xtruroyaltyx
Hall of Fame
Seth Payne wasn't too impressed with Andrews.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
To me injury prone is out multiple seasons with injuries; see Brian Cushing. 0-1 isn't injury prone in my eyes.
I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.
Seth Payne wasn't too impressed with Andrews.
Seth Payne wasn't too impressed with Andrews.
you would hope that old oath thinggy would come to fore.Sometimes you wonder about ego getting tied up with "business" -- which is typical -- when that business is other people's bodies.
If you're business is professional athletes, is the measuring stick how you maximize player's games/minutes played?
If so, does that put you in a position to push for your players to RTP (return to play) sooner than "other" doctor's patients? And who is your client -- the player or the team?
We'd like to think our doctors all follow the ethic of the Hippocratic oath... but I wonder how much pressure is brought to bear when the financial implications of losing your frontmost player -- a JJ Watt, for instance -- for a year?
Which one?
Which one?
To me, injury prone isn't someone that takes cheap shots to the knees 2 years in a row. Brian Cushing isn't injury prone, Arian Foster on the other hand, a guy who is always tweaking a hammy or groin, or back or something....that's injury prone.
I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.
His first injury Brian Cushing was blown up by a RB on a blitz because he didn't get his hands down and allowed a running back to explode into his leg, great motor, poor technique.. injury occured. The second was a cheapshot, but if had not been injured in the first one he might not sustain the second one.
His first injury Brian Cushing was blown up by a RB on a blitz because he didn't get his hands down and allowed a running back to explode into his leg, great motor, poor technique.. injury occured. The second was a cheapshot, but if had not been injured in the first one he might not sustain the second one.
To me, injury prone isn't someone that takes cheap shots to the knees 2 years in a row. Brian Cushing isn't injury prone, Arian Foster on the other hand, a guy who is always tweaking a hammy or groin, or back or something....that's injury prone.
I don't think Clowney is there yet. He just hasn't had a chance to recover from the injury he has.
After Charles' front-side block Sunday, here's what the Chiefs running back had to tweet.
Wishing @briancushing56 a speedy recovery. Hate to see anyone get injured on the football field.
Jamaal Charles (@jcharles25) October 21, 2013
And here was Cushing's response:
@jcharles25 appreciate you bro. I know you were just doing your job. Nothing but respect for your game.
Brian Cushing (@briancushing56) October 21, 2013
The Jamal Charles block was not a cheap shot. It was a head on block. How else should a 199lb RB block a blitzing 250lb LB'er?
My response wasn't directed to how he's dealt with injuries themselves, but rather his inept handling of the "don't have discussions with the press" aspect of them.I would hesitate to indict Clowney as "too dense" to respond appropriately to his response to injury........AJ has not exactly made all that good decisions (with the help of the medical staff) re. the handling of some of his injuries......with his own 14 Wonderlic.
I thought Slauson rolling him up in the Jets game was 2012, and Jamaal Charles blocking him was in 2013?
The Wonderlic really isn't that hard. To do badly requires: 1. dim bulb, 2. scared rabbit (test anxiety) or 3. bad attitude.You may have hit the nail on the head with Clowney with your "Clowney is too dense" statement, validated by his 14 Wonderlic score....now, que up the posters who will want to argue, you don't need no stinking Wonderlic to rush the passer and display their very own 14 Wonderlic score.
Looks like Tarzan, Plays like Jane. WE GOT SCREWED!
Dr. Death James Andrews.
The Wonderlic really isn't that hard. To do badly requires: 1. dim bulb, 2. scared rabbit (test anxiety) or 3. bad attitude.
Like clockwork, six weeks to the day after Houston Texans linebacker Jadeveon Clowney underwent an arthroscopic knee procedure that reportedly carried a recovery time of four to six weeks, toes started to tap...
Jadeveon Clowney Struggling with Complicated, Less Common Knee Injury
Dave Siebert, M.D.
Nothing in here that we haven't already been educated on all along by our own Dr. CND, but it was posted today using just one of the studies Dr. CND suggested, ignoring the one done in a group of NFL players. (Both were forwarded to Dr. Siebert weeks ago.) Still worth a read, prompts discussion.
I think it's time the FO starts cleaning house In the team doctor and trainer department
Unfortunately, the nature of Clowney's injury set him up for that frustration from the get-go. Even with the best doctors practicing the best medicine-Dr. Walt Lowe and his surgical team undoubtedly fall into and even help lead said group-some injuries pose unique challenges.
From the article
Maybe the problem is on the decision to get him back on the field...
I'm not basing this just off Clowney. Imo a few Players weren't handled as they should have been
I think it's time the FO starts cleaning house In the team doctor and trainer department
I'm all for trading Clowney for even a 2nd rounder in 2015. I don't trust him. He is a jake and a loser in my book. Clean house. Get rid of Rick Smith, Grier, the entire scouting department as well as the entire medical team and S&C team.
I am of the opinion that the responsibility of rushing Clowney back on to the field lies with coaches and not with the doctors. However that doesn't excuse the Texans medical staff for completely missing on Ed Reed's hip or on Nix's failed medicals.
I believe they rushed Cushing back the first time. Anybody know how long the current medical staff has been with the team?
This is for Doc -
By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?
Is he now damaged goods?
Yes. How damaged and how far from pre-injury depends on a lot of things, but yes.
This is for Doc -
By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?
Is he now damaged goods?
Take a salt tablet, man up and get yo ass out there! We have a division to win!
I'm all for trading Clowney for even a 2nd rounder in 2015. I don't trust him. He is a jake and a loser in my book.
Jadeveon Clowney Struggling with Complicated, Less Common Knee Injury
Dave Siebert, M.D.
Nothing in here that we haven't already been educated on all along by our own Dr. CND, but it was posted today using just one of the studies Dr. CND suggested, ignoring the one done in a group of NFL players. (Both were forwarded to Dr. Siebert weeks ago.) Still worth a read, prompts discussion.
While Nawabi's study suggests lateral meniscectomy recoveries go awry more frequently, the manuscript focused on elite soccer players, not NFL linebackers. Generalizing findings in one group of athletes to another is a slippery slope.
Nevertheless, the manuscript's overarching conclusion-one that lateral meniscus tears are generally more troublesome-is hard to ignore, as is the idea that Clowney had the deck of perception stacked against him the moment fans expected him back in four to six weeks.
Our study has shown that, on average, the time to return to play for an elite soccer player is 7 weeks after a lateral meniscectomy, compared with 5 weeks after a medial meniscectomy. The relative rate of return to preinjury level of competition at each time point during the recovery phase is 6 times greater after a medial meniscectomy. Our findings also show that those treating and coaching professional soccer players undergoing lateral meniscectomy should expect not only a slow recovery but also specific adverse events during recovery. We found that 69% of players in this study experienced persistent effusions and/or joint-line pain after lateral meniscectomy, with a small proportion needing further arthroscopy.
Time to return to play was recorded as the time-to the nearest week-when the player returned to full training and was involved in his first competitive match for at least 45 minutes
This is for Doc -
By removing the meniscus instead of repairing it, have they weakened the knee permanently.? Or to put in another way, have they destroyed any chance that the knee will come back to pre-injury status, even with the proper amount of rest, with the correct rehab?
Is he now damaged goods?
ANYTIME you have a meniscal tear, the chances are good that there may be accompanying underlying cartilage damage. Then, if you remove the meniscal segment rather than repair it, that is tissue that is lost forever....it does not grow back..........and the progressive consequences set the time clock rolling. If certain parts of the meniscus are gone, there can be a grinding down of joint cartilage created by a now unstabilized rocking motion of the joint. If there is accompanying cartilage damage to the original meniscus injury, it further exposes underlying tissues....cartilage and/or bone to unprotected further damage. This is especially true in lateral meniscus injury, since the lateral side of the joint carries a much greater portion of the knee joint load. If he was allowed to play on a knee that had a significant amount of meniscus removed......or they left behind frayed edges attempting to preserve meniscus that was lifted and should have been removed or repaired to begin with.
In the every day Joe, maybe the consequences may be something that they can legitimately after full informed consent accept........and not understanding the difference between having an excision vs. a repair is not as crucial. In an elite NFL player, that distinction better be hammered home by the orthopedic surgeon.........one, because most NFL players listen with one ear (and most of the time with half a brain) to what in reality those consequences will definitely be if an excision is chosen........and two, because the player just wants to get back on the field ASAP and typically is being pushed from all sides to the same end. It should be up to the surgeon counter the immediate gratification approach that is so pervasive in the NFL culture.
As an aside, because of Clowney's know problems with his bone spurs....which are direct decendants of an arthritic process, it would be surprising if the don't find that his knee demonstrates arthritic changes consistent with this and his many years of football-induced trauma.......another reason that a repair would have been the only smart long-term decision.
4 To 6 Weeks, My Ass: Why NFL Injury Estimates Are Bullshit
...
There it was. Four to six. If you're an NFL fan, those digits are virtually yoked together in your mind, like some sort of super-numeral that signifies "serious injury but healthy in time for the playoffs." Four to six tells a little story about the NFL. It says that in a sport of explosive contingency, the toll is knowable, containable; it exists within established parameters. It doesn't, thoughnot really. Although we eventually found out that Griffin had an exceedingly rare type of dislocation that didn't damage the surrounding tendons, given what we know about dislocated ankles in the NFL a prognosis of four to six weeks was at the time obviously insane. But it's an odd thing about the business of professional football that misinformation is spread as a matter of course by and among and about people who know it's not the truth but who for various reasons decide to play along anyway.
...
Injuries, particularly in the NFL, are one of the few topics in sports where old rules of thumb like "out four to six weeks" are still thrown around without anyone checking them against any data, in large part because no such database exists. So I built one.
Really? What about mallet? Should he take a salt tablet too?
I would say that the Texans medical staff is unethical, but that would imply they had a grasp of the consequences. Maybe they don't know what the hell they're doing.
If you're a media member, be assured that you'd get a lot of fan support if you put the screws to this organization over its medical staff. Cite JJ Watt's arm brace and the actual recovery time for a 3rd degree elbow dislocation. Maybe if more media in large markets laid the facts on the table, you'd see less medical professionals like Dr. Andrews selling out to the league.
A good example of the media doing its job is this article on Deadspin about the unreliability of NFL recovery estimates. The writer admits that his data collection process is flawed, but the contrasts between estimates and reality is conclusive enough.
Link
Team doctors don't do much talking to the press; coaches speak in a sort of sub-English when it comes to the health of their players; the players themselves often know less about their own bodies than their team; and fans, aware of the code, see injury timeframes less as a range of real possibilities than as a rough index of the team's concern. What we're left with, then, is Chris Mortensen shifting up onto one cheek and farting out a couple rounds of "4-to-6 weeks" before tossing it back to Wingo.
I would say that the Texans medical staff is unethical, but that would imply they had a grasp of the consequences. Maybe they don't know what the hell they're doing.
If you're a media member, be assured that you'd get a lot of fan support if you put the screws to this organization over its medical staff. Cite JJ Watt's arm brace and the actual recovery time for a 3rd degree elbow dislocation. Maybe if more media in large markets laid the facts on the table, you'd see less medical professionals like Dr. Andrews selling out to the league.
A good example of the media doing its job is this article on Deadspin about the unreliability of NFL recovery estimates. The writer admits that his data collection process is flawed, but the contrasts between estimates and reality is conclusive enough.
Link
I've read the book My Injury File: How I Shot, Smoked, And Screwed My Way Through The NFL written by a former NFL WR (Nate Jackson). It chronicles how only after his career did he ever see his detailed medical records........he had no idea how extensive his file and injuries were......nor their true implication.....as he and his team and medical staffs preferred keeping him in a state of perpetual ignorant bliss.
You will be enticed to read the entire book when you read this unbelievably revealing excerpt from the book.
You will be enticed to read the entire book when you read this unbelievably revealing excerpt from the book.
Deepi Sidhu ‏@DeepSlant · 6m6 minutes ago
O'Brien on Jadeveon Clowney: In the best interest of J.D, we'll place him on IR and have him undergo surgery on his right knee. #Texans