Only QB in this class I think could be day one ready is Bridgewater, Bortles is up in air still. Manziel def, but I think if he goes to Browns or Raiders likely will be day one.
I just find it really hard to believe Matt Schaub will be,here in Houston barring cut and or a massive paycut. Otherwise it just doesn't make sense with his contract; which makes him untradeable.
Though, i've decided Nitro is really Marshall Faulk.
lol, you're late to the party, I am rumored to be Schaub's brother, or some other relative, but whatever floats your boat dude.
Don't call someone else out for being ridiculous and then put complete nonsense in the rest of your post. Teams don't lock down their starting lineup in the middle of March. If a better player is available later, they will make him the starter. So if Schaub is available next week or next month or in June, if he is better than a team's starter he will beat out the other guy. If Schaub is available immediately and a team signs him, they may be projecting him as the starter but that's not a guarantee (see Seahawks & Matt Flynn).
So you think the Texans pulled a d!ck move by keeping Kubiak too long??? Or you are one of the folks here who hate everything about the Texans and will spin anything they do into a d!ck move. Personally I would rather they do what is in the best interest of the team, which at times does require some d!ck moves, although Kubiak and Schaub don't fall into that category.
Listen, I will call out anyone I like, and I do not have to take my queue's from you dude. Just because your perception is that my posts are full of crap does not mean they are. But I really appreciate you taking time out of your day to call me out.
The D!ck Move with Kubiak was not allowing him to finish the season with 3 games left, not going to go into it all over again. Read the other threads and get up to speed.
The D!ck Move with Schaub will be robbing him of a chance to start elsewhere by hanging onto him, and while you may think you know how, or when NFL teams set their starting roster, I am going to go ahead and guess you don't since you do not work for any of them, and are not present during contract negotiations, and that you, like many of the other wind bags in here have no idea what you are talking about and are just guessing.
You throw out anecdotal evidence about when teams set their starting lineup by using the Matt Flynn example and expect that to hold water? It's ridiculous. They thought he was the guy, which is why they spent the money on him, only to find in camp, he wasn't the guy. That does not happen all over the NFL every year so give me a break. The guy who gets paid the most, or is drafted 1st overall is going to start in 99.9% of the cases.
Of course teams have a pretty good idea who the starter is going to be, or who they want it to be, yes even in March. Does it happen on occasion when the projected starter does not work out and someone else is inserted, of course, but rarely.
I am one of the people who love the Texans, and I will support whatever they decide to do, and whomever they throw out there, and I will be entertained. It may not always be great entertainment, but it sure beats digging ditches, or reading your posts. it is only people like you who think that what you say in here, or think, makes a damn bit of difference on the direction of the team, or who the coach will select as the starter. We are here to discuss the Texans, and none of us KNOW what is going on, or what will happen, no matter how tuned in you think you are. If you were, you would be working for an NFL team, not posting messages in a forum.
Get over yourself.
