Wilson already has a year playing.
Why don't you compare his first seven starts against Keenum's?
With the benefit of a stout defense, a running game, and a ST that doesn't stink like the Texans, Wilson managed to lead the Hawks to many fewer offensive scores in those seven games than Keenum did in less than six and a half games.
Why don't you compare Keenum's play with Luck's first seven starts.
Last year, I had a post in which I noted that in the first five games alone, Luck had ten near-INTs, at least 5 of them were balls that he threw right into the defenders' arms and they simply dropped the ball. It was like the defenders were his receivers; that was how bad those throws were.
Why don't you compare Keenum's play with Geno Smith, whom you seem to spend the effort defending.
Wilson's first 7
4-3 104/175 59.4% 8 td 7 ints 3 fumbles in 16 games
4-3 159/288 55% 8 td 8 ints 3 rushing tds 9 fumbles in 16 games. 7 game winning drives for the season fwiw
0 wins 119/219 54% 9tds 4 ints 5 fumbles
Anyone not in houston picks luck or Wilson over their first 7, season or next season