Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Obrien be gone

It really doesn't matter BOB should've used a TO to challenge that play because,

1. There was a good chance he would've won the challenge.
2. A TO would've broken the rhythm the Pats offense had obviosly gained on that drive.

Yeah and just the fact that they were rushing was enough reason. They wanted to get a quick play off and we had 3 timeouts we weren't going to use.
 
They didn't sign a bunch of backups on their OL.

They've got all pro's/former all pro's and drafted a LT in the 1st rd.

See the difference a good OL makes.

Lets see what they score at the end. They only have 13 right now and the Rams D is nasty. Texans scored 20. People act like they put up 3 points.

2. A TO would've broken the rhythm the Pats offense had obviosly gained on that drive.

Good point that no one has really brought up.
 
I still put the loss on O'Brien, but his explanation of not calling a time out is making me think. If the guys in the booth don't give him a reason to call the time out (which they didn't, according to him), then why would he? If he loses that gamble because of unreliable information, the headline is "Why did O'Brien burn a valuable time out?"

It wasn't a valuable timeout. We had 3 timeouts.
 
We played horrible and lost 27-20 to the defending AFC champs on the road. And that's despite not getting our best players enough work this preseason.

I think we'll be okay...

Look at the Detroit Lions. Losing 48-17 at home late in the third quarter against a so-so Jets team. With a controversial rookie head coach that quite frankly not a lot of people have any respect for.

Bill O'Brien has his faults but at least he's a great man.
I think we can move forward with a lot of optimism.

I think BOB can win a Super Bowl with the Houston Texans. Just like I thought Gary Kubiak could have as well. He did in Denver after leaving.
I hereby nominate you for....

president of the Bill O'Brien Sunshine Club
bigsun.jpg


Be warned, it's a thankless job.

(I know because I was president of the GK Sunshine Club :D)
 
because of the muffed punt at the end
And that kid was on the bus the next morning. He was cut.

even with great players on it. And yesterday is just another example of the entire franchise being outperformed, outcoached, and just outplayed by a franchise that has been the gold standard for almost two decades.
This right here. Great players, Watt, Clowney, Mercilus, McKinney. I guess they all played well enough to keep the Texans in the game. But the Dline was getting stoned by an offensive line of basically JAG's! Not until the 2nd half did they start getting some pressure on Brady. And O'Brien's "game plan" offense sucks!
 
And that kid was on the bus the next morning. He was cut.


This right here. Great players, Watt, Clowney, Mercilus, McKinney. I guess they all played well enough to keep the Texans in the game. But the Dline was getting stoned by an offensive line of basically JAG's! Not until the 2nd half did they start getting some pressure on Brady. And O'Brien's "game plan" offense sucks!


Preseason reps. Bill Belichick made sure they were well prepared.
 
Really it’s just hard to judge this coach or that coach because there are too many factors involved in doing so. Let’s not compare Kubiak just because he won one Super Bowl by having two of the greatest in Manning and Elway.

Manning could have been a Texan with Kubiak here .. would we have won a championship since you're implying that Kubiak had less or a role in that run than Manning and Elway? Wierd.
 
Manning could have been a Texan with Kubiak here .. would we have won a championship since you're implying that Kubiak had less or a role in that run than Manning and Elway? Wierd.
Yes. Who knows? We could go on and on though. Denver basically had it all that season including the best defense. To me everyone gets to the same amount of credit for winning and blame for losing. Good for Gary he won but after Matt Schaub went down he and Rick both share the blame for not ever really adequately replaced him. I mean Jon Gruden won a ring (which he put on my finger when I met him) he did not ever really do anything after that. Is he a great coach? How about BB without Brady? All I mean is you that the stars have to align just right in order to win and be successful in any sport. Kerry Colins was an average QB who almost won the Super Bowl but he lost it to a team which had another average QB but they had an all time great NFL defense. Finding the right group of people who work well together is done by trial and error and that is the key it’s all that really matters.
 
Yes. Who knows? We could go on and on though. Denver basically had it all that season including the best defense. To me everyone gets to the same amount of credit for winning and blame for losing. Good for Gary he won but after Matt Schaub went down he and Rick both share the blame for not ever really adequately replaced him. I mean Jon Gruden won a ring (which he put on my finger when I met him) he did not ever really do anything after that. Is he a great coach? How about BB without Brady? All I mean is you that the stars have to align just right in order to win and be successful in any sport. Kerry Colins was an average QB who almost won the Super Bowl but he lost it to a team which had another average QB but they had an all time great NFL defense. Finding the right group of people who work well together is done by trial and error and that is the key it’s all that really matters.

In Koobs defense Manning was a shell of his former self in the Super Bowl run and quite frankly won in spite of him. Yup defense wins championships no argument there. I just found it odd you'd credit Elway and Manning over Kubiak, but you're entitled to your opinion. Jon Gruden is a maniac who is a control freak, and is usually his own worst enemy. Its his way or the highway and its an outdated coaching style and philosophy, I mean the dude was busting out the old halfback draws inside the tackles last night! I think Kubiak is a better coach than Gruden, and a far more intellectual offensive football mind.
 
In Koobs defense Manning was a shell of his former self in the Super Bowl run and quite frankly won in spite of him. Yup defense wins championships no argument there. I just found it odd you'd credit Elway and Manning over Kubiak, but you're entitled to your opinion. Jon Gruden is a maniac who is a control freak, and is usually his own worst enemy. Its his way or the highway and its an outdated coaching style and philosophy, I mean the dude was busting out the old halfback draws inside the tackles last night! I think Kubiak is a better coach than Gruden, and a far more intellectual offensive football mind.
I give as much credit to Kubiak I give to everyone it takes a group effort.
 
2. A TO would've broken the rhythm the Pats offense had obviosly gained on that drive.

Good point that no one has really brought up.
I hereby nominate you for....

president of the Bill O'Brien Sunshine Club
bigsun.jpg


Be warned, it's a thankless job.

(I know because I was president of the GK Sunshine Club :D)


He is of every Houston team they've ever had. They're all gonna win it all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
The Rams didn't play there starters at all in PS that I'm aware of. How did they do? Coaching is the difference.


Bwhahaha you just heard this **** on TV. Off the chains.

1 team out of how many. Is this the excuse we're going to use. Oh the Rams looked sharp in their first game without playing their starters in preseason. Man we are talking about the freaking Texans who are notorious for slow starts as well as not being prepared.
 
Bwhahaha you just heard this **** on TV. Off the chains.

1 team out of how many. Is this the excuse we're going to use. Oh the Rams looked sharp in their first game without playing their starters in preseason. Man we are talking about the freaking Texans who are notorious for slow starts as well as not being prepared.
There seemed to be a trend of teams not playing their starters as much as in previous years.
 
So now we find out O'Brien doesn't even know what he can and can not challenge! On his radio program he was asked if he could challenge too many men on the field and he said he couldn't. How did this guy ever become a head coach in this league. I guess the Texan's, who can't seem to ever admit they were wrong, need to hire someone smart to call all the shots during the game and put a headset on O'Brien that isn't plugged in.

How many stupid mistakes can this guy make. We're wasting some great years with some great talent with this guy at the helm.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ROO
So now we find out O'Brien doesn't even know what he can and can not challenge! On his radio program he was asked if he could challenge too many men on the field and he said he couldn't. How did this guy ever become a head coach in this league. I guess the Texan's, who can never admit they were wrong, need to hire someone smart to call all the shots during the game and put a headset on O'Brien that isn't plugged in.

How many stupid mistakes can this guy make. We're wasting some great years with some great talent with this guy at the helm.

When did he say that?
 
When did he say that?
They were talking about it on 610 this afternoon. It was in reference to the play Sunday where we were called for a false start and NE had 12 on the field. I believe they said it was during the Bill O'Brien show yesterday. They played the audio a couple of times this afternoon.
 
They were talking about it on 610 this afternoon. It was in reference to the play Sunday where we were called for a false start and NE had 12 on the field. I believe they said it was during the Bill O'Brien show yesterday. They played the audio a couple of times this afternoon.

was it unchallengable because we committed a false start? I know the flag gets thrown when the ball is snapped, and the ball was never snapped
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
That's football though. Shit happens and you try to take advantage. The Pats took advantage of the 1st play fumble. Bam, 7 points they shouldn't have had. At least that early anyway. If OB calls the TO and the Gronk completion gets overturned, do the Pats still get 7 there? If they do, at least they've got to get those 28 yards all over again. That's a possible 14 point difference in a 7 point game.

No, the game wasn't as close as the score indicated, but that doesn't mean the Texans didn't have their chances. Even as crappy as they played. If there's anything positive to take from that game, it's that.



Still love your avatar. Wish McNair would have bought the rights to the name, logo and colors.

:coffee:
 
was it unchallengable because we committed a false start? I know the flag gets thrown when the ball is snapped, and the ball was never snapped
On the program today they even read the rule and it specifically said it could be challenged even if there was another penalty. It was 610, it sounded to me like they were trying everything they could to make an excuse for OB but couldn't do it. They even commented how bad it looked after what happened Sunday.
 
Last edited:
On a false start, the flag is thrown when the O-lineman moves out of his stance. The play is blown dead right then, snap or not.

Yea i know that hence why i said the ball was never snapped. They flag 12 men on the defense when the ball is snapped, we never let the ball get snapped because of the false start, so they never got penalized for 12 men on the field
 
On the program today they even read the rule and it specifically said it could be challenged even if there was another penalty. It was 610, it sounded to me like they were trying everything they could to make an excuse for OB but couldn't do it. They even commented how bad it looked after all his mistakes Sunday.

another pre-snap penalty? I see it being able to be challeged if say a ref throws a flag on the offense for holding, then the defenses pre-snap penalty would precede the offensive penalty and wipe the holding out while still giving the offense a free 5 yards. However if the ref throws a flag for 12 men when the ball is snapped, and the ball itself was never technically snapped, because the refs blew it dead when we committed the false start. Therefore the penalty on them never actually occurred
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
full disclosure, I heard them when you did, they came back later and think actually he could not challenge because of the penalty. Anyway, would be good to know if BOB knows he can challenge 12 men without a penalty. I still am not clear if he knows the rule here

Bottom line, he is so busy being OC, he needs a better structure to do time management and challenges. I think he struggles to handle all the info flying at him, or gets bad info. For the first, I hire someone good with data and analytics to give me the best quick advice. For the second, get damn people who know the rules inside and out and are your eye in the sky. Go talk to the Astros, see how data can help before, during, and after
 
another pre-snap penalty? I see it being able to be challeged if say a ref throws a flag on the offense for holding, then the defenses pre-snap penalty would precede the offensive penalty and wipe the holding out while still giving the offense a free 5 yards. However if the ref throws a flag for 12 men when the ball is snapped, and the ball itself was never technically snapped, because the refs blew it dead when we committed the false start. Therefore the penalty on them never actually occurred
The details are really irrelevant as far as O'Brien's acumen is concerned. If you hear the audio it sounds like he didn't know you could challenge too many men under any circumstance. Now give him a day to circle the wagons and formulate his damage control and tomorrow he may have a different story like he did Sunday to Monday on the "it isn't my job" gaff.
 
Last edited:
full disclosure, I heard them when you did, they came back later and think actually he could not challenge because of the penalty. Anyway, would be good to know if BOB knows he can challenge 12 men without a penalty. I still am not clear if he knows the rule here

Bottom line, he is so busy being OC, he needs a better structure to do time management and challenges. I think he struggles to handle all the info flying at him, or gets bad info. For the first, I hire someone good with data and analytics to give me the best quick advice. For the second, get damn people who know the rules inside and out and are your eye in the sky. Go talk to the Astros, see how data can help before, during, and after

O'Brien talked about analytics in one interview. He was kind of dismissive of it. He said something along the lines of it can't replace what you see and know
 
full disclosure, I heard them when you did, they came back later and think actually he could not challenge because of the penalty. Anyway, would be good to know if BOB knows he can challenge 12 men without a penalty. I still am not clear if he knows the rule here

Bottom line, he is so busy being OC, he needs a better structure to do time management and challenges. I think he struggles to handle all the info flying at him, or gets bad info. For the first, I hire someone good with data and analytics to give me the best quick advice. For the second, get damn people who know the rules inside and out and are your eye in the sky. Go talk to the Astros, see how data can help before, during, and after
Did you hear when they read the rule and it said another penalty didn't mattter? I just wonder if that was before or after what you heard.
 
O'Brien talked about analytics in one interview. He was kind of dismissive of it. He said something along the lines of it can't replace what you see and know
Well, Sunday he didn't see an incomplete pass and he didn't know he could challenge too many men on the field. He might do better with analytics than what he sees and knows.
 
We tried RAC in the booth last year to help OBrien manage things like clock and TO's. Not too sure it helped.

But it sure screwed up a good defensive unit.


:coffee:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JB
Naturally I’ve calmed down since Sunday. Thought about some past experiences and observations. It’s a long season. Teams can get better in season. It was just Game 1.

They didn’t look “awful”. There were good aspects and things that can be cleaned up. Watson can play better. Sucks that it came due to concussion but kjo being out is addition by subtraction. Watt got the juices flowing. We’ll be getting fuller back. Young tackles saw their first NFL game...need to make big time adjustments. Running game was good.

I’m still not an OB fan, but this is still a young season. He’s got 15 (hopefully more) games to prove me wrong.
 
so there was no penalty because the ball was never snapped like I said. you cant challenge it because it never occurred
That makes sense as the defense has until the ball is snapped to get guys off the field, but like I said as far as O'Brien is concerned he sounded like he didn't know you could ever challenge too many men on the field. Of course he may sound differently tomorrow if asked about it again. The guys on 610 came to the same conclusion as one of them said and I'm paraphrasing, that's a really bad look after what happened Sunday.
 
The dirty refs will give us some flags and calls against the Tacks then screw us royally against a preferred team.

These refs are so nasty
 
If the Texans hire an offensive coordinator I want it to be a young and upcoming guy from the college ranks. So tired of all the same old recycled NFL OC's making the rounds every off-season.

Although I'd have been okay giving Todd Haley a chance before the Browns hired him back in January. He'd have clashed with O'Brien but that may have been a good thing. LOL. If nothing else it would have been entertaining to watch.

What I want the most is a better offensive lines coach.
Mike Devlin hasn't impressed me since he's been here.
A few of the guys we let go have become Pro Bowlers on other teams.
 
If the Texans hire an offensive coordinator I want it to be a young and upcoming guy from the college ranks. So tired of all the same old recycled NFL OC's making the rounds every off-season.

Although I'd have been okay giving Todd Haley a chance before the Browns hired him back in January. He'd have clashed with O'Brien but that may have been a good thing. LOL. If nothing else it would have been entertaining to watch.

What I want the most is a better offensive lines coach.
Mike Devlin hasn't impressed me since he's been here.
A few of the guys we let go have become Pro Bowlers on other teams.

I actually wouldn't mind our qb coach, sean Ryan, becoming our OC. He helped develop the offense we ran last year with Watson, he is still young for a coach at 46 and I think he has good football IQ
 
http://www.footballzebras.com/2018/...too-late-and-finger-pointing-is-off-the-mark/

Referee Tony Corrente, in a postgame interview with a pool reporter, said there was a delay with the replay command post at NFL headquarters in New York. When asked who was responsible for initiating the replay review, Corrente said, “It is New York. The situation was that New York did get back to us. However, unfortunately, they didn’t get to the game officials on the field until after the play had already started.”

That is partially correct. According to a league source who is familiar with the replay operations, “Corrente described the procedure incorrectly.”

Rule 15-2-2 explains the replay procedure after the two-minute warning thusly, with newly added language underlined:

A Replay Review will be initiated by a member of the Officiating department from a location in the League office or a Replay Official from a Replay Booth

If Corrente is correct that it was a call from New York to review the play, it means that Corrente’s replay official, Lou Nazzaro, was remiss in initiating a review before the next snap. Corrente adds, “They got to us on the field, but the play had already developed. It had started.” At the point where there is a legal snap, replay cannot change any aspect of the previous play, no matter how egregious the error may be.


In this case, there is enough for replay to at least take another look.


Pretty good article on what happened during the Gronk catch/no-catch on Sunday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max
Tony Frickin Romo was as puzzled by some of BO'B decisions as we all were. Tony pointed out the obvious just as we have. We stand no chance as long as BO'B continues to run the offense.

Sure we stand a chance, as usual we can beat the bad teams, but lose most of the time to the good teams. It's our fate as long as OB is the offensive coordinator.
 
Tony Frickin Romo was as puzzled by some of BO'B decisions as we all were. Tony pointed out the obvious just as we have. We stand no chance as long as BO'B continues to run the offense.

I've said this a hundred times myself. If you switch Romo and BOB, we win this game. The thing is, he didn't just question his clock management and his TO's but his play-calling in obvious situations. He was as puzzled as I was
 
O'B is here to stay because we have an owner that won't do anything unless we go 2-14.

He should have been way more prepared than what we saw on Sunday. The whole "it's not my job to call a timeout" still irks me.


:panic:
 
O'B is here to stay because we have an owner that won't do anything unless we go 2-14.

He should have been way more prepared than what we saw on Sunday. The whole "it's not my job to call a timeout" still irks me.


:panic:
Doesn't bother me as much as quitting on your team and punting with over 4 minutes to go
 
Back
Top