TheRealJoker
Hall of Fame
McCown is very high on Young. The Bears should have got #39. Their GM does not impress me.
That's BS. You don't make that trade without conviction on a QB.
Smokescreen season.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
McCown is very high on Young. The Bears should have got #39. Their GM does not impress me.
That's BS. You don't make that trade without conviction on a QB.
I posted this late last evening so it may have just slid by unnoticed.Okay guys - I think this is clever.
Let's say Texans QB is sitting at #2. Do not take him there.
Here's why.
You take Anderson at #2 and then immediately trade up from #12 with Arizona and then take your QB guy.
Think about it - you get Anderson and your QB.
Sure, it might cost you an extra protected first from next year, but why not?
I get it, but what if FO doesn't want to take the risk of missing out on a guy next year? And they intended to take the guy that fell to them here?I don't think I'd give that up to move up so little for a QB in this class. I'm not a draft guy or a college fan or any of that but I don't really see a guy I'd move up from 12 on in this bunch. For example, I like Levis but he'll be there at 12 if I want to do that. Of that I have little doubt. I'd rather see what they get for those picks and maybe bundle something together that doesn't include my 1's to move up a little in the mid rounds to get another 2 or some 3's.
There would likely be competition for to move up. Indy @ #4, Raiders @ #7. Pretty risky to get your guy.Okay guys - I think this is clever.
Let's say Texans QB is sitting at #2. Do not take him there.
Here's why.
You take Anderson at #2 and then immediately trade up from #12 with Arizona and then take your QB guy.
Think about it - you get Anderson and your QB.
Sure, it might cost you an extra protected first from next year, but why not?
True, except Raiders are out of the QB stakes now.There would likely be competition for to move up. Indy @ #4, Raiders @ #7. Pretty risky to get your guy.
The Raider's Garoppolo signing plus Texans adding Jimmy Ward have obvious implications on the draft.
Raiders will take Jalen Carter if he falls to them. If not, they can get a top DB at #7.
Texans now won't prioritize DB. They may take a swing at a lower round guy for depth.
From earlier today: There are just three GMs in attendance at the Georgia pro day earlier today including Omar Khan of the Steelers, who tends to go to them all; Terry Fontenot of the hometown Atlanta Falcons; and Chicago’s Ryan Poles, who is there with a full contingent including head coach Matt Eberfus. Interesting that the Bears, who were in Chicago yesterday at the Northwestern pro day, could be looking at a pair of former Bulldogs for the 9th pick which they now have after trading with Carolina. One is OT Broderick Jones, a rising OL candidate who one would think would be in the discussion along with Northwestern’s Peter Skoronski and Ohio State’s Paris Johnson should OT be the position the Bears look to address at that spot. The other guy of interest to the Bears has to be Carter who was linked to the Bears when they still had the #1 pick overall.
I don't think Levis will be there. If the Texans take Anderson then someone drops and I think Detroit will draft whoever is left from the top 4. Who knows maybe Seattle does and let's them sit for a year or two. Either way one of the top 4 won't be there at 12I don't think I'd give that up to move up so little for a QB in this class. I'm not a draft guy or a college fan or any of that but I don't really see a guy I'd move up from 12 on in this bunch. For example, I like Levis but he'll be there at 12 if I want to do that. Of that I have little doubt. I'd rather see what they get for those picks and maybe bundle something together that doesn't include my 1's to move up a little in the mid rounds to get another 2 or some 3's.
Adding another strong back to our running game will also extend his and Pierce's careers.Comparing Bijan Robinson to Saquon Barkley/Christian Mccaffrey. Obviously not the same player but Robinson likely to be the highest drafted RB since them.
Saquon draft profile:
CMC draft profile:
Bijan draft profile:
Obviously Bijan is a luxury pick but if you’re telling me the team is going to run the ball roughly 30 times per game like the 49ers do then it is hard to pass up the BPA at 12 and the impact he would have.
Adding another strong back to our running game will also extend his and Pierce's careers.
I can't see Texans taking BR unless they trade back and he is still somehow on the board.
Can still add a nice piece further down or via FA.
I wouldn't be mad. Because mad just wouldn't explain my frustration. Livid, Seething. What are the 5 stages of grief? That's what I'd be going thru. Because I would be done with these guys forever.Honestly- and while this isn't something I hope they do- I wouldn't be mad if they went Richardson at 2 and Robinson at 12.
Richardson at #2 is insanity.I would have zero issues with Robinson at 12. Robinson is good enough as a receiver that you can make sure both Pierce and Robinson get the touches they deserve.
Honestly- and while this isn't something I hope they do- I wouldn't be mad if they went Richardson at 2 and Robinson at 12. A backfield with Richardson, Pierce, and Robinson (because I think you could have them all at the field at the same time) could be fun. It's certainly a gamble (and like I said, not something I would do if I was making the decisions), but I could see that working out for a while.
I’m warming up to Levis #2. Predicated on Carolina taking Bryce.
So if you want Bryce, then don’t discount trading up.
Stroud agent is a real thing. Would support Hanna as reason why, so would listen to trade offers, even trade back to Colts.
Levis has the arm strength, size, durability, moxie and cocky demeanor (not everyone’s cup of tea) requisite of an NFL franchise QB.
![]()
"A really good one. There's all different kind of guys that come in all shapes and sizes. But to me, it's an ongoing conversation we've had over the last couple days. It's about who fits into this system, being selfless from a mentality standpoint, but also having a point guard mentality. Being able to distribute the ball to your playmakers. And on third down, red zone, two-minute, go play Superman."
That’s a lot of hoping Levis is the next Josh Allen and Slowik is the next Brian Daboll.
I like LZ's stuff. But he is also part of the media.Lance Zierlein comps him to Jay Cutler. Think your reading who media is comping him too which is lazy dot connecting.
Lance Zierlein comps him to Jay Cutler. Think your reading who media is comping him too which is lazy dot connecting.
Nothing against the players but as I look at Saquon and CMC, my concern is what did it do for their team when they were drafted (let's say 4 years)? Also, looking at the Shanahan 49ers, most of the high draft picks went to defense and WRs until 2021. But you're right an elite RB (via trade) added to their talented team with SB aspirations contributed to Purdy's success.Yes, you can add a nice piece. And that’s “fine”. But Robinson is an identity shift. Robinson/Pierce is the best RB duo in the NFL. Its been a long time since the Texans were the best at something. Foster/Tate esque.
As we saw with the 49ers last season, the scheme can make late round RBs look good. But if you get an elite player, they look great and make it so even Mr. Irrelevant looks good playing QB.
If Bijan is at 12 he’s my guy. This team has been not only bad, but boring. Adding Bijan to Pierce changes that and gives other teams something to be concerned about. There’s a reason Will Anderson named Bijan as the toughest player he played against. 12 is not too high to take a player with that sort of impact on the team.
I was trying to give you some credit spending the #2 pick on the next Josh Allen. But you want the next Jay Cutler. Carry on…
Jalen Carter would be better off watching the draft from home.The Raider's Garoppolo signing plus Texans adding Jimmy Ward have obvious implications on the draft.
Raiders will take Jalen Carter if he falls to them. If not, they can get a top DB at #7.
Texans now won't prioritize DB. They may take a swing at a lower round guy for depth.
If we’re talking about tools & ability I don’t have a problem with a Cutler comparison.Lance Zierlein comps him to Jay Cutler. Think your reading who media is comping him too which is lazy dot connecting.
I know I come across extremely biased concerning these QBs so I’m just going to say I don’t think his conclusions follow his arguments & ifVery interesting article by SIS (Sports Info Solutions) analyzing the top 4 QB prospects in the draft. They were looking to see how the players around them (receivers/O-line) and the offensive schemes they ran influenced production.
Some of the numbers are not intuitive. Like Stroud had the tightest window throws. And Levis' pass protection was superior to both Young's and Stroud's.
SIS is a sports data analytics company that's partnered with NFL, MLB, and NBA teams as well as ESPN and sports betting sites.
They’re joined exclusively by first round picks at the top: Kyler Murray, Justin Fields, and Mac Jones have the three best seasons.
Cutler & Rivers tested under old platform (Wonderlick Test) nowadays they have a much better way of measuring mental performance, particularly as it relates to QB position (S2 Cognitive Test). They’re kept private amongst NFL teams, unless leaked.If we’re talking about tools & ability I don’t have a problem with a Cutler comparison.
Do you think they were including psyche & mental capacity as well? How would they support that assertion?
You could definitely have them both on the field at the same time. BR is a reverse DeeboI would have zero issues with Robinson at 12. Robinson is good enough as a receiver that you can make sure both Pierce and Robinson get the touches they deserve.
Honestly- and while this isn't something I hope they do- I wouldn't be mad if they went Richardson at 2 and Robinson at 12. A backfield with Richardson, Pierce, and Robinson (because I think you could have them all at the field at the same time) could be fun. It's certainly a gamble (and like I said, not something I would do if I was making the decisions), but I could see that working out for a while.
You could definitely have them both on the field at the same time. BR is a reverse Deebo
Richardson at 2 is insanity but if Panthers take him 1, I'm yelling they are geniuses. Then going to breathe a sigh of relief equal to when Raiders signed Jimmy G.Richardson at #2 is insanity.
At #33 maybe. He is a rank project.
Richardson at 2 is insanity but if Panthers take him 1, I'm yelling they are geniuses. Then going to breathe a sigh of relief equal to when Raiders signed Jimmy G.
Possibly.…..could Panthers truly be that stupid?
Sounded to me like a specific group within Panthers organization, orchestrated the trade without consensus from ownership.…..could Panthers truly be that stupid?
They may have sold Tepper a bill of goods, but you can be certain he signed off on itSounded to me like a specific group within Panthers organization, orchestrated the trade without consensus from ownership.
![]()
They pulled a coup on David Tepper ?Sounded to me like a specific group within Panthers organization, orchestrated the trade without consensus from ownership.
![]()
Something fishy going onThey may have sold Tepper a bill of goods, but you can be certain he signed off on it
Then he lurked through our MB & realized how stupid the trade was.They may have sold Tepper a bill of goods, but you can be certain he signed off on it
I would not think so but I saw another mock today with richardson first overall.…..could Panthers truly be that stupid?
I’m warming up to Levis #2. Predicated on Carolina taking Bryce.
So if you want Bryce, then don’t discount trading up.
Stroud agent is a real thing. Would support Hanna as reason why, so would listen to trade offers, even trade back to Colts.
Levis has the arm strength, size, durability, moxie and cocky demeanor (not everyone’s cup of tea) requisite of an NFL franchise QB.
![]()
No, no and finally no. Richardson is an athlete first and QB second - very much a project. No way he starts first season.IMO, Richardson and Levis have the same weaknesses, while Levis lacks the pure talent of AR. Would prefer AR at 2, assuming the Texans don't go Stroud/Young