I'm on my cell phone, and I don't know how to quote Mr Tex regarding the matter of O'Brien vs Keenum from the Dallas preseason game thread.
OptimisticTexan brought up how O'Brien regarded Keenum as no more than a third string QB.
Mr Tex, to his credit, countered with "backup/third string", which was at least a better evaluation then OB.
.......
I then talked "football" about how OB's decisions were poor, bringing in Fitz, Mallett, Savage, and then Hoyer...
Keenum was on his second year of a rookie QB contract.
OB was "fresh off the boat" as an NFL QB.
Not only that, he were spending time in the college ranks the two years prior.
Can you imagine a thousand things a HC needs to prepare in that situation?
I disagree strongly the second time Keenum was around, winning two meaningless games (with O'Brien only asking him to manage the game, and understandbly so.)
So, who will be the stop-gap starter and the backup in 2015?
Obviously not Keenum for some reasons.
One is that O'Brien still think he can develop Savage (which turned out not to be the "case").
And he brought in Hoyer, also asking him to manage the game.
In this instance, I think OB let his ego get the best of him.
At least, there was no doubt in my mind that OB wants a taller QB.
But come on, even so, it was still a poor choice of utilizing resources.
How did O'Brien hope to use yet another stop gap measure in Hoyer?
Obviously, he never thought Fitz nor Hoyer to be "good enough" as a stop gap measure, but still holding out hope on Savage.
So O'Brien gave Savage a lot of time "to develop", and what was the end result?
I'm just an amateur scout, so I always know my limit. During a particular college football season, I only concentrate on one or two positions.
I have had access to TenYard Torrents for a long time now, so I got a lot of games.
But I also knew to learn about the defenses that, let's say, a QB had to face during his college career.
I gave ZERO weight against inferior opponents.
A conclusion I drew, and had stated early, around draft time, is that between Andrew Luck, RG III, and Wilson, I'm not so sure which one will end up having the best career.
If I had to, I would still draft Luck.
But I really thought that Wilson would be a better value (because "people" will draft Luck and RG III before they draft Wilson).
I had stated the reasons:
Wilson had played well in the WCO at NC State, and when he moved to the Pro system at Wisconsin, he adapted right away.
He played very well under pressure.
He looked to pass (same with Mahomes in the Air Raid system).
I "prefer" a "general" as a QB, one that can utilizes the other ten men on the field.
One that doesn't mind when an offensive lineman missed a block.
We all learn together to use our collective strength.
To me, it's a team game.
And also, for that reason, I love to have a HC that understand the strength and weakness of his players, and come up with a plan.
I once read a book by a great Texas HS coach (I can't remember his name for the life of me now), but he really opened my eyes.
He prepared his team against the superior team and the lesser team in different ways. He knew how to build confidence in the players agaisnt the "superior" team(s).
And he had methods to guard against let-down against "inferior" teams.
Now, that is a leader of men.