scarsdale said:
I hope Buffalo is bluffing and decides to take Houston's 5th if that is what they are offering.
Would they let him just walk? They get cap relief either way right? If he's traded, or gets cut, he saves them money I think.
Houston will not trade one single pick. Which they shouldn't. The Moulds issue is not about picks, it's about what he will sign for. He is not a Bill because he wants $5 million per. Not happening. Older, smaller receiver. No one is going to give him that. If they do, it is way overpriced.
Buffalo is not meeting his number. So why would you trade anything for him? You won't have to give up a mouthpiece to get him.
The Eagles believe in a pretty firm model in terms of how they slot people on the payroll. Wide receiver is not a value position for them. They think you invest in offensive and defensive line, your quarterback, a versitile running back, defensive backs, then WR, then linebacker. They pay accordingly.
T.O. was the anomaly. When you have the opportunity to get the best WR in the NFL, you go off your script a bit. They did. T.O. was a bit of problem, that has been documented. But if you look at the Eagles stance, it was the right one. Look at what happened in Dallas? T.O. signs and immediately Glenn is up the office saying, "I want my money". So Dallas blatantly overpays for an aging receiver who is injury prone because they don't want to rock the boat.
Philly was burned by this before and they aren't going down that road. They definitely will not give up a pick with this stance. Not a chance. There aren't really any other teams involved.
The Texans can play hardball with the numbers and come in with a resonable number. Moulds would make a fine addition, but it needs to be a smooth transition and it can't wreck our salary structure.