Hall of Fame
As I understand it, Dillard hasn't exactly tore it up in Philly. Still early, but may not be all that and a bag ofchips.
They tried him at LT and discovered he wasn't a LT. But hey, you've already said you know more than 30 year OL coach Paul Alexander, so it shouldn't surprise anyone that you still think you're the smartest man in the room.To think these idiot coaches thought he was a GUARD!! LMAO
He could have been our left tackle and saved us all those picks, but Buttchin is gonna Buttchin.
Now he and JJ can double-date with the new wives!Best wishes to the young man and his new bride!
Just one bit of advice to you, Tytus........
View attachment 5653
@Jeff_McLane’s reporting also indicates the Eagles don’t believe Andre Dillard is ready to take over at LT and Jason Peters is still playing at a Pro Bowl level. https://t.co/woZIfkxks6Wow @Tim_McManus just now on the Mike Missanelli show said he's heard whispers that the Eagles could be looking to use Andre Dillard as a means of dumping Alshon Jeffrey's contract. Thinks the fact Eagles seem very interested in bringing back Jason Peters tells you a lot.
— Play Like A Jet (@Playlikeajet1) March 2, 2020
The 38-year-old tackle told reporters after the season finale that he wanted to play in 2020. Nothing over the last two months has changed his mind. The Eagles, however, have yet to decide if they want him back. As it was put to Pederson on Tuesday, it’s an either/or choice: Either the Eagles bring back Peters for his 12th season in Philadelphia or they allow him to leave via free agency, thus beginning the Andre Dillard tenure at left tackle. Peters isn’t staying to be a backup or to play guard. He will have starting options if he hits the market. Eagles coaches believe that Peters still has more than enough gas left in the tank. They believe that he played at a Pro Bowl level in the final two months of last season after he returned from arthroscopic knee surgery. They do understand that he is unlikely to play in all 16 games or more than the 77 percent of snaps he has played the last two years.
Another year with Peters would allow Dillard to watch and learn and likely play enough to continue his development. He hasn’t made as much progress as the Eagles had hoped when they moved up to draft him in the first round last year. Dillard needs to get stronger, both physically and mentally. Eagles coaches still believe in Dillard. He has the necessary athleticism. But bringing Peters back, despite the message it would send about Dillard’s future, would give the 24-year-old some additional time in an NFL culture he struggled to adapt to as a rookie. Ideally, Dillard would have made it obvious that it was time to move on from Peters. He did not. And what can’t be underplayed is the role owner Jeffrey Lurie will play in deciding a future Hall of Famer’s future. He is Peters’ greatest advocate. But Peters can’t ask for the moon. A contract similar to the one he signed last offseason – one year, $6 million with incentives – could make the most sense for both sides.
Had to show those super awesome socks somehow!
It is good to have game plan but when that back field goes in motion, well the QB has to be ready as a leader to be prepared for any slippage or slides. A great tight end is what I want on the playing field. I never hand off once play begins and while old and stiff, always take it to the house and go all the way to score. I agree Watson wants to make great plays each time but I do understand. It is difficult to be patient and know when to slow and when to speed up butt it can be done.Here's to creativity.
What if you are a RB? Do you hesitate at the LOS like Le'Veon Bell, a straight ahead, hard charging RB like Earl Campbell or all over the place like Barry Sanders?It is good to have game plan but when that back field goes in motion, well the QB has to be ready as a leader to be prepared for any slippage or slides. A great tight end is what I want on the playing field. I never hand off once play begins and while old and stiff, always take it to the house and go all the way to score. I agree Watson wants to make great plays each time but I do understand. It is difficult to be patient and know when to slow and when to speed up butt it can be done.
Man I loved me some Earl Campbell but if I had to select one of that three, give me Barry Sanders. He just kept going and going...What if you are a RB? Do you hesitate at the LOS like Le'Veon Bell, a straight ahead, hard charging RB like Earl Campbell or all over the place like Barry Sanders?
Give Detroit Earl Campbell and the Oilers Barry Sanders......Sanders is done in the NFL sooner than Earl if used in the same manner by Phillips. I'm not even sure Sanders makes it to the Saints. Earl would eventually gets to run in the Run-N-Shoot offense and that would've extended his career just like it did for Sanders. Now Campbell might've ended some DB's careers earlier than expected when they became the primary road block between Earl and the marker or end zone. Don't get me wrong, Barry Sanders was right up there with Earl in my book.Man I loved me some Earl Campbell but if I had to select one of that three, give me Barry Sanders. He just kept going and going...
It'd be an amazing time in Houston if EC and BS were in the backfield at the same time. EC would be the first 2 down back and BS the 3rd down specialist. It'd change the entire gameplan.I responded to Earl 34s query as if Each of those running backs would be playing on the Texans today.