False Start
On # 69
I'm telling you dudes, he's Miami bound.
I'll bet 1000 theoretical reps on it.
Lets hope he doesn't go full on DB and pull this...


Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I'm telling you dudes, he's Miami bound.
I'll bet 1000 theoretical reps on it.
I love how talking heads try a justify why Manning wouldn't be a good fit in Houston because he doesn't roll out and use play action...
THEN they roll video footage of Manning... DOING EXACTLY WHAT THEY SAY HE CAN'T DO! About 5-6 clips were play action and 2 were him rolling out.
People are telling me Matt Schaub can do something Peyton Manning can't is very, very hard to believe.
the ONLY 2 reason this will not happen is...
1: Kubiak's ego will never let Manning's ego run the offense
2: money
otherwise Manning should already be signed, in a Texans uniform and Schaub traded. I would MUCH rather Yates or whom ever the future is, learning under one of the best QB in the history of the NFL rather a mediocre noodle arm that can barely stay healthy...
BUT that's just me...
Wow, I couldn't have said it any better.
I think it can send a positive message to a team in need of a QB and a leader. To a team with a QB and leader, it sends a message that now matter how much you put yourself on the line for the team, you can be replaced by the next bigger, better deal.
You know that McNair's not going after Manning. Seems like you're setting up an opportunity to criticize McNair.
Yes, you could have.
Manning is a savant at play-action, but not since the mid 2000's has he really been able to throw on the run effectively.
And that "noodle-arm, oft-injured" QB you speak of is top 5 in downfield passer rating (20+ yard passes) and also has started more games in the last 5 years than Andre Johnson. (64 vs 63) You ready to trade 'Dre away, too?
No, I definitely would not trade away Andre Johnson. I think the Texans should at least make an attempt to woo Peyton Manning and Reggie Wayne to Houston. Our offense with Matt Schaub is good but not great. Think of how many red zone drives ended with Neil Rackers field goals. Also, Matt Schaub isn't really good under pressure situations like the 2 minute drill. Think back to last year's game vs. Oakland.
The Texans have a prime opportunity to turn their offense to one of the best in the league with Arian Foster, Peyton Manning, Reggie Wayne, and Andre Johnson. It's hard to see that team, if healthy, not winning the AFC championship and making a Super Bowl appearance this season.
Good but not great?
You mean top 3/top 5 on a consistent basis isn't "great"??
Remember 2009? No running game, tons of field goals? How is that Matt's fault?
Not good under pressure? I beg to differ.
Our offense is great when running the ball well.
We were 4th in total offense in 2009 with one of the worst running games in the entire NFL.
Good but not great?
You mean top 3/top 5 on a consistent basis isn't "great"??
Remember 2009? No running game, tons of field goals? How is that Matt's fault?
Not good under pressure? I beg to differ.
Fgs in the redx zone are a direct effect of qb play. Redzone production is tracked and falls upon the qb unless you have a good running game. Schaub has had a better running game than peyton every yr he's been in houston,yet the colts have outscored houston every yr especially in the redzone.
Comparing what schaub has had and his lack of success and comparing that to peyton in the same light doesn't even stack up. Teams don't gameplan to play keep away with matt schaub. Miami had the ball for all but 14mins and still lost. Peyton and the colts always lead the league in fewest possession,yet they are always top 5. Why is that? Peyton Manning. He is a huge upgrade to schaub and I'm being conservitive.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think you're right.
For the record, I'm against bringing Manning to Houston in this particular situation. I think the Texans should talk about, and I'm sure they have, and say no.
I don't think anyone is trying to compare Manning at 100% and Schaub at 100% at the same age. That comparison would be ridiculous and would not be anywhere close to being in Schaub's favor or even to being even.
But what we're comparing is a 35 yo Manning coming off 4 neck surgeries to 30 yo Schaub coming off a foot injury. To me, there is just too much risk with Manning.
Fgs in the redx zone are a direct effect of qb play. Redzone production is tracked and falls upon the qb unless you have a good running game. Schaub has had a better running game than peyton every yr he's been in houston,yet the colts have outscored houston every yr especially in the redzone.
2007
18 Indianapolis Colts 16 28.1 450 446 27.9 1,706 3.8 106.6 19 23 119 26.7 4 0 1
22 Houston Texans 16 23.7 379 417 26.1 1,586 3.8 99.1 12 41 96 23.0 7 1 4
theory destroyed.
hurray for common sense.
I think that if Manning wasn't a huge health risk, the Colts would have happily paid him.
1. Manning, not Luck, gives them the best chance to win the AFC South and possibly make another Super Bowl appearance (especially since Eli has more rings than he does)
2. Who better to teach the youngster Luck the tricks of the QB trade than, as some of you say, "the best QB in the history of the NFL" (I don't think so, BTW)
3. The Colts' offense is built around Manning, so why not put him back where he belongs?? If you don't, it's total rebuild city.
Those three things are well worth the signing bonus.
....oh wait, Irsay distinctly said, "it's not about the money"
So if the Colts don't want him, neither do I.
Chris Mortensen ‏ @mortreport Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Even though #Texans have not jumped in and reportedly won't, they likely would be the heavy favorite if they expressed interest. #NFL32
3m Chris Mortensen ‏ @mortreport Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Manning's trip not a negotiation; does not reflect Broncos as 1st choice, per sources. It's Manning research. Other trips planned. #NFL32
10m Adam Schefter ‏ @AdamSchefter Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Peyton Manning's trip west to Denver is expected to include other visits, such as the Arizona Cardinals, @mortreport and I are told.
Originally Posted by leebigeztx
Schaub has had a better running game than peyton every yr he's been in houston,yet the colts have outscored houston every yr especially in the redzone.
2007
18 Indianapolis Colts 16 28.1 450 446 27.9 1,706 3.8 106.6 19 23 119 26.7 4 0 1
22 Houston Texans 16 23.7 379 417 26.1 1,586 3.8 99.1 12 41 96 23.0 7 1 4
theory destroyed.
But what we're comparing is a 35 yo Manning coming off 4 neck surgeries to 30 yo Schaub coming off a foot injury. To me, there is just too much risk with Manning.
The Skins would give us quite a haul for Schaub
Manning has been medically cleared to play,his neck is completely structurally healed, and he has been seen throwing again with velocity and accuracy (only questioned that had remained). Schaub has not been cleared to play, and may or may not ever be. I go with option 1.
Manning has been medically cleared to play, his neck is completely structurally healed, and he has been seen throwing again with velocity and accuracy (only questioned that had remained). Schaub has not been cleared to play, and may or may not ever be. I go with option 1.
skins could find a much better package trying to move up or standing pat at #6.
three of the teams infront of them have recently invested high picks on qbs and they could find themselves in a position to select RG3/Tannahill. the rams have decided to trade out of the #2 so theres washingtons chance to grab their qb there...
lets face the facts here with schaub, he wont get anywhere near the return people think hes worth.. 1 year left on his deal, his potential ready date is a bit sketchy, coming off an injury with a low success rate. all those things add up to him just being released to clear cap if they decide to go in another direction...
Trade doesn't have to (and most likely wouldn't) involve the Redskins 1st rounder this year.
Since, you know, the only reason they'd want to trade up is for a QB... and they'd be getting one in Schaub.
The biggest question about Manning that STILL remains is whether nerve regeneration in his neck had even started
How are they going to get a "better package" by trading up? In that situation, you trade away assets to move up... you do not receive them.
The whole point is that the Redskins *like* Schaub, which we have many reasons to believe is true. They're not in the market for a QB to draft in this scenario. Shannahan wants to and needs to win *now*, and I'm guessing he trusts a Kubiak groomed QB over a rookie to save his career any day.
More baseless bullcrap with zero support to back it up.
youre putting way too much stock in schaub... RG3 or Tannehill are right there for the skins taking.. Rams want to trade out, could open the door for the skins.. hell even flynn will be on the market. theres still a ton of questions about schaubs recovery that wont be answered until TC... RG3 sounds a lot more enticing than schaub...
"better package" as in
RG3>>>>Schaub
baseless bullcrap.. sure ignore the facts about schaubs injury..
The facts?
"Stable Lisfranc injuries that do not require surgery may cause an athlete to miss 2 months or more of their season. However, most athletes are able to successfully return at some point. Those injuries that are unstable, and require surgical repair, are serious injuries that almost always cause the injured athlete to miss the remainder of their season. It is also not uncommon for a high level athlete to not be able to return to the same level of athletic performance even in following seasons. Two well-known examples are Eric Rhett and Duce Staley both of whom had surgery for a serious Lisfranc injury and never successfully returned to their pre-injury form."
he'll be ready by may because kubiak says so.. if blind hope is your thing i see why youre so high on schaub...
Speaking of blind faith. You're willing to believe Peyton Manning's personal doctor's "cleared to play" recommendation without any kind of independent or team verification. You're also willing to believe reports that he was seen throwing with "velocity and accuracy" without corroboration. So, don't talk about having blind faith. You've clearly got an agenda against Schaub, so much so that you're even arguing against his trade value, despite the fact you obviously want to get rid of him no matter what happens.
I guess we can say goodbye to Schaub's career as a runningback then.
![]()
Wow, Oliver Stone is that you. Everything is huge conspiracy to this guy.
Only about 4% of cervical spine injuries in the NFL are suffered by QBs. When a QB expects to be sacked, he usually takes a fetal like position, with his head tucked in. Any trauma, accidental or not, to the top of his head by a defensive player is enough to create a herniation of a cervical disc. Once it occurs once, it becomes more vulnerable to lesser trauma. If one level is treated, it can put more stress on the adjacent disc. It can act as a domino effect. If Manning had his 2nd non-invasive procedure on the same segment, he can probably expect to go on to an open cervical fusion procedure (ala Slaton) sometime in the future........especially if he sustains further trauma to the area.
![]()
http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86913&highlight=shaub&page=30Following the anticipated surgery, screws will be left in place 3-6 months, during which time he cannot weight bear at all. Then probably another 3-6 more months to adequately rehab.
After that, taking for granted that the actual surgery was successful, there can be residual stiffness of the foot and at least 50% develop arthritis with accompanying chronic pain. The degree of severity of the aforementioned essentially dictates the long-term effects on performance. As I have mentioned, performance deficits would more likely to be noticed in players that require a great deal of push off against resistance and those likely to require landing forcefully on the ball of the foot. Of all the positions, it seems likely that the QB position would be one of the least affected. If there is a problem with a QB, it would likely be in an affected plant foot (as is the case of Schaub), where the strength and accuracy of a throw can be significantly impacted.
Schaub has a very good chance of coming back, but only time will tell us if he will end up in the fortunate group that is little affected, or if his long-term performance takes somewhat of a downturn.
Just because the Colts don't want him back doesn't mean Manning isn't still an elite QB. True enough he is in the twilight years of his career, but I think he still has it in him to win at least 1 more Super Bowl before he retires. Why can't that be with the Texans? The Colts are letting Manning go because they are willing to do something the Texans management have never really done - TAKE RISKS. The Colts realize that Luck may be one of the future elite QB of the NFL and are willing to let their franchise QB so that they can start to build around him. The Texans are happy to play it safe, make minor adjustments while everyone around them is getting better by doing all they can to make their team the best it can possibly be.
I just get so frustrated with the way this team is ran. How could they not even consider getting Manning. Unbelievable!
Here's the thing....... We'd be taking a chance with either Schaub or Manning at QB because no one really knows how healthy either of these guys is truly going to be this year. It's a roll of the dice no matter how you look at it.