I don't spend a lot of time here anymore (I have no desire to get into and/or read the same arguments ad nauseam) so I'm coming late to the party in this thread, but you are moving the goal posts. My argument post had nothing to do with
@steelbtexan 's thoughts on spending assets to acquire Stroud. It wasn't about his opinions on Williams. It was about his evaluation of Mahomes (including steel mentioning a trade up to #9, which would have actually been the position required to jump high enough to get Mahoemes), which I showed you misrepresented by linking older posts in lieu of his posts closer to the draft.
Let's recap how it all went down; steelbtexan is going on one of his usual rants against Stroud (and I agree with you that I think he is wrong there). You then kick off the argument
here by saying "You're so stubborn; it's no wonder you've never been all that good in QB evaluation."
steel
responds by bringing up Mahomes.
You
claim that he was "all over the place" and link a thread of his from 9 January 2017,
then one from 26 February 2017. Then it looks like you intended to link others, but I don't see them. In any case, none of this contradicts what I showed or what steel said- steel's posts nearer to the actual draft show that he was a fan of Mahomes and rated him highly, even advocating trading #25, #89, and the 2018 first (the Chiefs traded #27, #91, and the 2018 to get to #10 to select Mahomes in real life) in order to move up to #9 for him. Look at that; his proposed trade up was even very, very close to being on the mark for what that trade up ended up costing. I think steelb nailed the Mahomes situation in the days immediately leading up to the draft.