Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Texans agree to terms with Matt Leinart

After reading (most) of the posts int this 18 page thread, let me try and sum it up.

1. We're screwed if Schaub goes down no matter who's the backup. (DanO, Weiner, or Booty). And yes, I deliberately misspelled and making fun of Leinart there.

2. We're screwed if Schaub goes down.

3. It's raining outside.

4. Need. Coffee. This. Morning.


All I have to add to the discussion is this...

Everyone needs to go to their User CP and edit options so that they can see 50 posts per page. My "Texans agree to terms with Matt Leinart" thread is only 8 pages long.
 
Hopefully, he'll spend the year carrying a clipboard, watching and learning from some of the best, and getting his priorities straight. He's a TEXAN now, and I'll support him until he no longer wears our jersey. I want him to succeed, just like I hope Rackers succeeds, as a Texan. As these new guys come in we need to embrace them and make them part of our Texan family. As it has been pointed out so many times on this board, players can have very successful careers after a change of environment. Let's hope this theory works out for both our ex-Cardinals. Seems to be working out pretty good for A. Smith!
 
I have never thought highly of Leinart as a NFL QB, based upon his collegiate success.

If he can't beat out Orlovosky, it should mean that we will be drafting a QB next year and perhaps bringing in another veteran.

I would not call a Kubiak a developer of QBs, so I am not sure of the logic behind carrying three QBs for the year, two of which are career back ups.
 
Most of yall look at it as a mistake, some look at it as a ehhh, who cares about the 3rd string QB. Look at it from this prospective, say Kubaik get's Leinart's head on strait and makes him serviceable, then turns around and trades him for a 3rd or 4th round pick...

anybody gonna complain then? Kubiak did the same thing to Sage....

How do you trade a guy when his contract is up at the end of the year?

You think we're going to be able to trade him before the trade deadline? LOL.

It's a long shot that he re-signs here. (1) Kubiak might not want to re-sign him, and (2) Leinart might want to go be "The Man" somewhere else, which is what's gonna' happen, by the way.

That's why this signing is a big fat question mark. Not a multi-year deal, so that is very telling for both parties: They each are not all that enamored with one another, keeping it to a one-year testing period.

The guy is atrocious, and there's a lot of tape and analysis on him that says his problems are inherent to who he is on AND off the field. The older ya' get, the harder to change those stripes.

People need to stop fooling themselves about the future of Leinart in Houston. It's a one-year gig, as insurance against Orlovsky and Schaub both getting hurt. For as bad as Dan has been, I'd still start him over Leinart right now.
 
How do you trade a guy when his contract is up at the end of the year?

You think we're going to be able to trade him before the trade deadline? LOL.

It's a long shot that he re-signs here. (1) Kubiak might not want to re-sign him, and (2) Leinart might want to go be "The Man" somewhere else, which is what's gonna' happen, by the way.

That's why this signing is a big fat question mark. Not a multi-year deal, so that is very telling for both parties: They each are not all that enamored with one another, keeping it to a one-year testing period.

The guy is atrocious, and there's a lot of tape and analysis on him that says his problems are inherent to who he is on AND off the field. The older ya' get, the harder to change those stripes.

People need to stop fooling themselves about the future of Leinart in Houston. It's a one-year gig, as insurance against Orlovsky and Schaub both getting hurt. For as bad as Dan has been, I'd still start him over Leinart right now.

This is what I don't understand. How come we didn't at least try to work out an option year so that we could at least try and pry a 6 or 7 from somebody in 2011. I thought we should have tried to get that option year on Grossman too. I think you're a little too pessimistic about Leinart but time will tell. Regardless I agree with you on the one year gig thing. He's gone after 2010 and that's fine. I just hope the Texans take this backup QB position more seriously in the future and don't get us in a bind like this again in 2011 (assuming it isn't a lock-out/strike year)
 
Or dare I say...Vince Young. Alot of people mentioned the race card before and quickly got thrown under the bus.

I believe however, that this was a marketing thing though. You see what kind of media Brian Cushing got you, now Leinhart is on your team and ESPN talks about you a bit more.

As for the signing, I got a wait and see feel to this. Something tells me that Leinhart was a Dennis Green draft pick and Wisenhunt didn't want him any more. I've also seen that Leinhart has had the team in several winning positions but their D couldn't hold anyone off (ex. The Bears Game aka Dennis Green They Are Who We Thought They Were and last year against Tennessee.)

So we know we got a backup that has played before.

Bingo!!!
Didn't Wisenhunt bring in Warner during his first year and then brought in Anderson when Warner retired? I'm just saying.... Sure looks like more than coincidence to me.
 
I have never thought highly of Leinart as a NFL QB, based upon his collegiate success.

If he can't beat out Orlovosky, it should mean that we will be drafting a QB next year and perhaps bringing in another veteran.

I would not call a Kubiak a developer of QBs, so I am not sure of the logic behind carrying three QBs for the year, two of which are career back ups.

I've been thinking about this since this signing. We were sold the idea that Kubiak was a very good QB coach when he came here. Since he's been here he's been unable to coach up any of the QBs he's brought in here, save Schaub.

I like Kubiak, but working with Elway, Steve Young and a QB friendly system should not automatically give you the moniker of being an excellent QB coach.

Heck, maybe I'm wrong and he is a great QB coach. I'd just like a little proof
 
I've been thinking about this since this signing. We were sold the idea that Kubiak was a very good QB coach when he came here. Since he's been here he's been unable to coach up any of the QBs he's brought in here, save Schaub.

I like Kubiak, but working with Elway, Steve Young and a QB friendly system should not automatically give you the moniker of being an excellent QB coach.

Heck, maybe I'm wrong and he is a great QB coach. I'd just like a little proof

One thing is for certain, he can implement an offensive attack over a couple of years.
 
This is what I don't understand. How come we didn't at least try to work out an option year so that we could at least try and pry a 6 or 7 from somebody in 2011. I thought we should have tried to get that option year on Grossman too. I think you're a little too pessimistic about Leinart but time will tell. Regardless I agree with you on the one year gig thing. He's gone after 2010 and that's fine. I just hope the Texans take this backup QB position more seriously in the future and don't get us in a bind like this again in 2011 (assuming it isn't a lock-out/strike year)

A large part of my discontent is because there is no future with Leinart. Not as a QB, and not as a trading commodity.

So the risk is not only higher than the reward, there's actually no reward there at all. It's ALL risk.

Do we want a Pouty Face no-good QB in our locker room? People like David Carr and Matt Leinart need to wise up and realize their future is in modeling and not in quarterbacking. It's just how it is.
 
I've been thinking about this since this signing. We were sold the idea that Kubiak was a very good QB coach when he came here. Since he's been here he's been unable to coach up any of the QBs he's brought in here, save Schaub.

I like Kubiak, but working with Elway, Steve Young and a QB friendly system should not automatically give you the moniker of being an excellent QB coach.

Heck, maybe I'm wrong and he is a great QB coach. I'd just like a little proof

:thinking: Ummmmmm, that's kind of a big one; Not to mention Sage did fairly well here too, for being a career **** up, errrrrrrrr back-up.
 
Bingo!!!
Didn't Wisenhunt bring in Warner during his first year and then brought in Anderson when Warner retired? I'm just saying.... Sure looks like more than coincidence to me.

And the move for Warner makes Whisenhunt a whise man.

It made the Cardinals a dominant offensive team who went to the Super Bowl.

So, score card reads Whisenhunt 1....Green 0 in that department.

I have very little sympathy for Leinart. It's like Rick Flair says "You wanna' BE the man? Then you gotta' BEAT the man."
 
:thinking: Ummmmmm, that's kind of a big one; Not to mention Sage did fairly well here too, for being a career **** up, errrrrrrrr back-up.

Plus Sage sucked before he came to Houston. Nobody wanted him. He came to Houston and became a pretty sought after QB, enough to get us a 4th round pick right? Also he goes to Minnesota and he had something there. Enough to make them say, 'we aint just gonna cut him'.

Schaub was supposedly a career back up who only had two career starts in which, I believe, he lost. Now he's tops in the league in percentage and yards.

I'm one that doesn't like Orlovsky to be the backup. However, even I can see where he improved from last year. We only have preseason games to work with but this year he in Az he had us go on a pretty long drive that Slaton fumbled away. That was impressively long drive at that time. He led us on a TD drive against the Saints, and he didn't turn the ball over vs. Dallas. He really only screwed up in the Tampa Bay game. All of that showed me that he's not ready to be a back up QB at this time, but it didn't say that he didn't improve from last year when he started with Kubiak to this year.

Maybe we should also give credit to Kubiak for some decisions he did make concerning the QB position. Heck, he pretty much flat out told Bob Mcnair that HWNSNBM isn't going to cut it and Matt Schaub would and he got that right.
 
I've been thinking about this since this signing. We were sold the idea that Kubiak was a very good QB coach when he came here. Since he's been here he's been unable to coach up any of the QBs he's brought in here, save Schaub.

I like Kubiak, but working with Elway, Steve Young and a QB friendly system should not automatically give you the moniker of being an excellent QB coach.

Heck, maybe I'm wrong and he is a great QB coach. I'd just like a little proof

For the record, what was your opinion of the Schaub trade when we gave up two 2nd rd picks? Did you honestly think Schaub would turn into a pro bowl QB back in 2007?? Did you think it was a good move? (other than the getting rid of HWWNBN factor)
 
And the move for Warner makes Whisenhunt a whise man.

It made the Cardinals a dominant offensive team who went to the Super Bowl.

So, score card reads Whisenhunt 1....Green 0 in that department.

I have very little sympathy for Leinart. It's like Rick Flair says "You wanna' BE the man? Then you gotta' BEAT the man."

You DO realize that's pronounced WIZZ, right?
:D
 
Of course he was angry about not being "The Guy" in Arizona.

When you're staring down the barrel of the "I just got demoted and replaced by Derrick Anderson" gun, you're going to be upset about it. Because it's a reflection of how bad you suck. It's a wake-up call.

And now we get to be a part of his drama. We've co-signed on Leinart's career.

A lot of us just think it's hilarious, to tell you the truth. There's players who show flashes of promise. Do you really sense that in Leinart? Or is it the allure of his college years and that maybe he's not as bad as he has shown?

Our Plan B for QBs and RBs could cost us this year. It really could. All the tight ends and WRs in the world cannot counter a shaky backup QB and RB situation. I'm just nowhere near the idea that Leinart is an acceptable backup in this league.

What's also funny is that several teams are ridding themselves of guys you'd never think would be cut this soon in their careers: Houshmanzadeh, Leinart, etc. I've seen a lot of guys hit the curb and yet other teams can't control themselves from scooping them up off waivers. It's like fantasy football: "Ooh! Someone let HIM go? Oh man, this is waiver wire heaven right here!!!"

Nobody could work out a trade for him, not even a 7th rounder. Wouldn't you take at least a 7th rounder rather than get nothing at all? And we seem to have been bidding against only one other team. Maybe even against ourselves the whole time.

It's bizarre, and a lot of fans feel that way. Not just me.

What team would give up a draft choice for a player they knew the Cardinals were going to release? If they trade for them they take on the contract. If they sign them as FAs they can get them at a discount rate (hopefully).

I remember when the Texans were going to release Aaron Glenn or Jamie Sharper or Gary Walker and a lot of fans thought the team should trade them. It would be great, but most of the teams would rather keep their picks and attempt to sign them as FAs.

I'd be mad if the Texans passed up a solid #2 or got rid of a solid #2 to sign Leinart for a year, but the fact is they didn't. After the Cardinals preseason game I don't remember people discussing Booty as if he were the 2nd coming of Kurt Warner. I wouldn't have minded him being the #2, but I won't off a cliff or ***** and moan about the fact that he got cut and they brought in someone else. This is a 1 year deal in a no-cap year. What exactly do the Texans lose by having him as a backup?
 
For the record, what was your opinion of the Schaub trade when we gave up two 2nd rd picks? Did you honestly think Schaub would turn into a pro bowl QB back in 2007?? Did you think it was a good move? (other than the getting rid of HWWNBN factor)

I suppose I was neutral, if anything. I've never been an advocate of trading draft picks, but given our situation at the position I just looked the other way.
 
I don't know how much of the dirty rumors about Leinart are true (poor work ethic, doesn't work hard, wants to party more than he wants to play football) but he won't last with the Texans long if any of that manifests itself here. I know Kubiak wouldn't have brought him here if he thought any of that was an issue.

And the fact that Az pretty much is picking up the tab on it by outright releasing him, makes it so much less of a gamble.
 
Señor Stan;1513662 said:
All I have to add to the discussion is this...

Everyone needs to go to their User CP and edit options so that they can see 50 posts per page. My "Texans agree to terms with Matt Leinart" thread is only 8 pages long.

Thanks!!!
 
Two problems Matt Leinart had in Arizona. One, Leinart was drafted by Denny Green. He was never Ken Whisenhut's guy. As long as Leinart was there, Whisenhut would never be able to go out and get his kind of QB.

The 2nd problem Leinart had in Arizona? He isn't a good NFL QB. That's not likely to change in Houston.

Maybe he isn't a good QB. Have you seen anything from the other candidates to be Schaub's backup to say they are or can be good QBs?
 
Leinart, 1 year deal, 3rd string QB replacing John David Booty? I'll take it.

As others have pointed out his 'past', that concerns me some as well. Prima-donna attitude, reports of a HWSNBN-like work ethic replacing the family with college chicks, etc etc. But I'm willing to give guys a second chance. He's been embarrassed the last couple years, finally gets released and has to sign on with some team in Houston that's never been to the playoffs to be their 3rd string QB sitting behind Dan 'winless' Orlovsky??? Pretty humbling. He's a Texan and I hope we can all support him. As much as we may poke fun of or not like Leinart's off-field antics.... as far as we know that's been partying and hot tub late nights with hot chicks. I'm willing to give him the chance to redeem himself after "those terrible" crimes. Work ethic is basically what it comes to, and he's got to prove THIS SEASON that he's got it. If not, he won't be on the Texans and will be a 3rd string for the Lions or Raiders or Rams next year if he's in the NFL at all. As far as we know he doesn't sexually assualt women in clubs, he doesn't torture animals and run underground dogfighting rings, he hasn't had weapon and drug charges, and gosh darnit he isn't a habitual user of hCG!!

Seriously, what I'd like to happen is Kubiak/Knapp spends time working with him (the same time they would have been spending with Booty) and he shows development. He shows them he's (1) got the talent and just as importantly, if not moreso (2) he's got it in his mind of what has to be done now - aka better work ethic. He comes in when we're up a bunch in the 4th quarter for Kubes to evaluate, get some real time film and we like what we see. End up re-signing him to a 2-3 year deal. At this point Dan-O has 1 year left on his contract, either stays or gets cut. All our players are in their prime, we're a consistent deep playoff threat and Leinart develops well into this system that we only have to carry 2 QBs on the roster. We're making our Super Bowl runs, Leinart gets mop up duty for the most part but he's been developed into a great backup.
 
Matt Leinart has tons more potential than John David Booty. If Leinart doesn't have the drive to improve that Kubiak wants, he'll be gone. Some say Leinart doesn't have any future in Houston... well the same can be said about John David Booty. Leinart has the chance to improve, beat out Dan-O and become our solid backup QB. I never saw that in Booty.
 
What team would give up a draft choice for a player they knew the Cardinals were going to release? If they trade for them they take on the contract. If they sign them as FAs they can get them at a discount rate (hopefully).

I remember when the Texans were going to release Aaron Glenn or Jamie Sharper or Gary Walker and a lot of fans thought the team should trade them. It would be great, but most of the teams would rather keep their picks and attempt to sign them as FAs.

I'd be mad if the Texans passed up a solid #2 or got rid of a solid #2 to sign Leinart for a year, but the fact is they didn't. After the Cardinals preseason game I don't remember people discussing Booty as if he were the 2nd coming of Kurt Warner. I wouldn't have minded him being the #2, but I won't off a cliff or ***** and moan about the fact that he got cut and they brought in someone else. This is a 1 year deal in a no-cap year. What exactly do the Texans lose by having him as a backup?

I think it's just odd that we took the guy on. That's pretty much it.

Yes, we didn't lose a draft pick. Yes, it sounds as though the contract is cheap (due to him getting a ROYAL payment from the Cardinals).

The risks are that he's a dud superstar coming into a locker room full of guys who are the antithesis of what he has been his whole career. I hope our guys influence HIM and not the other way around. We don't need anoybody buying into his Poor Pitiful Me act. That's a risk.

Another risk is that the coaching staff somehow elevates him to QB #2 over the course of the season, and then he gets to come in if Schaub goes out with an injury. I don't want that. None of us should want that. There's still a little shine left on Leinart that hasn't faded yet, and he better be the 3rd string guy and just ride out his time with us.

The last thing, and it's not really a "risk," is that the guy is gone after this year. One year deal. He will NOT stay here to be the backup next year. You can bank on that.

So my opinion is that this was a weird acquistion for us. Awkward. But hey, it got us talking about something for several days didn't it? Gonna' make the week fly by.

Oh, and you can bet your boots that the MAIN STORY about the Texans (with the sports media this weekend) will be shots of Leinart in a Texans uniform on the sideline. That'll be the lead-in to talk about our game with the Colts. Then they'll transition with talking about Schaub's performance against the Colts. Then, after this Sunday...it won't be a topic anymore. LOL.
 
Who here believes that if Schaub went down in the next few weeks for let's say only 4 games, either Orlovsky or Leinart could afford us a "stay in the race" 2-2 record? In a year that the team and ownership has essentially relayed the message that they are pulling out all the stops to at least reach the playoffs, it blows my mind that there has been no move to bring in veteran backup. Sage didn't give us quality starter material, but he gave us 6victories in 12 games. We have NO reasonable expectations that either of our present backups can offer us much of any hope if Schaub goes down for even only a couple of games. A team like this, with goals for THIS year, have got to have more forthought to the backup position than just having a clipboard holder or a player you want to see if you can turn around and develop.
 
Are you suggesting what I think you're suggesting? Really?

All I'm suggesting is that Schaub was due for a $10 million roster bonus last year.

From the Dec 7 article (after the JAX game.)

Why is the recovery process for this injury different this time around (since it's basically the same injury)?

Maybe it's because they understand the nature of the injury, having been through it before.

And maybe it's because Schaub doesn't want to miss any more time and may be willing to play through some pain because: a) he never played in more than 11 games during his first two seasons as a Texan because of injuries, and b) he's due a $10 million option bonus at the end of this season that would trigger the final three years of his contract.

I'm guessing that bonus would be in serious jeopardy if he's on the sideline for the remainder of this season.

The Texans traded for Schaub's contract in 2007. The contract had a three year base (which is in its final year) and a three year option, which if exercised, would extend Schaub's deal through 2012. (note that the linked article was written in September, 2008)

If the Texans choose to exercise the option, they have to notify Schaub and his agent on or before February 12. The option bonus, if exercised, would be payable on March 15 and would extend Schaub through 2012.

To be honest, as much as I like Matt, there were times last year when I thought the same thing. It's not uncommon for players to crank it up when they have a big bonus or contract extension coming up.

I like the guy too and can't argue with his results. I know he looked like a hero on TV when he came charging back into the JAX game after getting knocked out.

I'm just pointing out that he also had a financial incentive for getting back into that game. Bearing that in mind, I don't have any problem bringing in Leinart. He has way more of an upside than any other backup QB that's out there.

BTW, any Texan fan who doesn't read AJ's column is doing themselves a disservice. He has a lot of info you don't hear anywhere else.
 
Who here believes that if Schaub went down in the next few weeks for let's say only 4 games, either Orlovsky or Leinart could afford us a "stay in the race" 2-2 record? In a year that the team and ownership has essentially relayed the message that they are pulling out all the stops to at least reach the playoffs, it blows my mind that there has been no move to bring in veteran backup. Sage didn't give us quality starter material, but he gave us 6victories in 12 games. We have NO reasonable expectations that either of our present backups can offer us much of any hope if Schaub goes down for even only a couple of games. A team like this, with goals for THIS year, have got to have more forthought to the backup position than just having a clipboard holder or a player you want to see if you can turn around and develop.

People can say he's a diva all they want, but this where a guy like Jeff Garcia would shine. he has the scrambling ability and the past experience with being in a good offense (Philly).

He'd be a guy who could take our weapons at TE, RB, and WR and would just flourish. IMO, of course.

We need a real salty, scrappy guy out there in case Schaub goes down. Not a few guys who are jittery and insecure. I'd take Joe Montana right now over the backups we have.
 
Who here believes that if Schaub went down in the next few weeks for let's say only 4 games, either Orlovsky or Leinart could afford us a "stay in the race" 2-2 record? In a year that the team and ownership has essentially relayed the message that they are pulling out all the stops to at least reach the playoffs, it blows my mind that there has been no move to bring in veteran backup. Sage didn't give us quality starter material, but he gave us 6victories in 12 games. We have NO reasonable expectations that either of our present backups can offer us much of any hope if Schaub goes down for even only a couple of games. A team like this, with goals for THIS year, have got to have more forthought to the backup position than just having a clipboard holder or a player you want to see if you can turn around and develop.

If Schaub goes down right now, we've got Dan The Interception Man to come in and Matt Hot Tub Leinart still learning. No, I don't believe any of our QBs (including Booty if he came back) can take over for Schaub and play, at a minimum, at 500 level football and hold the fort until Schaub returns.
 
Saw Troy Smith and Pat White were released. Those are two guys I wouldn't have minded seeing as our 3rd string. Add a little more excitment to things. :)
 
A large part of my discontent is because there is no future with Leinart. Not as a QB, and not as a trading commodity.

So the risk is not only higher than the reward, there's actually no reward there at all. It's ALL risk.

Do we want a Pouty Face no-good QB in our locker room? People like David Carr and Matt Leinart need to wise up and realize their future is in modeling and not in quarterbacking. It's just how it is.

David Carr hasn't gone on to destroy any team that he's played a back-up role for. I don't think Leinart will either. :scarygirl:
 
Plus Sage sucked before he came to Houston. Nobody wanted him. He came to Houston and became a pretty sought after QB, enough to get us a 4th round pick right? Also he goes to Minnesota and he had something there. Enough to make them say, 'we aint just gonna cut him'.

Schaub was supposedly a career back up who only had two career starts in which, I believe, he lost. Now he's tops in the league in percentage and yards.

I'm one that doesn't like Orlovsky to be the backup. However, even I can see where he improved from last year. We only have preseason games to work with but this year he in Az he had us go on a pretty long drive that Slaton fumbled away. That was impressively long drive at that time. He led us on a TD drive against the Saints, and he didn't turn the ball over vs. Dallas. He really only screwed up in the Tampa Bay game. All of that showed me that he's not ready to be a back up QB at this time, but it didn't say that he didn't improve from last year when he started with Kubiak to this year.

Maybe we should also give credit to Kubiak for some decisions he did make concerning the QB position. Heck, he pretty much flat out told Bob Mcnair that HWNSNBM isn't going to cut it and Matt Schaub would and he got that right.

Let's also not forget that against TB, we were down to a single RB and Kubiak had to adjust his game plan to throw, throw, throw so that he didn't get his last good RB hurt. Would've been much different play-calling in a real-game situation. Orlovsky made some huge strides this year, and I see why Kubiak decided to keep him on. But BECAUSE of those mistakes against TB, I also see why he went after Leinart.
 
If Schaub goes down right now, we've got Dan The Interception Man to come in and Matt Hot Tub Leinart still learning. No, I don't believe any of our QBs (including Booty if he came back) can take over for Schaub and play, at a minimum, at 500 level football and hold the fort until Schaub returns.

The same can be said about every team. If the starter goes down, the team is toast. Brady/Cassell is an anomaly. Although the Patriots didn't make the playoffs, 11 wins is pretty damn good for a starter much less a back up! I do understand the difference here though, is that Schaub has been injured before and missed significant time. But I think this past year he's showed everybody he isn't soft, he can take the hits, and that he's NOT injury prone.

If Dan-O or Leinart or Booty had to come in, I would not feel comfortable at all about our chances. Sage at least gave me some confidence, that feeling of "hey it doesn't look great but we've got a chance". But even with Sage, who we consider a great backup to have.... I don't see us have much shot at all of playoffs - and if we happen to make it, we'd be out in the first round. We might be able to bet the Rams/Lions/Etc but having to face the Ravens/Jets/Chargers??? Heck no.
 
I do understand the difference here though, is that Schaub has been injured before and missed significant time. But I think this past year he's showed everybody he isn't soft, he can take the hits, and that he's NOT injury prone.

I think it's too early to say that. He's been here 3 years and only played one complete season. And like I said before, he had a financial incentive last season.
 
A large part of my discontent is because there is no future with Leinart. Not as a QB, and not as a trading commodity.
Totally understandable. But any QB we brought in would most likely be signed to a 1 year deal and their future with the Texans would be about as good as Booty's, Craig Nall's or Shane Boyd's. As far as Leinart being trade bate? It's very doubtful THIS year. Unless a team has QB injuries and gets desperate or what I won't speak of... how Sage's value increased. A team could want to trade for him (6th/7th conditional) knowing their chances of getting him if he's an unrestricted FA would be thin. Again, I think any trade with him this season is very unlikely.

The main thing is which ever QB we have, had, or could have had as our 3rd stringer had a longshot to stay in a Texans uniform for a long period of time. It's not out of the question that we re-sign Leinart after this season. Probably he goes elsewhere, but on the other hand if Booty were the 3rd string still we may have ended up getting rid of him, drafting a QB in 2011 draft or picking up another guy next season.

I wouldn't get too caught up in Leinart's 1 year deal and potential no future with the Texans bit. Not unless we had cut Orlovsky and only had Schaub/Leinart on the roster!
 
I do understand the difference here though, is that Schaub has been injured before and missed significant time. But I think this past year he's showed everybody he isn't soft, he can take the hits, and that he's NOT injury prone.
I think it's too early to say that. He's been here 3 years and only played one complete season. And like I said before, he had a financial incentive last season.
I hear you. But there were huge question marks about Schaub going into last year. A lot of people were calling him soft, etc etc. He answered the questions for me. Regardless of the "contract/bonus theory" he's showed the toughness to stay in the games after every tough hit. He's developed into THE leader of this team, he's got the confidence, and his team mates believe in him. He's not missing significant time unless its a significant injury. THAT is what could happen to any QB. Is he Favre? no but he's proved he's going to stay in the game unless a bone is broken, that he's not "injury prone". That's good enough for me.
 
For the record, what was your opinion of the Schaub trade when we gave up two 2nd rd picks? Did you honestly think Schaub would turn into a pro bowl QB back in 2007?? Did you think it was a good move? (other than the getting rid of HWWNBN factor)

I know you're not asking me but... I thought it was a genius move. I thought Schaub was going to be a great QB. I thought he was a perfect fit.
 
I know you're not asking me but... I thought it was a genius move. I thought Schaub was going to be a great QB. I thought he was a perfect fit.

I just knew we needed to get HWWNBM out of town. I wasn't a big fan of using two #2s to get a backup QB with limited starts. I was for bringing in a F/A or two (Jake the Snake, Chris Simms, and Jeff Garcia were available) and let them duke it out with Sage for the starting job.

But when Schaub's first official act was to call his teammates and get to know them; he had me on his side. I'd never heard of a guy calling his future teammates before he had even moved to town.
 
I just knew we needed to get HWWNBM out of town. I wasn't a big fan of using two #2s to get a backup QB with limited starts. I was for bringing in a F/A or two (Jake the Snake, Chris Simms, and Jeff Garcia were available) and let them duke it out with Sage for the starting job.

But when Schaub's first official act was to call his teammates and get to know them; he had me on his side. I'd never heard of a guy calling his future teammates before he had even moved to town.

Prior to the trade, I had heard a lot about how Schaub was really a #1 even though he was backing up Vick. He was the hottest thing on the market (even though he wasn't a FA) and several teams were trying to work out trades to get him. When we landed him, I was surprised and heartened because we were getting a true franchise QB from everything I'd seen and heard. I was kinda pissed when people started dissing him as just some backup QB.
 
Prior to the trade, I had heard a lot about how Schaub was really a #1 even though he was backing up Vick. He was the hottest thing on the market (even though he wasn't a FA) and several teams were trying to work out trades to get him. When we landed him, I was surprised and heartened because we were getting a true franchise QB from everything I'd seen and heard. I was kinda pissed when people started dissing him as just some backup QB.

Yep. Schaub was a backup in function only. He was a talent that everybody was sniffing around. That's why when Kubiak met him over a weekend and played golf with him and got to know him, they hammered out a deal FAST. If you recall, that whole thing went down pretty quickly.

A bunch of other teams were after Schaub.
 
I know you're not asking me but... I thought it was a genius move. I thought Schaub was going to be a great QB. I thought he was a perfect fit.
Ditto. I even made a bet with a friend that he'd make the Pro Bowl in 3-5 years. This conceding the fact that Manning and Brady were virtual locks, leaving only 1 spot open. And the fact that his first "pro bowl calibre" year wouldn't get him in, he'd have to have 2 straight.
But when Schaub's first official act was to call his teammates and get to know them; he had me on his side. I'd never heard of a guy calling his future teammates before he had even moved to town.
I forgot about that. What a great move bringing Schaub in. That was an awesome thing to hear too!
Prior to the trade, I had heard a lot about how Schaub was really a #1 even though he was backing up Vick. He was the hottest thing on the market (even though he wasn't a FA) and several teams were trying to work out trades to get him. When we landed him, I was surprised and heartened because we were getting a true franchise QB from everything I'd seen and heard. I was kinda pissed when people started dissing him as just some backup QB.
There was even a large number of Atlanta fans that knew he was a better QB than Vick and that he really should be starting in place of him. I kind of laugh thinking back about those "Start Sage over Schaub" threads too.
 
Prior to the trade, I had heard a lot about how Schaub was really a #1 even though he was backing up Vick. He was the hottest thing on the market (even though he wasn't a FA) and several teams were trying to work out trades to get him. When we landed him, I was surprised and heartened because we were getting a true franchise QB from everything I'd seen and heard. I was kinda pissed when people started dissing him as just some backup QB.

I have to smile to myself about that. It's rather entertaining to go back into the archives and see who was bashing Schaub and wanting him to be benched, traded, or burned in effigy just a couple of years ago.

must resist
urge to
name names
:D
 
I have to smile to myself about that. It's rather entertaining to go back into the archives and see who was bashing Schaub and wanting him to be benched, traded, or burned in effigy just a couple of years ago.

must resist
urge to
name names
:D

Aw, go ahead and name names. I was one of them. I trashed Schaub and the trade to get him. Looks light I might have been a tad wrong on that one. LOL
 
Aw, go ahead and name names. I was one of them. I trashed Schaub and the trade to get him. Looks light I might have been a tad wrong on that one. LOL

Aww... it's all good.
Remember, I wasn't initially thrilled about the deal either. I knew SOMETHING had to be done, I just wasn't sure that was it. Turns out, it was.
 
Saw Troy Smith and Pat White were released. Those are two guys I wouldn't have minded seeing as our 3rd string. Add a little more excitment to things. :)

I would have liked to have given either one of those guys the "rope" they've given Orlovsky. I will say, I'm not sure either has the arm strength that Dan-O does. They just seem to have more smarts. In my book smarts >> arm strength at the QB position.
 
All this still begs the question of how our quarterback evaluation guru and negotiation guru have waited for the last minute to put us in this messy situation in a year that's so important to everyone's "security" and psyche.
 
I would have liked to have given either one of those guys the "rope" they've given Orlovsky. I will say, I'm not sure either has the arm strength that Dan-O does. They just seem to have more smarts. In my book smarts >> arm strength at the QB position.

Nothing against Orlovsky personally, for one who was hoping that Orlovsky would have developed as expected, I have to say that I had never heard Orlovsky speak before.............until the Bucs preinterview. I thought that I was listening to a boxer who had taken one too many hits. It seemed as though he had a great deal of trouble putting one word after the other. He left me with the feeling that he would need one hell of an arm out there on the field.
 
I just don't see how this situation is much different from last season when we had playoff aspirations and started the season with Dan-O and Grossman behind Schaub.
I don't recall everyone crying that the sky was falling because we had a reclamation project as a third string QB back then.
Pretty similar situation if you ask me, other than the fact that a lot of people dislike Lineart personally, because they think he's arrogant, or more likely they're Horns fans who have dislike for him in their DNA.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top