If Kubiak didn't have some sort of bizarre personal issue with Slaton, yada yada yada...yak yak yak...
WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???
First things first....
If Kubiak didn't have some sort of bizarre personal issue with Slaton, he would have already been trying to build his offense around him, much like the Eagles have used Westbrook so creatively over the years.
Umm, Kubiak would love nothing more than have the ability to build his offense around a running back and a strong running game (infact it possibly cost him two victories in the first 3 games), but Slaton keeps putting the damn ball on the ground everytime he tries to go to Slaton and on top of that, he's lost some of his quickness/explosiveness because Slaton decided to add weght during the offseason (and people please spare me the "he's still quick and fast as ever" crap......I still have all the game tape of him last year.....he's not the same player). I even mentioned as much this past offseason....
I WATCHED this guy throughout his college career, I saw this coming (but even I couldn't predict that he would fall this far)
I mean you're really going to question Kubiak and Gibbs....the two guys who never had a problem with finding a creative way to use a RB in their careers, but don't question Slaton?
Instead, last season Kubiak stuck with the likes of washed up Ahman Green, as long as he could, in order to hold down Slaton's touches. This season, he was already using mediocre journeyman Chris Brown at the goal line (how about giving Slaton a chance first? He didn't do poorly last season, and should have been given the first crack at it). He also publicly bemoaned his team's failure to sign Cedric Benson. That was a totally unprofessional move, almost unprecedented for a head coach in the NFL. How did he expect his starting RB to feel after hearing those comments?
LMFAO!!! Ahman Green...you do know that the guy who Kubiak allowed to "hold Slaton down last year" only carried the ball
74 TIMES all of last season......that's only 4.6 carries a game.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/styles/texanstalk/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Whew! you are funny, what a joke. You do realize EVERY SINGLE TEAM IN THE NFL has a #2 back? Even Adrian Peterson has Chester Taylor
As far as Chris Brown, he was never signed to take Slaton's carries. He was signed to help on short goal line carries.....where Slaton struggled last season. (where Houston struggled horribly last season.) That was NOT anything against Slaton, it was just the same thing that EVERY NFL TEAM DOES. (especially teams that have smallish RBs who struggle at the goal line).
As far as the "totally unprofessional move". Kubiak was just being honest...yeah, if they knew then, what they know now...they would like to have the "
NFL's LEADING RUSHER" when their back is getting tackled in the backfield and laying the ball on the ground every single game. (LMAO, who wouldn't want the NFL's leading rusher?)
I suspect that Kubiak also has a lot of Shanahan in him. Shanny loved to change RBs, often for no rational reason. I think both of them feel that their "system" is so brilliant and works so well, thus they can plug any scrub back they find (and Moats is a perfect example of that) in and produce results. Forget Slaton's fumbles
Again, WTF are you talking about? Shanahan lost ALOT of those runners because they either wanted high priced contracts (way more than they were worth to keep) or other teams offered a kings' ransom for them (alot more than they were worth).......please point to where that has happened here.. Please point to where either
A. Slaton entered the end of his contract and another team offered him a expensive FA contract
or
B. A team offered a trade that you just couldn't turn down for Steve Slaton...
Unless either of those things have happened you simply have no clue of what you're talking about.
Also LMAO at the "Forget Slaton's fumbles".....yeah, let's all just "forget the most important thing that
EVERY HEAD COACH ASKS A YOUNG PLAYER TO DO." Which is to
HOLD ON TO THE DAMN BALL! Truth is on any other team that was trying to make a push for the playoffs, Slaton would've been benched a LONG time ago. Even Slaton knows this.
Kubiak was screwing with him in the offseason, before he had any fumbling problem. The guy never really praised him for his stellar rookie season, and continued with his "we expected him to be no more than a third down back, and he really surprised us" posture in regards to a rookie back that put up better numbers than Chris Johnson. There was never a moment where his words or actions indicated that the team was content with Slaton as the starter, and were willing to build things around him to make him even better (like their woeful offensive line).
And this couldn't be further from the truth, Kubiak said Slaton was "drafted to be a third down back".....guess what? Every team in the league had that grade on him...it's the reason why he went in the middle of the 3rd round. Kubiak then praised Slaton for how much he exceeded their expectations....which is nothing like the spin you're trying to put out. My god, this is the same coach who dispite benching Slaton for fumbling the ball, told Slaton that the team still needs him and they still believe in him (but you forgot that.)
There is nothing Kubiak would love more than for Slaton to get his **** together and be the runner that he was last year and the fact that he hasn't been the back that he was last year isn't anybody's fault except his own.
IT'S SLATON'S FAULT.... Kubiak has done nothing but put him in situations where he could succeed, which is why when it became apparent Slaton couldn't run the ball like he did last year, Kubiak started getting involved on screens just so he could find ways to get the ball in his hands. Hell Kubiak has practically been wiping the guy's ass this year.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/styles/texanstalk/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
God forbid if he had a coach like Belichick. I don't know many coaches who would put up with a 3.1 ypc runner that put the ball on the ground 7 damn times in only 8 games
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/styles/texanstalk/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)