Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
so will take him over sanchez, big ben, brady, flacco, brees, rodgers etc
so will take him over sanchez, big ben, brady, flacco, brees, rodgers etc
I don't think anyone is saying he sucks.. but, c'mon, let's be real here. Long term analysis, this guy will not win us a superbowl, unless our D starts playing like the 2000 Ravens team. The dude is way too inconsistent, hot and cold, jekyll and hyde
We need a actual franchise QB, if we are ever going to take that step to get our team where we want them to be
If the team can't see that Schaub is a loser by now then they deserve what they get. They can cut him loose now and get started with the rebuild or they can give him 4 more years and wallow in mediocrity for those four years then start the rebuild.
I cannot think of a single quarterback out there that I wouldn't rather have.
To have the talent he has around him and to still be 10th in the league in ppg.
The team wins in spite of him, not because of him.
I don't think anyone is saying he sucks.. but, c'mon, let's be real here. Long term analysis, this guy will not win us a superbowl, unless our D starts playing like the 2000 Ravens team. The dude is way too inconsistent, hot and cold, jekyll and hyde
We need a actual franchise QB, if we are ever going to take that step to get our team where we want them to be
so will take him over sanchez, big ben, brady, flacco, brees, rodgers etc
all pro maybe but if he goes to a team without a hall of fame WR (AJ) and an all pro TE (OD) and a very good RB (Tate or Foster) he will only be a below average QB.I would like to see Matt traded.
I would like to see him with a team that can play defense. He would be All-Pro.
How many Houston fans didnt think the defense was going to give up a TD in every posession in the fourth quarter?
Matt leads a drive to set up the win with 2 minutes left. What's my only thought?
ooops...We scored too quickly.
Let Matt go somewhere else. He dewserves it after the years he has suffered here.
LOL. It is such a kick in the nuts to be a fan of this team.
Cool story bro
Did you see how we were scoring the points when the Saints were slumping in the 1st half?
so will take him over sanchez, big ben, brady, flacco, brees, rodgers etc
Because Slaton can run the ball in or slip out to catch the ball and be overlooked by defense focusing on AJ and TEs.And that was Schaub's fault? What hope does a QB have in the redzone when we call plays that include having Slaton in the backfield, or just no RB at all?
Did you not see how we moved the ball today? We scored 33 points. 33 points should be enough to win a game.
Can't believe you're saying you'd take Sanchez over Schaub, the dude has his faults but c'mon man Sanchez is holding the Jets back from being great not helping them to be really good.
Moving on to Schaub today, not that I think we should run him out of town or anything but he has a lot to work on for me.
This season he doesn't seem to have got into the zone with Andre, I've seen the ball bouncing out of AJ's hands too many times so far and logic leads me to believe that its Schaub's timing rather than AJ having hands of stone.
His pocket presence looks to have regressed somewhat, our O-line is built to concentrate on the run and is doing a very good job in that area but allows pressure to penetrate in Pass Pro.
Schaub doesn't do a good enough job of finding the check down when that happens, and frankly, when the line is setup the way it is, its on the QB to find a way of coping with that, we're not asking for Michael Vick or anything here, just feel the pressure coming and slide, and know where your RB is to get the ball out.
I definately believe all of these problems have come from Schaubs turnover problems earlier in his career, I think Kubiak designs the O to either get the 1st down or protect the ball.
I'm not sure we'll ever fully understand how good Schaub is tbh, in my mind there is the possibility that his elite numbers are genuine and he is a really good (not great) QB in a system which is designed to support the run as much as possible and then pass the ball. On the other hand he could be totally average in a great system that gets him the yardage. I really don't know, but I certainly wouldn't be looking to get rid of him while we have other priorities.
all pro maybe but if he goes to a team without a hall of fame WR (AJ) and an all pro TE (OD) and a very good RB (Tate or Foster) he will only be a below average QB.
I 'll take that bet. You seem to have lost track of the fact that he has been one of the most prolific qb's in the nfl. It's the defense that has cost him several years of his career.
But that's OK....A fan base of years of losing wouldnt know a good qb if he looked them in the face.
I 'll take that bet. You seem to have lost track of the fact that he has been one of the most prolific qb's in the nfl. It's the defense that has cost him several years of his career.
But that's OK....A fan base of years of losing wouldnt know a good qb if he looked them in the face.
I 'll take that bet. You seem to have lost track of the fact that he has been one of the most prolific qb's in the nfl. It's the defense that has cost him several years of his career.
But that's OK....A fan base of years of losing wouldnt know a good qb if he looked them in the face.
is it just me or did sanchez beat peyton then brady last year in the PLAYOFFS, not saying anything just saying
Yeh but Sanchez manages the game ok, but he isn't all that good, maybe above average, but no better than Schaub.
He also had 2 really good wide receivers splitting the coverage, Schaub has 1 in double coverage constantly. (not a knock on our decent depth at wr, just calling it as I see it)
He also has one of the top rated D's in this league.
I'd take Schaub over Sanchez, I'd take the Jet's D over last years Texans' D even quicker.
so what about peytons and bradys D, sanchez is not on their level nor is their D on sanchez's, who is their wr that demands constant doubles? by the way sanchez is 4-2 on the road in the playoffs, matt 0-0
The thing is, even the "perfect" QB's have bad days. We just don't see them because we're always watching the Texans. At most we see the highlights or we might watch the replay on NFLN if we care about that matchup or want to see "Mr. Perfect" screw the pooch for once. After it's over we forget about it mostly.
Schaub isn't a perfect QB. He's got problems. To say he doesn't is to watch the game through homer-vision goggles. His shortcomings are well known and just like almost every other team in the league we build our game plans around them while every defense in the league tries to exploit them.
Schaub's arm isn't exactly the ultimate weapon. Usually that's not an issue if the guy is terribly accurate. Schaub isn't. He's a streaky passer who threads needles sometimes and then throws one in the dirt or into the receivers back or ass. Schaub (like almost all QB's) is less effective when he's been smacked around a few times.
That's all pretty standard fare though. The real deal-breaker for most of us is that Schaub doesn't seem to be that vocal, "rallying point" leader-type. He's Gary only in uniform and throwing the ball as opposed to standing on the sidelines. As much as the players like him (just as they like Gary) they don't seem to be much in the way of inspired by him. Not one single guy on that team looks like he thinks Matt Schaub is going to throw all of them on his back and carry them to a win.
He's a good QB. Does what he's told, follows instructions and tries to execute the game plan. He's got most of the necessary tools to do the job. A lot of teams would like to have Matt Schaub starting for them. Unfortunately none of those teams are better than we are. That's a simple fact. You look at teams that are considered contenders in the AFC and all of them would say "Thanks but we'll stand pat" if you tried to swap them yours for theirs. New England wouldn't part with Brady nor would San Diego part with Rivers. Indianapolis wouldn't part with Manning and Pittsburgh wouldn't swap you for Big Ben. Likewise Baltimore wouldn't trade you Flacco. I question whether Buffalo would part with Fitzpatrick right now either. Jason Campbell in Oakland finally seems to be getting his legs under him as well. Statistically he's not in this discussion but he's not costing them games and sometimes that's all you want out of your QB.
The Jets would laugh if you tried to swap them Schaub for Sanchez.
You may think he's better than some of those guys but do you really think they would want Matt Schaub over their guy?
So in the AFC if you rule out those teams that appear (right now) to be headed for the post-season that leaves.
Jacksonville - Gabbert
Cincinnati - Dalton
Miami - Henne
Cleveland - McCoy
Denver - Orton
Tennessee - Hasselbeck
Kansas City - Cassell
Indianapolis - Collins
Over the hill guys and wet-behind the ears newcomers make up most of that list. Good company to be in. That's the hill that Matt Schaub is the king of right now and some of those younger guys might be surpassing him in the coming years.
There's a reason Gary Kubiak is always looking under rocks and sifting through the latter rounds for an overlooked QB prospect. Matt Schaub is exactly what he appears to be and that is a guy who is as coached up as he's ever gonna get.
And I like Matt Schaub. Don't think for a second that I don't like him. We need to upgrade that position though.
i dont know if i agree with this. You give us a number 1 defense and we wont always have to rely on Schaub to make a play. Sanchez is terrible only reason he has any success is cause they have always had a good Defense. Give Schaub a top 10 D and we wont be having this conversation.
The thing is, even the "perfect" QB's have bad days. We just don't see them because we're always watching the Texans. At most we see the highlights or we might watch the replay on NFLN if we care about that matchup or want to see "Mr. Perfect" screw the pooch for once. After it's over we forget about it mostly.
Schaub isn't a perfect QB. He's got problems. To say he doesn't is to watch the game through homer-vision goggles. His shortcomings are well known and just like almost every other team in the league we build our game plans around them while every defense in the league tries to exploit them.
Schaub's arm isn't exactly the ultimate weapon. Usually that's not an issue if the guy is terribly accurate. Schaub isn't. He's a streaky passer who threads needles sometimes and then throws one in the dirt or into the receivers back or ass. Schaub (like almost all QB's) is less effective when he's been smacked around a few times.
That's all pretty standard fare though. The real deal-breaker for most of us is that Schaub doesn't seem to be that vocal, "rallying point" leader-type. He's Gary only in uniform and throwing the ball as opposed to standing on the sidelines. As much as the players like him (just as they like Gary) they don't seem to be much in the way of inspired by him. Not one single guy on that team looks like he thinks Matt Schaub is going to throw all of them on his back and carry them to a win.
He's a good QB. Does what he's told, follows instructions and tries to execute the game plan. He's got most of the necessary tools to do the job. A lot of teams would like to have Matt Schaub starting for them. Unfortunately none of those teams are better than we are. That's a simple fact. You look at teams that are considered contenders in the AFC and all of them would say "Thanks but we'll stand pat" if you tried to swap them yours for theirs. New England wouldn't part with Brady nor would San Diego part with Rivers. Indianapolis wouldn't part with Manning and Pittsburgh wouldn't swap you for Big Ben. Likewise Baltimore wouldn't trade you Flacco. I question whether Buffalo would part with Fitzpatrick right now either. Jason Campbell in Oakland finally seems to be getting his legs under him as well. Statistically he's not in this discussion but he's not costing them games and sometimes that's all you want out of your QB.
The Jets would laugh if you tried to swap them Schaub for Sanchez.
You may think he's better than some of those guys but do you really think they would want Matt Schaub over their guy?
So in the AFC if you rule out those teams that appear (right now) to be headed for the post-season that leaves.
Jacksonville - Gabbert
Cincinnati - Dalton
Miami - Henne
Cleveland - McCoy
Denver - Orton
Tennessee - Hasselbeck
Kansas City - Cassell
Indianapolis - Collins
Over the hill guys and wet-behind the ears newcomers make up most of that list. Good company to be in. That's the hill that Matt Schaub is the king of right now and some of those younger guys might be surpassing him in the coming years.
There's a reason Gary Kubiak is always looking under rocks and sifting through the latter rounds for an overlooked QB prospect. Matt Schaub is exactly what he appears to be and that is a guy who is as coached up as he's ever gonna get.
And I like Matt Schaub. Don't think for a second that I don't like him. We need to upgrade that position though.
You know, in a more extreme example of the same thing if you give David Carr a league leading rusher, a bunch of Pro-Bowl linemen, and some HOF receivers as well as a top 10 defense then he'd be "leading" us to the playoffs right now.
At some point you have to look at the entire team objectively and ask the question "Is the talent we've stacked around him hiding the fact that our franchise QB really isn't a franchise QB?"
I'm not kidding when I say I like Matt Schaub but I'm not infatuated with his spooky-magic QB skills. He's good, not great. He's replaceable and we might just find that if we could upgrade the QB position we might get a few more wins. Maybe spend a little less time watching Matt on the sideline looking like "Oh ****, this is happening again isn't it".
I see. So this was a "TOP 10" defensive performance today? Maybe you need to look objectively. eh?
I'm talking about things Matt Schaub does and has been doing for years. You're taking about today I guess.
Oh...Ok.....You are right. So I guess the Texans have had a "Top 10" defense for years?
You need to learn how to read. When you can follow a conversation I'll continue talking to you.
always underthrows balls down field, throws a pick to a DT on a screen (how does that happen), then skips a ball to a guy 8 yards away. goodbye kubes, schaub, rick smith, and frank bush.
Sorry I made your point look foolish.
Give Matt a Top 10 defense for the last few years and he would be paid a lot more money than has been paid.
When you can make a point worth following I will continue talking to you, OK?
Why do you have blind allegiance to a single player like this?
Same college? High school? You're a relative of his?
I follow THE TEXANS. People who follow only a single player, and act like everything around the single player is faulty and holding back the single player is just bizarre.
Nobody can say anything critical of Matt Schaub without you crying.
Why do you have blind allegiance to a single player like this?
Same college? High school? You're a relative of his?
I follow THE TEXANS. People who follow only a single player, and act like everything around the single player is faulty and holding back the single player is just bizarre.
Nobody can say anything critical of Matt Schaub without you crying.
Now you stop picking on Mrs. Schaub. That's just not right.
I am a fan of Matt, and of the Texans.
When a player produces hugely despite the glaring weaknesses of the team (defense) but continues to persevere, I am very supportive. This is called "crying" on here, I guess, but it is with good reason. All I have seen from most Texans fans on this forum is crying without reason - - Follishly blaming the few players who have delivered time after time.
But you are right.....Judging texans fans based on the sample on here is probably foolish. It is difficult in Atlanta to find anyone who wants to talk about Houston.
This thread is dumb.