SkinsHomer
Practice Squad
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
(ducks)
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Welcome to the board. Hope we are treating with some respect, as we would like the same.
On a non-football note, hows the weather going to be like over there? I guess it was eight years ago since we last played in DC, so I am unfamiliar with the conditions. Especially since its the late afternoon game.
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
My biggest beef with the Redskins fans that I saw over at the forum was the way they trashed the city of Houston and the state of Texas. Unbelievable ignorance.
I have a feeling we will be able to gash that line up and down. Funny they were so confident that Dallas's Dline was so special. I remember a few weeks ago Gus Johnson said we were making them look like "swiss cheese". I like the leadership this team posesses. If the Redskins offense plays like it did Sunday night, then I wont sweat this game.
I've been perusing their message boards. Generally most seem decent, but as is usually the case, there's always some asshats!
Saw a guy talking about (and completely ignorantly) about the Oilers leaving town. Another one arguing with GB about Cushing (again, not knowing what he was talking about).
In fact, didn't Tom Brady play the majority of that game? I remember he came out at one point, but they brought him back in, IIRC. I also remember Junior Seau and most of their defenses starters playing too.... Whatever!!! Oldskool is just a dolt talking out his ass.
LMFAO at one guy talking about the Texans coming by to look at their trophies. That's like Rocket fan trying to bag on Oklahoma City fan... What dumbasses!!
I am ready to pummel Washington. I am tired of hearing there over confidence after a win over a bad Cowboys team. Hey we smashed there line all through preseason. Im confident we can handle yours as well.
We will win oh, wait i am being overconfident nevermind.
The Redskins offense looked like ours last year without the QB accuracy. I saw quite a few plays that we ran last year. The Shannys will have to change their playcalling tendencies or hope that their team executes really well, because Kubiak knows both of them really well.
I felt like we did. We made mistakes in the first Titans game and rebounded. We made mistakes in the Jax games and rebounded even though we came up short. We made mistakes in the Patriots game and rebounded.
Who cares if Brady was in that game or not? Was he lined up at LB trying to stop Foster?
.
Ok, one more, then I'm goin to bed.
You guys are calling us dumbasses...what's the difference? Note, I said none of that. I'm not here to talk ****.
The first of many things that make me think you're the same exact type of homer that many of you are calling my boys on our board.
Who cares if Brady was in that game or not? Was he lined up at LB trying to stop Foster?
Not nice.
You mean "their" overconfidence right? That's what I thought, just checkin. A bad Cowboys team, right. They're overrated and played badly against us, I admit they didn't bring their A game, but they're not a bad team. For bad teams, see Tampa Bay.
I see what you did there. I'm glad you caught yourself though.
I'll be more than happy to resume this CONVERSATION tomorrow.
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
Ummmm, You are aware that the Texans tied for 10th against the run last season AND this after a horrible first 3 or 4 games that we got dinged hard, no??
Y'all were ranked 16th against the run. NFL.com Statistics Rushing Defense
I can't quite believe no one has caught this yet, but we were 30th in the run last year, but I believe we finished the year 13th against the run.
I think that our running game can continue to flourish, and I have no concerns about our run defense.
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
Welcome aboard. I thought you were making a lot of sense, and I was actually lulled into the impression that you were a true football fan, until I got to the bolded statements. You have very obviously not watched many Texans games, or know much about our team at all. Your 'skins have not faced a team with a dyanamic offense as ours since the triplett days.
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
Ok, my mistake, however the NFL measures offense in terms of yardage, not scoring. You can gain a lot of yards and come away with three or zero points depending on the defense you are going against. If you are pinned on your own 10 yard line, or 20 even, you can rack up a good 50 yards of offense on that drive and still come away with no points.
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
Like I said, I am talking about points, not how much yardage the Texans will rack up.
I believe a couple of years ago the Lions under Mike Martz made a dramatic improvement in their passing offense according to yardage, but it didn't translate into many points or wins.
And in comes the running game. Thats been the missing link for 3rd and shorts, extending drives, and efficiency in the redzone.
Last week it was all run. The passing game was out of sync. I am anxious to see both parts come together. It could be downright scary.
Ok, my mistake, however the NFL measures offense in terms of yardage, not scoring. You can gain a lot of yards and come away with three or zero points depending on the defense you are going against. If you are pinned on your own 10 yard line, or 20 even, you can rack up a good 50 yards of offense on that drive and still come away with no points.
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
Like I said, I am talking about points, not how much yardage the Texans will rack up.
I believe a couple of years ago the Lions under Mike Martz made a dramatic improvement in their passing offense according to yardage, but it didn't translate into many points or wins.
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
Ok, my mistake, however the NFL measures offense in terms of yardage, not scoring. You can gain a lot of yards and come away with three or zero points depending on the defense you are going against. If you are pinned on your own 10 yard line, or 20 even, you can rack up a good 50 yards of offense on that drive and still come away with no points.
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
Like I said, I am talking about points, not how much yardage the Texans will rack up.
I believe a couple of years ago the Lions under Mike Martz made a dramatic improvement in their passing offense according to yardage, but it didn't translate into many points or wins.
Ok, my mistake, however the NFL measures offense in terms of yardage, not scoring. You can gain a lot of yards and come away with three or zero points depending on the defense you are going against. If you are pinned on your own 10 yard line, or 20 even, you can rack up a good 50 yards of offense on that drive and still come away with no points.
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
Like I said, I am talking about points, not how much yardage the Texans will rack up.
I believe a couple of years ago the Lions under Mike Martz made a dramatic improvement in their passing offense according to yardage, but it didn't translate into many points or wins.
Ok, my mistake, however the NFL measures offense in terms of yardage, not scoring. You can gain a lot of yards and come away with three or zero points depending on the defense you are going against. If you are pinned on your own 10 yard line, or 20 even, you can rack up a good 50 yards of offense on that drive and still come away with no points.
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
The Cowboys played horrible, sure, but you would have to credit the Redskins defense.
Coming into this season the Cowboys have had one of the most explosive offenses over the past few seasons.
They have "played bad" and still put up 21 points on teams with lesser defense.
There is a reason the Cowboys could not hit on big plays downfield, with the exception of their final drive and the big pass to Miles Austin.
Andre Johnson is a better WR then anyone on the Cowboys roster could ever hope to be, I'll give you guys that, but I am sure much of the focus of our secondary will be covering him with help from a safety over the top, to take away big play potential. He will probably still have a decent game, as most elite WRs still beat double coverage at times.
As far as Foster. To me the effectiveness of the running game is also going to come down to what the score is in the second half of the game. If the Texans are up, they will use Foster to try and wear down the Skins, set up for playaction. However if the game is tied or the Texans are behind, they will do what any other team would do and abandon the running game altogether.
To me, the biggest X factor in this game is the 'Skins offense. When you have a new coordinator and new QB, there are going to be struggles, but also there will be times where things seem to get on track ahead of time.
If the 'Skins can score 21-24 points on Sunday, I think they will win.
The Texans have a decent offense, but it is not a powerhouse. The 'Skins defense over the past few seasons has held better offenses to under 21 points, but the 'Skins offense was so horrible they could barely muster 17 points themselves.
As a 'Skins fan, I am not worried about our defense, I think we can handle or at least keep the damage to a minimum. It comes down to our offense and if we can put the ball in the endzone three times.
We were 10th in scoring without a running game. That lack of a running game hurt us in the Red Zone. We've got a running game this year.
We scored 24.2 points a game last year. The Cowboys scored 22.6 points a game last year. And the Redskins scored 16.6 points a game last year.
We will be scoring more than that this year.
Really, though. The Texans need to put a series of games together like
the Colts game, before people will take them seriously. Washington is
JUST the type of game they'd come out lax in, because of the
homecoming-like emotion the team exuded in game one. Does this
team have the mental fortitude to kick ass EVERY WEEK?
I don't know that it will be a question of being lax. We weren't lax against NYJets last year, we just got our butts whipped.
Washington was doing some pretty "innovative" things on defense Sunday night, with a seasoned group of guys. & our passing game isn't in sync.
Say, that reminds me. McNabb kicked our ass 4 years ago. Mario & Demeco both were on that team. Granted Mario has more help this time around, but McNabb is quite capable of putting up 400 yards on our defense.
It's not that I think we can't beat them. Just that it's going to take more than just effort.
I don't know that it will be a question of being lax. We weren't lax against NYJets last year, we just got our butts whipped.
Washington was doing some pretty "innovative" things on defense Sunday night, with a seasoned group of guys. & our passing game isn't in sync.
Say, that reminds me. McNabb kicked our ass 4 years ago. Mario & Demeco both were on that team. Granted Mario has more help this time around, but McNabb is quite capable of putting up 400 yards on our defense.
It's not that I think we can't beat them. Just that it's going to take more than just effort.
GB.... While I didn't sign on to the skins boards, you should know that I had your back on this board!!!! What asshats over there my brother!!
You handled yourself really well!!!!!!!!!!!! REP if I could!!!!!!!!!
Thanks man! It's been a interesting reading what they think of us over there. I think the euphoria of the Cowboys win has settled and more realistic predictions have started coming in. I just don't see how Washington beats us, unless we play down to their level. The Texans have more talent at just about every position over Washington.
How long did it take you to get on the board? I registered this morning still can't post. (I did the email confirmation)
Mike
I believe Houston was #11 in Scoring offense in 2009. Am I off there too?
Like I said, I am talking about points, not how much yardage the Texans will rack up.
For a team that was 30th against the run last year, you guys are banking a lot on a guy who has had one great game.
(ducks)
Ummmm, You are aware that the Texans tied for 10th against the run last season AND this after a horrible first 3 or 4 games that we got dinged hard, no??
Y'all were ranked 16th against the run. NFL.com Statistics Rushing Defense
I can't quite believe no one has caught this yet, but we were 30th in the run last year, but I believe we finished the year 13th against the run.
I think that our running game can continue to flourish, and I have no concerns about our run defense.
You drunk sumbitch!!
See my post about us against the run, we tied for 10th against the run.........
We finished at 13th in TOTAL defense.
And again, this was after a horrible first three or four games!
*EDIT*
No fun without SkinsHomer!
I'll say this. I'm weary of Matt Schaub's confidence going into this game. A) Because of the somewhat dismal outting he had last week (He didn't need to be awesome though) but B) Albert Haynesworth showing his face to Schaub again.
I'm hearing how great Meyers did and he did do a good job in our last game but he will not have to face Albert Haynesworth. He alone is going to draw a double team.
Then you got Orakpo who is pretty darned good. After that Deangelo Hall, Carlos Rogers are very good CBs.
The only thing we got working for us is the fact that they have to spend time preparing for Foster and we don't know if Foster can put two solid games together.
Defensively I think they match up well with our DEs. I think our secondary can cover their WR though and that might be where we can win this game but if Okoye can't hold up the middle, Portis has been able to kill us in years past.
I don't like this game. I'd say it feels like a trap, but it's only a trap game if the team you're going against really sucks. And while the Redskins didn't exactly impress last week, they have experienced talent who have had success against us in the past. Haynesworth knocked Schaub out in the not-so-distant past. Myers doesn't do so good against great big DTs like Fat Albert. Do you recall that McNabb put up 300+ yds and 3 TDs against us when last we saw him - did I mention he did that HERE?
Do you recall that McNabb put up 300+ yds and 3 TDs against us when last we saw him - did I mention he did that HERE?