Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

What Mallett brings as a (full-time) Starter

I know there are guys on this MB that are better talent evaluators than Smith.
LOL.....most definitely.....this ain't rocket science....it's just football.....and these morons get paid millions of $$.....for doing a lousy job!! I'm a barber.... If I give lousy haircuts everyday I'm not gonna get paid ....Dudes are gonna want their money back. But our current lousy coaches not only get paid.....they don't have to give a single dollar back even though they sucked at their job!! Unbelievable
 
A good leader does not undermine those he leads. They teach. They challenge. They push. They reinforce not knock down.

OB is not a good leader.

What he's done is crappy for all 3 QBs...and the team knows it.

My dad had made the observation that Jaelen Strong has not responded well to O'Brien's style of motivation. That makes some sense when you compare what Strong's previous coach, Todd Graham, said about him ("Jaelen Strong is the best player I have ever coached.") to O'Brien's quotes ("Strong is going down the wrong road.")

And when it comes to QB's -- Wow! If I'm Mallett, I'm no longer playing for O'Brien; I'm playing for highlight tape to send other coaches. Maybe Mallett didn't handle the benching well, but O'Brien had just torpedoed any possibility of a future NFL starting job for him. O'Brien may have been doing what he thought best to win the game, but the price was his integrity, credibility, and character -- which you need in order for the other players to buy in.
 
This is pretty much where I'm trying to go. Keenum got barely more time here than Mallett has already and he was run out of town. But Mallett needs a full 16 games before we can form our opinion. Why is that? Why is his potential considered so much greater when he has shown the same or less in almost the same amount of time?

10 overall games to 7 overall games may seem as "barely more time", but Keenum was THE starter with no one looking over his shoulder for 8 games in 2013. That is a half season as the entrenched starter to prove that he had what it took to keep the job.

Mallett played in two games then was on IR for the rest of the season in 2014. This year he has had 6 minutes against KC, played the whole game against Carolina and TB, was replaced one series after the half against the Falcons and in the 2nd quarter against the Colts.

Without making any commentary on Mallett's play or potential, you simply cannot compare the opportunity that Keenum got to the opportunity that Mallett has gotten so far. Apples and wrenches.
 
Who here thinks Bridgewater is a good QB? Who thinks Mariota is a good QB?

I like Mallett better than both of them because OB is our coach & Mallett has shown a pretty good understanding of O'Brien's offense. (A.J. McCarron would be my guy... so maybe I don't know what the check I'm talking about.)

Mallett has the size I'm looking for. He has the arm I'm looking for. He played in a pro-ish system. His college numbers, completion %, ypa, TD:Int... all where I want them to be. He played on a ranked team in a major conference. He holds multiple passing records for his school.

The only things that would have stopped me from taking him with the #1 overall was that he didn't win 23 games & he didn't start for three years. (McCarron was lacking the arm).

I know those things don't mean much to most around here. & I don't think that contradicts what I just said about Case. I wouldn't have drafted Case in the first. I might have drafted him in the 5th, unless I felt really good about getting him undrafted. But after seeing him in his first NFL game, all that measurement & grading sht went out the window. The kid (loosely used) shows promise.

I wouldn't say special, but promise.

Would you have drafted Tyler Wilson at #1?
 
Mallett hasn't played enough to know how good he is. Let him play the season out and if he stinks the Texans should be in a good position to draft their QB of the future. If Mallett is great (Doubtful) then the future is bright. Hoyer leading the team to a 6-10, 9-7 season does nothing to help find the QB of the future. Unfortunately it looks like BOB disagrees with my stance.

I don't even disagree with any of this and I never have. I have never once advocated that Hoyer finish out the season over Mallett. In fact, I have said many times that I think Mallett should start.

I do not know why every single response to my evaluation of Mallett is taken back to Hoyer. I haven't said anything about Hoyer. I do believe that this team would win more games with Hoyer. But not enough to mean anything, so no reason to switch back.

I am very open to discussing my evaluation of Mallett and why I'm certain he will never be a good NFL starter. But that conversation is apparently impossible to have here. Because I am not allowed to talk about why I think Mallett won't make it without people responding to me backing Hoyer for the starting job, which I have never done.

I do not want Hoyer to start. I have no problem with Mallett finishing the season. At the end of the season you guys will see exactly what I see now.

10 overall games to 7 overall games may seem as "barely more time", but Keenum was THE starter with no one looking over his shoulder for 8 games in 2013. That is a half season as the entrenched starter to prove that he had what it took to keep the job.

Mallett played in two games then was on IR for the rest of the season in 2014. This year he has had 6 minutes against KC, played the whole game against Carolina and TB, was replaced one series after the half against the Falcons and in the 2nd quarter against the Colts.

Without making any commentary on Mallett's play or potential, you simply cannot compare the opportunity that Keenum got to the opportunity that Mallett has gotten so far. Apples and wrenches.

It's not really the opportunity that I'm commenting on. It's the fan reaction and thought process to the opportunity.

How many games did TJ Yates get? Why not a full season as the starter? Does Zac Dysert or Tom Savage get a full season to see what they have?

The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

What is the difference between Mallett and those guys? What has he ever done that makes the fan base think he deserves that amount of time but others do not?

And it's not even about me thinking he shouldn't get the time. I'd rather him get the time than Hoyer. It's about this idea around here that a 27 year old QB cannot even be evaluated until he's received a full season's amount of starts. And yet we have had guys come through this franchise that received less and were kicked to the curb with no second thought to what their "potential" could be.
 
The way I see it, if Hoyer is the QB for the rest of the season. he may win a couple of games here and there...........and has no chance of ever turning into a QB that will take us anywhere in the future........and leaving us with little chance of a top pick QB in next year's Draft. If Mallet is the QB for the rest of the season, there is a chance that he may also win only a couple of games here and there and leave us no worse off in the Draft slot (or by some people's evaluation may leave us even better off with a worse record)...........but, unlike Hoyer, his final chapter has not been written and he could still carry the potential (though some would say very small) to show progressive development by the end of the season and turn into a QB worth taking us into the future. This is my personal opinion........and I certainly am not going to try to convince those that don't share my thoughts to jump ship.

Sounds disengenuous to me. :sarcasm:
 
I don't even disagree with any of this and I never have. I have never once advocated that Hoyer finish out the season over Mallett. In fact, I have said many times that I think Mallett should start.

I do not know why every single response to my evaluation of Mallett is taken back to Hoyer. I haven't said anything about Hoyer. I do believe that this team would win more games with Hoyer. But not enough to mean anything, so no reason to switch back.

I am very open to discussing my evaluation of Mallett and why I'm certain he will never be a good NFL starter. But that conversation is apparently impossible to have here. Because I am not allowed to talk about why I think Mallett won't make it without people responding to me backing Hoyer for the starting job, which I have never done.

I do not want Hoyer to start. I have no problem with Mallett finishing the season. At the end of the season you guys will see exactly what I see now.



It's not really the opportunity that I'm commenting on. It's the fan reaction and thought process to the opportunity.

How many games did TJ Yates get? Why not a full season as the starter? Does Zac Dysert or Tom Savage get a full season to see what they have?

The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

What is the difference between Mallett and those guys? What has he ever done that makes the fan base think he deserves that amount of time but others do not?

And it's not even about me thinking he shouldn't get the time. I'd rather him get the time than Hoyer. It's about this idea around here that a 27 year old QB cannot even be evaluated until he's received a full season's amount of starts. And yet we have had guys come through this franchise that received less and were kicked to the curb with no second thought to what their "potential" could be.

Were you really not around this MB for the Case Keenum lovefest? You joined in 2006 but maybe were on hiatus that season. People around here were saying that he deserved to go into TC last year as the #1 because he didn't get that benefit the season before when he went 0-8. He sucked during that 0-8 and there was never, ever a thought that he would get replaced. The vast majority who want Mallett to have more than 2 full games each season as an opportunity are much more objective about Mallett and his warts than the Houston homers were about Keenum.

You might be the only person I know who thinks 6 minutes, 2 full games, 1 half and 1 quarter are enough to determine if someone has the ability to fulfill their potential.
 
The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

This is why no one can take you seriously. There is mounds of evidence that he can be a good starting NFL QB. I have posted videos that demonstrate the skills Mallett has, as have people "in the biz" have also praised him, his skills and potential. All have also said he needs to work on some things like touch and accuracy, which is why he needs game experience.

I understand that you value your own opinion highly, and it's your right to do so. But the only way we are going to find out if you are right or not is for the coach to stop playing games with the QB's. Everyone knows what Brian Hoyer's ceiling is. We have seen in in it's full glory. Despite your assurances that Mallett is not worthy, --and you very well could be right-- I think all people are asking for is for him to prove it one way or the other, which he cannot do sitting on the bench, or getting yanked out every few quarters when he was playing just fine.

You keep asking about other QB's and whether they also deserve a full season. First, Keenum is no longer a Texan, so stop bringing him up. That ship has sailed. 2nd if Savage has potential, --and I think it's fair to say he has shown some-- he should get a fair shot if things are not working out with Mallett. He was drafted for a reason, and I don't think it was just to take up a roster spot. Perhaps Savage is the bridge to some other franchise QB, and perhaps he is the franchise QB. One thing I am certain of is that we are not going to find out based off of your gut feelings about them. They have to play in real games and acquire real experience.

If you want to lay your case out there regarding Mallett and his lack of NFL talent, go ahead and do it. Provide some tangible video evidence that illustrates your points. Because as of right now, you have failed to produce anything but your opinions with no evidence. We are just all supposed to believe in your ability to evaluate talent by watching games on TV and then coming to conclusions that effect someones career? Someone who has worked their whole life to get their shot at their dream. If pro football teams only knew it was as easy as checking your opinions on this message board, think of how that would revolutionize the game.
 
It's not really the opportunity that I'm commenting on. It's the fan reaction and thought process to the opportunity.

How many games did TJ Yates get? Why not a full season as the starter? Does Zac Dysert or Tom Savage get a full season to see what they have?

The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

What is the difference between Mallett and those guys? What has he ever done that makes the fan base think he deserves that amount of time but others do not?

And it's not even about me thinking he shouldn't get the time. I'd rather him get the time than Hoyer. It's about this idea around here that a 27 year old QB cannot even be evaluated until he's received a full season's amount of starts. And yet we have had guys come through this franchise that received less and were kicked to the curb with no second thought to what their "potential" could be.

I can't speak for anyone else here, but I have advocated Mallett get the season, and mostly because there's nothing else to go to. If Savage were healthy that may be completely different. If someone better than Hoyer were the alternative than that may be completely different. There was a better altenative than to give Yates 2012. There will hopefully be better alternatives than to give Dysert or Savage 2016.

We have Mallett now and poopoo for an alternative. Even if Mallett turns out less than poopoo I'd rather just go ahead and take a shot. At least it's not known poopoo. Again, not to speak for other folk, but it's not so much a lovefest with Mallett as just the specifics of the hand we've been dealt this season.
 
It's not really the opportunity that I'm commenting on. It's the fan reaction and thought process to the opportunity.

How many games did TJ Yates get? Why not a full season as the starter? Does Zac Dysert or Tom Savage get a full season to see what they have?

The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

What is the difference between Mallett and those guys? What has he ever done that makes the fan base think he deserves that amount of time but others do not?

And it's not even about me thinking he shouldn't get the time. I'd rather him get the time than Hoyer. It's about this idea around here that a 27 year old QB cannot even be evaluated until he's received a full season's amount of starts. And yet we have had guys come through this franchise that received less and were kicked to the curb with no second thought to what their "potential" could be.

I see what you're saying, but "this board" has been all over the place on all those guys. There were guys who were wanting to start Yates over Schaub, they "knew" Schaub wasn't going to win the big game.

Then anyone who supported Case got shot down... but there were plenty of people who argued for Case.

Next to Jj Watt, everyone's favorite Texans is the back up QB.
 
I don't think Keenum is that bad. And yeah I'd have rather had him here competing with savage to be the back up behind Mallet than Hoyer.

Keenum had some huge weaknesses, but he made plays too.

And last year he came from another teams PS out of a deer stand to win two games in a row here. Not great stats, but considering the circumstances under which Keenum played in both seasons he played here, he wasn't "terrible" IMO.

At the very least I enjoyed watching him play.
 
If you want to lay your case out there regarding Mallett and his lack of NFL talent, go ahead and do it. Provide some tangible video evidence that illustrates your points. Because as of right now, you have failed to produce anything but your opinions with no evidence.

Gotta jump in here and say bah's track record of opinions is very good, actually excellent. And while I appreciate you, 76Texan and others who break down tape, that's not the only way to go about it. IMO he's being a tad hasty on this one although it should be noted he would go ahead and start Mallett.

Now to bah, for every person you think is some excuse making fan boy for Mallett there are folks who won't acknowledge one thing he does right. Discussions about the extreme MB members and throwing anyone vaguely similar into these stupid homer hater piles doesn't benefit anyone. Normally you don't go there.
 
PDS ‏@PatDStat 5h5 hours ago

Also on the INT for Hoyer. Panicked waiting for CJF to come open. Look at Strong, never sees him.

CRTNE_UVEAA5mCW.png

That play is the mission statement of any dissertation on Brian Hoyer.

A good leader does not undermine those he leads. They teach. They challenge. They push. They reinforce not knock down.

OB is not a good leader.

What he's done is crappy for all 3 QBs...and the team knows it.

Well said, man. That's it in a nutshell.

My lowering opinion of O'Brien as a head coach is not knee-jerk, although it has been quicker than ever anticipated. What you said here nails my attitude about it.

His apparent inability to analyze, obtain, and develop a young QB reveals a lot about him. In my own perception, there is an arrogance that nobody is good enough for him to invest in.

And his apparent inability to lead the perennial backup QBs that he's chosen, as well as the haphazard coaching style that he's employed to undermine them, indicates to me that he's in over his head with this job.
 
Gotta jump in here and say bah's track record of opinions is very good, actually excellent. And while I appreciate you, 76Texan and others who break down tape, that's not the only way to go about it. IMO he's being a tad hasty on this one although it should be noted he would go ahead and start Mallett.

Now to bah, for every person you think is some excuse making fan boy for Mallett there are folks who won't acknowledge one thing he does right. Discussions about the extreme MB members and throwing anyone vaguely similar into these stupid homer hater piles doesn't benefit anyone. Normally you don't go there.

You're right. I'm just going to end the conversation right here. It's going nowhere and doing nobody any good. Nothing anybody says in here is going to change my mind. I'm sure that's hubris on my part but it is what it is.

There are a lot of very good posters here who I consider to be very knowledgeable about football. There are people in this thread that I am disagreeing with that I don't think I have ever disagreed with before.

I am a football coach by trade. That is my job. Granted, I coach at the high school level. Not the NFL. But because of my background and experience, it is very hard for me to defer to others on football opinions. I do not mean that in a derogatory way. I am not implying that I am any more knowledgeable than anyone else. I am not bringing that up to try to make people listen to me, just simply to show where I am coming from. I'm sure that is a character flaw on my part, but there it is. I know the game of football, and when I am sure of something there is no changing my mind outside of outright evidence, which Mallett has not provided.

I am absolutely certain that Mallett is not going to be the QB we are looking for. I have seen all that I need to see to feel confident saying that. But I accept that some of you need more time and more evidence before you are ready to say that. I come here to discuss football with other intelligent fans, not to get into petty arguments. And that is what has happened here. Suffice it to say, I'm dropping my gloves. I will just mute myself on this subject from now on.
 
Last edited:
My dad had made the observation that Jaelen Strong has not responded well to O'Brien's style of motivation. That makes some sense when you compare what Strong's previous coach, Todd Graham, said about him ("Jaelen Strong is the best player I have ever coached.") to O'Brien's quotes ("Strong is going down the wrong road.")

And when it comes to QB's -- Wow! If I'm Mallett, I'm no longer playing for O'Brien; I'm playing for highlight tape to send other coaches. Maybe Mallett didn't handle the benching well, but O'Brien had just torpedoed any possibility of a future NFL starting job for him. O'Brien may have been doing what he thought best to win the game, but the price was his integrity, credibility, and character -- which you need in order for the other players to buy in.

You are exactly right.... And it's a shame.....and I just don't get it w/Obrien
 
This is exactly how I feel. I'm clearly just not capable of putting my thoughts down into words this well.

Au contraire. You said the following very well; I should have muted myself on the subject too.

You're right. I'm just going to end the conversation right here. It's going nowhere and doing nobody any good. Nothing anybody says in here is going to change my mind. I'm sure that's hubris on my part but it is what it is.

There are a lot of very good posters here who I consider to be very knowledgeable about football. There are people in this thread that I am disagreeing with that I don't think I have ever disagreed with before.

I am a football coach by trade. That is my job. Granted, I coach at the high school level. Not the NFL. But because of my background and experience, it is very hard for me to defer to others on football opinions. I do not mean that in a derogatory way. I am not implying that I am any more knowledgeable than anyone else. I am not bringing that up to try to make people listen to me, just simply to show where I am coming from. I'm sure that is a character flaw on my part, but there it is. I know the game of football, and when I am sure of something there is no changing my mind outside of outright evidence, which Mallett has not provided.

I am absolutely certain that Mallett is not going to be the QB we are looking for. I have seen all that I need to see to feel confident saying that. But I accept that some of you need more time and more evidence before you are ready to say that. I come here to discuss football with other intelligent fans, not to get into petty arguments. And that is what has happened here. Suffice it to say, I'm dropping my gloves. I will just mute myself on this subject from now on.
 
I'm dropping my gloves. I will just mute myself on this subject from now on.

I think you'd be doing us a disservice by not revisiting the topic after a few more games (or the next one.) As you say, some people need to see a bit more to be swayed.
 
I think you'd be doing us a disservice by not revisiting the topic after a few more games (or the next one.) As you say, some people need to see a bit more to be swayed.

I'll come back to it down the road. We'll just let it play out a little while longer.
 
You're right. I'm just going to end the conversation right here. It's going nowhere and doing nobody any good. Nothing anybody says in here is going to change my mind. I'm sure that's hubris on my part but it is what it is.

There are a lot of very good posters here who I consider to be very knowledgeable about football. There are people in this thread that I am disagreeing with that I don't think I have ever disagreed with before.

I am a football coach by trade. That is my job. Granted, I coach at the high school level. Not the NFL. But because of my background and experience, it is very hard for me to defer to others on football opinions. I do not mean that in a derogatory way. I am not implying that I am any more knowledgeable than anyone else. I am not bringing that up to try to make people listen to me, just simply to show where I am coming from. I'm sure that is a character flaw on my part, but there it is. I know the game of football, and when I am sure of something there is no changing my mind outside of outright evidence, which Mallett has not provided.

I am absolutely certain that Mallett is not going to be the QB we are looking for. I have seen all that I need to see to feel confident saying that. But I accept that some of you need more time and more evidence before you are ready to say that. I come here to discuss football with other intelligent fans, not to get into petty arguments. And that is what has happened here. Suffice it to say, I'm dropping my gloves. I will just mute myself on this subject from now on.

Well said. I dropped the gloves last week as well. Just not worth the effort. I see what I see, I believe what I believe. I could be wrong, I could be right. But I'm done trying to convince anyone. The season will play out and we will go from there.

However, I will say this to the rest of the board, there are people here taking shots at other posters (it's coming from both sides) and it's complete BS. We can disagree and still have a cordial conversation doing so. You don't need to get personal just because you don't like where the other guys stands on an issue. It's petty and it's pathetic. Don't be that guy.
 
You're right. I'm just going to end the conversation right here. It's going nowhere and doing nobody any good. Nothing anybody says in here is going to change my mind. I'm sure that's hubris on my part but it is what it is.

There are a lot of very good posters here who I consider to be very knowledgeable about football. There are people in this thread that I am disagreeing with that I don't think I have ever disagreed with before.

I am a football coach by trade. That is my job. Granted, I coach at the high school level. Not the NFL. But because of my background and experience, it is very hard for me to defer to others on football opinions. I do not mean that in a derogatory way. I am not implying that I am any more knowledgeable than anyone else. I am not bringing that up to try to make people listen to me, just simply to show where I am coming from. I'm sure that is a character flaw on my part, but there it is. I know the game of football, and when I am sure of something there is no changing my mind outside of outright evidence, which Mallett has not provided.

I am absolutely certain that Mallett is not going to be the QB we are looking for. I have seen all that I need to see to feel confident saying that. But I accept that some of you need more time and more evidence before you are ready to say that. I come here to discuss football with other intelligent fans, not to get into petty arguments. And that is what has happened here. Suffice it to say, I'm dropping my gloves. I will just mute myself on this subject from now on.
Not that it means much, but you're good with me 007. I've been around here a while now and lately I've found myself scanning through threads rather than reading every post. A lot of posters on the board these days tend to trend the same, so I scroll right past them most of the time. Without sounding like a nuthugger, you're one of the several I stop to read.

I've stated before how much I appreciated all the draft analysis. Same goes for TT topics.

*Wipes mouth*

I'm done
 
I think you'd be doing us a disservice by not revisiting the topic after a few more games (or the next one.) As you say, some people need to see a bit more to be swayed.

I'm pretty much convinced that Mallett is no more the guy than Hoyer, and I know Hoyer ain't the guy. Might have a sliver of hope left but that's it. I've been more upset about how OB has handled the QB situation more than anything else.
 
I'm pretty much convinced that Mallett is no more the guy than Hoyer, and I know Hoyer ain't the guy. Might have a sliver of hope left but that's it. I've been more upset about how OB has handled the QB situation more than anything else.

Exactly this.
 
That play is the mission statement of any dissertation on Brian Hoyer.



Well said, man. That's it in a nutshell.

My lowering opinion of O'Brien as a head coach is not knee-jerk, although it has been quicker than ever anticipated. What you said here nails my attitude about it.

His apparent inability to analyze, obtain, and develop a young QB reveals a lot about him. In my own perception, there is an arrogance that nobody is good enough for him to invest in.

And his apparent inability to lead the perennial backup QBs that he's chosen, as well as the haphazard coaching style that he's employed to undermine them, indicates to me that he's in over his head with this job.
AMEN
 
I'm pretty much convinced that Mallett is no more the guy than Hoyer, and I know Hoyer ain't the guy. Might have a sliver of hope left but that's it. I've been more upset about how OB has handled the QB situation more than anything else.

For me, that's it.

I could be wrong. We could all be wrong.

But to me it made much more sense that if you were going to go with these clearance rack qb's to just roll with mallett. Even if you wanted Hoyer he shouldve been a fall back plan just in case Mal was a complete and utter disaster.

I think that is just one aspect of how OB has handled that position which I just found.....upsetting.

I never liked his qb "competition".

And as much as I would like to see Hoyer cut, I have to admit that he hasn't really done that guy any favors either.

And then the one guy who he drafted....he 1) didn't even have him in the running for starter or back up 2) IRd him when he probably could have come back this season.

The posts above about OB undermining his qb's is spot on. Those guys are supposed to be the leaders and OB is basically sending the message to the team that you shouldn't trust either of them for this year.
 
I'm pretty much convinced that Mallett is no more the guy than Hoyer, and I know Hoyer ain't the guy. Might have a sliver of hope left but that's it. I've been more upset about how OB has handled the QB situation more than anything else.

I think it is going to be a Hoyer slight lead, but Mallet given every opportunity to win the job situation. My fear is that it is going to be a mess where one or the other 'wins" the job, but gets pulled after a game or two of suckage. that along with an injury or two leads us to ending 21015 without knowing enough about Mallet nor still having a real starting QB.

BTW, I still not sure how I am supposed to conclude that a really smart guy with more recent experience with a system knows less than a dude three or four years removed from a system that was not entirely O'Brien's to begin with. Bill just likes Hoyer more than Fitzpatrick. We can only wait and see if O'Brien is correct in his assessment.

this was my March first guess.
 
I don't even disagree with any of this and I never have. I have never once advocated that Hoyer finish out the season over Mallett. In fact, I have said many times that I think Mallett should start.

I do not know why every single response to my evaluation of Mallett is taken back to Hoyer. I haven't said anything about Hoyer. I do believe that this team would win more games with Hoyer. But not enough to mean anything, so no reason to switch back.

I am very open to discussing my evaluation of Mallett and why I'm certain he will never be a good NFL starter. But that conversation is apparently impossible to have here. Because I am not allowed to talk about why I think Mallett won't make it without people responding to me backing Hoyer for the starting job, which I have never done.

I do not want Hoyer to start. I have no problem with Mallett finishing the season. At the end of the season you guys will see exactly what I see now.



It's not really the opportunity that I'm commenting on. It's the fan reaction and thought process to the opportunity.

How many games did TJ Yates get? Why not a full season as the starter? Does Zac Dysert or Tom Savage get a full season to see what they have?

The only point I have ever tried to make around here is that this board wants to give Mallett a predetermined amount of time regardless of results to "see what he has" because he has "potential". But there has not been one single hint of evidence that this supposed potential even exists.

What is the difference between Mallett and those guys? What has he ever done that makes the fan base think he deserves that amount of time but others do not?

And it's not even about me thinking he shouldn't get the time. I'd rather him get the time than Hoyer. It's about this idea around here that a 27 year old QB cannot even be evaluated until he's received a full season's amount of starts. And yet we have had guys come through this franchise that received less and were kicked to the curb with no second thought to what their "potential" could be.

I basically agree with these posts.

Now lets have an honest evaluation of Mallett. Mallett is probably too inaccurate to be a top 10 QB in the NFL and apparently the owner/coaches think he has maturity issues like Carr did. Last to show up and the first to leave.

It's the McNair's/BOB's perrogative to feel this way. They've seen much more of Mallett than you or I have. However going with Hoyer is not only predictable because of its shortsightedness, it's is the wrong thing in the long term for the Texans as a franchise.

Would people on this MB be OK with a 3-13, 6-10 season if it meant drafting a Goff/Cook/Hack/ Texian's guy Wentz etc...?
 
That play is the mission statement of any dissertation on Brian Hoyer.



Well said, man. That's it in a nutshell.

My lowering opinion of O'Brien as a head coach is not knee-jerk, although it has been quicker than ever anticipated. What you said here nails my attitude about it.

His apparent inability to analyze, obtain, and develop a young QB reveals a lot about him. In my own perception, there is an arrogance that nobody is good enough for him to invest in.

And his apparent inability to lead the perennial backup QBs that he's chosen, as well as the haphazard coaching style that he's employed to undermine them, indicates to me that he's in over his head with this job.
I'm with you on this. I've never been quick to call for a coach to be fired. I was not a fan of OB before he was hired, because he got way too much credit for "coaching Brady (well after Brady was "Brady") and for coaching Penn St. after that debacle. After last season, I was all in for him. I bought into the "start Mallett after the bye because he was traded to the Texans so late" theme. That made sense to me. It seemed logical and decisive. OB has been anything but since then. How well has any QB OB coached, not named Tom Brady, fared in the NFL?

I get a sense that OB is in over his head because he is over-thinking everything. He's also trying to imitate Belichick in all the wrong ways. Try doing a good Belichick imitation by making a decision and sticking with it. Don't worry about what the media is saying. He seems to be coaching job-scared and that's a recipe for what we've seen this season.
 
Sprained right shoulder.... Last preseason game....projected 4 - 6 weeks to recover

That would be the expected recovery IF if were an uncomplicated Type II A-C joint sprain/tear. However, immediately after he underwent a 2nd MRI (likely an MRI arthrogram to look at the labrum), they shut him down with no expectation for return this season. As you can read in my contemporary post below, labral tears occur in 2/3rds of Type II A-C joint sprains. Even though not all labral tears will go to surgery, it would not surprise me one bit that with a tear in a throwing shoulder of a QB, if next year we hear that he had undergone shoulder surgery sometime in 2015.

What bothers me is the fact that today O'brien said that Savage will undergo another MRI. (The initial one Friday revealed no fractures). Plain xrays usually can make the proper diagnosis of AC joint injury type. An MRI, though, essentially never downgrades the extend of the injury. In fact, the MRI upgrades the severity of a type I injury in 50% of cases and 20% in type II cases. Since this has already been classified as a "severe" sprain, and now an additional MRI is called for, I believe that the Texans have inadvertently revealed that Savage is dealing with a type III sprain............and will now be running an MRI arthrogram due to concern over associated injury(ies) such as labrum tears and/or intra-articular cartilage damage, which would not be necessarily identified by a standard MRI. (Remember when I pointed out the the Texans unknowingly missed Ed Reed's hip labrum tear which led to his necessitating major hip surgery, simply because they initially failed to order an MRI arthrogram in addition to the standard MRI?)

As a point of interest, a recent paper presented in March of this year at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons demonstrates a surprisingly high incidence of the associated injuries I mentioned above (even in lesser than type III AC joint injuries). (Do not become confused because you see type IV,V and VI referred to in this presentation........they do exist in the newer classification of AC joint injuries, but I did not want to make things any more complicated for you than it already may be to understand. The more basic type I, II and III classification will serve your fundamental understanding of this subject well.)

Abstract :

INTRODUCTION: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations are common in orthopaedic practice and frequently associated with high-impact forces to the shoulder. Despite the common occurrence of AC separations, little information is available about the incidence of intra-articular injuries that may also result from the high impact forces acting on the glenohumeral joint. Our hypothesis is that intra-articular shoulder pathology is common with acromioclavicular joint injury.

METHODS: Sixty-six patients (12 female, 54 males; ages 16-85 (average 40.5)) were clinically diagnosed with either an acute or chronic acromioclaviclar joint dislocation prospectively. Each patient then underwent an magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) to evaluate intra-articular pathology. Besides clinical and radiographic results, intra-operative findings were recorded from 21 patients that also underwent subsequent shoulder arthroscopy.

RESULTS: In this prospective case series, there were 66 patients who were included (52 acute AC joint dislocations, one acute on chronic, and 13 with chronic AC joint dislocations). The most common mechanism of injury was a fall (25%), biking (13.7%), football (12.1%), or motor vehicle accident (12.1%). The degree of AC joint injury ranged from grade I (16.67%), grade II (50%), grade III (27.27%), and grade IV (6.06%) AC separations. MRA demonstrated associated intra-articular pathology in 47/66 patients (71.2%) overall and included (44/66, 66.7 %) superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) tears (all SLAP tears Type 1, 2, and 3), (12/66, 18.2%) anterior labral tears, 3/66 (4.5%) posterior labrum tear. Labral injuries occurred in 6/11, 54.55% of grade I, 22/33, 66.67% of grade II, 13/18, 72.2% of grade III, and 4/4, 100% grade IV AC separations. Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was performed in 4/66 (6.1%) patients. Symptomatic labral pathology required treatment in 19/66 (28.7%). Intraoperative evaluation confirmed the intra-articular injuries seen on preoperative MRA in 19/21 surgical cases (91%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:
This is the first study that systematically investigates the incidence of intra-articular shoulder injuries associated with acromioclavicular joint separations. The results demonstrate a very high rate of glenoid labral injury and suggests that the incidence increases with the severity of the AC separation. This study suggests that labral injury should be considered as a cause of acute or persistent symptoms in patients with AC separations. Keywords: Labral tears, acromioclavicular joint dislocations, SLAP tears, shoulder trauma, shoulder instability.

SUMMARY: We report a high incidence of concomitant intra-articular glenohumeral joint injuries associated with AC joint separations that suggests that careful examination of the entire shoulder girdle should be performed when evaluating AC joint injuries.


Keep in mind that in an NFL QB, any one of these potentially associated injuries may independently become indications for surgical intervention in themselves.
 
That would be the expected recovery IF if were an uncomplicated Type II A-C joint sprain/tear. However, immediately after he underwent a 2nd MRI (likely an MRI arthrogram to look at the labrum), they shut him down with no expectation for return this season. As you can read in my contemporary post below, labral tears occur in 2/3rds of Type II A-C joint sprains. Even though not all labral tears will go to surgery, it would not surprise me one bit that with a tear in a throwing shoulder of a QB, if next year we hear that he had undergone shoulder surgery sometime in 2015.
If you've never suffered an A-C joint/rotator cuff injury, then it's hard to describe. I spent nearly 15 years not being able to lift my right arm straight out to my right. My wife would tell me of cradling my arm, in my sleep and crying. Post-op, I spent three months in a sling and sleeping up-right. The cure was as painful as the injury, if not more so. I'm disappointed that Savage was IR'd, but optimistic for his future.
 
If you've never suffered an A-C joint/rotator cuff injury, then it's hard to describe. I spent nearly 15 years not being able to lift my right arm straight out to my right. My wife would tell me of cradling my arm, in my sleep and crying. Post-op, I spent three months in a sling and sleeping up-right. The cure was as painful as the injury, if not more so. I'm disappointed that Savage was IR'd, but optimistic for his future.

My doc said "torn rotator cuff. You're not a professional athlete so we recommend leaving it alone." I can't throw a football, baseball, anything with velocity. My kids come by, "make it do those noises." Thanks doc.

The saving grace is for whatever reason it doesn't impair my bow pull.
 
Your shoulder wasn't as damaged ad mine? I still feel pain from mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Your shoulder wasn't as damaged ad mine? I still feel pain from mine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I wish I had shoulder problems at this point :(, I destroyed my left elbow, forearm, wrist and still dealing with it. 3 surgeries later and one to go, yay me!!!!! :/
 
Funny (ha) thing is busted up my shoulder on something nobody gives you a hard time about - skiing. I get crap constantly for riding a sportbike. Hell ive been hit 7 times on it and nothing permanent like this stupid shoulder.

Any hunters out there? Freaking shoulder is hanging on by a string to begin with if you've ever tore down a deer.
 
Funny (ha) thing is busted up my shoulder on something nobody gives you a hard time about - skiing. I get crap constantly for riding a sportbike. Hell ive been hit 7 times on it and nothing permanent like this stupid shoulder.

Any hunters out there? Freaking shoulder is hanging on by a string to begin with if you've ever tore down a deer.
Skiing killed Sonny Bono. It' a dangerous sport and even more dangerous pastime.
 
Y
My doc said "torn rotator cuff. You're not a professional athlete so we recommend leaving it alone." I can't throw a football, baseball, anything with velocity. My kids come by, "make it do those noises." Thanks doc.

The saving grace is for whatever reason it doesn't impair my bow pull.

Yep. 28 years ago. First month of freshman year, not even 18 yet. Playing flag football and some meathead decides to rip my arm off. Torn labrum. Had to redshirt freshman year. Somehow got through it without surgery because the weak point (straight out to the side) didn't impact playing basketball for some reason. Think It popped out 2-3 times in 4 seasons. Can't throw a football or baseball without looking like Dan Quissenberry. Never had it fixed. Got the noises all the kids love. I can skip stones like a sumbitch though.
 
I wish I had shoulder problems at this point :(, I destroyed my left elbow, forearm, wrist and still dealing with it. 3 surgeries later and one to go, yay me!!!!! :/
No you don't. I think Cloak knows some of the shoulder issues I've had in the past. I'll just leave it at this, I've now had a total of 4 surgeries on both shoulders. I can't lift weights anymore, can't throw a ball at all, can't play golf, etc. The last scope I had was basically to clean up the amount of arthritis that has formed. I've been told they do not wish to do anymore surgeries unless it's to replace the shoulders. He's hoping I can get to 50 before beginning the replacement of the 1st. We'll see. I've had about everything you could think of repaired between the both of them

BUT, the worst part about all of these surgeries isn't the actual surgeries, it's the rehab. The range of motion "exercises" alone about brought me to tears.
 
No you don't. I think Cloak knows some of the shoulder issues I've had in the past. I'll just leave it at this, I've now had a total of 4 surgeries on both shoulders. I can't lift weights anymore, can't throw a ball at all, can't play golf, etc. The last scope I had was basically to clean up the amount of arthritis that has formed. I've been told they do not wish to do anymore surgeries unless it's to replace the shoulders. He's hoping I can get to 50 before beginning the replacement of the 1st. We'll see. I've had about everything you could think of repaired between the both of them

BUT, the worst part about all of these surgeries isn't the actual surgeries, it's the rehab. The range of motion "exercises" alone about brought me to tears.

Cloak knows my injuries as well lol. The resident Dr! My injury is only 2 years old, so arthritis is still to come. I'm not gonna compare who's injury are worse, because they are probably both terrible, I just wished I had shoulder pain because the rest of my arm hurts so bad lol, it was more tongue in cheek.

Rehab is shitty. I can't straighten my arm past 40 degrees and just had a surgery to clean scar tissue out of the elbow region and now I have a machine I stick my arm into and it forces my arm straight. I do that 4-5 HOURS a day plus another handful of "stretches" throughout the day. Its like a full time job just rehabbing. It definitely sucks.
 
Back
Top