Definitely hold on to the romanticized notion about teams, though. I'm a bit jaded these days, so it's only my perspective. When I read about a guy turning down $23 million and griping about a $10 million/year franchise tag because of what he thinks he's worth, it just pulls back the layers to reveal the bones of industry beneath the entertainment aspect of it. So I do agree with your last take, as well. If he doesn't want to be here, then do what a good businessman does and get something of value for his worth on the market.
That does get me (and most other football fans). They moan as if being held to ransom when only being offered the kind of money that others would give their pinkies for. It is just greed. If a player had spent their whole career campaigning for charitable issues, and giving a whole heap of their salaries to good causes, then fine, yell all you want, but if you're looking for completing your set of classic Ferraris then you're just plain greedy, and should be damned thankful.
I hope so, too. But, when you study the great franchises of NFL history, there will always be players who appear selfish and not quite as commercially polished in the ranks. While I certainly respect the idea of getting a bunch of nice guys in the lockerroom, the point at the end of the day is winning. And with talent being the key, sometimes teams have to find the balancing act between serving high minded ideals like class with real world qualities like talent. These are not always inherent in the same package.
Fair point. At the end of the day, any team is going to be looking for a winning team. Although for me it boils down to two things. Firstly, do teams of over-paid, egocentric, greedy men, generally do well? And secondly, if they are that type of person, who the fans see no identity with, then how much pleasure, and gratification do you get from seeing them represent your city/team, regardless of whether they are 2-14, or Superbowl winners.
As the supporter of a soccer team who have in the past 8 or so years got a lot of money, and brought in a load of players who are 'all-that', I've found myself become more disenfranchised with the club, and if it weren't for 3 or 4 players who don't fit the me-first, egocentric mould, I would seriously question whether I could still follow such a team.
I guess the question that I end up asking myself, is would I rather see a team of Walter Peyton Men of the Year, perhaps not winning it all or being the best team, or seeing a team of Terrell Owens' bringing the team a more hollow glory... Obviously I hope that success and classiness aren't mutually exclusive, but if they are, then I think I'd take the respectable 'losers'.