I'm impressed, you went an entire post without cursing.
Progress
What would BOB have to do to win you over? I really am curious.
Actually, this post I'm making right here is my 22nd in a row without cursing. Go look for yourself.
Bill O'Brien doesn't have to "win me over." See that's the thing that bugs me the most here about him. This is why I refer to this whole thing as a cult. "You either join us and love him unconditionally or you're against him and you're still in love with the guy who was here before and the vision that was here before even though you've made ample criticisms when they need to be made."
"What does he have to do to show you that he is the light?"
It's not about "winning me over" or "losing me." It's about doing things that don't bother me. So far, he's conducted himself in a fashion which I don't like, given my proclivities. I don't think that'll ever change, given his inclinations. I don't think he's been all that impressive thus far and I think the heaps of adulation and cloak of infallibility that he has received is hasty at best. I think he's shown quite a bit of what people criticized all day every day about the previous guy in charge, and I think unadulterated praise regarding his game preparedness, playcalling, other game management management is hilarious given his failings thus far in the Dallas game, the Colts games, the Steelers game, and the Bengals/Mallett injury game. And of course, the fact that he was touted as a tight end/offensive/QB guru and all that yet didn't nearly use the tight end enough given our terrible situation at quarterback. Bad quarterbacks need security blankets. It baffles me how someone touted as a tight end/offensive/QB guru could have done so poorly in utilizing the position over an entire season.
And I think it's hilarious that everyone touts the turnaround to 9-7 as if 2-14 was the average for the two years prior. I realize that all of us wanted to win a Super Bowl in the first ten years of our existence and the numerous frustrations emanating from the Kubiak/Schaub-led years clouded everyone and made us feel like 2-14 was the norm, but people forget that the team was division champs for two years despite unbelievable injuries and luck and that it took the perfect storm of ridiculous to craft the 2-14 year. This is what I kept saying all last offseason. You people were coming from the idea that 2-14 was what we actually were and that 9-7 is MINDBLOWING because you expected 4-6 wins in 2014. I was coming from the idea that 2-14 was a *complete* abberation and I expected AT LEAST 8-8, 9-7 in 2014. This is why Bill O'Brien didn't impress me that much, even past the numerous and repeated specific in-game failings. This team did what it was SUPPOSED to do and the fact that the team let numerous games go that they should have won to put us back into the playoffs where we belonged to begin with angered me so much. And considering all this, when I see him get so much adoration, it bothers me that much more.
You people like the fact that he's turning us into the Patriots. I'm fine with turning into the Patriots in terms of winning. I'm not fine with turning into the Patriots in terms of how they conduct their business, their attitudes and personalities, and worst of all, their fanbase. You can be a successful franchise and organization without being morphed into an insufferable collection. The Green Bay Packers somehow do it. The Denver Broncos are not detestable. The Pittsburgh Steelers are highly respectful, tactful, and the picture of stability and loyalty. The St. Louis Cardinals are a model of class and dignity. The San Francisco Giants are smart, savvy, scrappy, and adaptable. And so on and so forth. Not only are there franchises that are successful, stable, iconic but respectable, so too are there players who are the same way. There are lovable and venerable players and there are repugnant players.
But of course, hating the New England Patriots (and all Boston Sports Teams and Fans) has to be reduced to hating them because they're successful, right? No. If we only hated teams and people because they're successful (as stated by you, Barackxecutioner, Kanye West, and society in general) then we wouldn't hate the Jaguars and Titans and I wouldn't hate the Mets, Phillies, Marlins, Raiders, and so many other countless examples. If I only hated teams and people because they're successful, I would LOVE the Los Angeles Lakers and Kobe Bryant right about now. But I don't. Why? Because there *are* other reasons to find something or someone detestable. When the New England Patriots are broken and busted, I'll still be there with a profound hatred for the team. It's because my hatred isn't based on superficial nonsense like success.
I abhor the fact that the franchise I adore is slowly morphing into the franchise I loathe the most. The Andre Johnson fiasco only confirms this trend. Not that they cut him, mind you. But how it went down. Again, you people only see it as morphing into a winning franchise, but to me, it's more than that because above all, that's where I formulate my deep love for the franchises I choose to root for. I look into personalities, attitudes, the way business is conducted, etc. I look for reasons beyond success. I look for ties to my character. It helps me fall in love more. For a long time, I used to be proud that all four of the teams I root for somehow, someway were a reflection of my strongest qualities. Integrity and honor. Not so much anymore. The Suns have been taken over by an owner, general manager and players who have ruined the very fabric of what I loved about them. The Sabres are straight up losing on purpose for draft picks. Maybe I shouldn't do this, but hey, that's what I do. What good is success if you don't like the people who are achieving the success?