Yes, we have a good group of RBs (which I'm including Foster). The fact that we were able to muster some type of running game, even after our all-world RB goes down, shows how well our depth is at that position. I like out depth at TE, but I do NOT like our starter(s). Yah, I understand if you think that makes no sense what so ever.
In regards to naming backups... come on man, I can easily name the whole 53. Just like I bet you can do the same. I do like Pleasant, I thought he did a great job at helping cover TEs. I do like Bullough & Dent as backups. Tuggle has good experience inside as well.
JMO, and I know everyone doesn't agree, but I'm ok with the depth of this team, except at OL.
Pleasant was playing nickle LB and did a good job. I shudder at the thought of Pleasant playing as a single high safety.
The LB's are good ST's and you better hope that McKinney/Cushing stay healthy. This defense really struggled until Hal replaced Moore and McKinney took over fulltime.