Did I say that you were condoning sexual assault? No, I did not. What I can show is the post quoted above where you say that because none of these women filed a criminal complaint at the time of the alleged assault and that they have only come forward as part of these civil lawsuits, you are not inclined to believe them.
First, you have already been provided real world, confirmed and easily Googled data that the vast majority of women do not report sexual assault at the time that it happens. Not to be Captain Obvious, but this is why we have Statute of Limitation laws.
Second, the civil lawsuit is the preferred path for many dealing with a "he said/she said" case involving rich men with strong connections to local leaders.
Third, why do you think my first two points happen? Because many times they can't even get the authorities to open a case, they are intimidated to not pursue or (much like what you are doing) their character is impugned beyond recognition in a very public way.
So no, I don't believe all women, but I am compelled to listen to them honestly and openly. Because I have a single daughter living in another city. Heaven forbid anything ever happen to her, but if it did I would want her to be able to tell her story to the proper authorities and not have to defend what she was wearing, how much she was drinking, what did she say to lead him on, or any other version of "she had it coming to her" excuse from a bunch of men like you before they would even file the complaint or have it dismissed.
You on the other hand have already rapped the gavel in your own court of opinion and determined on nothing other than egregious and debunked assumptions that these women are not to be believed.