They did last night. LOLNot with Jimmy G's contract. 49ers fans don't even want Jimmy G.
I believe after next season they can get out of Jimmy G's contract fairly easily.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
They did last night. LOLNot with Jimmy G's contract. 49ers fans don't even want Jimmy G.
Why would the Niners give up a better QB plus 2 first rounders for a worse QB?Jimmy G threw 3 TD's last night on a bad ankle. I would take two 1sts and Jimmy G in a heartbeat for DW4. Gotta rebuild the defense.
Cal would never do this though. Gotta make his $$$$ and DW4 certainly helps Cal put butts in the seats.
Patrick Mahomes is the fastest to get to 90 Passing TD's in NFL History in 37 games (Marino - 40 games). Where is Watson? 84 Passing TDs in 44 games. So, He will probably be top 5 for quickest to 90 passing TDs and then 100 TDs. I think Watson will have the record for fastest to 100 career Passing/Rushing TDs combined on his next TD.They did last night. LOL
I believe after next season they can get out of Jimmy G's contract fairly easily.
Man the offense must really suck with those numbers. If he only had a better playcaller he would have 150 TD's by now.Patrick Mahomes is the fastest to get to 90 Passing TD's in NFL History in 37 games (Marino - 40 games). Where is Watson? 84 Passing TDs in 44 games. So, He will probably be top 5 for quickest to 90 passing TDs and then 100 TDs. I think Watson will have the record for fastest to 100 career Passing/Rushing TDs combined on his next TD.
Edit: Mahomes has 97 Total TDs. So, Deshaun may get there first...but Mahomes will get there faster when he gets to 100.
I would take two 1sts and Jimmy G in a heartbeat for DW4. Gotta rebuild the defense.
Yup. That rating shows a very high opinion of dw. I'd take that deal to.Quoted to bring attention to steelbtexan saying something good about Watson
He would be at 120 TDs atleast if he had tore his ACL in 2017.Man the offense must really suck with those numbers. If he only had a better playcaller he would have 150 TD's by now.
BTW, the problem with the offense was the play calling. O'Brien was too conservative, and lacked adjustments. He was stubborn with the run game and many times lacked creativity.Man the offense must really suck with those numbers. If he only had a better playcaller he would have 150 TD's by now.
Agreed, like I said with a good playcaller DW4 would've thrown 150 TD's according to some and they still wouldn't have won a darn thing.BTW, the problem with the offense was the play calling. O'Brien was too conservative, and lacked adjustments. He was stubborn with the run game and many times lacked creativity.
LOLHe would be at 120 TDs atleast if he had tore his ACL in 2017.
Got any teams in mind that may have had 3-4 quality players on the entire team and won or lost a Super Bowl? Not to mention, got there with a HC and coaching staff like OB and his staff?Agreed, like I said with a good playcaller DW4 would've thrown 150 TD's according to some and they still wouldn't have won a darn thing.
My point is DW4 couldn't have those kinds of stats if BOB was as awful as some on this MB makes him out to be. Is BOB a championship level HC? Nope Is BOB a bottom feeder HC? Nope He's an avg HC and it was past time to move on from BOB. 51-7Got any teams in mind that may have had 3-4 quality players on the entire team and won or lost a Super Bowl? Not to mention, got there with a HC and coaching staff like OB and his staff?
Signed Jamies WinstonWatson is number 3 in passing yards on the season. Even after a rough start with OB.
I started to respond to that but thought better of it .... Just no need to pile on.Signed Jamies Winston
I could say the same about Watson but you just have no desire to look at the whole picture when trying to hold a single player accountable in a 34 player assessment. How many times has Watson handed the defense the lead only to watch a complete breakdown and the opposing team drives the field for the win?My point is DW4 couldn't have those kinds of stats if BOB was as awful as some on this MB makes him out to be. Is BOB a championship level HC? Nope Is BOB a bottom feeder HC? Nope He's an avg HC and it was past time to move on from BOB. 51-7
All of his 88 INTs vs 121 TDs.Signed Jamies Winston
BOB is awful no matter how you slice it.My point is DW4 couldn't have those kinds of stats if BOB was as awful as some on this MB makes him out to be. Is BOB a championship level HC? Nope Is BOB a bottom feeder HC? Nope He's an avg HC and it was past time to move on from BOB. 51-7
Did you understand the context of what I posted, or did it go over your head?All of his 88 INTs vs 121 TDs.
Maybe your humour is a little dry?Did you understand the context of what I posted, or did it go over your head?
We spent days arguing over a Watson INT that was basically a punt. Can you imagine having a selection of 88 INTs to argue over?All of his 88 INTs vs 121 TDs.
Haha, right.We spent days arguing over a Watson INT that was basically a punt. Can you imagine having a selection of 88 INTs to argue over?
Since when did one become "they"?Haha, right.
"They" like to say Watson takes too many sacks and praise Tannehill as the better QB, but they don't even realize that his sack pct. is way higher than that of Watson.
And that's with a better offensive line (based on both professional opinions and data crunching by certain outfits that "they" themselves regard highly).
Not even mentioning the WCO "they" knew well from Kubiak; "they" even said/agreed that it's a QB-friendly system.
Oh, what irony.
Agreed about the players quittingBOB is awful no matter how you slice it.
Some people around here like to claim that the players quit on Kubiak.
Well, guess what?
The players helped show OB the door.
0-4 is definitely worse than 2-14, isn't it?
All I know is Tannehill drove his team the length of the field for a game tying TD with less than 2:00 with no TO's and threw for 350 yds. His play speaks for itself and he's been quite good and very consistent this yr.Haha, right.
"They" like to say Watson takes too many sacks and praise Tannehill as the better QB, but they don't even realize that his sack pct. is way higher than that of Watson.
And that's with a better offensive line (based on both professional opinions and data crunching by certain outfits that "they" themselves regard highly).
Not even mentioning the WCO "they" knew well from Kubiak; "they" even said/agreed that it's a QB-friendly system.
Oh, what irony.
Or maybe that post was kind of hard to tell that you were trying to be funny. BTW, if people dont get the humor that attempt wasn't funny.Maybe your humour is a little dry?
Or maybe I need clarification all the time?
Amazing80 saidMaybe your humour is a little dry?
Or maybe I need clarification all the time?
So I repliedWatson is number 3 in passing yards on the season. Even after a rough start with OB.
As Jamies Winston was constantly among the passing leaders, implying passing yards alone doesn't make a person a good QB (I happen to be one of the ones who believe Watson is a good QB, just don't think his passing yards is a good barometer for that, just like all the TDs Watson's thrown in a short amount of time does not mean BO'b was a good HC).Signed Jamies Winston
I wasn't trying to be funny. The point was being a passing leader doesn't apply to what Amazing80 was trying to imply.Or maybe that post was kind of hard to tell that you were trying to be funny. BTW, if people dont get the humor that attempt wasn't funny.
Thanks for spelling it out for him.Amazing80 said
So I replied
As Jamies Winston was constantly among the passing leaders, implying passing yards alone doesn't make a person a good QB (I happen to be one of the ones who believe Watson is a good QB, just don't think his passing yards is a good barometer for that, just like all the TDs Watson's thrown in a short amount of time does not mean BO'b was a good HC).
Your reply about Winston's interceptions was totally irrelevant to the conversation. Had Amazing80 said, look at Watson's TD/Int ratio, then it would. But since he didn't, & I didn't...... it doesn't.
But Watson's done the same thing before... well, the defense spit the bit, but Watson's done pretty much the same thing. More than once. Did you see the 2 play 75 yard drive that put us up 30-29?All I know is Tannehill drove his team the length of the field for a game tying TD with less than 2:00 with no TO's and threw for 350 yds. His play speaks for itself and he's been quite good and very consistent this yr.
This is another case of the numbers geeks trying to skew the numbers to make some twisted case.
I bet it's not enough. He's going to reply how those interceptions mean something even further removed from my point & amazing80's as well.Thanks for spelling it out for him.
You shouldn't have to do this.
When they are more than one.Since when did one become "they"?
I figured everything was implied.Amazing80 said
So I replied
As Jamies Winston was constantly among the passing leaders, implying passing yards alone doesn't make a person a good QB (I happen to be one of the ones who believe Watson is a good QB, just don't think his passing yards is a good barometer for that, just like all the TDs Watson's thrown in a short amount of time does not mean BO'b was a good HC).
Your reply about Winston's interceptions was totally irrelevant to the conversation. Had Amazing80 said, look at Watson's TD/Int ratio, then it would. But since he didn't, & I didn't...... it doesn't.
I wasn't trying to be funny. The point was being a passing leader doesn't apply to what Amazing80 was trying to imply.
No one ever said you did. I was replying to amazing80I never even thought for a moment that yardage alone is a measuring stick;
I've only seen one that proclaimed Tannehill to be better than WatsonWhen they are more than one.
In comparing Watson and Tannehill, wouldn't you rather compare his numbers while with the Dolphins versus the luck he got when traded to the Titans? Watson didn't get the opportunity to get traded to the Patriots, Bears, or any other relavent team.....he got stuck with that below avg team and HC/OC, O"Brien.All I know is Tannehill drove his team the length of the field for a game tying TD with less than 2:00 with no TO's and threw for 350 yds. His play speaks for itself and he's been quite good and very consistent this yr.
This is another case of the numbers geeks trying to skew the numbers to make some twisted case.
You're not looking hard enough.I've only seen one that proclaimed Tannehill to be better than Watson
There was a great interview on 610 with Sage Rosenfels a few years ago that went into depth about Kubiak's offense. I looked for it but they have the page and it's not on there anymore.Could be both actually. We saw this with Schaub in the past where we as fans didn't think he had "permission" to audible and Schaub through his radio show on monday mornings a few times explained to us that he in fact could audible...What he didn't go into specifics about however was how much lattitude Kubiak gave him in audibling..in which case as we all suspected, was probably rather limited. In fact, most likely b/c the more you change the harder it is to keep all players on offense on the same page. It takes a **** ton of communication to be able to do it.
That's a coach that can talk the talk but could not walk the walk. Or, as they say in Texans, he was all hat and no cattle.You missed my point. I'm not saying that it should not be about T-E-A-M. I'm saying these are grown men. Going through the halls at NRG and removing player records, awards or whatever that was on the walls is amateurish. Why not remove their names from the jerseys too.
Just my opinion, it just seems silly and time could be spent on other more productive things like designing screen plays. The players are on social media, they see commercials, they are mentioned on ESPN and NFL network. These are grown men. Treat them like men, professionals.
Yep, this is why we can't have nice things.Another great thread has been derailed
We don't agree alot, but Devlin getting gone is one. Scharping has hustled backwards too.I didn't have a problem with the trade because if they would've drafted a LT they would've had to trade two 1sts to get up high enough to draft a LT that could start as a rookie and there would be no guarantee that the rookie would ever be as good as Tunsil already is. The contract is a result of getting a proven LT.
What I want to know is why Howard has regressed so badly. Devlin has to go. The OL has talent but is missing something and I think that something is the OL is thinking too much instead of thinking about kicking the guy across from them azz on a regular basis.
Tannehill didn't go to a relevant team. No more relevant than Houston anyway.Watson didn't get the opportunity to get traded to the Patriots, Bears, or any other relavent team.....
Relevancy these days is in the eye of the beholder.Tannehill didn't go to a relevant team. No more relevant than Houston anyway.
If anything they are relevant because of Tannehill.Relevancy these days is in the eye of the beholder.
Derek Henry finally started producing at the same time Tannehill arrived. The talent on the team got much better while Tannehill has been on board. Timing and getting the pieces to the puzzle are crucial......Texans, I believe they were dyslexic and never quite understood how to put a puzzle together.If anything they are relevant because of Tannehill.
I understand David Henry stirs the koolaid, but nobody was worried about the Titans before Tannehill.
Their offensive line got much better. That’s where it all starts. In the trenches.Derek Henry finally started producing at the same time Tannehill arrived. The talent on the team got much better while Tannehill has been on board. Timing and getting the pieces to the puzzle are crucial......Texans, I believe they were dyslexic and never quite understood how to put a puzzle together.