wrong icak. they have lost 2 starters from last years roster however you cut it. studdard was a replacement for Pitts the 'starter'.
i appreciate your candor in stating that you would like to get Pitts back, because so would I, but trying to act like he isn't a starter is revisionist. Could they lure him back? sure, and the longer the Texans go without addressing the Guard position in Free Agency and the longer Pitts goes unsigned, the better the chance.
As of now they have lost 2 starters. As of yesterday they had lost 3 starters. They managed to lure one back onto the team and they get kudos for that, but I am not going to act like Pitts isn't a starter. Even Kubiak himself spoke about getting Pitts back as their starter in his post season presser. That was why I was so taken aback when they let him test the UFA waters. Yes, Dunta they chose to get rid of but he was the best corner in this market and was obviously worth enough for a playoff contending team, Atlanta, to break open the bank for him. It is obvious that Dunta burned his bridges here but he was a starter and our best corner at the end of the day.
they had lost 3 starters. they got one back. now they have lost 2 starters. could they get Pitts back and make it where they only end up losing 1 starter? Sure and I hope that is the case but to act like we haven't lost anything is a disservice to the years and quality play that Dunta and Pitts put in here. It's your right, but I think its kinda narrow minded.