A long and detailed piece, but quite interesting.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
NFL Players With Long Hair Could Be in for a World of Pain
A recent study says football players should know the risks of a flowing mane.
By
Nadra Nittle Feb 1, 2018, 9:32am EST
Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.
Tune into any NFL game and it’s impossible to miss the Samson trend. Scores of players now have long hair. It’s like the jocks all became hippies, or
Rastafarians, or something like that. In fact, this year’s two Super Bowl teams — the Philadelphia Eagles and the New England Patriots — have a dozen players between them with long, or longish, hair. These men boast dreadlocks and flowing manes that would put a Disney princess to shame. Since the aughts, football players have landed deals with haircare brands like
Head & Shoulders or even
insured their precious curls with Lloyd’s of London’s backing.
But a recent
Sport Journal study called “
Analyzing Hair Pulling in Athletics” urges football players not to skip their next cut. Study author Laura Ruhala, associate professor of mechanical engineering at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, argues that long-haired players are vulnerable to catastrophic neck injuries because the NFL permits hair pulling to make a tackle. It gives the colloquialism “snatching wigs” an entirely new, and troubling, spin.
“I’m really concerned there’s going to be a serious injury,” Ruhala says. “It doesn’t mean it won’t happen just because it hasn’t happened yet. I’m really concerned somebody’s going to end up with a broken neck because you can have twisting around several different axes — chin up and down, chin right and left, clockwise and counterclockwise.”
Like what you're reading?
Get Racked's twice-weekly newsletter.
SIGN UP
For years, the NFL refrained from making any rules about hair. But in 2003, it enacted the “Ricky Rule,” which deemed hair part of an athlete’s uniform. This gave players the green light to grab an opponent’s hair to pull him down. The rule’s namesake, Ricky Williams, is a former NFL tailback who has the dubious distinction of being tackled by his dreads twice in one game. Poor thing. Three years later, then-Pittsburgh Steeler safety Troy Polamalu was
famously dragged by his ringlets.
Perhaps Polamalu’s pride, or his
Head & Shoulders deal, was talking, but afterward he denied the tackle caused him pain.
“No, it didn’t hurt,”
he insisted. “It felt good.”
Polamalu’s takedown prompted
Orlando Sentinel sports columnist David Whitley to
write about the dangers of long hair in the NFL. Today, the sportswriter still has concerns.
“In the NFL, they are overly persnickety about rules,” he says. “Guys are getting fined for the most nitpicky things.” In his column, he pointed out that the league even regulates sock length. Hair, however, is a completely different animal.
“I could see why that could be dicey,” Whitley says of the NFL regulating length. “It’s [the players’] contention that long hair is an expression of culture. There’s a lot of cultural identity that goes with this. So regulating hair would be venturing on politically incorrect territory a little bit.”
Pacific Islanders, like Polamalu, have long hair because it’s part of their heritage. What’s more, African Americans have increasingly embraced their natural hair, including dreadlocks, over the past two decades. In 2008, the league did consider banning hair so long that it concealed the the names on jerseys, but after outcry from athletes, it walked back the idea. Since then, a number of players, including
Andre Ellington,
Richard Sherman, and
Marshawn Lynch, have had their hair whipped back and forth, to paraphrase, um, Willow Smith. While Richard Sherman’s opponent just pulled his hair, Ellington and Lynch actually lost locs as they were tackled. Lynch coolly shrugged it off, retrieving his hair and tucking it into his waistband as if he’d simply dropped his cell phone and not had his hair ripped from the roots.
As recently as September, the ombre dreadlocks of Jay Ajayi, the Philadelphia running back headed Sunday to Super Bowl 52, inspired a controversial call. When Los Angeles Charger Joey Bosa pulled them, officials accused him of committing a
horse collar tackle, a no-go in the league. “For a horse collar tackle you’ve got to grab inside the collar of either the jersey or the shoulder pad or on the nameplate and pull the runner toward the ground,” explained
Fox Sports rules analyst Dean Blandino, who objected to the foul call against Bosa. Blandino cited the Ricky Rule, arguing that Bosa had actually pulled Ajayi’s locs, a perfectly legal, albeit controversial, maneuver.
According to Ruhala’s study, which analyzed 2015 NFL data, 14 percent of the 2,905 athletes on team rosters had hair long enough to activate the Ricky Rule. A slight majority of such players, 54 percent, played defense, while 44 percent played offense. Ruhala says it’s plain risky for offensive players to grow out their cuts since their hair could be used to tackle them, and more than 500 pounds of force could be applied to their necks during the takedown. The stakes here are much higher than a bald patch. Hair tackles could result in “high shear and compressive stresses in the neck, as well as neck torsion, that could cause severe and life-changing injuries” the study posits.
Despite these dangers, not everyone is sounding the alarm about the Ricky Rule. John A. Torres, a former
Florida Today sports columnist and author of more than 40
sports books for children, says the NFL shouldn’t prohibit hair tackles. He argues that football players, even at the college level, try to gain every advantage they can.
“Wide receivers will often wear jerseys that look painted on,” he says. “Why so tight? Because they don’t want defenders grabbing their jerseys as they run their routes and try to get open. Why do that and then allow long flowing hair or braids to be exposed?”
He also points out how difficult it is to make a tackle. Players may not be able to avoid the hair.
“It is very difficult to let go of a jersey, face mask, leg, arm, or even a handful of hair.”
“It is very difficult to let go of a jersey, face mask, leg, arm, or even a handful of hair,” he says. “Your instinct is to grab and pull down and make the tackle. It is unfair to ask defensive players to let go.”
Torres recommends that long-haired players tuck their hair into their uniforms to prevent it from being exposed.
How players wear their long hair matters — and not just for aesthetic reasons. Ruhala’s research found that 74 percent of long-haired players in 2015 had dreadlocks, and 24 percent had free-flowing hair.
“The knotting of the dreads makes the hair weaker, like when you knot a rope, because there’s all of these stress concentrations,” Ruhala says. “But dreads are actually safer because if the hair breaks, the force is not transmitted to the skull and neck. The dreadlocks are safer than the free-flowing hair.”
THE REST OF THE STORY
