Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
I did not try to compare anything or anybody.At the end of the day……Mills hasn’t even played his rookie season yet. So what in the world is everyone trying to compare. When Mills finally gets a season in the books we’ll all have something to base a comparison on. I look forward to watching when his opportunity finally arrives.
If our ol is crap they'll be reluctant to put him in.
I think it's inevitable he starts by seasons end though.
I think it’s more being flustered about “Oily” never playing a down for HOU again than anything Mills has or has not done especially considering he has yet to play a single freaking down in the NFL.At the end of the day……Mills hasn’t even played his rookie season yet. So what in the world is everyone trying to compare. When Mills finally gets a season in the books we’ll all have something to base a comparison on. I look forward to watching when his opportunity finally arrives.
How about the David Carr comparison? Both are playing on teams with expansion level talent.
If our ol is crap they'll have to put him in because Taylor will be in the hospital. LOL
Nothing personal to you, BL, or Mr. Mills, but please stop that Stanford smart thing.Interesting the Media and fan base are worried about Herbert slipping into a sophomore slump, per avg. stats of grouping 2nd year QB production compared to their rookie season. My guess because teams have tape and can game plan against his tendencies. Despite having more time in the pocket better running game with much improved OL. So second year is different than first where you more or less sling it around and play to your strengths.
Hence, Mills can sling it around and showcase his arm strength, accuracy and touch. What you guys worry about will come later, reading the defense, anticipating the Windows and developing timing with receivers. That only comes with PT/reps, and he will pick up playbook quick, Stanford smart.
So school smarts don’t mean anything, but you feel the need to attack his school smarts regardlessSchool smart doesn't translate directly into football smart.
Studies had proved that IQ has no relation with football performance.
Mills isn't all that smart to begin with.
He had a 3.5 GPA in HS.
His college major, STS, is in the humanity field, a far cry from rocket science.
Nothing personal to you, BL, or Mr. Mills, but please stop that Stanford smart thing.
School smart doesn't translate directly into football smart.
Studies had proved that IQ has no relation with football performance.
Mills isn't all that smart to begin with.
He had a 3.5 GPA in HS.
![]()
Prep
www.gwinnettprepsports.com
Sounds pretty good until it becomes known that the top 20% of the graduates has a 4.41 GPA.
College Counseling - Greater Atlanta Christian School
College Counseling - Greater Atlanta Christian Schoolwww.greateratlantachristian.org
His college major, STS, is in the humanity field, a far cry from rocket science.
The median starting salary for a graduate from that field (53K) trails several standard degrees (with Engineering being the top earner at nearly 70K)
![]()
Starting Salary Projections for Top-Earning Degrees Level
While engineering, computer science, and math and sciences degrees continue to be the highest earning bachelor’s degrees, the individual average projections for these degrees appear to have leveled.www.naceweb.org
Why do you think everything has to be an attack?So school smarts don’t mean anything, but you feel the need to attack his school smarts regardless
![]()
But it doesn’t matter. That’s what you said, why even mention it?Why do you think everything has to be an attack?
The truth is not an attack.
It's just a fact.
Why do you think everything has to be an attack?
The truth is not an attack.
It's just a fact.
Because Ignorance is not Bliss.But it doesn’t matter. That’s what you said, why even mention it?
I'm not comparing anything.Why is it OK for you to post this about Mills but not the Pervert.
Tell you what, lets compare Mills grades to the Perverts grades. In fact lets compare Mills real world smarts to the Perverts real world smarts.
Not saying Mills will be as good a QB as Pervert but lets compare athletic testing and Wunderlich testing at the Combine.
I mean if this is where you really want to go.
So school smarts don’t mean anything, but you feel the need to attack his school smarts regardless
![]()
Understandable. I was with him when he stated it didn’t matter.i took it as 76ers response to those using his cardinal pedigree as a guarantee of his qb iq
It's the truth to dispell the rumor of a Stanford smart.Understandable. I was with him when he stated it didn’t matter.
But then to argue Mills isn’t “that smart” & minimize Mills’ major... low blow, if it doesn’t matter
You got it.i took it as 76ers response to those using his cardinal pedigree as a guarantee of his qb iq
& if you left it at that, it would have been fine. End of argument.First off, I had already stated that a QB does not to be any kind of a "genius" in math, science, etc. to be a good NFL QB.
Don't forget big Dan flipping his boat into a crowd and killing 2 people.
Here's an excerpt from the story:
LIBERTY, Tex., May 26 (AP) - A Liberty County grand jury ruled today that there was no criminal responsibility involved in an accident in which a jet-powered boat driven by Dan Pastorini. Houston Oiler quarterback, crashed into a crowd in Liberty County last Sunday. Two persons died as a result of the mishap.
Pastorini's boat went out of control as it crossed the finish line of a drag race on Lake Mizzel. The boat struck the shoreline at a speed estimated at 100 miles an hour, hurtled 101 feet through the air and stopped after having crashed into three parked vehicles.
Sherry Gasllins, 10 years-old, of Houston, was killed at the scene. Herman Dale Johnson, 33, of Houston, died yesterday at a Houston hospital. Pastorini was not injured.
A thief knows a thief as a wolf knows a wolf.& if you left it at that, it would have been fine. End of argument.
But no, you argue he's not that intelligent & pretty much say he majored in basket weaving.
To put it another way, "Intelligence doesn't matter, Mills is as dumb as a box of rocks."
If it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, so why bring it up?
If you want to argue that going to Stanford doesn't make him particularly intelligent, then the 3.5 GPA & his non-math & science major is relevant.
But to make that argument you shouldn't start with, "it's irrelevant, but..."
It’s the truth to dispel the rumor that an opinion is the truth.Da
It's the truth to dispell the rumor of a Stanford smart.
The truth can be hard to take.
It ain't no blow to anybody.
Ok, here is the way your “logic” runs as far as I can tell. Somebody expresses an opinion about a player by addressing some of their skill sets. You disagree, go get “data” that shows it doesn’t apply across the board and debunk the opinion. Your opinion, not truth, appears to be that the only thing that is the “truth” is football skills. Yet anyone can get an endless quantity of instances where football skills also don’t matter. Do you realize you are at ground zero when discussing a draft pick and any one thing can make or break that player? so Where is your “truth”. Remember truth can’t be contradicting. The only real truth then is that you don’t know it.You got it.
First off, I had already stated that a QB does not to be any kind of a "genius" in math, science, etc. to be a good NFL QB.
That alone should be sufficient to say that there's no need to question Mills, or Vince Young, or any other QB.
The questions to me are, can this coaching staff improve his flaws and enhance his skills? if they can, and he's receptive to their coaching methods, he could become, in time, a productive NFL quarterback.
So the baseline should be: Better than rookie David Carr.The Texans will have a much better ol than what Carr played behind.
So the baseline should be: Better than rookie David Carr.
So the baseline should be: Better than rookie David Carr.
No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.Ok, here is the way your “logic” runs as far as I can tell. Somebody expresses an opinion about a player by addressing some of their skill sets. You disagree, go get “data” that shows it doesn’t apply across the board and debunk the opinion. Your opinion, not truth, appears to be that the only thing that is the “truth” is football skills. Yet anyone can get an endless quantity of instances where football skills also don’t matter. Do you realize you are at ground zero when discussing a draft pick and any one thing can make or break that player? so Where is your “truth”. Remember truth can’t be contradicting. The only real truth then is that you don’t know it.
No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.
I had two points to counter that.
1. You don't need to be Stanford smart to be a good NFL QB.
(Debunked by the Wonderlic scores).
2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).
Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
Did I ever say that he isn't smart enough?Trust me I will take Mills Stanford smart over the Perverts form of smart anyday. Truth is Mills is plenty intelligent enough and has the physical abilities to become a franchise QB. Will he? who knows, but the traits are there. He's missing experience. Not a bad flier to take in the 3rd rd. IMHO
One of the broader questions I was getting around to is do the Texans even have the coaching staff to develop a young quarterback regardless the draft round. I'm not confident they do. Every time I hear Culley he sounds like some random guy that was picked out of the stands and offered a head coaching job in the NFL having his first interview ever after meeting the rest of the coaching staff. His interview this past week he was talking about blocking sleds as if they were some novel concept. Pep Hamilton doesn't instill confidence in me either and Kelly is an O'Brien holdover.What’s the definition of a productive NFL QB? Blaine Gabbert? He was drafted 10 years ago and is still drawing an NFL paycheck. Ryan Fitzpatrick? Tyrod Taylor?
Of course IF this and this and that happens you’ve got a good chance to be productive in this league. But that’s a lot of ifs to overcome. The talk around here is like Mills was a top 10 draft pick. He’s a 3rd rounder!!
Maybe it works out well because sometimes it does, but there’s a good probability it doesn’t because that’s what history tells us.
But the “smart” college he went to, his wonderlic scores, his GPA, his high school stats, stop already. None of that means squat. Those aren’t the things that are going to make him a productive NFL QB, or not.
One of the broader questions I was getting around to is do the Texans even have the coaching staff to develop a young quarterback regardless the draft round. I'm not confident they do. Every time I hear Culley he sounds like some random guy that was picked out of the stands and offered a head coaching job in the NFL having his first interview ever after meeting the rest of the coaching staff. His interview this past week he was talking about blocking sleds as if they were some novel concept. Pep Hamilton doesn't instill confidence in me either and Kelly is an O'Brien holdover.
As far as Mills, just looking at him, there is so little to analyze that I don't really know what to expect.
.
Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).
Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
awkward interview but seems real and nothing scripted.
Happy Fathers Day to all Texans
Pep suppose to be good at developing quarterbacks.
Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.
I'm wondering if Justin Reid got this much debate (notice I didn't say criticism) in 2018. I wanted them to take Orlando Brown Jr.
I hate to keep getting into this, but you guys wouldn't just leave it alone.Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.
I'm wondering if Justin Reid got this much debate (notice I didn't say criticism) in 2018. I wanted them to take Orlando Brown Jr.
& smart enough to know it.I don't care if he's dumb as a rock as long as he can play football.
What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.
I had two points to counter that.
1. You don't need to be Stanford smart to be a good NFL QB.
(Debunked by the Wonderlic scores).
2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).
Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.
I know enough with some of the things I've already posted.What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.