Frills said:
The fact remains UT had to switch to the spread offense cause VY couldn't stop throwing INTs when it was a pro-style. He didn't have to adjust it due to physical ability...6 or 16, it doesn't matter.
Football smarts are NOT take snap look downfield 2 secs, take off since noone can catch you. In the NFL he will be hit/caught/punished.
Done with the subject till may
Yeah, cause Major Applewhite (collegiate offensive coordinator) and Chris Simms (NFL starting QB) had no problems with not throwing INTs in that offense. Oh wait...
Applewhite:
1998 - 11 INTs (273 attempts)
1999 - 9 INTs (427 attempts)
2000 - 7 INTs (279 attempts)
Simms:
1998 - 1 INT (36 attempts)
1999 - 7 INTs (117 attempts)
2000 - 11 INTs (362 attempts)
2001 - 12 INTs (396 attempts)
The one year Vince Young ran that offense he was a redshirt freshman. He had 7 INTs in 143 attempts. That's a better rate than Applewhite's and Simms' sophmore seasons in the same offense.
Apparently this change in offenses came after the Oklahoma game. After being put in a "simplified spread" offense, Vince threw 4 TDs to 9 INTs to finish out the '04 season. In the 4 games leading up to the Oklahoma game (before the offense was changed and it was still "pro-style"), Vince had 8 TDs to 2 INTs.
In other words, Vince's numbers as a redshirt freshman and sophmore looked like this while running the pro-style offense at Texas:
135 of 224 (60.3%), 1,808 yards, 14 TDs, 9 INTs
They didn't "have" to switch because Vince couldn't run the other offense. They made the switch because that offense wasn't taking advantage of Young's abilities...not his lack of abilities. And after losing one game (right before the offense was changed) in the last two years, who would be dumb enough to argue with the results?
Probably a good thing you're done with the subject.