One thing people could "take issue with" is that the article and all its facts meant the Texans should have won 7.8 games, but they won 10 - if numbers and statistics were the ends all be all and nothing else mattered they would have won 7 or 8 games.
This is where the subjectivity comes into play - what accounted for the additional 2 or 3 games they won?
For some on the forum, it's DW4 dragging the team to victory carrying the team and Billy on his shoulders.
For others, it's Billy crafting a game plan that, while not exciting, keeps a defense he knows is suspect off the field by utilizing a slow-moving "run on first down" "score just enough to win" offense.
This is why we have every thread on this forum overrun with the "your guy sucks, my guy is the reason for the team's success" crowd.
My OPINION - it's most realistically a little of both - DW can shine at times (even though I agree he has things to work on, and if I was a Saints fan I would probably still post things like "WTF was Drew thinking there, come on man!? I'm a fan it's my right to complain
), and BoB could have been trying to protect, what he new was a banged up, traded, not talented defense.
The real test for me will be - if BoB knows the defense lacks talent, and game planned for it in 2019 - what is BoB the GM going to do about it NOW? The truth will come out if he decides to draft a TE in the 2nd round and signs no big-name and/or medium tier defensive free agents - then I think we can all stamp "confirmed" on our BoB's an idiot bumper stickers.
Nothing will change even if we all agree BoB sucks - as long as Cal / Janice don't agree with us - but maybe we can stop the sh*t show the forum has turned into over the past 3 or 4 months.
One simple man's opinion - go back to name-calling and finger-pointing.