HOU-TEX said:If you're saying it's McNairs fault, then you're saying Kubiak was a mistake.McNair hired Kubiak, which was the one who made the decision to keep Carr. McNair shouldn't have to make player decisions. That's what the FO is for. If he was to get involved in player decisions, then he would be putting himself in the same class as Bud Adams, Benson, Jerry, etc.
![]()
IMO, one of the primary reasons that Kubiak was hired is his ability to get 'production' out of players in his style of offense-especially true with RB's and QB's. Kubiak's offense is 'user friendly' to both these positions. In contrast, despite his short comings, Carr has played in a 'joke' of an offense his first 4 yrs in the NFL. So, IMO, if I were McNair I'd want to give Carr the benefit of the doubt for '06, if Kubiak 'signed off' on the proposal. Kubiak did, so everything has been set in motion to see if Carr is the 'answer.'
Without a doubt, the 'ball' is in Carr's 'corner,' and it's clearly 'showtime.' I know it's been a tough 4 yrs for everyone but I know I'd rather know-once and for all (given all the improvements around him) if Carr can lead us to 'better days (wins).' However, saying this-and not expecting the 'Super Bowl' over night-we should see 'positive' signs of progress from the 'get go' from David. This will be Kubiak's call, no doubt...here's hoping it's a good one!
