Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Maybe his camp felt he was going on the exempt list until things settled? Maybe he wants this to just go away? Maybe he is guilty?Why settle if he feels he did nothing wrong?
Why settle if he feels he did nothing wrong?
I feel like this isn’t going to end the way we hoped it would.
Well, at least we got some draft choices to spend out of it.
Browns QB Deshaun Watson settles all but four of 24 lawsuits alleging sexual misconduct
The settlements end the women's litigation against Cleveland Browns quarterback Deshaun Watson nearly 15 months after most were filed in 2021.www.usatoday.com
Not at all surprised but disappointed that more information will not come out and that Watson will likely not see the need to change his behavior.
As long as he's not in jail he will be out there preying on women of lesser means. It's his MO.
And watch the Browns crater!
The football gods hate Houston so the Browns will probably make it to the AFC Championship game.
The Texans 2023 pick from the Browns would end up being 29th or something.
Exactly
Exactly. Buzbee and Hardin will quietly meet at Vic & Anthony, Del Frisco, Mastro or other high dollar steakhouses and discuss the framework of future settlements while racking up lawyer fees for his dumbassery, perversions or whatever anyone wants to call it. This wasn't about the alleged crimes or justice for women. It was two high powered lawyers playing a game of cat and mouse while hoping Houstonians go down their rabbit holes, become emotionally invested, sway public opinion and pressure. Based on this thread and the 24 hour postings and speculations, it appears their cynical ploys worked.Exactly
Don't think some of those 40 or so massage therapist out there that haven't filed a complaint won't be hearing from Buzbee. Derrick has just settled 20 cases, he's still got another 40-80 potential cases sitting out there waiting to be filed. This is far from over. Derrick is the gift that keeps on giving. He didn't settle because he doesn't know the number of women he violated. Now that he's settled there will be more women coming out of the woodwork.
Not going to jail, he’s decided to cough up a lot more money is all.
This is far from over.
Four of the women refused to settle, they want their day in court.
There are at least 6 more possible criminal cases, three of those involve minor victims. The same 6 could also file civil suits.
Then there's the suspension which has been referred to as "Indefinite" .
You really believe this?Exactly. Buzbee and Hardin will quietly meet at Vic & Anthony, Del Frisco, Mastro or other high dollar steakhouses and discuss the framework of future settlements while racking up lawyer fees for his dumbassery, perversions or whatever anyone wants to call it. This wasn't about the alleged crimes or justice for women. It was two high powered lawyers playing a game of cat and mouse while hoping Houstonians go down their rabbit holes, become emotionally invested, sway public opinion and pressure. Based on this thread and the 24 hour postings and speculations, it appears their cynical ploys worked.
minors?
That would change this story!
You really believe this?
This is about a pervert violating more women than he can remember.
The complaints are going to drip, drip, drip and this isn't going away like some fanboys would like it too. Derrick may get off easy because Hardin kept him out of jail. But he's going to have to pay the price of never knowing when his perverted actions are going to bite him in the butt again. As it should be.
Can’t imagine statute of limitations running out on something that occurred in 2020I think one of the million Florio articles posted here mentioned something about statute of limitations on the events that happened during 2020/21. Any new potential incidents in Cleveland obviously wouldn't be subject to that.
If I remember correctly, he said it was statue of limitations for civil suits, not criminal.Can’t imagine statute of limitations running out on something that occurred in 2020
Can’t imagine statute of limitations running out on something that occurred in 2020
minors?
That would change this story!
Wait.
What?
That was in relation to voiding Watson's Cleveland contract. It would take new cases to do that since he supposedly open with them & told them about all of the current onesI think one of the million Florio articles posted here mentioned something about statute of limitations on the events that happened during 2020/21. Any new potential incidents in Cleveland obviously wouldn't be subject to that.
I saw the OJ quote on twitter yesterday, but it was so outlandish, I thought it was a fake. I would not be able to think of anyone else I would more want to stand up for me if I were Watson.
Problem with that though, no one knows when his final suit will be. He’s still facing possible charges. Long way to go.If Mulugheta, Hardin, and Haslam have anything to say about it…..Watson will be front and center at the Browns podium after he settles his final civil suit. He would begin by stating his remorse and public apologies for the situation he put each one of the masseuses through. Then follow that up with apologies to the NFL, Browns, Texans, and their fans for putting each through this situation as well. Admit he’s going to learn from this situation and seek counseling immediately to help him stop making similar mistakes in the future.
I see that as his only option to move forward. Of course, Goodell would have to put his stamp of approval on this as well.
Only available to subscribers @CloakNNNdaggerAkron Beacon Journal
www.beaconjournal.com
See if this helps your out!Only available to subscribers @CloakNNNdagger
Why is it funny? I’m not defending Watson. I’ve seen enough to think he’s at least a creep. But what would your defense be if you were innocent and had allegations against you like this?See if this helps your out!
https://archive.ph/oClYn
*****************************
Funny that Watson's/Hardin's defense on EACH AND EVERY lawsuit was "Watson has denied all the allegations against him and said any sexual contact between him and the women suing him was consensual."
With all these answers being the same, this goes against his depositions saying that his intent was always for a legitimate massage. You have to give disclaimers for every massage contact? Not very believable, especially in light of the other 66+ similar incidents.Why is it funny? I’m not defending Watson. I’ve seen enough to think he’s at least a creep. But what would your defense be if you were innocent and had allegations against you like this?
Thanks, but that form of question doesn't even merit a response from me.Hey CnD what does any of this crap have todo with your “concern” for the women?
I can't think of a good defense. 66 massage therapist in 17 months.But what would your defense be if you were innocent and had allegations against you like this?
I can't think of a good defense. 66 massage therapist in 17 months.
Whatever the truth is, he's complicit in something & it ain't good.
Who said he was innocent?Why is it funny? I’m not defending Watson. I’ve seen enough to think he’s at least a creep. But what would your defense be if you were innocent and had allegations against you like this?
It’s not a good defense because he went to actual licensed massage therapists and even estheticians (skin care therapists) and was asking them to massage his anus upfront. He demanded they be alone, so he put himself in a situation to where if anything happened no one could corroborate his story. That’s a classic sign of a predator, to get you alone, no one to help you.Over time I have come to agree with this. Just too much information out there to describe it as "money grab" or "Buzbee coached them". But I don't think a defense of "I wanted a massage and stuff happened" is something that is too far fetched. May be his only legit defense.
Who said I was talking about him?Who said he was innocent?
Isn't it innocent until proven guilty or does that not apply in this country?Who said he was innocent?
That premise only applies AFTER a defendant is CHARGED with a crime, and thereafter during a criminal trial.Isn't it innocent until proven guilty or does that not apply in this country?