Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

JaDeveon Clowney

Status
Not open for further replies.
To me injury prone is out multiple seasons with injuries; see Brian Cushing. 0-1 isn't injury prone in my eyes.

To me, injury prone isn't someone that takes cheap shots to the knees 2 years in a row. Brian Cushing isn't injury prone, Arian Foster on the other hand, a guy who is always tweaking a hammy or groin, or back or something....that's injury prone.

I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.
 
Seth Payne wasn't too impressed with Andrews.

Sometimes you wonder about ego getting tied up with "business" -- which is typical -- when that business is other people's bodies.

If you're business is professional athletes, is the measuring stick how you maximize player's games/minutes played?

If so, does that put you in a position to push for your players to RTP (return to play) sooner than "other" doctor's patients? And who is your client -- the player or the team?

We'd like to think our doctors all follow the ethic of the Hippocratic oath... but I wonder how much pressure is brought to bear when the financial implications of losing your frontmost player -- a JJ Watt, for instance -- for a year?
 
Sometimes you wonder about ego getting tied up with "business" -- which is typical -- when that business is other people's bodies.

If you're business is professional athletes, is the measuring stick how you maximize player's games/minutes played?

If so, does that put you in a position to push for your players to RTP (return to play) sooner than "other" doctor's patients? And who is your client -- the player or the team?

We'd like to think our doctors all follow the ethic of the Hippocratic oath... but I wonder how much pressure is brought to bear when the financial implications of losing your frontmost player -- a JJ Watt, for instance -- for a year?
you would hope that old oath thinggy would come to fore.
 
Which one?

Yeah. Exactly.

The words "injury-prone" might not be the best way I would describe it. The inability "to answer the bell" for one reason or another, is a better one.

If it was just the knee injury alone, I'd blow that off. Shut it down, recover, and come back next year.

But my fear is that next year will be the same as this one. A season 2 of "for one reason or another".

THAT is the concern.
 
This season is a wash anyway. Just let him sit out the rest of the season and try again next year. If he does this **** next year, then he's a real time bust. I just don't think bust is a good term for Clowney yet.
 
To me, injury prone isn't someone that takes cheap shots to the knees 2 years in a row. Brian Cushing isn't injury prone, Arian Foster on the other hand, a guy who is always tweaking a hammy or groin, or back or something....that's injury prone.

I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.

His first injury Brian Cushing was blown up by a RB on a blitz because he didn't get his hands down and allowed a running back to explode into his leg, great motor, poor technique.. injury occured. The second was a cheapshot, but if had not been injured in the first one he might not sustain the second one.
 
His first injury Brian Cushing was blown up by a RB on a blitz because he didn't get his hands down and allowed a running back to explode into his leg, great motor, poor technique.. injury occured. The second was a cheapshot, but if had not been injured in the first one he might not sustain the second one.

You have those backwards.
 
His first injury Brian Cushing was blown up by a RB on a blitz because he didn't get his hands down and allowed a running back to explode into his leg, great motor, poor technique.. injury occured. The second was a cheapshot, but if had not been injured in the first one he might not sustain the second one.

I thought Slauson rolling him up in the Jets game was 2012, and Jamaal Charles blocking him was in 2013?
 
To me, injury prone isn't someone that takes cheap shots to the knees 2 years in a row. Brian Cushing isn't injury prone, Arian Foster on the other hand, a guy who is always tweaking a hammy or groin, or back or something....that's injury prone.

I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.

The Jamal Charles block was not a cheap shot. It was a head on block. How else should a 199lb RB block a blitzing 250lb LB'er?

LINK:

After Charles' front-side block Sunday, here's what the Chiefs running back had to tweet.

Wishing @briancushing56 a speedy recovery. Hate to see anyone get injured on the football field.
— Jamaal Charles (@jcharles25) October 21, 2013

And here was Cushing's response:

@jcharles25 appreciate you bro. I know you were just doing your job. Nothing but respect for your game.
— Brian Cushing (@briancushing56) October 21, 2013
 
I would hesitate to indict Clowney as "too dense" to respond appropriately to his response to injury........AJ has not exactly made all that good decisions (with the help of the medical staff) re. the handling of some of his injuries......with his own 14 Wonderlic.
My response wasn't directed to how he's dealt with injuries themselves, but rather his inept handling of the "don't have discussions with the press" aspect of them.

He's definitely in good company - We all remember Arian's anti-awesomeness MRI tweet fondly. :smiliepalm:
 
You may have hit the nail on the head with Clowney with your "Clowney is too dense" statement, validated by his 14 Wonderlic score....now, que up the posters who will want to argue, you don't need no stinking Wonderlic to rush the passer and display their very own 14 Wonderlic score.
The Wonderlic really isn't that hard. To do badly requires: 1. dim bulb, 2. scared rabbit (test anxiety) or 3. bad attitude.

My suspicion is that there are equal numbers of each.
 
Looks like Tarzan, Plays like Jane. WE GOT SCREWED!

Don't see how you can say that... to play like Jane he would have to get on the field. I don't think he went out there and tried to get injured.

To say WE GOT SCREWED like that, one would think you were part of the decision making process. I could just as easily say TTalk got screwed by letting you join the board. You haven't made a single contribution yet that I've seen.


:troll:
 
The Wonderlic really isn't that hard. To do badly requires: 1. dim bulb, 2. scared rabbit (test anxiety) or 3. bad attitude.

Or not knowing how the wonderlic works and spending too much time on the wrong questions.
 
Jadeveon Clowney Struggling with Complicated, Less Common Knee Injury

Dave Siebert, M.D.


Like clockwork, six weeks to the day after Houston Texans linebacker Jadeveon Clowney underwent an arthroscopic knee procedure that reportedly carried a recovery time of four to six weeks, toes started to tap...

Nothing in here that we haven't already been educated on all along by our own Dr. CND, but it was posted today using just one of the studies Dr. CND suggested, ignoring the one done in a group of NFL players. (Both were forwarded to Dr. Siebert weeks ago.) Still worth a read, prompts discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
I think it's time the FO starts cleaning house In the team doctor and trainer department

From the article
Unfortunately, the nature of Clowney's injury set him up for that frustration from the get-go. Even with the best doctors practicing the best medicine-Dr. Walt Lowe and his surgical team undoubtedly fall into and even help lead said group-some injuries pose unique challenges.

Maybe the problem is on the decision to get him back on the field...
 
I'm not basing this just off Clowney. Imo a few Players weren't handled as they should have been

I totally agree with you, I just didn't know that Dr. Lowe was held in such high regard in the medical community. That is also why I ask the questions about who is making decisions to put them back on the field too soon
 
I'm all for trading Clowney for even a 2nd rounder in 2015. I don't trust him. He is a jake and a loser in my book. Clean house. Get rid of Rick Smith, Grier, the entire scouting department as well as the entire medical team and S&C team.
 
This is for Doc -

By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?

Is he now damaged goods?
 
I think it's time the FO starts cleaning house In the team doctor and trainer department

Unless the two are joined at the hip. I have to think there's some type of parasitic or mutually beneficial or just entrenched relationship between those at the top of the organization and team doctors/trainers. Hopefully O'Brien doesn't wash his hands of this and looks into it -- he doesn't have the advantage of knowing the history that we do.
 
I am of the opinion that the responsibility of rushing Clowney back on to the field lies with coaches and not with the doctors. However that doesn't excuse the Texans medical staff for completely missing on Ed Reed's hip or on Nix's failed medicals.
 
I am of the opinion that the responsibility of rushing Clowney back on to the field lies with coaches and not with the doctors. However that doesn't excuse the Texans medical staff for completely missing on Ed Reed's hip or on Nix's failed medicals.

I believe they rushed Cushing back the first time. Anybody know how long the current medical staff has been with the team?
 
I believe they rushed Cushing back the first time. Anybody know how long the current medical staff has been with the team?

They could have waited 3000 weeks with Cush. If Jamaal Charles were to put his helmet in Cushing's knee again, it would have had the same effect.
 
This is for Doc -

By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?

Is he now damaged goods?

Yes. How damaged and how far from pre-injury depends on a lot of things, but yes.
 
This is for Doc -

By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?

Is he now damaged goods?

From a patient standpoint I can confirm what the Doc (CnD) has said about sprained ankles and arthroscopic knee surgery. When I was 10 I severely sprained my left ankle falling out of tree. I'm now 62 and to this day my left ankle has never been as stable as my right ankle. I had arthroscopic surgery on my left knee when I was 30. It took 6 full months to fully recover with no pain. Since the surgery my left knee has never been as strong or as stable as my right knee. When I put considerable stress on the knee jumping or cutting I could've some pain caused by bone on bone. At 62 I don't stress that knee much anymore. However, now I do have some arthritis in that knee.

In my case before the knee operation my knee would swell and I would often have to have it drained to ease the pain and get some motion back in the knee. My doctor explained to me the swelling and pain would continue until the cartilage (meniscus) was repaired or removed. After assessing the damage during the arthroscopic my doctor decided to remove the damaged cartilage.
 
I'm all for trading Clowney for even a 2nd rounder in 2015. I don't trust him. He is a jake and a loser in my book.

One of the dumbest post I have ever read on any message board. The last sentence hits the nail on the head on how I feel about you though. :strangle:
 
Jadeveon Clowney Struggling with Complicated, Less Common Knee Injury

Dave Siebert, M.D.




Nothing in here that we haven't already been educated on all along by our own Dr. CND, but it was posted today using just one of the studies Dr. CND suggested, ignoring the one done in a group of NFL players. (Both were forwarded to Dr. Siebert weeks ago.) Still worth a read, prompts discussion.

From the above article:

While Nawabi's study suggests lateral meniscectomy recoveries go awry more frequently, the manuscript focused on elite soccer players, not NFL linebackers. Generalizing findings in one group of athletes to another is a slippery slope.

And as I pointed out from the beginning......
Nevertheless, the manuscript's overarching conclusion-one that lateral meniscus tears are generally more troublesome-is hard to ignore, as is the idea that Clowney had the deck of perception stacked against him the moment fans expected him back in four to six weeks.

Soccer players do not have to deal with the extreme resistant forces that the knees must sustain from many angles against 250-300+ pound opposing players.........and yet there is still a very significant difference in the recovery and the consequences of the injury itself AND very much so with the approach to the treatment.

The original Nawabi medical article was one of many articles in my library that I read in my search for pertinent answers on the subject of Clowney's injury.

From the original medical article (cannot post a link):

Our study has shown that, on average, the time to return to play for an elite soccer player is 7 weeks after a lateral meniscectomy, compared with 5 weeks after a medial meniscectomy. The relative rate of return to preinjury level of competition at each time point during the recovery phase is 6 times greater after a medial meniscectomy. Our findings also show that those treating and coaching professional soccer players undergoing lateral meniscectomy should expect not only a slow recovery but also specific adverse events during recovery. We found that 69% of players in this study experienced persistent effusions and/or joint-line pain after lateral meniscectomy, with a small proportion needing further arthroscopy.

Most people think of recovery from medial meniscus surgery being quite short......and mistakenly assign these expectations to lateral meniscus surgery.

What you are not told in the Dr. Siebert article is how this study defined return to play:

Time to return to play was recorded as the time-to the nearest week-when the player returned to full training and was involved in his first competitive match for at least 45 minutes

Whether the player ever saw the field again after the definition had been fulfilled was not a part of this limited study. The study was not set up to follow the player's career beyond that narrow period....so that the true full extent of the consequences of the injury and its treatment was unable to be determined.

What was also not mentioned in the article was the medial meniscectomy 5 week recovery was quite narrow in its range as it applied to each soccer player......i.e., ~ 3-6 weeks, whereas the lateral meniscus group showed a 3-18 week range



This is for Doc -

By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?

Is he now damaged goods?

ANYTIME you have a meniscal tear, the chances are good that there may be accompanying underlying cartilage damage. Then, if you remove the meniscal segment rather than repair it, that is tissue that is lost forever....it does not grow back..........and the progressive consequences set the time clock rolling. If certain parts of the meniscus are gone, there can be a grinding down of joint cartilage created by a now unstabilized rocking motion of the joint. If there is accompanying cartilage damage to the original meniscus injury, it further exposes underlying tissues....cartilage and/or bone to unprotected further damage. This is especially true in lateral meniscus injury, since the lateral side of the joint carries a much greater portion of the knee joint load. If he was allowed to play on a knee that had a significant amount of meniscus removed......or they left behind frayed edges attempting to preserve meniscus that was lifted and should have been removed or repaired to begin with.

In the every day Joe, maybe the consequences may be something that they can legitimately after full informed consent accept........and not understanding the difference between having an excision vs. a repair is not as crucial. In an elite NFL player, that distinction better be hammered home by the orthopedic surgeon.........one, because most NFL players listen with one ear (and most of the time with half a brain) to what in reality those consequences will definitely be if an excision is chosen........and two, because the player just wants to get back on the field ASAP and typically is being pushed from all sides to the same end. It should be up to the surgeon counter the immediate gratification approach that is so pervasive in the NFL culture.

As an aside, because of Clowney's know problems with his bone spurs....which are direct decendants of an arthritic process, it would be surprising if the don't find that his knee demonstrates arthritic changes consistent with this and his many years of football-induced trauma.......another reason that a repair would have been the only smart long-term decision.
 
Last edited:
ANYTIME you have a meniscal tear, the chances are good that there may be accompanying underlying cartilage damage. Then, if you remove the meniscal segment rather than repair it, that is tissue that is lost forever....it does not grow back..........and the progressive consequences set the time clock rolling. If certain parts of the meniscus are gone, there can be a grinding down of joint cartilage created by a now unstabilized rocking motion of the joint. If there is accompanying cartilage damage to the original meniscus injury, it further exposes underlying tissues....cartilage and/or bone to unprotected further damage. This is especially true in lateral meniscus injury, since the lateral side of the joint carries a much greater portion of the knee joint load. If he was allowed to play on a knee that had a significant amount of meniscus removed......or they left behind frayed edges attempting to preserve meniscus that was lifted and should have been removed or repaired to begin with.

In the every day Joe, maybe the consequences may be something that they can legitimately after full informed consent accept........and not understanding the difference between having an excision vs. a repair is not as crucial. In an elite NFL player, that distinction better be hammered home by the orthopedic surgeon.........one, because most NFL players listen with one ear (and most of the time with half a brain) to what in reality those consequences will definitely be if an excision is chosen........and two, because the player just wants to get back on the field ASAP and typically is being pushed from all sides to the same end. It should be up to the surgeon counter the immediate gratification approach that is so pervasive in the NFL culture.

As an aside, because of Clowney's know problems with his bone spurs....which are direct decendants of an arthritic process, it would be surprising if the don't find that his knee demonstrates arthritic changes consistent with this and his many years of football-induced trauma.......another reason that a repair would have been the only smart long-term decision.

Thanks for info, Doc. I was afraid of that.

Unbelievable. :smiliepalm:
 
I would say that the Texans medical staff is unethical, but that would imply they had a grasp of the consequences. Maybe they don't know what the hell they're doing.

If you're a media member, be assured that you'd get a lot of fan support if you put the screws to this organization over its medical staff. Cite JJ Watt's arm brace and the actual recovery time for a 3rd degree elbow dislocation. Maybe if more media in large markets laid the facts on the table, you'd see less medical professionals like Dr. Andrews selling out to the league.

A good example of the media doing its job is this article on Deadspin about the unreliability of NFL recovery estimates. The writer admits that his data collection process is flawed, but the contrasts between estimates and reality is conclusive enough.

4 To 6 Weeks, My Ass: Why NFL Injury Estimates Are Bullshit

...

There it was. Four to six. If you're an NFL fan, those digits are virtually yoked together in your mind, like some sort of super-numeral that signifies "serious injury but healthy in time for the playoffs." Four to six tells a little story about the NFL. It says that in a sport of explosive contingency, the toll is knowable, containable; it exists within established parameters. It doesn't, though—not really. Although we eventually found out that Griffin had an exceedingly rare type of dislocation that didn't damage the surrounding tendons, given what we know about dislocated ankles in the NFL a prognosis of four to six weeks was at the time obviously insane. But it's an odd thing about the business of professional football that misinformation is spread as a matter of course by and among and about people who know it's not the truth but who for various reasons decide to play along anyway.

...

Injuries, particularly in the NFL, are one of the few topics in sports where old rules of thumb like "out four to six weeks" are still thrown around without anyone checking them against any data, in large part because no such database exists. So I built one.

Link
 
I would say that the Texans medical staff is unethical, but that would imply they had a grasp of the consequences. Maybe they don't know what the hell they're doing.

If you're a media member, be assured that you'd get a lot of fan support if you put the screws to this organization over its medical staff. Cite JJ Watt's arm brace and the actual recovery time for a 3rd degree elbow dislocation. Maybe if more media in large markets laid the facts on the table, you'd see less medical professionals like Dr. Andrews selling out to the league.

A good example of the media doing its job is this article on Deadspin about the unreliability of NFL recovery estimates. The writer admits that his data collection process is flawed, but the contrasts between estimates and reality is conclusive enough.



Link

Rep coming your way. I was glad when I saw that you posted this article (I was about to do so). RTP (return to play) put out by teams to me so many times seem to be "best case scencario" off-the-wall hopeful, and unrealistic estimates that are there to "calm the natives."

The example of the routine ankle sprain compared to high ankle sprain RTPs coincide with what I've tried to demonstrate in comparing the more serious lateral meniscus injury vs. the more benign more common, familiar medial meniscus injury.

Another point I've tried to emphasize when hearing that "the player made the decision to........":

Team doctors don't do much talking to the press; coaches speak in a sort of sub-English when it comes to the health of their players; the players themselves often know less about their own bodies than their team; and fans, aware of the code, see injury timeframes less as a range of real possibilities than as a rough index of the team's concern. What we're left with, then, is Chris Mortensen shifting up onto one cheek and farting out a couple rounds of "4-to-6 weeks" before tossing it back to Wingo.

I've read the book My Injury File: How I Shot, Smoked, And Screwed My Way Through The NFL written by a former NFL WR (Nate Jackson). It chronicles how only after his career did he ever see his detailed medical records........he had no idea how extensive his file and injuries were......nor their true implication.....as he and his team and medical staffs preferred keeping him in a state of perpetual ignorant bliss.

You will be enticed to read the entire book when you read this unbelievably revealing excerpt from the book.
 
I would say that the Texans medical staff is unethical, but that would imply they had a grasp of the consequences. Maybe they don't know what the hell they're doing.

If you're a media member, be assured that you'd get a lot of fan support if you put the screws to this organization over its medical staff. Cite JJ Watt's arm brace and the actual recovery time for a 3rd degree elbow dislocation. Maybe if more media in large markets laid the facts on the table, you'd see less medical professionals like Dr. Andrews selling out to the league.

A good example of the media doing its job is this article on Deadspin about the unreliability of NFL recovery estimates. The writer admits that his data collection process is flawed, but the contrasts between estimates and reality is conclusive enough.



Link

Very interesting read.

Repped
 
I've read the book My Injury File: How I Shot, Smoked, And Screwed My Way Through The NFL written by a former NFL WR (Nate Jackson). It chronicles how only after his career did he ever see his detailed medical records........he had no idea how extensive his file and injuries were......nor their true implication.....as he and his team and medical staffs preferred keeping him in a state of perpetual ignorant bliss.

You will be enticed to read the entire book when you read this unbelievably revealing excerpt from the book.

Wow. the excerpt alone is eye-opening. Well worth reading.
 
I've haven't questioned the Texans training staff before, but there is something seriously wrong with this picture. Bad, bad look for our training staff

Deepi Sidhu ‏@DeepSlant · 6m6 minutes ago
O'Brien on Jadeveon Clowney: In the best interest of J.D, we'll place him on IR and have him undergo surgery on his right knee. #Texans
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top