Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

[Pick 67] Davis Mills QB Stanford

At the end of the day……Mills hasn’t even played his rookie season yet. So what in the world is everyone trying to compare. When Mills finally gets a season in the books we’ll all have something to base a comparison on. I look forward to watching when his opportunity finally arrives.
I did not try to compare anything or anybody.
 
At the end of the day……Mills hasn’t even played his rookie season yet. So what in the world is everyone trying to compare. When Mills finally gets a season in the books we’ll all have something to base a comparison on. I look forward to watching when his opportunity finally arrives.
I think it’s more being flustered about “Oily” never playing a down for HOU again than anything Mills has or has not done especially considering he has yet to play a single freaking down in the NFL.
 
Interesting the Media and fan base are worried about Herbert slipping into a sophomore slump, per avg. stats of grouping 2nd year QB production compared to their rookie season. My guess because teams have tape and can game plan against his tendencies. Despite having more time in the pocket better running game with much improved OL. So second year is different than first where you more or less sling it around and play to your strengths.

Hence, Mills can sling it around and showcase his arm strength, accuracy and touch. What you guys worry about will come later, reading the defense, anticipating the Windows and developing timing with receivers. That only comes with PT/reps, and he will pick up playbook quick, Stanford smart.
 
Interesting the Media and fan base are worried about Herbert slipping into a sophomore slump, per avg. stats of grouping 2nd year QB production compared to their rookie season. My guess because teams have tape and can game plan against his tendencies. Despite having more time in the pocket better running game with much improved OL. So second year is different than first where you more or less sling it around and play to your strengths.

Hence, Mills can sling it around and showcase his arm strength, accuracy and touch. What you guys worry about will come later, reading the defense, anticipating the Windows and developing timing with receivers. That only comes with PT/reps, and he will pick up playbook quick, Stanford smart.
Nothing personal to you, BL, or Mr. Mills, but please stop that Stanford smart thing.

School smart doesn't translate directly into football smart.
Studies had proved that IQ has no relation with football performance.

Mills isn't all that smart to begin with.
He had a 3.5 GPA in HS.

Sounds pretty good until it becomes known that the top 20% of the graduates has a 4.41 GPA.

His college major, STS, is in the humanity field, a far cry from rocket science.

The median starting salary for a graduate from that field (53K) trails several standard degrees (with Engineering being the top earner at nearly 70K)

 
His college major, STS, is in the humanity field, a far cry from rocket science.

You made me curious, so I googled that to see a sample course listing, and it's a lot of the history and ethics of science and technology and it's uses. Not much advanced science or math involved.
 
Nothing personal to you, BL, or Mr. Mills, but please stop that Stanford smart thing.

School smart doesn't translate directly into football smart.
Studies had proved that IQ has no relation with football performance.

Mills isn't all that smart to begin with.
He had a 3.5 GPA in HS.

Sounds pretty good until it becomes known that the top 20% of the graduates has a 4.41 GPA.

His college major, STS, is in the humanity field, a far cry from rocket science.

The median starting salary for a graduate from that field (53K) trails several standard degrees (with Engineering being the top earner at nearly 70K)


regardless, you will come out on the wrong side of this. Mills is the Texans best option, post Watson.
 
Why do you think everything has to be an attack?

The truth is not an attack.
It's just a fact.

Why is it OK for you to post this about Mills but not the Pervert.

Tell you what, lets compare Mills grades to the Perverts grades. In fact lets compare Mills real world smarts to the Perverts real world smarts.

Not saying Mills will be as good a QB as Pervert but lets compare athletic testing and Wunderlich testing at the Combine.

I mean if this is where you really want to go.
 
Why is it OK for you to post this about Mills but not the Pervert.

Tell you what, lets compare Mills grades to the Perverts grades. In fact lets compare Mills real world smarts to the Perverts real world smarts.

Not saying Mills will be as good a QB as Pervert but lets compare athletic testing and Wunderlich testing at the Combine.

I mean if this is where you really want to go.
I'm not comparing anything.
 
Da
Understandable. I was with him when he stated it didn’t matter.

But then to argue Mills isn’t “that smart” & minimize Mills’ major... low blow, if it doesn’t matter
It's the truth to dispell the rumor of a Stanford smart.
The truth can be hard to take.
It ain't no blow to anybody.
 
i took it as 76ers response to those using his cardinal pedigree as a guarantee of his qb iq
You got it.

First off, I had already stated that a QB does not to be any kind of a "genius" in math, science, etc. to be a good NFL QB.

That alone should be sufficient to say that there's no need to question Mills, or Vince Young, or any other QB.
 
The Wonderlic Test, for example, cannot predict how well a player will become in the NFL.
Many players with bottom scores had gone on to have great careers.


On the other hand, several QBs with the highest scores were complete bust or never had much of a career.

 
First off, I had already stated that a QB does not to be any kind of a "genius" in math, science, etc. to be a good NFL QB.
& if you left it at that, it would have been fine. End of argument.


But no, you argue he's not that intelligent & pretty much say he majored in basket weaving.

To put it another way, "Intelligence doesn't matter, Mills is as dumb as a box of rocks."

If it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, so why bring it up?

If you want to argue that going to Stanford doesn't make him particularly intelligent, then the 3.5 GPA & his non-math & science major is relevant.

But to make that argument you shouldn't start with, "it's irrelevant, but..."
 
Don't forget big Dan flipping his boat into a crowd and killing 2 people.

Here's an excerpt from the story:

LIBERTY, Tex., May 26 (AP) - A Liberty County grand jury ruled today that there was no criminal responsibility involved in an accident in which a jet-powered boat driven by Dan Pastorini. Houston Oiler quarterback, crashed into a crowd in Liberty County last Sunday. Two persons died as a result of the mishap.

Pastorini's boat went out of control as it crossed the finish line of a drag race on Lake Mizzel. The boat struck the shoreline at a speed estimated at 100 miles an hour, hurtled 101 feet through the air and stopped after having crashed into three parked vehicles.

Sherry Gasllins, 10 years-old, of Houston, was killed at the scene. Herman Dale Johnson, 33, of Houston, died yesterday at a Houston hospital. Pastorini was not injured.


Sherry Gasllins was in my class at the time she passed ....
 
At this point in time, it doesn't really matter to me what school Mills went to, what his major was, his GPA or what he scored on the Wunderlic. I don't even care that he has only 11 starts in college. The questions to me are, can this coaching staff improve his flaws and enhance his skills? if they can, and he's receptive to their coaching methods, he could become, in time, a productive NFL quarterback. And now, with the Texans (hopefully) ditching the notion that they only have a few pieces missing, they have time to develop Mills as they build a young team around him. If that is Caserio's plan, and the only reason the Texans are one of the oldest teams (players age) is because he's planning on jettisoning a whole bunch of older vets out in 2022 and just wasn't able to do it all in 2021 due to some contract issues, I'm behind the idea of the Mills pick. I hope there's a concrete long-term plan in place for Mills and they didn't draft him out of desperation.
 
& if you left it at that, it would have been fine. End of argument.


But no, you argue he's not that intelligent & pretty much say he majored in basket weaving.

To put it another way, "Intelligence doesn't matter, Mills is as dumb as a box of rocks."

If it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, so why bring it up?

If you want to argue that going to Stanford doesn't make him particularly intelligent, then the 3.5 GPA & his non-math & science major is relevant.

But to make that argument you shouldn't start with, "it's irrelevant, but..."
A thief knows a thief as a wolf knows a wolf.

Have fun with it; I ain't playing your little game.
 
You got it.

First off, I had already stated that a QB does not to be any kind of a "genius" in math, science, etc. to be a good NFL QB.

That alone should be sufficient to say that there's no need to question Mills, or Vince Young, or any other QB.
Ok, here is the way your “logic” runs as far as I can tell. Somebody expresses an opinion about a player by addressing some of their skill sets. You disagree, go get “data” that shows it doesn’t apply across the board and debunk the opinion. Your opinion, not truth, appears to be that the only thing that is the “truth” is football skills. Yet anyone can get an endless quantity of instances where football skills also don’t matter. Do you realize you are at ground zero when discussing a draft pick and any one thing can make or break that player? so Where is your “truth”. Remember truth can’t be contradicting. The only real truth then is that you don’t know it.
 
The questions to me are, can this coaching staff improve his flaws and enhance his skills? if they can, and he's receptive to their coaching methods, he could become, in time, a productive NFL quarterback.

What’s the definition of a productive NFL QB? Blaine Gabbert? He was drafted 10 years ago and is still drawing an NFL paycheck. Ryan Fitzpatrick? Tyrod Taylor?

Of course IF this and this and that happens you’ve got a good chance to be productive in this league. But that’s a lot of ifs to overcome. The talk around here is like Mills was a top 10 draft pick. He’s a 3rd rounder!!

Maybe it works out well because sometimes it does, but there’s a good probability it doesn’t because that’s what history tells us.

But the “smart” college he went to, his wonderlic scores, his GPA, his high school stats, stop already. None of that means squat. Those aren’t the things that are going to make him a productive NFL QB, or not.
 
So the baseline should be: Better than rookie David Carr.

Honestly, I don't see how Mills can be worse than Carr. And if Mills isn't our long term answer to the QB dilemma, that just means we still have that item on our checklist. Which, as far as I'm concerned, that checkbox isn't checked yet anyway.
 
Remember Banks was supposed to be the starter first season? This would also be a good comp, Banks just wasn’t as mobile as Taylor and with 2002 offensive line spelled trouble. Still can visualize him breaking his hand on follow through against on coming rushers helmet.

So yes, baseline better than Carr largely because of better OL.
 
So the baseline should be: Better than rookie David Carr.

The point is that Mills will have much better support than Carr had. So he shouldn't be gun shy like Carr became. But you know this and I'm still trying to figure out why you would ask this question.
 
Ok, here is the way your “logic” runs as far as I can tell. Somebody expresses an opinion about a player by addressing some of their skill sets. You disagree, go get “data” that shows it doesn’t apply across the board and debunk the opinion. Your opinion, not truth, appears to be that the only thing that is the “truth” is football skills. Yet anyone can get an endless quantity of instances where football skills also don’t matter. Do you realize you are at ground zero when discussing a draft pick and any one thing can make or break that player? so Where is your “truth”. Remember truth can’t be contradicting. The only real truth then is that you don’t know it.
No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.

I had two points to counter that.

1. You don't need to be Stanford smart to be a good NFL QB.
(Debunked by the Wonderlic scores).

2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).

Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
 
No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.

I had two points to counter that.

1. You don't need to be Stanford smart to be a good NFL QB.
(Debunked by the Wonderlic scores).

2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).

Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.

Trust me I will take Mills Stanford smart over the Perverts form of smart anyday. Truth is Mills is plenty intelligent enough and has the physical abilities to become a franchise QB. Will he? who knows, but the traits are there. He's missing experience. Not a bad flier to take in the 3rd rd. IMHO
 
Trust me I will take Mills Stanford smart over the Perverts form of smart anyday. Truth is Mills is plenty intelligent enough and has the physical abilities to become a franchise QB. Will he? who knows, but the traits are there. He's missing experience. Not a bad flier to take in the 3rd rd. IMHO
Did I ever say that he isn't smart enough?

No, I never did.

The fact remains he's not Stanford Smart.

And quit bring up Watson. He has nothing to do with Mills.
Watson has already proven to be a franchise QB with how much attention he got in various trade scenarios.
Mills; on the other hand, in your own words, may never be one.
 
Well damn someone is always tripping on me about the way I address others opinions. Then I read we can't bring up certain things in our sports opinion. So now we cant have our opinion ( I was accused of doing to others) when bringing up high school stats ( which was a damn example of the kid being a play maker since then). Wonderlic score which is very important to the interviewing process of every freaking player. No it doesn't mean he will be an elite player. And the college he came from.

These same things were brought up when Watson arrived on the Texans scene.
When Fitzpatrick first year here, the college he came from was brought up. Mainly because of what of Obrien. Even the media heads were talking about it.
 
What’s the definition of a productive NFL QB? Blaine Gabbert? He was drafted 10 years ago and is still drawing an NFL paycheck. Ryan Fitzpatrick? Tyrod Taylor?

Of course IF this and this and that happens you’ve got a good chance to be productive in this league. But that’s a lot of ifs to overcome. The talk around here is like Mills was a top 10 draft pick. He’s a 3rd rounder!!

Maybe it works out well because sometimes it does, but there’s a good probability it doesn’t because that’s what history tells us.

But the “smart” college he went to, his wonderlic scores, his GPA, his high school stats, stop already. None of that means squat. Those aren’t the things that are going to make him a productive NFL QB, or not.
One of the broader questions I was getting around to is do the Texans even have the coaching staff to develop a young quarterback regardless the draft round. I'm not confident they do. Every time I hear Culley he sounds like some random guy that was picked out of the stands and offered a head coaching job in the NFL having his first interview ever after meeting the rest of the coaching staff. His interview this past week he was talking about blocking sleds as if they were some novel concept. Pep Hamilton doesn't instill confidence in me either and Kelly is an O'Brien holdover.

As far as Mills, just looking at him, there is so little to analyze that I don't really know what to expect.

.
 
One of the broader questions I was getting around to is do the Texans even have the coaching staff to develop a young quarterback regardless the draft round. I'm not confident they do. Every time I hear Culley he sounds like some random guy that was picked out of the stands and offered a head coaching job in the NFL having his first interview ever after meeting the rest of the coaching staff. His interview this past week he was talking about blocking sleds as if they were some novel concept. Pep Hamilton doesn't instill confidence in me either and Kelly is an O'Brien holdover.

As far as Mills, just looking at him, there is so little to analyze that I don't really know what to expect.

.


Pep suppose to be good at developing quarterbacks.
 
2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).


Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.
I'm wondering if Justin Reid got this much debate (notice I didn't say criticism :)) in 2018. I wanted them to take Orlando Brown Jr.
 
Pep suppose to be good at developing quarterbacks.

I will take Mills being as good as Herbert was last yr.

It wasn't like Herbert was some kind of cant miss prospect. Sure he was talented, but there were questions about his leadership/competitiveness. Pep was able to reach Herbert. Seems like some of the same questions are currently being asked about Mills.

The way I see it is, Herbert was throwing to a lower level of WR's at Oregon and Mills was doing the same thing at Stanford. Difference is Herbert had more experience and Herbert was more consistent throwing outside the numbers accurately. This is do to footwork and not arm strength. IMHO If Mills can improve this and Pep should be able to help with this, then Mills should be able to become a quality NFL starter. But for fans expecting Mills to come in and light up the NFL like Herbert did, you're going be disappointed. Again, he needs to gain experience and there will be growing pains.
 
Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.
I'm wondering if Justin Reid got this much debate (notice I didn't say criticism :)) in 2018. I wanted them to take Orlando Brown Jr.

I dont know about this, Bob Whitfield (Former All Pro LT) fought child support payments on The Housewives of Atlanta and beat the lawyer (Phaedra) on the show in court. His exact statement when they asked him how he won the case was, Well I did go to Stanford. Not that this means anything when it comes to play on the football field.
 
Cmon dude, you know there is no such thing as Stanford smart. Even if you attempted to define it I could only see it be measured by 1)being accepted to Stanford or 2)graduating from Stanford.
I'm wondering if Justin Reid got this much debate (notice I didn't say criticism :)) in 2018. I wanted them to take Orlando Brown Jr.
I hate to keep getting into this, but you guys wouldn't just leave it alone.


Mills HS GPA was nowhere near enough to be admitted to Stanford.
He got in because he play football.
 
No, the poster brought up Stanford smart.

I had two points to counter that.

1. You don't need to be Stanford smart to be a good NFL QB.
(Debunked by the Wonderlic scores).

2. Mills isn't Stanford smart anyway.
(Proof = his HS GPA and his field of study).

Therefore, it's a moot point to even bring up Stanford smart.
What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.
 
What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.

Also his sister's although still very young are successful. Odds are he will be successful too.
 
What do you know about his field of study? Actually it may be ideal for someone that plans to be a tech investor and the social trends that can direct technology. Maybe this is his end goal whether he’s making big bucks in NFL or for another career. His HS GPA? You stop at nothing to support your “truth” junk.
I know enough with some of the things I've already posted.
1. The median salary is lower than several traditional fields like Engineering, IT, Hardware, etc.
Difficult Work = Higher Pay
That's simple enough to understand.

2. The course works, like Thorn had mentioned, are not on par (not as tough) as in those fields and many others.

3. His HS GPA is nowhere near enough to get admitted into Stanford as a regular student, nor was his HS rank. On those counts, he can only dream of going to Stanford.

Are you happy now?
Or do you want some more?
 
Back
Top