Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Bryce Young vs CJ Stroud

Do you build your team in 2023 and hope you do not have a record that pushes you out of getting a franchise quarterback in 2024?
 
I'd take Williams, Maye, maybe Penix, Evers, and McCarthy in 2024 over Stroud and Young. Tell me how many of the top NFL QBs were surrounded by the talent in college that Stroud and Young are. Stroud gets no pressure on him and has the top receivers in the country. When he does get pressure he fails. Young is a midget.

Hell at this point I'd rather take Levis with the Brown's pick if he is there or trade back from 1:1 and then take Levis.

I prefer my QBs to have some adversity in college and not have the best of everything. Look how long it has taken Jalen Hurts to put it together.
Jalen Hurts played his first three years at Alabama which is thought to have the best of everything annually. I would ecstatically take Jalen stats for Bryce Young. I am a fan of Hurts but think that Young is a better quarterback.

It did not take Hurts long at all in my opinion as he took over Wentz at the end of his rookie season and then had a very good sophomore season going eight and seven if I recall.
 
Man I don’t think Cal could afford another year like this. You want to convince the fans to come back. You better get a quarterback in here asap. You’re talking about four years of suctitude barely winning 1-4 games a year in that span. The fans needs some type of glimmer of hope.
Stros fans used to say the same things about Crane and that turned out pretty good. Rebuilds are painful and really 3-4 bad yrs isn't that long. Ask Browns/Lions/Jags etc... if 3-4 yrs is a long time.

The 49ers are a good example of being bad for a few yrs and becoming really good.
 
I agree. I think the fear goes both ways, you either make a mistake and take the wrong one or you make the mistake and let someone else take the qb you should have taken.
You think Chicago isn’t kicking themselves every time they see Mahomes in the playoffs?
Just me but I would rather swing and Miss than not swing at all.
 
i would prefer they wait on a qb if they insist on keeping lovie next year. having #1 overall pretty much means they’re taking a qb tho…so with that in mind, of the 3, i think i lean Young…i like his poise, you know he’s been coached up with Saban & co., and he’s already got the repoire with Metchie to boot.
Yep, BOB hasreally coached Young up well. LOL

Or is Young succeeding inspite of BOBlike many said happened when towel boy was here?
 
Nope, but most likely Williams or Maye will be there when the Texans are picking.
Let's say the Texans do what you want and sign a quality veteran QB. Then hit on two or three or four offensive players in the draft. And Metchie comes back. Are you that positive the Texans won't win enough games to put these two QB's out of reach, especially if teams won't trade? What's the backup plan? Draft your third or four best option.
 
Let's say the Texans do what you want and sign a quality veteran QB. Then hit on two or three or four offensive players in the draft. And Metchie comes back. Are you that positive the Texans won't win enough games to put these two QB's out of reach, especially if teams won't trade? What's the backup plan? Draft your third or four best option.

Pretty sure because most rookies hit a wall.

Do you really believe Dalton/McCoy etc... is going to lead them to more than 4 wins? I dont
 
Pretty sure because most rookies hit a wall.

Do you really believe Dalton/McCoy etc... is going to lead them to more than 4 wins? I dont
I happen to believe the Texans offense is three quality players - a deep threat WR, a Center and a RG - from making significant improvent. So yes, I believe more than 4 wins in '23 is not out of the realm of possibility. But there are too many question marks between now and the draft. Who knows?
 
I happen to believe the Texans offense is three quality players - a deep threat WR, a Center and a RG - from making significant improvent. So yes, I believe more than 4 wins in '23 is not out of the realm of possibility. But there are too many question marks between now and the draft. Who knows?

Agree to disagree

They also lack the depth at most positions. to have a better season. I definitely want 2 high picks 2nd/3rd rd to be spent on 2 centers that can also play OG. (Depth along with Cann.)

I'm wanting Caserio to beef up the OL/DL in this draft.
 
Do you build your team in 2023 and hope you do not have a record that pushes you out of getting a franchise quarterback in 2024?

I’d rather not reach on over hyped RD1 QB’s either. Build the team first b/c it would be a completely new path for the Texans.
 
I heard Lance Zierlein say when judging QBs in college you need to remove the wide open receiver completions because in college that happens a lot. You really want to focus in on the other completions.

That can really change the completion % for a QB that has elite receivers like Stroud did this past season. I am not saying he should not be drafted but his numbers are more skewed.

Also, the smaller college QBs have to deal with lesser talent so they are making more of those contested throws that may be in tight windows or using better ball placement.

It definitely makes sense to look at college QBs that way.
 
I happen to believe the Texans offense is three quality players - a deep threat WR, a Center and a RG - from making significant improvent. So yes, I believe more than 4 wins in '23 is not out of the realm of possibility. But there are too many question marks between now and the draft. Who knows?
Along with a change in playcalling
 
I heard Lance Zierlein say when judging QBs in college you need to remove the wide open receiver completions because in college that happens a lot. You really want to focus in on the other completions.

That can really change the completion % for a QB that has elite receivers like Stroud did this past season. I am not saying he should not be drafted but his numbers are more skewed.

Also, the smaller college QBs have to deal with lesser talent so they are making more of those contested throws that may be in tight windows or using better ball placement.

It definitely makes sense to look at college QBs that way.
I agree somewhat, but in Stroud case, his #1 wr hasn't hardly played. Williams has the former best wr in the nation trophy winner. Peyton Manning had Pearless Price and Nash. All these bigtime college programs have wrs running butt naked in the secondary. Look at who Tua, Mac Jones, and Hurts.
 
I agree somewhat, but in Stroud case, his #1 wr hasn't hardly played. Williams has the former best wr in the nation trophy winner. Peyton Manning had Pearless Price and Nash. All these bigtime college programs have wrs running butt naked in the secondary. Look at who Tua, Mac Jones, and Hurts.


It’s not about the #1 receiver. It’s about taking out the throws to wide open receivers and only grading the receiver on the throws that were in coverage.

So while Manning was throwing to Nash and Price and had wide open throws he probably had throws that were covered well. If you only look at those throws and compare them to Ryan Leaf’s in the same circumstances you would be able to make a comparison. For example don’t take that literally.

Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Greg Cosell agreed with him. He was a guest on the show.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
I agree somewhat, but in Stroud case, his #1 wr hasn't hardly played. Williams has the former best wr in the nation trophy winner. Peyton Manning had Pearless Price and Nash. All these bigtime college programs have wrs running butt naked in the secondary. Look at who Tua, Mac Jones, and Hurts.
While Stroud doesn't have Smith-Njigba who is supposedly the #1, he does have Harrison Jr who I feel is quite a bit better and also has Egbuka and Fleming and Stover at TE. Harrison Jr would be a top 10 pick if he came out this year. So compared to Young and other QB's, Stroud is loaded with top receivers and rarely has to throw in a tight window
 
It’s not about the #1 receiver. It’s about taking out the throws to wide open receivers and only grading the receiver on the throws that were in coverage.

So while Manning was throwing to Nash and Price and had wide open throws he probably had throws that were covered well. If you only look at those throws and compare them to Ryan Leaf’s in the same circumstances you would be able to make a comparison. For example don’t take that literally.

Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Greg Cosell agreed with him. He was a guest on the show.
What separated Leaf from Manning was more maturity than ability. When Polian interviewed both and asked what was the 1st thing they would if drafted #1. Manning was like I want the playbook and get some film while Leaf stated he was going to get his crew and go kick it. Pollan said he knew right then whom he was drafting
While Stroud doesn't have Smith-Njigba who is supposedly the #1, he does have Harrison Jr who I feel is quite a bit better and also has Egbuka and Fleming and Stover at TE. Harrison Jr would be a top 10 pick if he came out this year. So compared to Young and other QB's, Stroud is loaded with top receivers and rarely has to throw in a tight window
You don't think Caleb got players at USC?
 
What separated Leaf from Manning was more maturity than ability. When Polian interviewed both and asked what was the 1st thing they would if drafted #1. Manning was like I want the playbook and get some film while Leaf stated he was going to get his crew and go kick it. Pollan said he knew right then whom he was drafting
You don't think Caleb got players at USC?

My previous post said - don’t take this literal when I spoke of manning and leaf. I was using their two names as a comparison because they went 1 and 2.
 
Also, the smaller college QBs have to deal with lesser talent so they are making more of those contested throws that may be in tight windows or using better ball placement.
Those guys might be in a gimmick offense designed to get the ball out quickly. It's difficult to evaluate QBs in college because so much is different from the NFL.

What to look for? Traits. Does he have a good arm that can make NFL throws. Is he athletic enough to evade the pass rush? Accuracy. Whether a guy is tightly covered or is running wide open, is the ball where it needs to be? Competitiveness. Does he rally his teammates in the huddle and on the sideline? Poise. Does he bounce back after a bad drive or turnover? Improvision. Can he see the field in total and know where to go with the ball when a play breaks down.

A lot of little things go into finding the right QB. That's why it's so hard and there are so many mistakes made. Rarely is it something so obvious like "This guy is short". QB prospects can make up for physical limitations, but rarely can make up what's missing inside them.
 
Those guys might be in a gimmick offense designed to get the ball out quickly. It's difficult to evaluate QBs in college because so much is different from the NFL.

What to look for? Traits. Does he have a good arm that can make NFL throws. Is he athletic enough to evade the pass rush? Accuracy. Whether a guy is tightly covered or is running wide open, is the ball where it needs to be? Competitiveness. Does he rally his teammates in the huddle and on the sideline? Poise. Does he bounce back after a bad drive or turnover? Improvision. Can he see the field in total and know where to go with the ball when a play breaks down.

A lot of little things go into finding the right QB. That's why it's so hard and there are so many mistakes made. Rarely is it something so obvious like "This guy is short". QB prospects can make up for physical limitations, but rarely can make up what's missing inside them.

My post didn’t say it was the only thing people should look for…

I agree with you on 99% of you post. I was just sharing a little bit of knowledge that I heard on the radio. And Lance has better credibility than most radio personalities.

All of it goes into scouting a QB prospect that is arm chair GMs probably don’t do.

The second part of looking at a prospect’s height isn’t something new. That is part of the screening process or they wouldn’t have a height measurement at the combine. Or pro days. They measure hands too. I am sure you are well aware of this.

And I agree that skills or other intangibles can make up for height. Such as competitiveness, being clutch, processing information, etc.

But it is possible there are some aspects of a prospect that are too big to overcome.
 
I agree with you on 99% of you post. I was just sharing a little bit of knowledge that I heard on the radio. And Lance has better credibility than most radio personalities.
You're right. I trust Lance's evaluations 99% more than my own. He has the time, the knowledge, and the contacts to thoroughly investigate the many, many prospects that come out. I have a handful of games I've watched without notes and a computer that I can use to look up stats. Basically, my gut (which is more formidable than ever). I know Lance looks at a ton of things. I was just pointing some things out.
 
You're right. I trust Lance's evaluations 99% more than my own. He has the time, the knowledge, and the contacts to thoroughly investigate the many, many prospects that come out. I have a handful of games I've watched without notes and a computer that I can use to look up stats. Basically, my gut (which is more formidable than ever). I know Lance looks at a ton of things. I was just pointing some things out.

My apologies. I misread your post.
 
Those guys might be in a gimmick offense designed to get the ball out quickly. It's difficult to evaluate QBs in college because so much is different from the NFL.

What to look for? Traits. Does he have a good arm that can make NFL throws. Is he athletic enough to evade the pass rush? Accuracy. Whether a guy is tightly covered or is running wide open, is the ball where it needs to be? Competitiveness. Does he rally his teammates in the huddle and on the sideline? Poise. Does he bounce back after a bad drive or turnover? Improvision. Can he see the field in total and know where to go with the ball when a play breaks down.

A lot of little things go into finding the right QB. That's why it's so hard and there are so many mistakes made. Rarely is it something so obvious like "This guy is short". QB prospects can make up for physical limitations, but rarely can make up what's missing inside them.

Can they make up for being short?

How many QB's under 6'0 have won championships?

BTW, I'm a Young>Stroud guy.
 
Last edited:
Can they make up for being short?

How many QB's under 6'0 have won championships?

BTW, I'm a Young>Stroud guy.

Not many but I'd bet even the 6 footers and 6 1' guys fibbed on their height. Wison is under and accorrding to those that know him Brees was not 6' so you can put those two in that camp as SB winners. Different game now no doubt but Bart Starr was listed at 6′1″ Len Dawson at 6′, Joe Theismann, 6′0″, and Johny U at 6′1″. I'd bet all those had some fibbing going on....but back to your point its not a whole lot of them that's for sure.
 
.but back to your point its not a whole lot of them that's for sure.
There's more 6 ft QBs at the college level than under 6 ft. It's a matter of how big the pool is. A couple of years ago, there was the discussion of a 6'6" QB being too tall. How many 6'6" QBs have won the Super Bowl? Well, how many 6'6" QBs are there?

The tall and short QBs available have already made it through the filters to get to this point. They've proven the bias were wrong in their case. Now is the time to evaluate them on what they may be able to do at the NFL level.
 
Not many but I'd bet even the 6 footers and 6 1' guys fibbed on their height. Wison is under and accorrding to those that know him Brees was not 6' so you can put those two in that camp as SB winners. Different game now no doubt but Bart Starr was listed at 6′1″ Len Dawson at 6′, Joe Theismann, 6′0″, and Johny U at 6′1″. I'd bet all those had some fibbing going on....but back to your point its not a whole lot of them that's for sure.

The combine measurements stopped the fibbing.

The old guys you listed the fibbing was probably true. Also players were smaller back then. Also in addition to height Young has a smaller frame. You want to bet 1-1 on that?
 
There's more 6 ft QBs at the college level than under 6 ft. It's a matter of how big the pool is. A couple of years ago, there was the discussion of a 6'6" QB being too tall. How many 6'6" QBs have won the Super Bowl? Well, how many 6'6" QBs are there?

The tall and short QBs available have already made it through the filters to get to this point. They've proven the bias were wrong in their case. Now is the time to evaluate them on what they may be able to do at the NFL level.

What have they proven, other than the chances of winning a championship is slim with them as your QB?
 
I heard Lance Zierlein say when judging QBs in college you need to remove the wide open receiver completions because in college that happens a lot. You really want to focus in on the other completions.

That can really change the completion % for a QB that has elite receivers like Stroud did this past season. I am not saying he should not be drafted but his numbers are more skewed.

Also, the smaller college QBs have to deal with lesser talent so they are making more of those contested throws that may be in tight windows or using better ball placement.

It definitely makes sense to look at college QBs that way.

I think this is somewhat overstated by LZ...I think something that alot of these guys..including LZ don't take into account enough anymore is the playcaller/coaching & systems these guys are coming out of; that is to say how good/bad is that guy making his qb look.

For instance, Caleb Williams is now the 3rd Heisman produced by Lincoln Riley and his offense/playcalling. Obviously the other 2 guys that won it under him went #1 overall. But that sizzle those guys had in college has yet to translate over to the NFL. Sure the numbers look good/decent on paper from a distance, but all of the obvious flaws they had coming out...flaws that scouts were or so willing to overlook b/c of the monstrous numbers they put up under Riley, have now begun to rear their heads.

Kyler's size has seen him significantly hurt/hobbled in every year he's been in the league...his height has him getting an inordinate number of passes batted down..or sends him scrambling around like a chicken with its head cut off looking for better passing windows b/c he can't really see from the pocket.

Mayfield showed a tendency to throw horrible picks in college & had some maturity issues as well. Safe to say those things have continued in the NFL.

I say all this to say, Although i prefer Young, I think all this applies to Stroud at OSU..The kid has only ever operated from a clean pocket. The system he runs is 1-2 reads max & the ball is out..& although he's got a plus arm and a silky smooth release, he doesn't....or has never had to make throws through NFL windows consistently. The system he plays in has done him no favors and its unclear whether he can be that difference maker at QB we'd need him to be here without being surround by elite talent.
 
Last edited:
The combine measurements stopped the fibbing.

The old guys you listed the fibbing was probably true. Also players were smaller back then. Also in addition to height Young has a smaller frame. You want to bet 1-1 on that?
and that is why NC is the GM, good luck with that.
 
The combine measurements stopped the fibbing.

The old guys you listed the fibbing was probably true. Also players were smaller back then. Also in addition to height Young has a smaller frame. You want to bet 1-1 on that?
Is a small frame really an issue? Do you have a problem with slot receivers, who are often under 6'0" and small framed? They certainly take more of a pounding, physical game than qb's.

The issue of small frame (small boned) vs large frame (big boned) would be an interesting one.
 
Kyler Murray 5'10"
Bob Griese 6'1"
Baker Mayfield 6'1"
Y. A. Tittle 6'
Doug Flutie 5'10"
Eddie Lebaron 5'9"
Tyrod Taylor 6'1"
Russell Wilson 5'11"
Fran Tarkenton 6'

It's the ability to be a Waffle House cook on a weekend morning and not so much as how tall you are. That said, I'm not that big a fan of the running QB. I'd much rather have a smart arm than a fast leg.

And how can we forget that other great Cowboys QB, Woodrow Dantzler, 5'10".
 
Last edited:
Is a small frame really an issue? Do you have a problem with slot receivers, who are often under 6'0" and small framed? They certainly take more of a pounding, physical game than qb's.

The issue of small frame (small boned) vs large frame (big boned) would be an interesting one.
Apples and oranges comparisons when talking the QB/slot positions.

There's a reason not many small guys have played QB in today's NFL. BTW, with Wilson/Murray hurt, who's the smallest QB now starting in the NFL?
 
Apples and oranges comparisons when talking the QB/slot positions.

There's a reason not many small guys have played QB in today's NFL. BTW, with Wilson/Murray hurt, who's the smallest QB now starting in the NFL?
Quiet a few at 6'1", but LAR's Justin Wolford and Miami's Tua Tagovailoa are both at 6'0".
 
Quiet a few at 6'1", but LAR's Justin Wolford and Miami's Tua Tagovailoa are both at 6'0".

Wolford doesn't really count as he's a backup

Tua's short, but he's listed at 6'1. 3 inches taller than Young.

Young's closer to 5'9 Flutie than 6'1 Tua. BTW, I expect Young to have aFlutie type career. Great and similar college careers, although Flutie had much less to work with. I expect similar NFL careers also. Exciting but no championships.
 
Wolford doesn't really count as he's a backup

Tua's short, but he's listed at 6'1. 3 inches taller than Young.

Young's closer to 5'9 Flutie than 6'1 Tua. BTW, I expect Young to have aFlutie type career. Great and similar college careers, although Flutie had much less to work with. I expect similar NFL careers also. Exciting but no championships.
Tua was 6'0", 217 lbs at the combine.

Learning that Saban wears 3" shoe inserts, Young looks to be 5'11" - 6'0", which is what he is listed at.

Williams is only 6'1" and 210 lbs.
 
Tua was 6'0", 217 lbs at the combine.

Learning that Saban wears 3" shoe inserts, Young looks to be 5'11" - 6'0", which is what he is listed at.

Williams is only 6'1" and 210 lbs.

ESPN listed Tua at 6'1.

We will see at the Combine what Young's true height is. I'm guessing around 5'10.5.
 
ESPN listed Tua at 6'1.

We will see at the Combine what Young's true height is. I'm guessing around 5'10.5.
Why do you think ESPN is correct and the measurements from the combine are wrong? Wikipedia has measurements from the combine.

I'm guessing 5'-11 1/2" for Young. We'll see.
 
Back
Top