
Oh. So I guess it's not gonna happen then. Good talk everyoneIF it is an independent offensive mind and not some yes man.
Counter argument to your points on keeping O'Brien:
2 division titles in the crappiest division in football for both of those years.
Combined record of the three other teams in 2015 was 16-32.
In 2016 it was 20-28.
Two points: those boo boo QBs were O'Brien's and Rick Smith's picks. No matter how you analyze it, there is no denying that these two are responsible for 100% of those boo boo QBs.
And secondly, being in a crappy division was eventually going to catch up to the Texans as the other teams accumulated high round draft picks. We see the results this year with both the Jags and Titans.
In both of those seasons, they were the only single-digit-win division leaders and would not have qualified for a wildcard spot. They only got in the postseason because of the crappy division
True, but see the above mention of a crappy division. In addition, those winning seasons were all 9-7, with no improvement in win record and a clear and steady decline in offensive production before DW4.
And if we are completely honest about it, those three seasons were mainly the result of RAC's defense more than anything else. Special teams are nothing special and O'Brien's offense is about as pedestrian as it gets.
Teams have turned it around in one year. Kubiak in Denver comes to mind as a recent example. First year with the Broncos and he wins a championship. They had to learn a different offensive and defensive systems, and that only took one offseason..
It is also shortchanging Watson's ability to learn a new system. Look at what he did this year with just one off-season in this system and not getting first team reps.
btw, I'm not saying that your points do not have merit, but rather there is a counter argument for the ones you presented.
I'd say this team still fighting and playing hard after losing so many starters is probably the biggest strength of O'Brien as a HC. He has not lost the lockerroom even with only four wins this season.
If he stays, I think he should devote himself full time to being a HC and delegate OC duties so he can look big picture at both team development and overall game management.
Oh. So I guess it's not gonna happen then. Good talk everyone
I wish we had a coach that was more like Mike Tomlin or Cowher that would just handle the Head coaching duties and not worry that they have to control every OC and DC coordinator. It worked well when Kubiak hired Kyle but then Kubiak went back to controlling the offense when Kyle left.
OB is repeating the same mistake in my opinion.
I don't think I would mind Wisenhut if he could be pried from LAC
Being a QB guru doesn't equate to being an effective OC. Here's some reading material on him. BTW, I'm not opposed to him as much as I'm ignorant as to what system he would potentially run.It's not, the improvement in personnel falls on Ricky.
Christensen has a history of helping QB's improve.
He has never been an OC that I can find. He specializes just on QBs from everything I've read on him (2 articles).wasn't he OC for the Colts at 1 point? In any case, I can't see how a change at the OC position is going to help with the improvement of the o-line, the health of the players and roster depth.... which are the true enemies of this season.
My biggest issue with replacing OB is who it will be? That's such a big gamble. RGIII was pretty dang talented. I bet he'd be a top 10 QB if Shanny hadn't ruined him.Let me ask you something simple: do you think Deshaun Watson would have looked good in any offensive system?
I do not have an agenda. I've said it before that I'm ambivalent about O'Brien. I could make a case to fire or keep him.
We've got four seasons of history with O'Brien now. And you are admitting that he's far from an offensive genius. Why not find a guy that IS an offensive genius when you've got one of the most dynamic young talents at QB?
Make a case for keeping O'Brien, because so far, I'm not convinced by any of the pro-O'Brien arguments as an offensive system. And he does not seem like the kind of guy that can handle being a head coach without having a finger in the offense, so you have to rule out getting an OC with a non-EP scheme while O'Brien is HC.
The main thing, though, is that he and Rick Smith are not a good team. One of them needs to be better to compliment the other, and we know that Smith is not going anywhere anytime soon.
DW4 is not RG3. He's much more talented, mature and smarter than RG3 could have ever hoped to be.
And RG3 should never have been allowed to play with an injured knee. That's on Shanahan.
I don't 'know' for the same reason that you can't 'know' that Ryan wasn't involved with the design of the O.Now you know Ryan was involved in O design?
If OB is still calling plays, what's the difference other than door plate?
If I remember right, OB was trying to hold Watson down, but Watson continued to ad lib successfully until OB started to go along with him. That's hardly great playcalling by OB.Here's what I don't get:
When Watson was in at QB, O'Brien was calling plays like a pro. Watson made the plays work, of course, but even before the snap of the ball, you saw jet sweeps, motion men, different formations, etc. Before and after Watson, the playcalling just seems to suck. That's just inexcusable. I mean, if you call a play that motions the TE out and Savage screws it all up, you go back to the film and say "look how the LB responded to the TE motion. That means THIS". Instead, we just get garbage called.
At the end of it all though, I just can't really get fired up about O'Brien as long as Rick Smith is still here. We have a 100+ page thread calling for Rick Smith to be fired already. Send them both out on their ear, but if Rick Smith stays, I don't think it much matters who the HC is beyond the ability to fk up time management.
If I remember right, OB was trying to hold Watson down, but Watson continued to ad lib successfully until OB started to go along with him. That's hardly great playcalling by OB.
You give OB credit for Miller up the middle on about half of the plays and call that adapting and credit worthy? OB, minus DW4, is at his best when he's been forced to limit his "play book" due to having another QB who is inexperienced in his "system". With DW4, OB started mixing in a lot of college plays and relying on DW4's athleticism. Kind of a retro adaptation there.Great playcalling is, in part, adapting. So I give O'Brien credit for that. Of course, that begs the question why he's forced every other QB he's had to try and conform to his crappy playcalling, but hey, that's why we have a thread.
You give OB credit for Miller up the middle on about half of the plays and call that adapting and credit worthy?
My biggest issue with replacing OB is who it will be? That's such a big gamble. RGIII was pretty dang talented. I bet he'd be a top 10 QB if Shanny hadn't ruined him.
RGIII had 2 ACL surgeries.