Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

All Encompassing Andre Johnson Thread (Just got some disturbing news about A Johnson)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Name the last SB that the #1 WR in the NFL has won a SB after Rice?

That's a pretty ridiculous standard for any position. And looking down the list there are a bunch of HoF or close to it guys - Irvin, Rod Smith, Isaac Bruce, Tory Holt, Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Hines Ward, etc.
 
Dude, if I said the sky is blue, just after sunset there'd be 10 people in here telling me what a jackass I am. :ahhaha:

well... I'm not implying you are a jackass, but...

[IMGwidthsize=200]http://www.astrosurf.com/merimages/Desktop/HomePlate-desktop.jpg[/IMG]
 
That's a pretty ridiculous standard for any position. And looking down the list there are a bunch of HoF or close to it guys - Irvin, Rod Smith, Isaac Bruce, Tory Holt, Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Hines Ward, etc.

Mostly pre salary cap era

Sorry you don't agree with my standards but my post remains the same.

HOFers mean nothing to me SB's do. BTW, McNair has been more than fair to AJ would you not agree?
 
Mostly pre salary cap era

Sorry you don't agree with my standards but my post remains the same.

The salary cap was introduced in 1994. Isaac Bruce was drafted in 1994, Rod Smith was in that class, but was not drafted. The majority of Michael Irvin's career was after 1994.

Everyone else definitely played in the salary cap era.... they were all drafted after 1994.

So unless the word "mostly" means something different to you, I think you missed that one.

But I agree, anything over $12M/yr is too much of a salary cap number for a WR... any position other than QB if you ask me.
 
well... I'm not implying you are a jackass, but...

[imgwidthsize=200]http://www.astrosurf.com/merimages/Desktop/HomePlate-desktop.jpg[/IMG]
I guess Thorn didn't specify the sky had to be from Earth...
:hmmm:
 
Agreed

Moral of the story is spending your cap $$$$ on the WR position is never a great idea. regardless of how great the WR is. Name the last SB that the #1 WR in the NFL has won a SB after Rice?

That's a pretty ridiculous standard for any position. And looking down the list there are a bunch of HoF or close to it guys - Irvin, Rod Smith, Isaac Bruce, Tory Holt, Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Hines Ward, etc.

Mostly pre salary cap era

Sorry you don't agree with my standards but my post remains the same.

HOFers mean nothing to me SB's do. BTW, McNair has been more than fair to AJ would you not agree?

The salary cap was introduced in 1994. Isaac Bruce was drafted in 1994, Rod Smith was in that class, but was not drafted. The majority of Michael Irvin's career was after 1994.

Everyone else definitely played in the salary cap era.... they were all drafted after 1994.

So unless the word "mostly" means something different to you, I think you missed that one.

But I agree, anything over $12M/yr is too much of a salary cap number for a WR... any position other than QB if you ask me.

I don't understand SteelB's point.
Every SB winning QB has a, clutch-time, #1 receiver as his go-to guy.
Flacco had Anquan Boldin
Rodgers had Greg Jennings
Brees had Marques Colston

And the teams that let those guys walk haven't been back since they won the SB.
even Russell Wilson had Golden Tate
 
I don't understand SteelB's point.
Every SB winning QB has a, clutch-time, #1 receiver as his go-to guy.
Flacco had Anquan Boldin
Rodgers had Greg Jennings
Brees had Marques Colston

And the teams that let those guys walk haven't been back since they won the SB.
even Russell Wilson had Golden Tate

I think the Seahawks are the closest we've come in a while to being that team without a true clutch receiver to win the SB. But they had Lynch, so that kind of cancels it out in my mind.
 
I think the Seahawks are the closest we've come in a while to being that team without a true clutch receiver to win the SB. But they had Lynch, so that kind of cancels it out in my mind.
I don't think there's any single formula which adds up to a SB winner, rather it's just the team that has the greatest sum of all of it's parts: for example this year the total of Seattle's superior defense with well-balanced offense including a competent QB just added up to more than Denver's outstanding offense led by a HOF QB.
 
I don't think there's any single formula which adds up to a SB winner, rather it's just the team that has the greatest sum of all of it's parts: for example this year the total of Seattle's superior defense with well-balanced offense including a competent QB just added up to more than Denver's outstanding offense led by a HOF QB.

Granted, but the old adage that "defense wins championships" has proven accurate time and time again.

So maybe no formula per-Se, but definitely the focus still has to be on defense.
 
I don't think there's any single formula which adds up to a SB winner, rather it's just the team that has the greatest sum of all of it's parts: for example this year the total of Seattle's superior defense with well-balanced offense including a competent QB just added up to more than Denver's outstanding offense led by a HOF QB.

Oh I agree there's no single formula, but I think there are some parts that have to be there. There tends to be a go-to WR or RB is all I'm saying.
 
I think the Seahawks are the closest we've come in a while to being that team without a true clutch receiver to win the SB. But they had Lynch, so that kind of cancels it out in my mind.

It doesn't get any more clutch than this.

Replacement-Refs.jpg
 
And got paid after his uncle did a bad deal when McNair didn't have to redo his deal. Sucking up the cap so you cant be competitive in FA and then wanting to walk on your team when things don't work out =

A. Tough Titty
B. Wanting even more $$$$

Either way screw AJ on this one. McNair/Smith (His lackey) are right in holding the line. I can actually see how McNair can feel like AJ betrayed him and that AJ is behaving like a petulant child. Truth is this situation between AJ & McNair comes down to $$$$. Which is what it always comes down to in the professional sports leagues.

Dude, you're attitude is like AJ has been acting like Terrel Owens or some other diva WR.

Petulant child? For real? Petulant is defined as "childishly sulky or bad-tempered".

How is AJ being petulant by giving an honest answer to a question?

He has not shown up for VOLUNTARY (you might need to look up the definition of that word, too) workouts, which is quite common in the NFL for older veterans.

Big. Freakin'. Deal.

That you ramble on about billionaire Bob feeling betrayed is pure hyperbole and conjecture on your part. Your are projecting your surly attitude about life into a professional situation. You do not have a clue what McNair thinks about this matter any more than the rest of us, but you sure seem confident to speak for a man that you have always held in contempt.

"Truth is this situation between AJ & McNair comes down to $$$$"

Prove this statement as TRUTH or it is nothing but evidence of posterior vocalization on your part.

And don't come in here months later acting like you had some inside information. Make your case now or just admit you are speculating based on nothing but your opinion.
 
He has not shown up for VOLUNTARY (you might need to look up the definition of that word, too) workouts, which is quite common in the NFL for older veterans.

Big. Freakin'. Deal.

Not to get involved in the conversation between you & steelb .... but


Its been reported that #80 wont be showing up for the mandatory workouts.


It might not be a big deal now .... but it could escalate real quick to a full blown disaster.
 
Not to get involved in the conversation between you & steelb .... but

Its been reported that #80 wont be showing up for the mandatory workouts.

It might not be a big deal now .... but it could escalate real quick to a full blown disaster.

If he does not show up to mandatory minicamp, then he certainly deserves to be criticized (unless he retires from the NFL this summer).

That said, the criticism should be about not acting professional, but folks tend to bring personal agendas to the issue and start making unsubstantiated accusations.

I guess I give AJ the benefit of the doubt until the facts come out.

If I had to speculate, I'd say it's less about money and more about wanting to play somewhere else. Mainly due to what he said about rebuilding again and tired of losing so much. But, I completely admit that this is just opinion on my part that is colored by my respect toward AJ. I have no problem with folks speculating, but just don't state that it is "truth" and "facts" when stating opinion.
 
The salary cap was introduced in 1994. Isaac Bruce was drafted in 1994, Rod Smith was in that class, but was not drafted. The majority of Michael Irvin's career was after 1994.

Everyone else definitely played in the salary cap era.... they were all drafted after 1994.

So unless the word "mostly" means something different to you, I think you missed that one.

But I agree, anything over $12M/yr is too much of a salary cap number for a WR... any position other than QB if you ask me.

Proud of you, doing good research, learning, seeing the BIG picture. So what do you say to JJ Watt and his agent who will be asking for $20 mil + a year?
 
Not to get involved in the conversation between you & steelb .... but


Its been reported that #80 wont be showing up for the mandatory workouts.


It might not be a big deal now .... but it could escalate real quick to a full blown disaster.

I say make some lemonade out of this lemon, there is a team who thinks they're a SB contender and only a player away, say 49ers or the Pats who would likely part with a 2015 or a 2016 1st RD pick for AJ.
 
I say make some lemonade out of this lemon, there is a team who thinks they're a SB contender and only a player away, say 49ers or the Pats who would likely part with a 2015 or a 2016 1st RD pick for AJ.

No one is giving a first round pick for AJ.
 
20m a year for JJ is a steal ...

anything over a million for any of these guys to play a game is way to much IMO. Take some of that nfl revenue and spread it out among military vets and their families. No one should make as much as these guys do to play a game. IMO
 
anything over a million for any of these guys to play a game is way to much IMO. Take some of that nfl revenue and spread it out among military vets and their families. No one should make as much as these guys do to play a game. IMO

Of course, that is a given.

Priority put on entertainment in the world is disgusting. But I still enjoy football ...
 
anything over a million for any of these guys to play a game is way to much IMO. Take some of that nfl revenue and spread it out among military vets and their families. No one should make as much as these guys do to play a game. IMO

I get what you're saying, but I think people should be paid whatever someone is willing to pay.
 
xtruroyaltyx said:
I get what you're saying, but I think people should be paid whatever someone is willing to pay.

yep, such is the inherent nature of a free market economy.

The opposite would have a government mandated price system, which is totalitarian in nature and very close to real world fascism.

infantrycak said:
Ah, such piety.

Everything above necessities is entertainment.

My thoughts, as well. This would be a boring world if only necessities were allowed to exist.
 
yep, such is the inherent nature of a free market economy.

The opposite would have a government mandated price system, which is totalitarian in nature and very close to real world fascism.



My thoughts, as well. This would be a boring world if only necessities were allowed to exist.

trust me, you don't want that :)
 
Proud of you, doing good research, learning, seeing the BIG picture. So what do you say to JJ Watt and his agent who will be asking for $20 mil + a year?
I'd say "JJ, you are under contract for 2015 and if you don't come down some, I will franchise tag you until you do."
 
I'd say "JJ, you are under contract for 2015 and if you don't come down some, I will franchise tag you until you do."

IIRC, Franchising a player comes with a face value cap hit. So, imo, it'll hurt the "team" more than it'll hurt JJ. A cap hit of 13+ would be a tough one to absorb in our present (within 3 yrs) situation.
 
IIRC, Franchising a player comes with a face value cap hit. So, imo, it'll hurt the "team" more than it'll hurt JJ. A cap hit of 13+ would be a tough one to absorb in our present (within 3 yrs) situation.

Yep. And franchising a player like JJ is not the way to stay in his good graces as an organization. I think you can only franchise a guy twice in a row, iirc, so it's not like you could keep him here indefinitely.

JJ is a guy that the team just needs to pay and build around. Any fan that wants to gripe and moan about what he is making has a choice to either quit being a fan and quit supporting the product or just deal with reality and enjoy it for the entertainment that it is at the end of the day.
 
IIRC, Franchising a player comes with a face value cap hit. So, imo, it'll hurt the "team" more than it'll hurt JJ. A cap hit of 13+ would be a tough one to absorb in our present (within 3 yrs) situation.

There has to be some more cutting of these enormous salaries, the CBA helped tremendously but signing a player to gobs then have him get hurt like Cush or crap out hurts team more imo. A 20 million dollar annual salary regardless of how it is arranged will hurt also.
 
IIRC, Franchising a player comes with a face value cap hit. So, imo, it'll hurt the "team" more than it'll hurt JJ. A cap hit of 13+ would be a tough one to absorb in our present (within 3 yrs) situation.

It's either an average of the five largest salaries at the offered players' position at the end of restricted free agency this season, or 120 percent of the offered player's current salary-whichever is greater.

[IMGwidthsize=400]http://img.bleacherreport.net/img/article/media_slots/photos/001/379/061/2f9b69649dd3ad22064a9b248057fea0_crop_exact.png?w=650&h=433&q=85[/IMG]

source

:tiphat:

-edit-
picture fail :)
that is for the non-exclusive tag, which averages the top 10 salaries, not the top 5
 
Yep. And franchising a player like JJ is not the way to stay in his good graces as a franchise. I think you can only franchise a guy twice in a row, iirc, so it's not like you could keep him here indefinitely.

JJ is a guy that the franchise just needs to pay and build around. Any fan that wants to gripe and moan about what he is making has a choice to either quit being a fan and quit supporting the product or just deal with reality and enjoy it for the entertainment that it is at the end of the day.
You are correct but 2014, 2015, '16 and '17 allows us time to decide what to do.
Texans have been successful offering reasonable contracts to players they wanted to keep and I'm sure Watt will not be an issue either. Of course, AJ's future may impact Watt.
 
I don't understand SteelB's point.
Every SB winning QB has a, clutch-time, #1 receiver as his go-to guy.
Flacco had Anquan Boldin
Rodgers had Greg Jennings
Brees had Marques Colston

And the teams that let those guys walk haven't been back since they won the SB.
even Russell Wilson had Golden Tate

How much of the cap % wise was allotted to the Go to guys that you listed above
 
Dude, you're attitude is like AJ has been acting like Terrel Owens or some other diva WR.

Petulant child? For real? Petulant is defined as "childishly sulky or bad-tempered".

How is AJ being petulant by giving an honest answer to a question?

He has not shown up for VOLUNTARY (you might need to look up the definition of that word, too) workouts, which is quite common in the NFL for older veterans.

Big. Freakin'. Deal.

That you ramble on about billionaire Bob feeling betrayed is pure hyperbole and conjecture on your part. Your are projecting your surly attitude about life into a professional situation. You do not have a clue what McNair thinks about this matter any more than the rest of us, but you sure seem confident to speak for a man that you have always held in contempt.

"Truth is this situation between AJ & McNair comes down to $$$$"

Prove this statement as TRUTH or it is nothing but evidence of posterior vocalization on your part.

And don't come in here months later acting like you had some inside information. Make your case now or just admit you are speculating based on nothing but your opinion.

Voluntary is why I don't care if AJ shows up or not.

Question for you? In your business doesn't it always come down to $$$$?

It's the same for AJ and McNair. CBS had a report that AJ wanted more $$$$ and McNair said no. (Thru Smith I'm Sure) You don't think that is the root of the problem and I respect that.

I'm speculating but if you follow the $$$$ you will usually find the answer to the questions that have been asked.

We will have too agree to disagree on this one. I get the AJ love I like him too.
 
Question for you? In your business doesn't it always come down to $$$$?

Not even close to always and that is true in lots of professions for lots of people. People take jobs based on all sorts of other factors - location, hours, flexibility, work environment, etc.
 
If he does not show up to mandatory minicamp, then he certainly deserves to be criticized (unless he retires from the NFL this summer).

That said, the criticism should be about not acting professional, but folks tend to bring personal agendas to the issue and start making unsubstantiated accusations.

I guess I give AJ the benefit of the doubt until the facts come out.

If I had to speculate, I'd say it's less about money and more about wanting to play somewhere else. Mainly due to what he said about rebuilding again and tired of losing so much. But, I completely admit that this is just opinion on my part that is colored by my respect toward AJ. I have no problem with folks speculating, but just don't state that it is "truth" and "facts" when stating opinion.

All of this is speculation.

You give AJ the benefit of the doubt, I don't. My OPINION of AJ's lack of loyalty comes from the fact that McNair redid AJ's contract when he didn't have too.

I could be wrong but these kinds of things usually come down to $$$$ in my experience. As I said in the post above I respect your opinion I happen to disagree with it. No harm/no foul.
 
IIRC, Franchising a player comes with a face value cap hit. So, imo, it'll hurt the "team" more than it'll hurt JJ. A cap hit of 13+ would be a tough one to absorb in our present (within 3 yrs) situation.

Not if AJ's contract was removed from the books.
 
Voluntary is why I don't care if AJ shows up or not.

Question for you? In your business doesn't it always come down to $$$$?

Speaking solely from my own perspective, no, it doesn't always come down to money.

I won't get into my personal details, but safe to say, I am a living example that business doesn't always come down to money. Those on this forum that know me in real life understand what I'm saying, but safe to say that I value other things greater than money and this directly impacts my professional life.

It's the same for AJ and McNair. CBS had a report that AJ wanted more $$$$ and McNair said no. (Thru Smith I'm Sure) You don't think that is the root of the problem and I respect that.

I'm speculating but if you follow the $$$$ you will usually find the answer to the questions that have been asked.

We will have too agree to disagree on this one. I get the AJ love I like him too.

I have not seen a report from CBS, so if it has been officially reported, then it is what it is.

I only commented because you quoted me, and you made some absolute statements that you presented as truth, in addition to disparaging AJ's character. There are not many athletes that I hold in high regard, because I do not know these guys in real life. That said, based on history and M.O., I choose to give a couple of them the benefit of the doubt as a fan. AJ is obviously one of them.

All of this is speculation.

Well, yeah, that was basically my whole point. Thanks for agreement. :)

You give AJ the benefit of the doubt, I don't. My OPINION of AJ's lack of loyalty comes from the fact that McNair redid AJ's contract when he didn't have too.

No problem with different perspectives. As far as loyalty in pro sports, I find that team loyalty only extends to a what-can-you-do-for-me-now mentality.

Loyalty is a strange concept in a business that allows the owners to cut players under contract, while players are bound to honor that same contract as long as the team wants them on the roster.

Loyalty in my book should be a two way street. McNair CHOSE to pay AJ based on a variety of factors, ALL of which directly benefit McNair's business. This is no different than Jimmy Johnson's perspective as Cowboys head coach who treated players differently based on who they were and what they had accomplished. It is basic human nature in that regard.

I could be wrong but these kinds of things usually come down to $$$$ in my experience. As I said in the post above I respect your opinion I happen to disagree with it. No harm/no foul.

I tend to agree most of the time, but AJ has not been the typical diva WR for the past decade+, and loyalty to this franchise has most likely cost him a chance to be on a Super Bowl team and even put up stats that could get him into the HoF. His talent level is certainly up there with the greats, and while I'm not asking for anyone to feel sorry for the guy, I would like to at least think that his 11 year career with the Houston Texans has created a reservoir of goodwill from the fan base.
 
You can only franchise a player twice. (Peppers at Carolina)

In JJ's case it will be cheaper to franchise him than pay him the salary he will want and command. $12-$13 million vs $20+ million

The BIG picture and right thing to do for the long term success of the Houston Texans, if in fact JJ and his agent seek a $100 million +/$20 million + a year, 5 yr contract, is do a sign and trade starting at (3) 1st RD draft picks.

One reason McNair won't pay AJ additional $ is because he really doesn't have additional $ to pay unless he borrows from future year salary caps.

Best thing to do is put out the word to all Super Bowl wanna bees, who can actually taste it, that a 2015 or 2016 FIRST RD draft pick gets AJ.
 
Not to get involved in the conversation between you & steelb .... but


Its been reported that #80 wont be showing up for the mandatory workouts.


It might not be a big deal now .... but it could escalate real quick to a full blown disaster.
Reported by who?

Is there a quote from A.J. himself? ...because that's who I'd like to hear it from.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top