Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Mahomes had more carries in the first 4 games than McKinnon did all yearMahomes didn't start running the ball until the end of the season.
Mahomes had more carries in the first 4 games than McKinnon did all year
Whoa I'm getting some real pushback on my CM evaluation !You also said he is not a gifted runner
so you just disregarded all his years in Carolina and in SF???Whoa I'm getting some real pushback on my CM evaluation !
First time I saw him was in his last year in college @ Stanford when he caught a little pass in the
flat and took it down the sidelines about 45-50 yards for a TD, and I thought dang that's one
fast white boy ! So after a little research I found out that the great Dave Sime was his grandpa:
OK now I get it !
You know what I have very little recollection of his pro career until he was traded to San Fran which of course has been just relatively recently. Living in an AFC city like I do and Carolina getting minimal exposure especially here in large part has a lot to with the opportunities I'veso you just disregarded all his years in Carolina and in SF???
C. McCaffrey has been a beast since he's come into the league. All you have to do is watch one game and see just how good he is....not only at toting the rock but also running routes and catching passes. He runs hard with tenacity and refuses to go down fighting for every inch he can get....Thats all the "research" thats required.
(1) NFL Network on X: "“He can RUN run!” @DeionSanders was VERY impressed with @Traps_5’s 4.35u 40-yard dash : #NFLCombine LIVE on NFL Network https://t.co/zlFMQUGp92" / X (twitter.com)Whoa I'm getting some real pushback on my CM evaluation !
First time I saw him was in his last year in college @ Stanford when he caught a little pass in the
flat and took it down the sidelines about 45-50 yards for a TD, and I thought dang that's one
fast white boy ! So after a little research I found out that the great Dave Sime was his grandpa:
OK now I get it !
The problem with edge becomes the fact that all the guys around that pick, like the ones you mentioned, are essentially developmental guys. Meaning we'd likely need to have a vet there (and that costs $) or our d-line could massively suffer and if the trenches are suffering this whole defense is going to suffer badly.I would add Pollard to this list.
You can probably get Dugger for 3yrs 40 mil and Ekeler for 3yrs 21 mil.
This means you probably can't bring back Greenard and Edge becomes a high priority on the draft list. 2 guys I like a lot are Chop and Darius Robinson at 1-23.
That's why you bring back Barnett to go a long with Sanders and hopefully Horton. Also if you want to play it safe draft Darius Robinson. Lower upside but less risk. IMHO I trust Ryans on this one.The problem with edge becomes the fact that all the guys around that pick, like the ones you mentioned, are essentially developmental guys. Meaning we'd likely need to have a vet there (and that costs $) or our d-line could massively suffer and if the trenches are suffering this whole defense is going to suffer badly.
Imagine we go out there and out starting edges are Will and Tyree Wilson part 2. That spells disaster to me in my opnion. Especially if will were to get hurt for any amount of time.
I'd far rather just keep Greenard instead of risking tanking the d-line.
Singletary as good as Barkley? That's laughable!
Plus he will have a 10X better QB throwing to him on passing plays.Barkley >>> Singletary all day, every day and twice on Sunday.
Yes, Devin is ok as a pass catcher. He's passable, but not special. Saquan is near elite as a pass catcher. He's not CMC, but who is? He'd bring a whole new dimension to the pass game imho.
Can Barkley run the clock out in 4 minute offense is my question. Sometimes you have to match physicality with physicality.Definitely an upgrade to the short passing game. Which comes in handy when an elite defense, injuries and poor weather take away the deep passing game. Which happens in the playoffs.
Releasing a few underperforming guys on one year contracts will open up a bit more tooThat's an extra 10-15m in cap space that was not expected. That could make going for a couple of those big name players like Jones and Evans more palatable, while retaining quite a few of our guys.
Perhaps, it also allows teams to keep their own. KC greater likelihood of keeping Chris Jones and Snead.That's an extra 10-15m in cap space that was not expected. That could make going for a couple of those big name players like Jones and Evans more palatable, while retaining quite a few of our guys.
Anyone interested in Tee Higgins…the Bengals are franchise tagging him. I like Tee, but I felt pretty strongly the Bengals would either sign or tag him. Onward and upward!
AgreedNo interest in a franchise tagged WR2. Plenty available for less.
AFC SOUTH
Houston Texans
Trade for OLB Khalil Mack
Mack, who just turned 33, had 17 sacks last season for the Chargers and he would come with a huge contract. He has a $38.5 million cap number, and the Chargers are nearly $46 million over the cap for 2024. Trading Mack before June 1 would save them over $23 million in cap space.
The Texans, on the other hand, have $57 million in cap space. They also have the space to bring Mack in with starting edge rusher Jonathan Greenard hitting free agency. Imagine Mack playing opposite Will Anderson Jr., with opponents able to double-team only one of them. It probably wouldn't cost the Texans a very high draft pick while bringing a big addition to their defense.
No way in hell J. Jefferson could be had for a 2nd and 3rd....but man if it could be had would I jump all over that in a HEARTBEAT.Interesting take from Aaron Schatz, suggesting the Texans make a "BOLD" move to trade for Khalil Mack to fill the hole across from Anderson. If traded, I believe he becomes a 1 year $23,250,000 cost to the team acquiring him, and he's quite the player for that amount. Not sure what he would cost to extend at 33 years old, but it might be worth it if he's able to be had for a 5th round pick.
I also like the idea they had for the Vikings in trading Justin Jefferson and going into rebuild mode, he makes 19.7m this year. They aren't winning a Super Bowl with Kirk Cousins, and they don't have a ton of prospects in their future. Jefferson is an amazing young WR, and if he could come here for a 2nd/3rd and sign an extension, he amplify this offense greatly. I would much rather spend 25m a year over 5 years on JJ than an aging Evans.
32 teams, 32 daring offseason moves: Trade Stefon Diggs? Acquire Justin Fields?
A bold move at the 2024 NFL draft or in free agency could make the difference for NFL teams looking to contend. But which move should each make?www.espn.com
No way in hell J. Jefferson could be had for a 2nd and 3rd....but man if it could be had would I jump all over that in a HEARTBEAT.
Do you know how to make an egg omelette? First you start with an egg...Interesting take from Aaron Schatz, suggesting the Texans make a "BOLD" move to trade for Khalil Mack to fill the hole across from Anderson. If traded, I believe he becomes a 1 year $23,250,000 cost to the team acquiring him, and he's quite the player for that amount. Not sure what he would cost to extend at 33 years old, but it might be worth it if he's able to be had for a 5th round pick.
I also like the idea they had for the Vikings in trading Justin Jefferson and going into rebuild mode, he makes 19.7m this year. They aren't winning a Super Bowl with Kirk Cousins, and they don't have a ton of prospects in their future. Jefferson is an amazing young WR, and if he could come here for a 2nd/3rd and sign an extension, he amplify this offense greatly. I would much rather spend 25m a year over 5 years on JJ than an aging Evans.
32 teams, 32 daring offseason moves: Trade Stefon Diggs? Acquire Justin Fields?
A bold move at the 2024 NFL draft or in free agency could make the difference for NFL teams looking to contend. But which move should each make?www.espn.com
Deandre Hopkins was traded for a 2nd and 4th in his contract year, so maybe it could happen. 19.7m is a lot of money, plus the extension means there may not be a ton of teams bidding on him. Depends on who else is interested. Tyreke Hill went for a lot more in a similar situation, but he also was the best WR in the league at the time and got a 4 year and 120 million extension with it.No way in hell J. Jefferson could be had for a 2nd and 3rd....but man if it could be had would I jump all over that in a HEARTBEAT.
Salary dumps for a decent player on a huge contract are typically around that value. Two 6ths or a Future 5th, whatever. Doesn't really matter, it's just speculation and options for the team.Do you know how to make an egg omelette? First you start with an egg...
To make a trade with a fifth round pick, you first have to have a fifth round pick...
Jefferson 2 yrs ago was considered the best WR in the NFL. So I would expect a trade package to be similar to Hill's in both draft picks and yrs/money. If I'm Caserio I pass and look for another Collins/Dell.Deandre Hopkins was traded for a 2nd and 4th in his contract year, so maybe it could happen. 19.7m is a lot of money, plus the extension means there may not be a ton of teams bidding on him. Depends on who else is interested. Tyreke Hill went for a lot more in a similar situation, but he also was the best WR in the league at the time and got a 4 year and 120 million extension with it.
AgreeJefferson 2 yrs ago was considered the best WR in the NFL. So I would expect a trade package to be similar to Hill's in both draft picks and yrs/money. If I'm Caserio I pass and look for another Collins/Dell.
Interesting take from Aaron Schatz, suggesting the Texans make a "BOLD" move to trade for Khalil Mack to fill the hole across from Anderson. If traded, I believe he becomes a 1 year $23,250,000 cost to the team acquiring him, and he's quite the player for that amount. Not sure what he would cost to extend at 33 years old, but it might be worth it if he's able to be had for a 5th round pick.
Getting Mack for that would be a dream come true for me.
Really? If you release a player from the 53, that spot has to be filled with another player.Releasing a few underperforming guys on one year contracts will open up a bit more too
Except 5-10 of these roster spots will be filled by draft picks and UDFA's. Another 5- 10 will be filled by minimum FA types. Then you have the 3 cheap LS, K,P guys. So there will be more cap space than meets the eye.Really? If you release a player from the 53, that spot has to be filled with another player.
I don't understand all this speculating about how much money the Texans have for signing all these big name players. The Texans have about 30 free agent openings on the team that need to be filled. Of these, maybe 10 are higher dollar contracts.. How much will this take? If you take the 10, is an average of $3M reasonable? Then the other 20, maybe $1M each? That's about $50M. That leaves, maybe, $20M for signing splash players. Just ball parking, does this sound about right? So, maybe 2 or 3 higher dollar signings?
Really? If you release a player from the 53, that spot has to be filled with another player.
I don't understand all this speculating about how much money the Texans have for signing all these big name players. The Texans have about 30 free agent openings on the team that need to be filled. Of these, maybe 10 are higher dollar contracts.. How much will this take? If you take the 10, is an average of $3M reasonable? Then the other 20, maybe $1M each? That's about $50M. That leaves, maybe, $20M for signing splash players. Just ball parking, does this sound about right? So, maybe 2 or 3 higher dollar signings?
Well Robert Woods isn't worth keeping around if you can save 5m by cutting him. Having 79m in space after that move gives a lot of leeway to make some splashes. If you can throw 30m of it at Chris Jones to get the D-line and pass rush solidified for the next 4 years, I think that's pretty substantial. It also means you don't need quite as good of a secondary if you can constantly pressure QBs from both sides. 9m for Barkley, 4m for a kicker, 2m for a punter, 5m for Cashman, 5m for Nelson, and you still have 24m to fill out the rest of the roster. The Texans could save a bit by drafting a kicker or punter with one of those 7ths to save a couple million over the next 4 years too.
Well Robert Woods isn't worth keeping around if you can save 5m by cutting him. Having 79m in space after that move gives a lot of leeway to make some splashes. If you can throw 30m of it at Chris Jones to get the D-line and pass rush solidified for the next 4 years, I think that's pretty substantial. It also means you don't need quite as good of a secondary if you can constantly pressure QBs from both sides. 9m for Barkley, 4m for a kicker, 2m for a punter, 5m for Cashman, 5m for Nelson, and you still have 24m to fill out the rest of the roster. The Texans could save a bit by drafting a kicker or punter with one of those 7ths to save a couple million over the next 4 years too.
Hopefully just 2...Saquon which shouldnt cost a lot, and some D help...whether at DE, or an athletic LB that can blitz and cover.Really? If you release a player from the 53, that spot has to be filled with another player.
I don't understand all this speculating about how much money the Texans have for signing all these big name players. The Texans have about 30 free agent openings on the team that need to be filled. Of these, maybe 10 are higher dollar contracts.. How much will this take? If you take the 10, is an average of $3M reasonable? Then the other 20, maybe $1M each? That's about $50M. That leaves, maybe, $20M for signing splash players. Just ball parking, does this sound about right? So, maybe 2 or 3 higher dollar signings?
I would love to add Wilkins,Pollard Whitehead and Brown.Hopefully just 2...Saquon which shouldnt cost a lot, and some D help...whether at DE, or an athletic LB that can blitz and cover.
I would be very happy if it didn't go that wayI would love to add Wilkins,Pollard Whitehead and Brown.
Then have the draft fall the way the group mock is going over the in the draft section and I would be very happy.
Do you not like the picks. Which ones dont you like?I would be very happy if it didn't go that way
I don't want them to sign Pollard or Brown, I don't want to sign a first round WR that doesn't bring anything new to the room or has drop problems and I don't want an injury prone LB in the 3rdDo you not like the picks. Which ones dont you like?
I was torn between picking Mustafa and Wright to go with Johnson at 4-124 and 4-125. A good case can be made to go either way.