Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

CJ Stroud Success Level (Mark it down)

Where do you think CJ Strouds success level will be in THREE years.

  • Elite

  • Great

  • Good

  • Average

  • Below Average

  • Hot Garbage

  • Gone


Results are only viewable after voting.
I get it, but nobody will be able to answer that question meaningfully without having all the details, results, and possibly methodology.

All I really care about is the results. I really dont care what kind of methodology or really how they came to the results.

Like I said I get what you're saying, our brains just work differently and there's nothing wrong with that.
 
He doesn't know either. There is an article that states Anderson was number 1 on their board period. They also knew the needed a qb and several teams had Stroud 3rd or even higher than Bryce. That's why the drafted Stroud 1st and took the steam out of Titans and even the Colts to a certain extent.
How do you know if doc knows? Serious inquiry on my part.
 
Wait - 5 hours ago you posted this:



So 5 hours ago you knew from a good source that Stroud was Hannah’s call.

But a few hours later you didn’t know.

Why the change? Did your source change?
I think it changes at least once every day, because Tuesday it was

Ownership made this decision, just like they did with Carr. Nothing has changed down on Kirby in this regard. Cal wanted a QB and Stroud is the QB they settled on. Rumor before the draft was the Texans FO was split on this QB class. Who do you think made the final decision? I don't think they will be bad with Stroud, but I think he won't bring a championship to Kirby.
 
So whose choice was it? Since apparently cal sat on the sideline. So was it demeco? Hannah? Janice?
It was all of their choice. When are we going to actually listen to the people making the decisions. Both of them said it was a collective decision. And the McNair’s said they leave it up to the football guys to make those decisions. Last season and the season before were different animals because of what was going on during those times.
 
Last edited:
He doesn't know either. There is an article that states Anderson was number 1 on their board period. They also knew the needed a qb and several teams had Stroud 3rd or even higher than Bryce. That's why the drafted Stroud 1st and took the steam out of Titans and even the Colts to a certain extent.
Exactly
 
Forgiveness is for everyone and everything but so is accountability for those and what they did. IMO, we forgive the street racer as we should the wife/girlfriend abuser. But each would have different levels of discipline or punishment (which are NOT the same).

Each of us decides how we respond to that person going forward.
Let her who is without sin cast the first stone.
 
How many yrs of data do you need before the data becomes not arbitrary? 5 yrs is a long time. Would 10 yrs satisfy you? 20?

Working in the data field..... 50 examples is typically the threshold for more "accurate" data.

I think the S2 is largely irrelevant at this time. Yes NFL teams use it, but if you are picking at the top of the first round and are selecting guys who were actually Heisman level production/talented players, then theres been about 6 NFL QB's in the last 5 years who I would classify as being a part of the data field.

Do the math... its going to be a while until the data is significant to suggest it has any indication on what a player with real talent can do.

Problem is, if CJ works out which I suspect he will after watching his tape. Then we will suggest the S2 is largely irrelevant for elite prospects? You need more sample sizes. Making career assumptions with low data samples is just showing me you have a narrative you want to push or don't understand data. Nothing personal there, but the only people pushing the S2 are casual fans and analyst who were projecting draft boards.

What do we know?

Carolina moved up for him per their insiders originally.
Houston graded him as a 1a/1b with Bryce Young per their scouting department as mentioned by Brooks Kubena.
Houston took him as the 2nd overall.
The Titans were willing to mortgage their future despite not having capital like the Texans for him at 3.
The Colts were reportedly going to take him at 4 if he was there per their insiders.
The Raiders and Falcons were reportedly very interested in him as well among other teams.

I have my doubts NFL teams at this point even put much credence in to this test. Sure seemed like a lot of them could care less on draft night.
 
As a fan of the Houston Texans, my support is for the entire organization itself and not just the individual players. Mulughetas opinion and my own differ in that he believes the player to be the most important aspect of the team.
View attachment 12037

That in itself isn't a bad thing, where the player in concernd, and I can see whay a player would choose him as an agent. But from a team perspective, it doesn't make doing business easy.

And then there is Mulughetas stance on racism. I have nothing against standing up for what you believe in, but as a fan of the team, I want the players focused on playing and winning, not on things taking place off the field. Hard to focus on the game when your agent is so focused on racial injustices.

View attachment 12038

NFL agent calls for Texas donors to give up suites in 'Eyes of Texas' controversy (247sports.com)

Again, nothing wrong with that. And I understand that these battles need to be discussed and fought. However,......I want what is best for my team, and that is laser focus on the product on the field, not in possibly getting unintentionally (or intentionally) pulled in another direction by their Agent.

And then forced trade of Deshaun Watson and Jalen Ramsey. I understand that the player makes the demand and the Agent works to make it happen. BUT again, I am team first above individual player. Mulugheta coached these two on what to do and what to say in order to fulfill their wishes. Again, good for the player, but I don't want the team I follow to be getting undermined at every turn by a players agent. Mulugheta is a smart one, and those are the dangerous ones.

I also don't need to mention how the Mulugheta mob came out to attack Brady Quin for mentioning CJ strouds test scores. Something doesn't sit well with me concerning Mulugheta, and I think the longer he is employed by the good athletes, the more backhanded and devious things we may see.

All this said, Mulugheta is as GOOD an agent as a player can have, but that does not always equal good things for the team. And I am team first above else, so I would prefer to stay away from him as much as possible. I am not taking anything away from his clients. I will root for them (If they play for the Texans), but I would caution this franchise to deal with him as little as possible.

All this of course, is just my opinion, please take it as such.
I would bet the farm that Mulugheta was the one pushing the agenda, not the players. When your agent, an obvious racist, is telling you how badly you're being mistreated by an organization and how racist that organization is, it's easy to see how, and why, the players did what they did.
No QB should be involved in hiring a GM. What does a QB know about scouting, drafting, and running an organization? I could see a superstar QB having a say in hiring a HC. That affects the superstar QB directly. What superstar QB would want to play in a Jeff Fisher or Marty Schottenheimer offense?
 
I would bet the farm that Mulugheta was the one pushing the agenda, not the players. When your agent, an obvious racist, is telling you how badly you're being mistreated by an organization and how racist that organization is, it's easy to see how, and why, the players did what they did.
No QB should be involved in hiring a GM. What does a QB know about scouting, drafting, and running an organization? I could see a superstar QB having a say in hiring a HC. That affects the superstar QB directly. What superstar QB would want to play in a Jeff Fisher or Marty Schottenheimer offense?

Has any of this actually been confirmed or is it all largely conspiracy? Not questioning your validity... I just never knew if the Deshaun stuff was actually confirmed as the reason he wanted to leave the organization.
 
Has any of this actually been confirmed or is it all largely conspiracy? Not questioning your validity... I just never knew if the Deshaun stuff was actually confirmed as the reason he wanted to leave the organization.
Watson demanded a trade right after Caserio was hired. That crap had nothing to do with his agent or his agent being racist. WTF did that crap come from. Jokers be making up stuff.
 
Remember when Cal announced the committee that was going to help him hire a GM & HC?

Remember when he said Easterby doesn't make important football decisions?

Remember when Caserio said Culley was the best guy for the job?

1. Cal did hire a committee to help him hire a GM. He just didn’t use their recommendations.

2. Was Easterby just giving advice on what the decision should be and not the one responsible? For example he worked with OB on the Watson extension but it was OB who was the GM making the decision.

3. Culley was the best guy for a job that had no future. Obviously they had had a placeholder coach until a better opportunity presented itself.

#3 isn’t talked about enough. Remember when Shannahan was available after the Super Bowl and we said Texans should fire OB and go after Shanny? Bob McNair didn’t.

Cal did that with Lovie and Demeco.
 
I say he will be good. Good enough to get our hopes up, get the team to the playoffs, maybe win a game. But that’s it. Team still needs more top end talent imo.
The AFC is loaded at QB, so Steoud needs to be better than good, he needs to be great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
I say he will be good. Good enough to get our hopes up, get the team to the playoffs, maybe win a game. But that’s it. Team still needs more top end talent imo.
The AFC is loaded at QB, so Steoud needs to be better than good, he needs to be great.

Hopefully his Georgia game becomes the kids new baseline... Then we can hope to beat Burrow and Mahomes in the AFC playoffs if were lucky.

AFC is stacked LOL.

This team is going to go as far as the defense led by Demeco takes it.
 
I say he will be good. Good enough to get our hopes up, get the team to the playoffs, maybe win a game. But that’s it. Team still needs more top end talent imo.
The AFC is loaded at QB, so Steoud needs to be better than good, he needs to be great.
Is that what the crystal ball says?
 
What I will say is you either believe in the data they provide or you dont.

Like they said, a great S-2 score doesn't ensure success. But over 7 yrs (Your number) a bad score projects a QB to not be successful.

I get that we took a guy with a low score…reportedly…

But I don’t get why everyone wants to dismiss the results.

It’s just another piece of the puzzle just like interviews and other non game day related drills and such…

IF he scored low on it, it does align with what a majority of scouts have said about him which is that his weak spots are making plays under pressure and he has issues quickly processing past his initial read.

IF these things are truly issues, as a Texans fan you’ve got to hope that he can improve AND the personnel and offensive scheme highlight his positives.

IF he does have a processing/dealing with pressure issue and if neither of the things I laid out happen he will be a huge bust. I don’t see any way around that. But I’m a huge fan of the offense I think we’ll be running so I think he’ll be pretty good.
 
I get that we took a guy with a low score…reportedly…

But I don’t get why everyone wants to dismiss the results.

It’s just another piece of the puzzle just like interviews and other non game day related drills and such…

IF he scored low on it, it does align with what a majority of scouts have said about him which is that his weak spots are making plays under pressure and he has issues quickly processing past his initial read.

IF these things are truly issues, as a Texans fan you’ve got to hope that he can improve AND the personnel and offensive scheme highlight his positives.

IF he does have a processing/dealing with pressure issue and if neither of the things I laid out happen he will be a huge bust. I don’t see any way around that. But I’m a huge fan of the offense I think we’ll be running so I think he’ll be pretty good.
Good post. Ryan Fitzpatrick scored a 48 out of 50 on the Wonderlic and made some of the dumbest INTs and turnovers at the most crucial moments. Eli Manning's Wonderlic (39) was higher than Peyton's (28). Blaine Gabbert scored a 42 and scored better than Mahomes (24), Marino (16), Favre (22), and even Brady (33).

My point? A low S-2 or Wonderlic score is a concern. However, it's only one tool in the evaluation toolbox. It's not supposed to be the primary tool in your evaluation. I also find it funny that the S-2 has been around for years and this is the first I've heard about scores being leaked. Seems like either a team that wanted Stroud to drop in the draft or an agent of one of the QBs in this draft leaked the score. So, there was a draft agenda at work.
 
Last edited:
But I don’t get why everyone wants to dismiss the results.

It’s just another piece of the puzzle just like interviews and other non game day related drills and such…
I'm more interested in the game related stuff. If you can show me on tape where Stroud consistently has issues with pressure and processing, we can have a real discussion. But if you're going to question Stroud because of a series of tests you know nothing about, it's difficult to take your post seriously.

And it's not just you. It's everyone on this forum. In the media. And I'd guess, the overwhelming majority of NFL front offices. I'm not saying we are experts on football. But compared to cognitive testing, we have PhD's in football.
 
I didn't care about the low S2 score. What threw a red flag for me was his response, "I'm not good with tests, I'm here to play football."

I mean 3.0 GPA & this is your answer?
 
I'm more interested in the game related stuff. If you can show me on tape where Stroud consistently has issues with pressure and processing, we can have a real discussion. But if you're going to question Stroud because of a series of tests you know nothing about, it's difficult to take your post seriously.

And it's not just you. It's everyone on this forum. In the media. And I'd guess, the overwhelming majority of NFL front offices. I'm not saying we are experts on football. But compared to cognitive testing, we have PhD's in football.


I'm excited about Stroud.

I do hope that people remember him as a case study of sorts for the S2 test.

Regardless of how anyone feels about it one way or the other, it should change some narratives about it.
 
I get that we took a guy with a low score…reportedly…

But I don’t get why everyone wants to dismiss the results.

It’s just another piece of the puzzle just like interviews and other non game day related drills and such…

IF he scored low on it, it does align with what a majority of scouts have said about him which is that his weak spots are making plays under pressure and he has issues quickly processing past his initial read.

IF these things are truly issues, as a Texans fan you’ve got to hope that he can improve AND the personnel and offensive scheme highlight his positives.

IF he does have a processing/dealing with pressure issue and if neither of the things I laid out happen he will be a huge bust. I don’t see any way around that. But I’m a huge fan of the offense I think we’ll be running so I think he’ll be pretty good.

The S2 test is given on a laptop or Xbox controller.

S2 Cognition attempts to quantify split-second reaction times to visual stimuli on a computer screen.

This is from their FAQ.

We will have to wait and see how that translates into an accurate gauge of on the field play.

To me how fast you press a button in response to what you see on computer isn’t going to tell you much.

Except to draft Kyler Murray.
 
I'm excited about Stroud.

I do hope that people remember him as a case study of sorts for the S2 test.

Regardless of how anyone feels about it one way or the other, it should change some narratives about it.

Yes!

Reading his story elsewhere on this site, he passed a lot of "tests" in his life that are much more revealing than S2 could ever be..

Here's rooting for the guy to be ultra successful..texanpride

:coffee:
 
“Relative to the tests i’ve taken on the football field, the S2 test is irrelevant.”

- What CJ Stroud should have said.
It’s my understanding at least half the teams don’t subscribe to S2. I thought long & hard on it, prayed on it & decided I’m not going to be used by another corporate shill with his hand out.
 
I don‘t watch college football - and highlight videos don‘t show the real story. So I tried and look at each scouting report I could find on youtube, by the likes of of Simms, Palmer, The Ringer etc. I especially tried to find out the bad things they had to say about him. There were very few of those.

One of them was, that he doesn‘t set his feet when he gets pressure in his face which leads to less accuracy. Fair - but there were also examples of him doing that and of him handling the pressure just fine. So this should be coachable as long as this is not a fear thing that gets worse when NFL defenders hit him.

The other was him deciding where to got to before seeing how the defense reacts. To me this would be biggest “red flag“ about him - this might also have something to do with his low S2 score. But on the other hand, in the Georgia game he did just that perfectly, looking the defense of, not throwing into covered receivers, rolling out extending the play etc. So this may also be coachable.

And the big thing was his mobility or lack there of. He actually seems to be pretty good at maneuvering in the pocket. What he lacks is the desire to run. Now I do want him to run when there is no throw and he has a lot of green in front of him. And again, he did do that in the Georgia game. But I am perfectly fine with a QB that is 100% pass first and also uses his mobility mainly to find another throw.

But other than that, there was a lot of praise and gushing. His accuracy is great, his timing is great, his manipulation of safeties is great, his decision making is great, his strength is great. To me all these scouting reports make him seem like a surefire top pick along the lines of a Joe Burrow. So I am really happy with the pick!
 
I don‘t watch college football - and highlight videos don‘t show the real story. So I tried and look at each scouting report I could find on youtube, by the likes of of Simms, Palmer, The Ringer etc. I especially tried to find out the bad things they had to say about him. There were very few of those.

One of them was, that he doesn‘t set his feet when he gets pressure in his face which leads to less accuracy. Fair - but there were also examples of him doing that and of him handling the pressure just fine. So this should be coachable as long as this is not a fear thing that gets worse when NFL defenders hit him.

The other was him deciding where to got to before seeing how the defense reacts. To me this would be biggest “red flag“ about him - this might also have something to do with his low S2 score. But on the other hand, in the Georgia game he did just that perfectly, looking the defense of, not throwing into covered receivers, rolling out extending the play etc. So this may also be coachable.

And the big thing was his mobility or lack there of. He actually seems to be pretty good at maneuvering in the pocket. What he lacks is the desire to run. Now I do want him to run when there is no throw and he has a lot of green in front of him. And again, he did do that in the Georgia game. But I am perfectly fine with a QB that is 100% pass first and also uses his mobility mainly to find another throw.

But other than that, there was a lot of praise and gushing. His accuracy is great, his timing is great, his manipulation of safeties is great, his decision making is great, his strength is great. To me all these scouting reports make him seem like a surefire top pick along the lines of a Joe Burrow. So I am really happy with the pick!

I will take a pass-first QB all day over a running QB playing hero ball. Running QBs can look good early but once defenses figure them out it is much harder to learn how to beat defenses from the pocket. See Young, Vince.
 
I get that we took a guy with a low score…reportedly…

But I don’t get why everyone wants to dismiss the results.

It’s just another piece of the puzzle just like interviews and other non game day related drills and such…

IF he scored low on it, it does align with what a majority of scouts have said about him which is that his weak spots are making plays under pressure and he has issues quickly processing past his initial read.

IF these things are truly issues, as a Texans fan you’ve got to hope that he can improve AND the personnel and offensive scheme highlight his positives.

IF he does have a processing/dealing with pressure issue and if neither of the things I laid out happen he will be a huge bust. I don’t see any way around that. But I’m a huge fan of the offense I think we’ll be running so I think he’ll be pretty good.

They will have to run their WCO like Kubes did with Schaub. No audibles.
 
I will take a pass-first QB all day over a running QB playing hero ball. Running QBs can look good early but once defenses figure them out it is much harder to learn how to beat defenses from the pocket. See Young, Vince.


I hear ya, and I agree on ALWAYS wanting a pass first qb. But I think he can run. Highlights don't really show it which is actually a good thing. It's truly a last option for him. He ran a 4.5. If we can threaten a defense horizontally with hard play fakes and a boot game, it could be devastating.
 
I hear ya, and I agree on ALWAYS wanting a pass first qb. But I think he can run. Highlights don't really show it which is actually a good thing. It's truly a last option for him. He ran a 4.5. If we can threaten a defense horizontally with hard play fakes and a boot game, it could be devastating.

Where?
 
Back
Top