infantrycak
Hall of Fame
Franchise QBs are no guarantee of a Superbowl and it doesn't take a franchise QB to win a Superbowl.
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Franchise QBs are no guarantee of a Superbowl and it doesn't take a franchise QB to win a Superbowl.
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
I suspect that if either Winston or Mariota are there at 16, we'll take them even with their high risk of being busts. But I suspect they will not be there. But you don't ignore other great players and reach for a QB which is what many are suggesting. We are not in desperate need of QBs. We have several capable of managing this team and most have upside potential. And we get no more if we reach for a lessor QB with our first pick.
I think you'd have to define a franchise QB then. I wouldn't consider Eli a franchise QB. Maybe not Wilson even.
Well the Ravens disagree and the Seahawks are about to.
But to me a franchise QB is exactly what it sounds like - once you've got him, the position is set and the franchise stops looking. Eli and Wilson both qualify on that standard. All have been the undisputed starter since getting their gig. Doesn't have to be elite, that's why we have a separate elite QB category.
Not sure why the Ravens think Eli is franchise
I get your point tho, and I guess the Giants figure they got their guy and are set so yeah you could be right. Franchise is not the same as elite
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
Russell Wilson was a 4th round pick and backup going into the season
Eli, Wilson and Flacco are not elite.
3rd round but so what? He's clearly a franchise guy.
That wasn't the assertion.
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
Really? Name the last non-franchise guy to win one.
I'd say you have to go all the way back to Brad Johnson.
Russell Wilson. I don't have to go back further than last year.
I remember I thought the same of Tom Brady his first five years in the league. Three Super Bowls didn't mean much to me, he wasn't much of a "QB" & I thought the comparisons to Manning were just plain silly.
There's no guarantee that Russell will develop the way Brady has, but he's off to a really good start.
He can be successful as long as he is surrounded by a great team. And that's my point. The team consists of more than the QB. Great QBs can take an average team far on occasion, but even the best QB's can't do it with a bad team or consistently with an average team.
Sub in Fitz and Seattle goes nowhere the last 4 years.
This game manager thing has become a mindlessly repeated meme about Wilson. That franchise is about to give him a contract making it absolutely clear he's their franchise QB.
Dude orchestrated an historic playoff comeback yesterday with perfectly placed touch passes and this drivel continues.
Sub in Fitz and Seattle goes nowhere the last 4 years.
This game manager thing has become a mindlessly repeated meme about Wilson. That franchise is about to give him a contract making it absolutely clear he's their franchise QB.
Dude orchestrated an historic playoff comeback yesterday with perfectly placed touch passes and this drivel continues.
Does he get credit for the comeback when it's the 4 INTs that got them in that whole mess? He looked horrible for the vast majority of that game.
I didn't like the INT in the endzone, he should have got that ball ahead of his receiver when the DB was trailing. He also shouldn't have chucked the ball into double coverage.
The other two INTs that popped off his receiver's hands shouldn't be on him.
He wasn't great, before the final 5 minutes of the game, but he wasn't "horrible" either.
& it's not like Andrew Luck doesn't put his team in bad positions, then becomes the hero at the end of the game either.
You'd be foolish not to want Russell Wilson on your team.
Never said I wouldn't want him on our team. I only questioned if he gets credit for this comeback. He was off the entire game but he made two of the most beautiful passes you'll ever see.
But yeah, he was pretty horrible the rest of that game, except when it counted most. Constantly throwing into double and triple coverage. Not making more than one read. (I'm sure there's more than a few pages of us complaining about our QBs doing the same this year) But he did deliver when his team needed him most. No doubt about that.
So I guess Aaron Rodgers was horrible in the second half when his team couldn't manage more than a field goal.
So I guess Aaron Rodgers was horrible in the second half when his team couldn't manage more than a field goal.
Does he get credit for the comeback when it's the 4 INTs that got them in that whole mess? He looked horrible for the vast majority of that game.
But he did deliver when his team needed him most. No doubt about that.
I contend you're just wrong. Put Fitz in there and the result would have been the same.
Are you honestly saying Wilson wasn't terrible before the last five minutes of the game? He completed one pass to his team in the first half and only had 75 yards passing with five minutes remaining in the game. He was terrible. It was the worst game of his career.
So I guess Aaron Rodgers was horrible in the second half when his team couldn't manage more than a field goal.
Are you honestly saying Wilson wasn't terrible before the last five minutes of the game? He completed one pass to his team in the first half and only had 75 yards passing with five minutes remaining in the game. He was terrible. It was the worst game of his career.
I'm just trying to define "horrible"
For the entire game, Aaron Rodgers threw the ball 34 times for 178 yards.
Russell Wilson threw the ball 29 times for 209 yards.
You answered your own question.
When it came down to must perform, he did. Every QB makes mistakes. Some can recover and some can't. He makes few mistakes overall and has a long track record now of performing to bring his team back to win from behind whether due to his own mistakes or others'.
LOL, LOL, LOL, LOL, LOL
Dude has led the league in game winning drives two of his three seasons and was 2nd the 3rd. In twice as many starts Fitz has just over half as many GWDs. Fitz is anti-clutch.
Thing is games aren't 55 minutes long.
But you're right, it was the worst game of his career - and he still got a playoff win.
Agreed.I didn't like the INT in the endzone, he should have got that ball ahead of his receiver when the DB was trailing. He also shouldn't have chucked the ball into double coverage.
The other two INTs that popped off his receiver's hands shouldn't be on him.
He wasn't great, before the final 5 minutes of the game, but he wasn't "horrible" either.
He got a playoff win? No his team got a playoff win.
He stunk in that game and no matter what you say he's not, never has been and will never be a QB that can carry a team on his back.
He is not an elite QB.
It took a dominating Lynch and onside kick to win that game. Not a hero QB.
Stat of the morning -- Russell Wilson passer rating:
First 55 minutes 7.0
Last 9 minutes 158.3
Remember "The Catch"; Joe Montana to Dwight Clark? Everyone remembers that drive and that throw as classic. It started the Niners' dynasty. But nobody remembers that Montana turned the ball over four times (three picks and a fumble) that day. Winning the T/O battle 6-3, the Cowboys should have killed them.
Sub in Fitz and Seattle goes nowhere the last 4 years.
This game manager thing has become a mindlessly repeated meme about Wilson. That franchise is about to give him a contract making it absolutely clear he's their franchise QB.
Dude orchestrated an historic playoff comeback yesterday with perfectly placed touch passes and this drivel continues.
Thing is games aren't 55 minutes long.
But you're right, it was the worst game of his career - and he still got a playoff win.
I'm not knocking Russell Wilson at all. I would take him as our QB in a heartbeat. Wilson was clutch yesterday at the end of the game. I'm not denying that. I'm just saying he was horrible the first 56 minutes of the game.
I wanted the Packers to win but I guess Russell Wilson just ended up managing the sh*t out of the end of the game. #Notjustagamemanager
Sub in Fitz and Seattle goes nowhere the last 4 years.
This game manager thing has become a mindlessly repeated meme about Wilson. That franchise is about to give him a contract making it absolutely clear he's their franchise QB.
Dude orchestrated an historic playoff comeback yesterday with perfectly placed touch passes and this drivel continues.
Agreed.
At least two of those picks hit the WR dead in the hands. He couldn't have placed them any better.
Remember "The Catch"; Joe Montana to Dwight Clark? Everyone remembers that drive and that throw as classic. It started the Niners' dynasty. But nobody remembers that Montana turned the ball over four times (three picks and a fumble) that day. Winning the T/O battle 6-3, the Cowboys should have killed them.
It's what you do at crunch time, baby. And Montana came through.
Aaron Rodgers got the ball back with 3 timeouts and 1:25 (or something like that) on the clock when his crunch time came. All he could muster was a FG.
You tell me, which guy "answered the bell", Rodgers or Wilson?
Excellent example with Montana. MSR. I was going to use the same example. Most folks do not remember any of those four turnovers by Montana, but The Catch is celebrated every year.
It's not how you start that really matters, but how you finish.
IIRC, Montana was throwing that ball away and Clark just made an awesome catch out of it
IIRC, Montana was throwing that ball away and Clark just made an awesome catch out of it
lol! Except Bill Walsh, Dwight Clark, and several other 49ers have said that it was a play they practiced all the time.
lol! Except Bill Walsh, Dwight Clark, and several other 49ers have said that it was a play they practiced all the time.
This is a thread about Clowney right?
It was definitely a play they practiced, but that doesn't answer the question. Walsh also said he thought Montana was throwing it away and started to call another play.
I get that, but I figure the rest of Joe Cool's career pretty much confirmed that you could argue a case for it. It wasn't like that was the only clutch moment for Montana, all things considered.
Either way, that's what makes the NFL so great. Moments like that one on a big stage, where inches and seconds are so important. We are still chatting about one play 33 years later.
This is a thread about Clowney right?
That's true of every football game ever.
He has too many times for this to be an assertion anymore. Not even worth arguing.
Nice strawman. Haven't ever said he is.
Shear stupidity - IT TOOK ALL THREE. Without QB heroics they lose.
Damn I was going to use that exact example and chickened out not wanting to face the moronic replies of "Wilson shouldn't be in the same sentence with Montana."
IIRC, Montana was throwing that ball away and Clark just made an awesome catch out of it
lol! Except Bill Walsh, Dwight Clark, and several other 49ers have said that it was a play they practiced all the time.
This is a thread about Clowney right?