Texecutioner
Hall of Fame
Lol
I think @steelbtexan will appreciate such a post. Love him or hate him it does spur conversation.
He's gonna love it.

Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Lol
I think @steelbtexan will appreciate such a post. Love him or hate him it does spur conversation.
Heck, he only threw for 145 yards in that SB besides missing more than half the AFC championship game.Like I said, Rogers was already a dinosaur.
But let's get to Brady first.
The Pats had a complete and balanced team that year.
They have a running game, a defense, and a HC.
And a backup QB, without whom, Brady wouldn't have been in the SB to begin with.
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Brady didn't play 3 great games to win the SB.
Heck, he only threw for 145 yards in that SB besides missing more than half the AFC championship game.
Heck, he only threw for 145 yards in that SB besides missing more than half the AFC championship game.
As for Staubach, he threw for fewer than 300 yards COMBINED in the 3 games.By his 3rd yr Staubach won a SB.
By the end of Brady's 2nd yr he was leading his team to a last second GW FG drive in a SB.
Comparing these GOAT's to DW4 isn't just laughable. It's sad. We all wish DW4 was like these guys, but he's not.
Not sure what you're referring to?Now you're doing it too?![]()
Not sure what you're referring to?
I was simply bring up numbers to show that it took a whole team to win that SB.
He was talking about Brady's first super bowl run.Man, talk about ignoring everything on purpose. This post has Nick Wright or Max Kellerman written all over it.
Him and his offense smoked the Chargers who had one of the best defenses in the league last year by putting up 35 at half time and the game was already over. They ended up scoring into the 40's. The next week they went on to put up almost 40 in the AFC Championship Game where Brady let not one but TWO last minute drives to win that game at Arrowhead Stadium.
Brady had one of the best overall post seasons of all time. He didn't play awful in the SB either. His WR's outside of Edelman and a washed up Gronk didn't get open and that consisted of Hogan and Dorsett who is a first round bust that Indy let go of. He played within the strategy of their offense and made most of the plays that were there. They weren't playing from behind and he didn't need to force things to keep up on the scoreboard like he did in KC where he delivered there as well.
You're trying to squeeze one game out of the entire post season and trying to make the narrative about that when you don't get to the SB without his brilliance at QB in the first two games.
He was talking about Brady's first super bowl run.
That would take a lot of time to study, and I don't think I'm up to it- unfortunately.This is a fair post.
You cold also say he's taken less sacks this yr because last yrs OL was putrid and this yrs OL is better although not as good as it should be.
Facts? What are those?I'm not sure that using facts is an allowable debating tactic.
Unfortunately you interact with so many posters that I would miss a lot of things they are discussing if I blocked you.
Not sure what you're referring to?
I was simply bring up numbers to show that it took a whole team to win that SB.
I was on a tiny Android phone.Quoting yourself and then typing as if to a 3rd person
I was on a tiny Android phone.
Very difficult to do certain things.
Imagine we had a dawg like Henry running the ball.
Don't get me wrong, I appreciate what Carlos Hyde did when he was doing it & I appreciate what Duke does given the opportunities.
But nobody game plans for them the way they try to game plan for Henry.
Lol
I think @steelbtexan will appreciate such a post. Love him or hate him it does spur conversation.
Tannehill has been playing against a string of poor to mundane defense.A80
Has DW4 not had an uneven season?
Is Tannehill not playing better than DW4 right now?
He was talking about Brady's first super bowl run.
Tannehill has been playing against a string of poor to mundane defense.
Watson played better against the Chargers.
Tannehill has been playing against a string of poor to mundane defense.
Watson played better against the Chargers.
True. Tanney had a great game vs the best defense he's seen so far in the Chargers (common win) (23/29 312 2:1) /// Deshaun's line was (25/34 351 3:0)
Total defense ranks for the last 6 Tenn games:
Chiefs - 20th
Jags - 23rd
Colts - 15th
Raiders - 28th
Carolina (common loss) - 24th = (Tanney 27/39 331 1:2) L 30-20 /// (Deshaun 21/33 160 0:0) L 16-10
Tampa - 17th
and now they get the vaunted Triple B Houston D!! ranked an intimidating 25th!! Titans are not that hot either at 19th, and Deshaun loves to play vs Tenn for whatever reason posting his best stats vs teams he's faced more than once so it should be a fun QB game. Vegas has the game as the highest point total (50 last time I checked) on the entire week 15 slate so expect some fireworks!
Here are Deshauns competition during Tanneys great run FWIW:
Broncos - 12th
Patriots - 1st (carved them up!!)
Colts - 15th
Ravens - 6th (yikes)
Jags - 23rd
Raiders - 28th
The new generation QBs have no idea how great they have it today. It's actually quite humorous how QBs are graded on how they react under pressure. I would dare say that their grades would be much worse across the board if the old "no holds barred rules" that existed back when monstrous crazy pass rushers were allowed to roam and scare the pgeez out of their "targets." Reactions by today's QBs to these unrestricted fire-breathing rushers would be much altered when they needed to fear for their lives while still having to concentrate on finding and hitting their receivers..........not to mention running the ball would be all but an afterthought.
Don't forget to take into consideration points allowed as well.True. Tanney had a great game vs the best defense he's seen so far in the Chargers (common win) (23/29 312 2:1) /// Deshaun's line was (25/34 351 3:0)
Total defense ranks for the last 6 Tenn games:
Chiefs - 20th
Jags - 23rd
Colts - 15th
Raiders - 28th
Carolina (common loss) - 24th = (Tanney 27/39 331 1:2) L 30-20 /// (Deshaun 21/33 160 0:0) L 16-10
Tampa - 17th
and now they get the vaunted Triple B Houston D!! ranked an intimidating 25th!! Titans are not that hot either at 19th, and Deshaun loves to play vs Tenn for whatever reason posting his best stats vs teams he's faced more than once so it should be a fun QB game. Vegas has the game as the highest point total (50 last time I checked) on the entire week 15 slate so expect some fireworks!
Here are Deshauns competition during Tanneys great run FWIW:
Broncos - 12th
Patriots - 1st (carved them up!!)
Colts - 15th
Ravens - 6th (yikes)
Jags - 23rd
Raiders - 28th
Total defense ranks for the last 6 Tenn games:
Chiefs - 20th
Jags - 23rd
Colts - 15th
Raiders - 28th
Carolina (common loss) - 24th = (Tanney 27/39 331 1:2) L 30-20 /// (Deshaun 21/33 160 0:0) L 16-10
Tampa - 17th
I don't believe that I ever advocated MORE contact. I simply was making the point that assessment of how present day QBs react to the pressure (and potential trauma) they are "allowed" to experience are much lesser a challenge than had we had their assessments to compare to with them playing under the rules of the old brutal days.HOw are QBs supposed to be graded "under pressure"? I appreciate the trip down memory lane, but the NFL is innovating and the brutality of the 80's and 90's is gone forever. Snapping QBs legs in half shouldn't be some kind of badge of honor. This isn't the Roman Coliseum. If you want blood and guts watch the UFC. If you want to get an understanding of where certain QBs rank vs the Blitz those metrics are easily attainable.
CTE is real, and having to watch stuff like this on the field will actually TURN ME OFF from the sport rather than keep me engaged:
(i get the overall humor of the post Doc, not trying to be crass im just a little confused you would be advocating MORE contact)
I don't believe that I ever advocated MORE contact. I simply was making the point that assessment of how present day QBs react to the pressure (and potential trauma) they are "allowed" to experience are much lesser a challenge than had we had their assessments to compare to with them playing under the rules of the old brutal days.
No
I really hate how "total" defense (and offense too) ratings are only measured by yards given up. That doesn't even come close to telling you anything. We've got to start using DVOA. Or even Aikman is a better tool than just total yards.
Your point still stands as most of those defenses are ranked about the same or worse when DVOA is applied, though KC and TB are considerably better rated. KC-13, Jac-29, Ind-15, Oak-31, Car-23, TB-10
Sorry, just a pet peeve of mine when yards are used as the measuring stick. The Chargers, by NFL total yards standards, would have the 4th best defense. DVOA has them 21st. Even Aikman has them 18th.
Like I said, the point still stands in this instance as most of those defenses still suck. But that's off my chest. Carry on.
BTW, Texans defensive DVOA, 27th.
Rk | Team | G | Pts/G | TotPts | Scrm Plys | Yds/G | Yds/P | 1st/G | 3rd Md | 3rd Att | 3rd Pct | 4th Md | 4th Att | 4th Pct | Pen | Pen Yds | ToP/G | FUM | Lost |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | New England Patriots | 13 | 12.9 | 168 | 764 | 264.8 | 4.5 | 15.5 | 36 | 159 | 23 | 6 | 17 | 35 | 91 | 814 | 28:04 | 23 | 10 |
2 | Buffalo Bills | 13 | 16.3 | 212 | 796 | 296.8 | 4.8 | 18.4 | 59 | 171 | 34 | 7 | 18 | 39 | 83 | 742 | 29:25 | 18 | 7 |
3 | San Francisco 49ers | 13 | 17.6 | 229 | 766 | 267.4 | 4.5 | 16.5 | 44 | 152 | 29 | 7 | 22 | 32 | 93 | 787 | 28:26 | 24 | 14 |
4 | Chicago Bears | 13 | 17.8 | 232 | 849 | 326.5 | 5.0 | 19.6 | 61 | 174 | 35 | 12 | 20 | 60 | 97 | 782 | 30:20 | 14 | 8 |
5 | Baltimore Ravens | 14 | 18.4 | 257 | 818 | 314.3 | 5.4 | 17.8 | 64 | 170 | 38 | 6 | 17 | 35 | 84 | 686 | 25:51 | 19 | 10 |
6 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 13 | 18.6 | 242 | 838 | 310.9 | 4.8 | 19.5 | 59 | 164 | 36 | 7 | 17 | 41 | 98 | 983 | 30:59 | 27 | 15 |
7 | Minnesota Vikings | 13 | 19.2 | 249 | 842 | 338.5 | 5.2 | 20.1 | 67 | 173 | 39 | 14 | 25 | 56 | 73 | 611 | 30:27 | 11 | 7 |
8 | Los Angeles Chargers | 13 | 19.3 | 251 | 751 | 304.8 | 5.3 | 17.8 | 67 | 157 | 43 | 7 | 12 | 58 | 93 | 832 | 29:27 | 14 | 3 |
9 | Tennessee Titans | 13 | 19.6 | 255 | 862 | 361.5 | 5.5 | 20.7 | 62 | 170 | 36 | 8 | 20 | 40 | 104 | 893 | 31:31 | 14 | 9 |
10 | Denver Broncos | 13 | 20.1 | 261 | 822 | 331.2 | 5.2 | 19.0 | 64 | 173 | 37 | 8 | 15 | 53 | 99 | 821 | 30:47 | 13 | 6 |
11 | Los Angeles Rams | 13 | 20.2 | 262 | 871 | 325.5 | 4.9 | 19.8 | 70 | 185 | 38 | 13 | 23 | 56 | 90 | 724 | 31:28 | 17 | 8 |
12 | Dallas Cowboys | 13 | 20.5 | 267 | 817 | 326.2 | 5.2 | 20.6 | 56 | 163 | 34 | 9 | 16 | 56 | 91 | 786 | 30:53 | 17 | 9 |
13 | Green Bay Packers | 13 | 20.8 | 270 | 806 | 367.9 | 5.9 | 20.5 | 59 | 150 | 39 | 7 | 12 | 58 | 86 | 853 | 28:50 | 17 | 7 |
14 | Kansas City Chiefs | 13 | 21.6 | 281 | 853 | 364.8 | 5.6 | 22.0 | 57 | 161 | 35 | 13 | 21 | 62 | 94 | 682 | 30:44 | 17 | 7 |
15 | Cleveland Browns | 13 | 22.4 | 291 | 815 | 346.0 | 5.5 | 20.5 | 54 | 162 | 33 | 5 | 15 | 33 | 92 | 732 | 29:44 | 13 | 5 |
16 | Indianapolis Colts | 13 | 22.7 | 295 | 786 | 345.1 | 5.7 | 19.5 | 67 | 162 | 41 | 6 | 15 | 40 | 96 | 915 | 29:11 | 15 | 8 |
17 | New Orleans Saints | 13 | 22.8 | 296 | 820 | 338.3 | 5.4 | 20.2 | 60 | 169 | 36 | 9 | 20 | 45 | 74 | 554 | 28:10 | 13 | 8 |
18 | Philadelphia Eagles | 13 | 23.2 | 301 | 782 | 326.7 | 5.4 | 18.1 | 58 | 165 | 35 | 8 | 12 | 67 | 104 | 831 | 27:41 | 14 | 6 |
19 | Houston Texans | 13 | 23.8 | 309 | 821 | 375.3 | 5.9 | 21.4 | 80 | 165 | 48 | 6 | 13 | 46 | 94 | 747 | 30:09 | 15 | 9 |
20 | Washington Redskins | 13 | 23.8 | 310 | 865 | 359.8 | 5.4 | 21.3 | 84 | 182 | 46 | 11 | 18 | 61 | 73 | 637 | 32:53 | 17 | 7 |
21 | New York Jets | 14 | 24.5 | 343 | 910 | 328.6 | 5.1 | 19.2 | 81 | 197 | 41 | 3 | 11 | 27 | 98 | 828 | 31:16 | 25 | 8 |
22 | Seattle Seahawks | 13 | 24.7 | 321 | 825 | 375.5 | 5.9 | 21.5 | 57 | 151 | 38 | 6 | 11 | 54 | 81 | 679 | 29:14 | 22 | 16 |
23 | Cincinnati Bengals | 13 | 25 | 325 | 830 | 399.5 | 6.3 | 20.4 | 73 | 166 | 44 | 4 | 8 | 50 | 108 | 878 | 31:19 | 8 | 5 |
24 | Detroit Lions | 13 | 25.8 | 335 | 868 | 394.7 | 5.9 | 22.5 | 74 | 168 | 44 | 3 | 10 | 30 | 93 | 743 | 30:42 | 20 | 11 |
25 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 13 | 25.9 | 337 | 799 | 373.1 | 6.1 | 20.6 | 64 | 154 | 42 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 83 | 732 | 29:08 | 18 | 7 |
26 | Atlanta Falcons | 13 | 26.4 | 343 | 818 | 366.4 | 5.8 | 21.5 | 69 | 159 | 43 | 7 | 14 | 50 | 102 | 880 | 29:31 | 14 | 4 |
27 | Carolina Panthers | 13 | 27.7 | 360 | 850 | 373.9 | 5.7 | 21.8 | 65 | 161 | 40 | 4 | 6 | 67 | 101 | 856 | 30:59 | 16 | 7 |
28 | New York Giants | 13 | 27.8 | 362 | 853 | 376.3 | 5.7 | 20.8 | 71 | 174 | 41 | 6 | 9 | 67 | 97 | 774 | 32:05 | 12 | 5 |
29 | Oakland Raiders | 13 | 28.2 | 366 | 797 | 376.4 | 6.1 | 22.3 | 72 | 155 | 46 | 7 | 11 | 64 | 72 | 600 | 29:33 | 11 | 5 |
30 | Arizona Cardinals | 13 | 28.8 | 374 | 878 | 414.7 | 6.1 | 24.0 | 79 | 170 | 46 | 2 | 11 | 18 | 91 | 840 | 33:24 | 20 | 8 |
31 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 13 | 29.3 | 381 | 860 | 354.3 | 5.4 | 20.9 | 58 | 171 | 34 | 11 | 22 | 50 | 100 | 873 | 28:58 | 22 | 13 |
32 | Miami Dolphins | 13 | 30.7 | 399 | 848 | 397.7 | 6.1 | 22.6 | 69 | 156 | 44 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 91 | 921 | 32:02 | 13 | 1 |
I agree with you, he may be the longest running troll in the history of the internet.I hope no one takes this as a personal attack because it is NOT - I like SteelB without him (and the constant replies to him, what would there be - three post a day on this forum?) but I think he has pulled off the longest troll in the history of the internet.
Seriously - he picks what he knows is a controversial position then won't back down no matter what and the forum goes nuts for it. Rick Smith, defending BoB, now on to Watson.
It is not going to matter what proof you bring, the goalpost will move - the narrative will be on point and we will eat it up.
It's the NFL (or really most sports) - you don't have to be Nostradamus to pick your favorite team and proclaim loudly, to anyone that will listen, that they will never win it all until X or with X yada yada - and most of the time you will be proven correct. Most teams every year don't win it all - nobody goes to Vegas to bet on who WON"T win the SB.
He is the man of Steel - and if you think facts are his kryptonite, you are going to have a rough time of it.
I agree with you, he may be the longest running troll in the history of the internet.
However I disagree that his presence improves the traffic on this site. A lot of people either don't come here at all anymore or (like me) they come much less than they otherwise would, because they know that every single thread (Watson / O'Brien / Game week / Takeaways / whatever) is just going to be the ridiculous nonsense.
If someone else repeats the same point three or four times, one of the new Moderators will reply with "that's enough" but he is free to keep trolling the same nonsense hundreds of times. Even if the Mods don't care about it, it seems like Hookem would care.
He isn't trolling by giving his opinions. Just because you don't like them, doesn't mean he isn't allowed to suggest that Watson isn't that good of a QB. That is really the main issue people take up with him regarding the Texans, is that belief. You could easily just put his account on ignore and keep it moving or you could breeze through his posts and not read them.
My response post got deleted. LMAO
Apparently I wasn't playing nice enough with others. For the life of me I cant figure out how I attacked the poster.
Almost like the entire football world sees him growing...minus the local experts.
You guys just proved @steelbtexan right. At the beginning of the year he said Watson had to get better at reading defenses. Y’all got sand in your nether regions and said it was someone else’s fault.
The video posted y’all just said Watson has gotten better at reading defenses.
Good job guys. Good job.
That's a lame assessment though. ALL young QBs have to get better at reading defenses.
That's a lame assessment though. ALL young QBs have to get better at reading defenses.
Of course it is
But you wouldn't think DW4 needs to learn anything according to some around these parts.
Man stop the freaking press. Nobody is acting like that lol .
That's a lame assessment though. ALL young QBs have to get better at reading defenses.
Man stop the freaking press. Nobody is acting like that lol .