Hey that’s three good games in a row for D4.
Yep if DW4 got to play if he got to play the Jags 2 out of 3 games he would be as good as you think he is.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Hey that’s three good games in a row for D4.
On the pregame they said 6. Hmm.
You can add yourself to this statement as well. And those that are cheering for Watson were fans of this team way before he was drafted. So please stop this madness of fabrications.
So now 280+ yards 2 touchdowns no interceptions and leading his team in rushing is considered not good.
Wow is all I can say at this point. Lol
A true fan imo does not cheer for another team. Especially not a team in the same division or conference.
What’s really hilarious is listening to all the cowgirl fans talking like they just made a great trade and this is the first step in fixing their problems.
They made several big plays ..... but typical of the Texans , they really didn't really sustain any drives or control the game with their offense and Anger punted 5 times against the one defense in the league that may be worse than their own. You expect more than this.
Here's their drives -
2 plays · 75 yards TD
6 plays · 45 yards FG
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
14 plays · 59 yards FG
4 plays · 18 yards Fumble
6 plays · 98 yards TD
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
3 plays · 81 yards TD (Shoulda been a delay of game penalty)
9 plays · 17 yards Punt
3 plays · 2 yards Punt
8 plays · 26 yards Punt
3 plays · -3 yards End of game
Watson was 19/32 (59.4%) for 281 and 2 TD's
That's not a bad day , they won ... but again , it points to the big play or bust narrative typical of Watson and this offense.
They made several big plays ..... but typical of the Texans , they really didn't really sustain any drives or control the game with their offense and Anger punted 5 times against the one defense in the league that may be worse than their own. You expect more than this.
Here's their drives -
2 plays · 75 yards TD
6 plays · 45 yards FG
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
14 plays · 59 yards FG
4 plays · 18 yards Fumble
6 plays · 98 yards TD
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
3 plays · 81 yards TD (Shoulda been a delay of game penalty)
9 plays · 17 yards Punt
3 plays · 2 yards Punt
8 plays · 26 yards Punt
3 plays · -3 yards End of game
Watson was 19/32 (59.4%) for 281 and 2 TD's
That's not a bad day , they won ... but again , it points to the big play or bust narrative typical of Watson and this offense.
A true fan imo does not cheer for another team. Especially not a team in the same division or conference.
You can add yourself to this statement as well. And those that are cheering for Watson were fans of this team way before he was drafted. So please stop this madness of fabrications.
Would this be the same guys that said it was good to squeeze butts into the hole?On the pregame they said 6. Hmm.
Quoted for truth and also some cheap dislikes.I think it is Watson. I have been looking at him in school and then in the pros and it is the same thing. Done almost the exact same way. He can hand off, who can't and throw on the run (right mostly) and so on... I'm not sure the play book is like his stats. Seeing even with OB it was DHop, deep shot on a roll or punt/INT.
Look at the Jags QB throwing for 300+ and if not for the INT would have been better numbers than Watson. That's is not a good sign
I think it is Watson. I have been looking at him in school and then in the pros and it is the same thing. Done almost the exact same way. He can hand off, who can't and throw on the run (right mostly) and so on... I'm not sure the play book is like his stats. Seeing even with OB it was DHop, deep shot on a roll or punt/INT.
Look at the Jags QB throwing for 300+ and if not for the INT would have been better numbers than Watson. That's is not a good sign
Who the heck is / was cheering for the other team ?
SMH
So what you’re saying is you can’t have a rational, logical discussion with points and counter points nor address direct questions, which you saw because you down voted them, so all you can do is straw man arguments and baseless attacks about “true fans” and “ cheer for another team”. Starting to remind me of my 18 month old when he doesn’t get what he wants. I laugh at that to.
On the pregame they said 6. Hmm.
I was close!10.67%
Definitely had issues gettin to the right play against the blitzAnd that scouting report Maverick put up is still spot on.
DW4 did well against the Jags. Whoopty freaking doo.
He did what he should be doing all of the time against top tier defenses. He wasn't even that good today.
That 9 play drive for 17 yards should have been the game clinching drive. Jags down 8, a FG probably puts that game away but the offense turtled and let the Jags get within one play of OT.They made several big plays ..... but typical of the Texans , they really didn't really sustain any drives or control the game with their offense and Anger punted 5 times against the one defense in the league that may be worse than their own. You expect more than this.
Here's their drives -
2 plays · 75 yards TD
6 plays · 45 yards FG
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
14 plays · 59 yards FG
4 plays · 18 yards Fumble
6 plays · 98 yards TD
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
3 plays · 81 yards TD (Shoulda been a delay of game penalty)
9 plays · 17 yards Punt
3 plays · 2 yards Punt
8 plays · 26 yards Punt
3 plays · -3 yards End of game
Watson was 19/32 (59.4%) for 281 and 2 TD's
That's not a bad day , they won ... but again , it points to the big play or bust narrative typical of Watson and this offense.
Is that what that smell is?We do have a Baltimore Ravens fan in the mist.
They made several big plays ..... but typical of the Texans , they really didn't really sustain any drives or control the game with their offense and Anger punted 5 times against the one defense in the league that may be worse than their own. You expect more than this.
Here's their drives -
2 plays · 75 yards TD
6 plays · 45 yards FG
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
14 plays · 59 yards FG
4 plays · 18 yards Fumble
6 plays · 98 yards TD
3 plays · 5 yards Punt
3 plays · 81 yards TD (Shoulda been a delay of game penalty)
9 plays · 17 yards Punt
3 plays · 2 yards Punt
8 plays · 26 yards Punt
3 plays · -3 yards End of game
Watson was 19/32 (59.4%) for 281 and 2 TD's
That's not a bad day , they won ... but again , it points to the big play or bust narrative typical of Watson and this offense.
I think it is Watson. I have been looking at him in school and then in the pros and it is the same thing. Done almost the exact same way. He can hand off, who can't and throw on the run (right mostly) and so on... I'm not sure the play book is like his stats. Seeing even with OB it was DHop, deep shot on a roll or punt/INT.
Look at the Jags QB throwing for 300+ and if not for the INT would have been better numbers than Watson. That's is not a good sign
I’ve talked about it before but Dabo cut the field in half and limited most plays to fast, first read type plays. Watson thrived in that and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that if you have a coach that can adapt the system and build around that. Dabo could and they won championships, OB couldn’t and it was a cluster. I’m hoping and praying the next coach can because if so then we should see the Watson we think he can be,
Until you factor in the 4 dropped INT’s....right?
That same qb who had 2 - 3 ints dropped?Look at the Jags QB throwing for 300+ and if not for the INT would have been better numbers than Watson. That's is not a good sign
I’ve talked about it before but Dabo cut the field in half and limited most plays to fast, first read type plays. Watson thrived in that and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that if you have a coach that can adapt the system and build around that. Dabo could and they won championships, OB couldn’t and it was a cluster. I’m hoping and praying the next coach can because if so then we should see the Watson we think he can be,
I counted 3 dropped .... two of those tipped at the LOS.
Can't ask for much more than he gave from a 3rd string rookie who had limited reps .... he gave them a chance.
My view is well documented on here and very logical. I've posted things that back my stance up. But hey good try. Deflection failed
Very tough to sustain drives w/o a run game. 18 carries for 57 yards. Yikes!
That same qb who had 2 - 3 ints dropped?
Sounds like we've got our very own Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer, or Mathew Stafford.I’m starting to believe some fans are only on here for attention. To say Watson strength isn’t passing is pure comedy. Dude you’re reaching big time as well as trying to get a rise out of the True Texan fans on here. You also know two other members will back that outlandish claim up. Great job in accomplishing your mission.
2018(8) in Completion % (11) in Yards (12) Touchdowns (15) QBR
2019 (6) in Completion % (13) in Yards (11) Touchdowns (7) QBR
So far this season
2020 (7) in Completion % (10) in Yards (7) in Touchdowns (15) QBR and (6) in rate
This is all while having a horrendous play caller, terrible offensive line and either missing key receivers ( due to injuries) and now having new receivers because OB’s hasty decision to get rid of one of the best receivers in today’s game.
That scouting report is not spot on. That young man has exceeded that crappy report.
Sounds like we've got our very own Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer, or Mathew Stafford.
My view is well documented on here and very logical. I've posted things that back my stance up. But hey good try. Deflection failed
Lmao another thumbs down from a member who never says anything positive about D4. He only likes the negative stuff that are spewed.
#classic
Didn't you say you always have your own principals and beliefs?Of course you don't
Smartest man in the room says hi to you.
Matthew Stafford is someone who immediately sprang to mind when someone attempted to define a franchise QB as winning big games in the playoffs a week or so ago.Sounds like we've got our very own Phillip Rivers, Carson Palmer, or Mathew Stafford.
Matthew Stafford is someone who immediately sprang to mind when someone attempted to define a franchise QB as winning big games in the playoffs a week or so ago.
If this thread has arisen because the rookie put up respectable numbers on our awful D vs Watson’s respectable number on the Jag’s good coverage D.
Our pass rush was non-existent this game, 3 LBs unavailable to begin with, then the injuries began in-game. Plus we had Hargreaves and Gaines as our outside CBs.
Jax has talent on D despite their dysfunctional franchise never putting it together. They have good CB’s in particular. Watson did a decent job yesterday.
There was plenty of good coverage by the Jags yesterday, and the Texans’ running game offered nothing to help.The Jags defense is just about as bad as the Texans defense and has been that way all season.
Good defenses don't have record's like the Jags record.
There was plenty of good coverage by the Jags yesterday, and the Texans’ running game offered nothing to help.
There was plenty of good coverage by the Jags yesterday, and the Texans’ running game offered nothing to help.
Jones played well, I’d take him over Gaines. CJ Henderson is a genuine talent.So you're saying the Jags have a good defense?
If so, agree to disagree.
But hey, that great coverage CB Sidney Jones will be available in FA next off-season.
Jags also have one of the worst rushing D’s in the league, by the numbers.Some fans do not believe in telling the full story of these games welsh. Their main purpose is directed on one particular player. You are right the Jaguars defense played solid. They got after the quarterback because reports says the Texans offensive line struggles with blitz and stunts. Reports states that we have the worst running game in the league.
Jones played well, I’d take him over Gaines. CJ Henderson is a genuine talent.
Jags also have one of the worst rushing D’s in the league, by the numbers.
I’m personally shocked at how Watson’s season is being evaluated. I felt that last year there was genuine cause for concern around a number of games where nothing good seemed to happen for him until garbage time.
This season we are seeing solid performance on a garbage team. His TD-INT ratio stands at 17-5, averaging 300 yards per game, 108 rating. On a terrible team.
Saying Sweeny cutting the field in half is like saying Kubiak cutting the field in half or BOB's EP limiting Fitz' and Hoyer's read to one or two in the same line of vision (remember how those receivers kept running into each other?I’ve talked about it before but Dabo cut the field in half and limited most plays to fast, first read type plays. Watson thrived in that and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that if you have a coach that can adapt the system and build around that. Dabo could and they won championships, OB couldn’t and it was a cluster. I’m hoping and praying the next coach can because if so then we should see the Watson we think he can be,
Yeah?And that scouting report Maverick put up is still spot on.
DW4 did well against the Jags. Whoopty freaking doo.
He did what he should be doing all of the time against top tier defenses. He wasn't even that good today.
The Ravens game sticks out as a poor showing. There were other slow starts also. I’m not here to argue with you, though, I’m open minded on where Watson will end up, hopeful he is top drawer and the season he is having is pointing in the right direction.He’s been playing on a terrible team since he got here. And his HC/OC was not doing him no justice. And yet we made the playoffs and should’ve went 11-6.
Last season what games are you talking about?
Yeah?
If you like PFF's scouting report, you would have traded the farm for Trubisky.
PFF scouting report: Mitchell Trubisky, QB, North Carolina | NFL News, Rankings and Statistics | PFF
The PFF analysis team breaks down the prospects of North Carolina's Mitch Trubisky ahead of the 2017 NFL Draft.www.pff.com
LMAO with all these scouting reports.
Who ?
I don't know about others, but my no. 1 was Mahomes, so it wasn't me who said that Watson would be a superstar if he was drafted by the Chiefs.Personally I don't think Trubisky should have been taken over Mahomes or Watson but let me ask you this. One of the big arguments around here is that Watson would be the superstar QB instead of Mahomes if KC had drafted him and that coaching and scheme matter greatly. So is it possible the same applies to Trubisky? Chicago wouldn't know what to do with a QB if Joe Montana found the fountain of youth and went and played for them. Hell Jay Cutler holds their franchise records. So if what is holding Watson back is the Texans coaching then should we not also consider the possibility that it applies to other QBs as well?
The scouting reports are what they are and nobody takes them as gospel. However to just disregard them because you are using hindsight to judge them by is laughable. Tom Brady didn't get drafted till the 6th round, does that mean that every team was just bad and every player taken before him wasn't worth the spot they were drafted at? I know the Texans weren't around at the time but if whatever team you most supported had drafted him with their round 1 would you have been happy at the time? To bring it back to the Texans how many people were unhappy they drafted Watt in the first round? I wasn't on these boards at that time but the board I was on, and hell even the local media, were not happy at all.
Its amazing how accurate a person can be with their draft picks if they are only picking them years later.
As for Brady, I wasn't paying attention to football at the time, being too busy with other stuffs, but I did know I'd have love to see the Oilers take Joe Montana back then.Personally I don't think Trubisky should have been taken over Mahomes or Watson but let me ask you this. One of the big arguments around here is that Watson would be the superstar QB instead of Mahomes if KC had drafted him and that coaching and scheme matter greatly. So is it possible the same applies to Trubisky? Chicago wouldn't know what to do with a QB if Joe Montana found the fountain of youth and went and played for them. Hell Jay Cutler holds their franchise records. So if what is holding Watson back is the Texans coaching then should we not also consider the possibility that it applies to other QBs as well?
The scouting reports are what they are and nobody takes them as gospel. However to just disregard them because you are using hindsight to judge them by is laughable. Tom Brady didn't get drafted till the 6th round, does that mean that every team was just bad and every player taken before him wasn't worth the spot they were drafted at? I know the Texans weren't around at the time but if whatever team you most supported had drafted him with their round 1 would you have been happy at the time? To bring it back to the Texans how many people were unhappy they drafted Watt in the first round? I wasn't on these boards at that time but the board I was on, and hell even the local media, were not happy at all.
Its amazing how accurate a person can be with their draft picks if they are only picking them years later.
Jones played well, I’d take him over Gaines. CJ Henderson is a genuine talent.
Jags also have one of the worst rushing D’s in the league, by the numbers.
I’m personally shocked at how Watson’s season is being evaluated. I felt that last year there was genuine cause for concern around a number of games where nothing good seemed to happen for him until garbage time.
This season we are seeing solid performance on a garbage team. His TD-INT ratio stands at 17-5, averaging 300 yards per game, 108 rating. On a terrible team.