Texansphan
Football connoisseur
I really like him - could be our long awaited answer for AJ. Even if he's only 90% of AJ, he'll be worth having.He's also going to be drafted in the 1st round.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I really like him - could be our long awaited answer for AJ. Even if he's only 90% of AJ, he'll be worth having.He's also going to be drafted in the 1st round.
Ruckert is a favorite of mine. I also really like McBride, but I feel he’ll go earlier than when I would want to address the positionI’ve really come around on Ruckert. He’s a do it all TE who could a perfect addition to Jordan.
WR1- Pierce (CIN) or Watson (NDSU)
WR2- Collins
SWR- Cooks
TE1- Jordan **Elevates to 1 this season**
Ruckert is a favorite of mine. I also really like McBride, but I feel he’ll go earlier than when I would want to address the position
I believe Anenih was a local visit, and not a top 30.
Well, someone is confused. Pretty rare a team double dips a visit, when they're limited to 30.
You can afford to kick 'em to the kerb when you have Dante Scarneccia as your Oline coach.This is the Patriot type of offensive lineman they grab late rounds, develop into starters and if unwilling to extend to a third contract because market says they’re worth 8-12 million per year and become coveted free agent signings.
Agreed. I don’t think the cooks signing changes anything in terms of needing another receiver.Cooks is one hit from retirement. No matter what anyone thinks of Mills, myself included, getting another top shelf wr threat sets up whomever plays qb
I could see McBride as an option as well.Mcbride will go top 50 for sure.
Guess Caserio couldn’t smuggle him out from under Belichick.You can afford to kick 'em to the kerb when you have Dante Scarneccia as your Oline coach.
I would add - and Tom Brady setting his protections and calling plays.You can afford to kick 'em to the kerb when you have Dante Scarneccia as your Oline coach.
I thought Pierce ran a 4.33?I could easily go Cincinnati WR, Alec Pierce who’s 6-3 @ 211 lbs and popped the same 4.41-40 as Moore. Pierce is a guy who can do the job from the slot and he doesn’t mind blocking downfield. I think Pierce could be there early in RD3 and be just as effective as Moore.
I'm not knocking Watson, but there have been plenty of big,tall,fast, wrs who couldn't get open. If you cant drop your hips and run a comeback or a post route, that 4.3 speed means nothing. You have to be able to show a route even if you're running another.Agreed. I don’t think the cooks signing changes anything in terms of needing another receiver.
Christian Watson ran an unofficial 4.28 and a 4.36 at the combine. Dude is nearly 6’5” with burner speed.
He’d be perfect. And yes I like Moore too. I see both him and Watson gone by pick 40 though.
Guess Caserio couldn’t smuggle him out from under Belichick.
Agreed. I think Watson is fine but I would of liked to see his targets up a bit more.I'm not knocking Watson, but there have been plenty of big,tall,fast, wrs who couldn't get open. If you cant drop your hips and run a comeback or a post route, that 4.3 speed means nothing. You have to be able to show a route even if you're running another.
I thought Pierce ran a 4.33?
I'm not knocking Watson, but there have been plenty of big,tall,fast, wrs who couldn't get open. If you cant drop your hips and run a comeback or a post route, that 4.3 speed means nothing. You have to be able to show a route even if you're running another.
I imagine all rookies learn plenty of new tricks in the big time - via professional training and coaching.Watson can do this, or atleast it appeared he could do this during the Sr. Bowl practices.
I imagine all rookies learn plenty of new tricks in the big time. And get professional training and coaching.
Agree. I would not like to see a bunch of sophs and rooks out there without a #1 guy to look up to.Cooks is a good leader and mentor for the WR room.
Especially a guy who can play.Agree. I would not like to see a bunch of sophs and rooks out there without a #1 guy to look up to.
I normally hit the sr bowl practice, but something came upWatson can do this, or atleast it appeared he could do this during the Sr. Bowl practices.
Kubiak/Smith reached out to Alex Gibbs in retirement. More than likely hands off on everybody was part of agreement.He retired
I'm not knocking Watson, but there have been plenty of big,tall,fast, wrs who couldn't get open. If you cant drop your hips and run a comeback or a post route, that 4.3 speed means nothing. You have to be able to show a route even if you're running another.
I thought Pierce ran a 4.33?
Wow - what's wrong with this guy?Agreed. Texans have a guy who blew up the combine more than anybody in this year’s WR class in Chris Conley who has yet to translate that athleticism into anything beyond below average WR2/average WR3.
2015 Draft Scout Chris Conley - WR - Georgia
2015 Draft Scout Chris Conley - WR - Georgiadraftscout.com
Check out Conley's stats and bio - he even has big hands at 9 7/8" and ran a 4:33.Wow - what's wrong with this guy?
I got the wrong guy.I think it was Watson (NDSU) who hit the sub 4.4-40. Pierce’s Combine 40 was listed as 4.41. Either receiver would be a good fit for the Texans b/c they’re blue-collar WR’s who do the dirty work downfield with physicality.
Wow - what's wrong with this guy?
You would think with his speed he should be able to get a step on a less talented CB and convert it to at least a solid gain.He's fast but not sudden in and out of his breaks.
Although he's got big hands, his hands are avg.
If we somehow get an additional pick in the 2nd round I’d go for McBride.I could see McBride as an option as well.
Watson’s drops concern me. Although he does have great potential.I think it was Watson (NDSU) who hit the sub 4.4-40. Pierce’s Combine 40 was listed as 4.41. Either receiver would be a good fit for the Texans b/c they’re blue-collar WR’s who do the dirty work downfield with physicality.
Pierce ran a 4.33I think it was Watson (NDSU) who hit the sub 4.4-40. Pierce’s Combine 40 was listed as 4.41. Either receiver would be a good fit for the Texans b/c they’re blue-collar WR’s who do the dirty work downfield with physicality.
And keeping with 40 times London did not even run the 40. But man, this kid is seriously talented. He reminds me of Mike Evans too. Lots of comps to Evans out there.![]()
What would USC WR Drake London bring to the Texans?
The Houston Texans have a variety of options at No. 13 overall in the 2022 NFL draft. The Texans could shore up their backend if safety Kyle Hamilton is fortunate enough to fall that spot. Houston could also pick a tackle in Mississippi State's Charles Cross.…texanswire.usatoday.com
He's fast but not sudden in and out of his breaks.
Although he's got big hands, his hands are avg.
I bet he's in the 4.6 range and I would pick him in a heartbeat if he falls to 37. Which is doubtful.And keeping with 40 times London did not even run the 40. But man, this kid is seriously talented. He reminds me of Mike Evans too. Lots of comps to Evans out there.
ProsI bet he's in the 4.6 range and I would pick him in a heartbeat if he falls to 37. Which is doubtful.
Pros
Cons
- Rare combination of size and athleticism
- Elite hands and ball skills at all levels
- Impressive timing on leaps
- Crisp routes and success at all three levels of the defense
- Uses height and strong hands to win almost all 50/50 balls
- Experienced both outside and in the slot
- Basketball skills add to superior catch ability
- Dominated NCAA defenses
- Size makes him a formidable downfield blocker
- Smart receiver that finds the open spot
Fantasy outlook
- Lack of elite speed is compensated with size and football IQ
- Didn’t measure at combine but should at Pro Day
- Needs work on run blocking
- Not quick off the line
- Most experience was in the slot, not outside
Drake London rates to be in the first round, usually as a Top-3 rookie wideout and has the chance of being the first name called for his position. Breaking his ankle last season short-circuited an electric performance on an otherwise ineffective Trojans’ team. London was described as “a quarterback’s best friend”. He was so proficient with receptions, that he didn’t need the ball thrown to him, merely “at him,” and he’d come down with it.
A perceived lack of top speed, and quickness getting there, is a downgrade by some scouts, but there is no arguing how well he played, and on a team without any other elements of an elite offense around him. London compares to Mike Evans who logged much the same measurables when he entered the NFL.
London needs to prove that the fractured ankle is not of any ongoing concern – and it isn’t expected to be. But his recovery meant that he wouldn’t have logged as fast in a 40-time back at the NFL Combine, so he’s delayed his personal Pro Day as long as he can.
London may not sport elite speed, but he’s been everything else that a team could want from their No. 1 wideout. While he was once described as a tremendously talented tight end, he is not slow. He is a factor on deep routes though his bread and butter is short and intermediate routes that maximizes his catching ability, size advantage and overall football intelligence.
There’s plenty to love about a 6-4 receiver with elite hands and pass-catching skills. Playing on a USC team that trailed in most games last year and that had no other real threats, London still managed to catch at least nine passes in all but one game and turned in over 130 yards in six of the eight. He’d be a great addition to a team with a young quarterback looking to establish a connection that could last for years.
And he’d be a potential rookie of the year if he ends up paired with one of the elite veteran quarterbacks.
I would not be upset if we take this guy.
He will be a great possession receiver and should become a big target and go-to guy for Mills to compliment Cooks.Heck of a prospect and would give Mills two WRs with an A+ catch radius. I just don’t want to spend 13 on him given the team’s other needs and who may be available later that can help. But I certainly wouldn’t go all Texian on the file clerk if this is who they pick…
Stingley is visiting the Texans today.
Hmmm.Stingley is visiting the Texans today.
12 ypc. I'll pass until the 5th or 6th rd. Why take a possession wr now when there are better prospects on the board is my question.Pros
Cons
- Rare combination of size and athleticism
- Elite hands and ball skills at all levels
- Impressive timing on leaps
- Crisp routes and success at all three levels of the defense
- Uses height and strong hands to win almost all 50/50 balls
- Experienced both outside and in the slot
- Basketball skills add to superior catch ability
- Dominated NCAA defenses
- Size makes him a formidable downfield blocker
- Smart receiver that finds the open spot
Fantasy outlook
- Lack of elite speed is compensated with size and football IQ
- Didn’t measure at combine but should at Pro Day
- Needs work on run blocking
- Not quick off the line
- Most experience was in the slot, not outside
Drake London rates to be in the first round, usually as a Top-3 rookie wideout and has the chance of being the first name called for his position. Breaking his ankle last season short-circuited an electric performance on an otherwise ineffective Trojans’ team. London was described as “a quarterback’s best friend”. He was so proficient with receptions, that he didn’t need the ball thrown to him, merely “at him,” and he’d come down with it.
A perceived lack of top speed, and quickness getting there, is a downgrade by some scouts, but there is no arguing how well he played, and on a team without any other elements of an elite offense around him. London compares to Mike Evans who logged much the same measurables when he entered the NFL.
London needs to prove that the fractured ankle is not of any ongoing concern – and it isn’t expected to be. But his recovery meant that he wouldn’t have logged as fast in a 40-time back at the NFL Combine, so he’s delayed his personal Pro Day as long as he can.
London may not sport elite speed, but he’s been everything else that a team could want from their No. 1 wideout. While he was once described as a tremendously talented tight end, he is not slow. He is a factor on deep routes though his bread and butter is short and intermediate routes that maximizes his catching ability, size advantage and overall football intelligence.
There’s plenty to love about a 6-4 receiver with elite hands and pass-catching skills. Playing on a USC team that trailed in most games last year and that had no other real threats, London still managed to catch at least nine passes in all but one game and turned in over 130 yards in six of the eight. He’d be a great addition to a team with a young quarterback looking to establish a connection that could last for years.
And he’d be a potential rookie of the year if he ends up paired with one of the elite veteran quarterbacks.
I would not be upset if we take this guy.
Mike Evans was 20 yds per catch. Not only that, he didn't play football until his sr year in high school. Drake London isn't close to the prospect Evans was.Pros
Cons
- Rare combination of size and athleticism
- Elite hands and ball skills at all levels
- Impressive timing on leaps
- Crisp routes and success at all three levels of the defense
- Uses height and strong hands to win almost all 50/50 balls
- Experienced both outside and in the slot
- Basketball skills add to superior catch ability
- Dominated NCAA defenses
- Size makes him a formidable downfield blocker
- Smart receiver that finds the open spot
Fantasy outlook
- Lack of elite speed is compensated with size and football IQ
- Didn’t measure at combine but should at Pro Day
- Needs work on run blocking
- Not quick off the line
- Most experience was in the slot, not outside
Drake London rates to be in the first round, usually as a Top-3 rookie wideout and has the chance of being the first name called for his position. Breaking his ankle last season short-circuited an electric performance on an otherwise ineffective Trojans’ team. London was described as “a quarterback’s best friend”. He was so proficient with receptions, that he didn’t need the ball thrown to him, merely “at him,” and he’d come down with it.
A perceived lack of top speed, and quickness getting there, is a downgrade by some scouts, but there is no arguing how well he played, and on a team without any other elements of an elite offense around him. London compares to Mike Evans who logged much the same measurables when he entered the NFL.
London needs to prove that the fractured ankle is not of any ongoing concern – and it isn’t expected to be. But his recovery meant that he wouldn’t have logged as fast in a 40-time back at the NFL Combine, so he’s delayed his personal Pro Day as long as he can.
London may not sport elite speed, but he’s been everything else that a team could want from their No. 1 wideout. While he was once described as a tremendously talented tight end, he is not slow. He is a factor on deep routes though his bread and butter is short and intermediate routes that maximizes his catching ability, size advantage and overall football intelligence.
There’s plenty to love about a 6-4 receiver with elite hands and pass-catching skills. Playing on a USC team that trailed in most games last year and that had no other real threats, London still managed to catch at least nine passes in all but one game and turned in over 130 yards in six of the eight. He’d be a great addition to a team with a young quarterback looking to establish a connection that could last for years.
And he’d be a potential rookie of the year if he ends up paired with one of the elite veteran quarterbacks.
I would not be upset if we take this guy.