Texans_Chick
Utopian Dreamer
Okay looking at the report, including doing a stop page to read the letters involved makes me think the following:
1. Stevenson's lawyer screwed up his original grievance at a minimum with procedural errors. The letter from the NFL says both procedural and factual errors.
2. There are two issues: 1. Whether drills were impermissible; 2. Whether the Texans failed to pay for needed treatment.
3. It is not uncommon for teams and players to have disagreements with teams about when injuries occurred. That is not a federal case. NFL players, especially linemen, tend to be nicked up. All teams want players to report injuries right away.
4. Just because a team denies paying for a surgery and then pays for it, and then says that paying for it isn't admission of liability, is no big deal. They made it a big deal in the ESPN report, but that is just legal verbiage.
Stevenson is fussing now because his original grievance was denied because it appears as though his lawyer screwed up. That's what procedural problems are--you didn't file something the right way.
1. Stevenson's lawyer screwed up his original grievance at a minimum with procedural errors. The letter from the NFL says both procedural and factual errors.
2. There are two issues: 1. Whether drills were impermissible; 2. Whether the Texans failed to pay for needed treatment.
3. It is not uncommon for teams and players to have disagreements with teams about when injuries occurred. That is not a federal case. NFL players, especially linemen, tend to be nicked up. All teams want players to report injuries right away.
4. Just because a team denies paying for a surgery and then pays for it, and then says that paying for it isn't admission of liability, is no big deal. They made it a big deal in the ESPN report, but that is just legal verbiage.
Stevenson is fussing now because his original grievance was denied because it appears as though his lawyer screwed up. That's what procedural problems are--you didn't file something the right way.