Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
But the season Cap doesn't affect the 51 CAP they need to hit in FA. They can hold onto AJ through the FA period until they need 51 CAP space and they have a lot of ways to do that without cutting AJ. But that also provides an incentive for him to renegotiate just before the CAP goes from the 51 CAP to the SEASON CAP since cutting him then helps the Texans, but not him.
Come March 10th at 4:00PM ET if AJ hasn't been traded or released his salary will count against the salary cap. Therefore I think you will see a resolution to AJ's status before then.
I know it's the "Partiots way". It was the Bill Parcells way before that, the Bill Walsh way before that, the Tom Landry way before that, the Vince Lombardi way before that, etc.
These winning coaches only want the best years of a player.
And that is understandable, because they are winners.
The difference here with the Texans is that not everyone is subject to such intense scrutiny
Otherwise, Rick Smith would be gone.
A couple of quick thoughts.
2) For those of you who do believe it's true (I'm not saying I blame you or you're wrong to think that), then how do you justify AJ's actions? He's under contract to make around $10mil, and when his coach explains his view of AJ's role on the team, AJ demands to be traded or cut?
After all, if we are to believe AJ, this was never about a pay cut. So, in my view, AJ basically is refusing to do the job he is paid to do. There is no guarantee in his contract of minimum catches, or what role he will play.
He is paid good money to be a wide receiver for the Houston Texans, and he is refusing to do it?
2) For those of you who do believe it's true (I'm not saying I blame you or you're wrong to think that), then how do you justify AJ's actions? He's under contract to make around $10mil, and when his coach explains his view of AJ's role on the team, AJ demands to be traded or cut?
After all, if we are to believe AJ, this was never about a pay cut. So, in my view, AJ basically is refusing to do the job he is paid to do. There is no guarantee in his contract of minimum catches, or what role he will play.
He is paid good money to be a wide receiver for the Houston Texans, and he is refusing to do it?
I guess Andre wants out of the the contract if it isn't in his best interest, similar to the Texans wanting out of the contract if paying it isn't in their best interest.
I guess Andre wants out of the the contract if it isn't in his best interest, similar to the Texans wanting out of the contract if paying it isn't in their best interest.
That is what I've been saying for yrs and have been named a vitriolic hater and been question by DB himself as to why I remained a Texans fan.
According to AJ's camp, the Texans just defined his role for 2015 and he was unhappy about it. If you believe him, they do not want out of the contract, he does.
According to AJ's camp, the Texans just defined his role for 2015 and he was unhappy about it. If you believe him, they do not want out of the contract, he does.
So you think the Texans are good for paying $14M (or whatever) for a projected 40 catches? They should just keep him then. Why talk about it at all?
Fans don't want to except this but AJ wanted out last yr.
I only asked you that question because it seems like you have no joy in being a fan of this team. You do not seem to have any pleasure in the 2011 and 2012 seasons, which are obviously the best years of this franchise so far.
And it is a question that I do ask myself from time to time.
After all, "fans" in this day and age are really just customers.
We cannot change the past. We can analyze it and learn from it, but I cannot throw away the best years of this organization to support my vitriol of a particular coach. (did you see what I did there? just for you, man)
However, going forward, I do think it is fair to wonder if the past is indicative of where this team is going in the future. And misguided loyalty is one of those aspects that we can clearly wonder about as customers....errrrr....fans. We see the oft-stated and celebrated loyalty to a particular player is now gone. Let's see if that same mentality is extended to other facets of this franchise. Because if not, it's going to be the same old same old of a chain only being as strong as its weakest link.
Chris Gordy @ChrisGordy
So you think the Texans are good for paying $14M (or whatever) for a projected 40 catches? They should just keep him then. Why talk about it at all?
Actually there has been no statement from either side the Texans would be happy paying AJ his current salary in the reduced role. The statement was salary was never discussed.
That has been accompanied by 100% understandable speculation that the next step was for the Texans to ask for a pay cut.
Exactly, there's no point in the role conversation unless it is a prelude to a pay cut conversation.
Who did the Patriots cut today? Was it a 33yo star player by chance?
From what I've read, Andre told OB that he would not be happy with the role OB described for him. OB/Smith then offered Aj & co to seek a trade.
In Aj's narrative, he did not demand a trade.
Aj's camp replied that they will not seek a trade, but would prefer the Texans just cut him.
According to Aj's account, he's working within the framework of what the Texans are allowing.
While agree that it was ultimately about a pay cut, it is possible that McNair had advised that he was willing to pay the salary, even if O'Brien saw a decreased role for AJ in his scheme.
At any rate, AJ made his request before there were any salary discussions, so it is still a situation where he is saying he can't accept the HC's role for him at his current salary.
"People try to picture it the way they want to picture it, saying that I asked for a trade (but),there's a reason I asked for a trade," Johnson said. "I think if anybody else was in my situation, they would have done the same thing I did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Lou
I'm sure there is a rule that prevents this, but if Andre wants to be cut have him renegotiate his contract to lower his cap hit then cut him. The contract could be written to protect Andre, so say, Andre make vet minmum, but if he starts training camp with Houston he makes $20 million. That way he knows they are truely going to cut him as soon as he signs the deal, and Houston reduces its cap hit.
Why would AJ do that?QUOTE]
To gaurantee his release rather than a trade.
Even that is disputed with AJ's camp saying the Texans broached the subject of trade. Don't know, don't care on that point.
I don't think anyone around believes the Texans are prepared to pay for AJ in a reduced role. The meeting doesn't even make any sense at that point.
Other than a pay cut, there's only one purpose for a meeting with AJ prior to signing a FA or drafting a WR - driving him out the door.
I agree that the goal was probably a reduced salary, but there are reasons to discuss a major role change with a key player beyond salary.
A lot of people want to just believe AJ because he's AJ, but you said it yourself, even his own camp isn't on the same page about the way things went down.
Right before going into free agency and the draft those reasons would be?
Not that I think this was the reason in this case, but giving the best player in franchise history a heads up that there may be a FA signing or high draft pick at his position would seem like a reasonable courtesy to extend.
Think of the discussion ending with the statement to Andre "We just didn't want you to be blindsided by what might be going down sometime in the next few weeks".
The Matrix tried to create that world, but that program was rejected as unbelievable.I would rather live in a Matrix like world in which Andre Johnson stays with Houston and wins the Super Bowl in Houston.
If the Texans end up trading for Brandon Marshall sometime in the next seven days I'll feel more than okay saying goodbye to Andre Johnson. My main concern with him demanding a trade or release is the fact that we don't have anybody to replace him. Now with this B-Marsh news breaking about the Bears trying to trade him before March 12 that gives me some hope. A chance to acquire a 30-year-old, five-time pro bowler, one time all pro, legitimate number one wideout for a mere fourth-round pick. It's a no brainer. Brandon Marshall turns 31 years old in a few weeks. We could easily ride him for the two or three more productive years he has left. About the same we were expecting out of Andre Johnson at this point in his career (33).
Maybe because that isn't clear at all. There were reports what AJ wanted initially was to be guaranteed to be here through 2015.
The reason although I took pleasure in the 2011-2012 seasons I thought they didn't mean much was that I didn't think Smith/Kubak were the team to lead the team to the SB.
While agree that it was ultimately about a pay cut, it is possible that McNair had advised that he was willing to pay the salary, even if O'Brien saw a decreased role for AJ in his scheme.
At any rate, AJ made his request before there were any salary discussions, so it is still a situation where he is saying he can't accept the HC's role for him at his current salary.
I would rather live in a Matrix like world in which Andre Johnson stays with Houston and wins the Super Bowl in Houston.
What color pill would that be?
The Super Bowl winning, stocked to the gills with talent Patriots? Yes.
Now they're stocked to the gills? Mid-season they were done and talks to trading Brady were rampant. All about perspective.
So what do you mean? Are they low in talent or not?
My point is that comparing the Texans to the Patriots on anything but the most superficial level is mental masturbation more than anything else.
Absolutely a courtesy call or meeting to say we may pick up hell even both a FA and draft pick WR would be perfectly reasonable. Nothing points to that.
I never thought Kubiak / Schaub would get us to the Super Bowl.
I was told AJ could not be permanent slot by some here but I think he would be very good especially with an outside burner like Parker or Strong. I really like AJ but if I could trade him for anything 4th round or above, he's traded. I don't care whom he is traded to either as we don't owe him anything.First you ask for permission to seek a trade, then you say that's not good enough and demand that he be released.
I still think this is simply two sides staking out their opening gambits in a renegotiation.
Scenario,
Houston drafts a top three WR in the draft.
Because of this, AJ moves to the slot at a restructured rate to reflect his new job (about 40 catches). We now have three top notch receivers which stretch the field (new Guy) and can make possession catches (AJ) and compete for jump balls (Nuk).
But moving AJ to slot is not an easy sell and he and his agent have to be made aware that that is now his highest and best use on the field.
I still hold out hope that AJ returns as our slot receiver. I also think if he bought into the new role, it would extend his career.
Now they're stocked to the gills? Mid-season they were done and talks to trading Brady were rampant. All about perspective.
Where in this "scenario" do we get a new HC?
Nothing in Belichick or OB's actions says slot for AJ. Nor does it say slot is 40 receptions.
Which one is out of place?
AJ 6'3" 220 lbs
Welker 5'9" 185 lbs - avg. 110 rec.
Edelman 6' 198 lbs - avg. 95 rec.
Demaryius Johnson - 5'8" 175 lbs
The small burners OB interviewed at the combine
We're back to the worst sales job ever if 40 rec. and slot were even mentioned. Would have been real easy to say "we'd like to draft a WR to learn from you and we're going to move to mostly 3 WR sets. We'll try it out in training camp to see who fits where best but right now we think we'll primarily keep the rookie stretching the outside and have your route running and feel for the zones eating up the interior like Welker did when he was averaging 110 rec. 1300 yds like he did for the other Bill."
It's still a horseshit scenario, but at least it would have been a decent sales job.
If Dre end up in Denver it would be interesting to see what it would look like with 5 head throwing to him. Just think, we could have seen that years ago if Kubiak didn't have a boner for Schaub. :kubepalm:
I still don't think Manning would have came here. Sure he said he'd like to be here & I can believe he meant it. But it's not like he said, "I only want to play for Houston."
It would have ended up John Elway vs Teflon Don & I think Elway would have won. We'd have been stuck with a pissed off Schaub trying to prove something & we saw how that went.
If Dre end up in Denver it would be interesting to see what it would look like with 5 head throwing to him. Just think, we could have seen that years ago if Kubiak didn't have a boner for Schaub. :kubepalm:
I still don't think Manning would have came here. Sure he said he'd like to be here & I can believe he meant it. But it's not like he said, "I only want to play for Houston."
It would have ended up John Elway vs Teflon Don & I think Elway would have won. We'd have been stuck with a pissed off Schaub trying to prove something & we saw how that went.
It also wouldn't have been the same Texans team with Manning instead of Schaub. That was the offseason that they had to scramble to release Winston because the cap was lower than expected. I don't remember the contract details for the whole team obviously from back then, but imagine who else would have had to be let go to make room for Manning's $20MM cap hit.
Hindsight decisions are always easy, but they would have had to blow up the team they put together to sign an aging future HOF QB who was at the time potentially one sack from career end.
MYTH! Fantasy! Dreaming! The truth is in 2012 the Texans did not have enough money to meet the payroll for their 53 player roster much less $20M for Peyton Manning. The Texans HAD TO to restructure several contracts just to get under the salary cap to start the 2012 season, FACT! NEVER WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.
MYTH! Fantasy! Dreaming! The truth is in 2012 the Texans did not have enough money to meet the payroll for their 53 player roster much less $20M for Peyton Manning. The Texans HAD TO to restructure several contracts just to get under the salary cap to start the 2012 season, FACT! NEVER WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.
It was $18 and there is nothing saying the contract couldn't have been structured to count as little as $4.4 mil on the 2012 cap.
But keep making up your facts as you go along.
And before you go off on me as some kind of dreamer that wanted him here, I like you thought it would NEVER happen for a WRONG reason. I didn't believe Manning would coexist with Kubiak. Clearly that is not the case.
I think that is yet to be seen. But I think they'll figure something out. When given the choice between running his system or getting damaged Manning with his own system at a high cost, Kubiak chose his own system. Now the choice wasn't his; all he could choose was accept or decline the job.
It was $18 and there is nothing saying the contract couldn't have been structured to count as little as $4.4 mil on the 2012 cap.
But keep making up your facts as you go along.
And before you go off on me as some kind of dreamer that wanted him here, I like you thought it would NEVER happen for a WRONG reason. I didn't believe Manning would coexist with Kubiak. Clearly that is not the case.
http://www.spotrac.com/blog/contract-projections-for-upcoming-free-agents-extension-candidates/Andre Johnson (WR, HOU)
3 years, $19,191,228 ($6.5M guaranteed)
Average Salary: $6,397,076
Its somewhat hard to believe Johnson made it through the 2014 season in Houston. In any event the time appears right to part ways after 12 seasons. Now 33 years old, Johnson has dipped in production (especially finding the endzone) but can still be a major contributor to plenty of NFL offenses. Statistically over the past two seasons hes valuing out at over $6M per year, though its perfectly possible he can push $10M should the market be there.
I wonder why they would straight up cut Chris Myers but play games with Andre.