...in college.
They said they drafted him because he won in college
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
...in college.
So now the NFL Combine guys are 3" incompetent? C'mon Pat,
And Watson in a practice setting where he knows he won't get hit is incapable of restraining his urge to run - yeah right, Either the coaches have no problem with the running or Pat is exaggerating,
You are corect!....typo omission........MY mistake.TY Doc. I think in the Pat Star podcast he was saying that there was no way that Watson was 6'2", but I was only listening with a cursory ear.
I heard him say the same thing about Savages accuracy, but from multiple other sources, I heard that today was a very off day for Savage with a lot of inaccuracy and trouble moving the first team. Not sure what to believe on that. Its kinda why I suspect that Pat Star has a man crush on Savage.
EDIT: The podcast was for the first week of TC. Savages day today would not have been in there.
They said they drafted him because he won in college
Then why did they pass on AJ McCarran?
Sounds like a marketing ploy.
sucks!! he wont even be able to work on his hands for two months. might ass well put him on IR.FUC>>>>>>>>
What's the ploy?
Unproven college players rarely translate to the NFL. Unproven college QBs that have found success in the NFL has to a tiny group, if it exists at all. Having success in college seems to be the bare minimum quality to put on your QB resume.Proven college players don't always translate to the NFL. How many times have we seen this in the NFL to still be trying to talk our way around it?
We'll know if Watson is good or not soon enough.
Buy tickets to come see a Texans game featuring a college winning QB that may or may not be any good. And buy a jersey while you are at even though we don't know how he will do. And buy more Texans stuff because we could win with him in the future. Because he did win in college and that means something - am I right? You know it! Superbowl! Championship!
Some have already bought into this line of thinking.
Could you kindly support those statements?Yes. I don't know about disproved but the Kool Aid drinkers have already made excuses for them, yes .
Unproven college players rarely translate to the NFL. Unproven college QBs that have found success in the NFL has to a tiny group, if it exists at all. Having success in college seems to be the bare minimum quality to put on your QB resume.
Then there's Tom Savage. Who has probably the weakest college resume of any QB currently in the NFL. So he's got that going for him.
Could you kindly support those statements?
I'm not sure who you mean by 'kool aid drinkers' but I am one of the people that disproved most if not all the claims you made. Yes. Disproved. Not excuses. Actual proof that disproved your claims.
That would be a good example of an unproven college player.- What differentiates proven/unproven?
- Matt Cassel.
Passing yards per completion, Watson ranked #72, so yes he was a dink and dunker: http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/individual/740/p2
He had 32 INTs so yes that does bring in to question his decision making, especially when playing in a spread offense surrounded by enormous amount of talent.
I was not a big Watson fan. Hoping for the best though...
But, those kinds of stats in college are hard to really put a lot of stock into because of the variance in competition and you have sooooo many teams...
Take a guy like Mahomes who most would not consider a dink and dunker...He was only ranked 40 and he only averaged 1 more yard/completion than Watson...
Then there are other things to consider like YAC...Guys getting a ton of YAC helps the yards per completion.
If you aren't getting YAC with WR's like Willams/Renfroe/Hopkins/Watkins etc.... there are much deeper issues.
Well don't forget that he won the high school championship too, as Rick mentioned.
33-5 in college and great in the clutch in college, according to Bill OBrien. Even in the ACC. When the chips were down, he led the team to victory.
The low ranking says as much about O as it does the QB, most of the passes were < 5 yds, that's pretty cut and dried.I was not a big Watson fan. Hoping for the best though...
But, those kinds of stats in college are hard to really put a lot of stock into because of the variance in competition and you have sooooo many teams...
Take a guy like Mahomes who most would not consider a dink and dunker...He was only ranked 40 and he only averaged 1 more yard/completion than Watson...
Then there are other things to consider like YAC...Guys getting a ton of YAC helps the yards per completion.
He performs well on the BIG stage. [sarcasm]We need to give Vince Young another chance.
And if they are getting good YAC what does that say about the low ranking? Those YAC make the low ranking even worse?Hopkins and Watkins were in the NFL last year and I didn't say that they struggled to get YAC.
What I said was that if other guys are getting a ton of YAC it helps their QB's ypc.
Yes. I don't know about disproved but the Kool Aid drinkers have already made excuses for them, yes they have. I do believe those Kool Aid drinkers debunked the Brock Osweiler scouting report also.
- What differentiates proven/unproven?
- Matt Cassel.
And if they are getting good YAC what does that say about the low ranking? Those YAC make the low ranking even worse?
Passing yards per completion, Watson ranked #72, so yes he was a dink and dunker: http://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/individual/740/p2
Fuller appears to be lost for around 2-3 months and he will need surgery to repair the broken collarbone. This comes as a big blow to an offense that uses his skills to stretch the field. Earlier in the day, Fuller had a big play on a crossing pattern that saw him break for a touchdown. Fuller has had a strong camp and this comes as a big blow to an offense looking to find their way.
J.J. Watt returned and took part in the complete practice. Not only were there team drills but Watt did all of the team work with full contact. Watt was matched up with Breno Giacomini and it took everything Giacomini had to slow Watt down. It is early but it was a good sight to see Watt back and banging pads in both rush and run support. His best rush came when he drove the offensive tackle into Tom Savage's lap, effectively killing the play. Watt got warmed up as practice went on but had a solid day first day of contact.
The Texans are working D'Onta Foreman and during team sessions, he ripped off chunks of yards, eating up the defense. Foreman was wearing the defense down, dropping his shoulder on the defense. When he got north and south, he was tough for the defense to handle. Foreman continues to make his mark on the field, particularly in the run game.
Rookie linebacker Zach Cunningham had his best day of camp so far. The best parts of what he showed were his run support and ability to get downhill. This was on display during short yardage when he and Brian Cushing made a key stop. His speed is unmatched in the middle of the defense and he slowly is understanding his role.
Dare Ogunbowale is turning heads at camp, stemming from his ability to do everything. He catches well, is solid in running ball, and is a plus player in pass protection. With a loaded running back group, Ogunbowale is standing out by putting together a strong, well-rounded camp.
Deshaun Watson continues building blocks as a quarterback and today did it in two drives that resulted in scores. On one, he hit Chris Thompson on a deep ball over the heads of defenders. Later on, a pass to tight end Evan Baylis in the middle of the field capped off another drive. Watson had a strong outing behind center for the second straight day.
The defense stepped up and made life tough for Tom Savage and the offense. They shut down the running and passing games of the offense, leading to some poor throws. Savage did have some early completions to DeAndre Hopkins in the corner of the end zone and he hit Will Fuller on a long and catch and run that would have resulted in a touchdown. However, the defense made their mark after the early success and shut down the offense.
So Breno Giacomini slowed down JJ Watt?
Lucky said, "Then there's Tom Savage. Who has probably the weakest college resume of any QB currently in the NFL." Actually, his 3 yrs of playing is compares quite favorably to a current starting QB in the NFL...
Doesn't make Savage the next Brady, but it does show that his college years were as productive as a top level, current NFL QB's were.
· Tom Brady college career
Passing Table
Passing
Year School Conf Class Pos G Cmp Att Pct Yds Y/A AY/A TD Int Rate
1996 Michigan Big Ten QB 2 3 5 60 26 5.2 -3.8 0 1 63.7
1997 Michigan Big Ten QB 4 12 15 80 103 6.9 6.9 0 0 137.7
1998 Michigan Big Ten QB 12 200 323 61.9 2427 7.5 7 14 10 133.1
1999 Michigan Big Ten QB 11 180 295 61 2217 7.5 7.7 16 6 138
Career Michigan 395 638 61.9 4773 7.5 7.2 30 17 134.9
· Tom Savage college career
Passing Table
Passing
Year School Conf Class Pos G Cmp Att Pct Yds Y/A AY/A TD Int Rate
*2009 Rutgers Big East FR QB 12 149 285 52.3 2211 7.8 7.6 14 7 128.7
2010 Rutgers Big East SO QB 6 43 83 51.8 521 6.3 5.1 2 3 105.3
*2013 Pitt ACC SR QB 13 238 389 61.2 2958 7.6 7.6 21 9 138.2
Career Overall 430 757 56.8 5690 7.5 7.4 37 19 131.1
"He has the winning gene."
-Rick
"We look at a lot of stuff but the kid is just a winner."
-Bill
Nuff said
Buy tickets to come see a Texans game featuring a college winning QB that may or may not be any good. And buy a jersey while you are at even though we don't know how he will do. And buy more Texans stuff because we could win with him in the future. Because he did win in college and that means something - am I right? You know it! Superbowl! Championship!
Some have already bought into this line of thinking.
We've got a poster on here who waited 5 years to finally get season tickets. The thought that Watson was drafted expressly to sell more tickets and buy more merch is simply a ridiculous projection on your part of your opinion of McNair and Smith.
Texian can't tell the difference between Dan Marino and Johnny Manziel (by his definition they are both classic Pure Pocket Passers). Yet you care what he thinks about QBs?You were right about Os. What are your thoughts on Watson?
I never said that Watson was expressly drafted to sell more tickets. I was saying that the Texans were talking him up and making him sound better than sliced bread because it helps their multiple causes with one of those being to keep the fans invested.
But hey - you keep basing your facts on what one random person says he did on the internet to represent the entire Texans fan base.
Maybe he's actually doing well?
And you are probably right. I just wouldn't put too much faith in Rick or OB statements in preseason and for a number of other reasons.
I imagine that press access at camp may be more exclusive this year, so I think Starr tries to avoid biting the hand that feeds him. I noticed that he tends to avoid addressing an elephant in the room like Watt's conspicuous absence from most camp reports last week (Starr's tweet to me about it: "Watt is present in drills.")
Some details are expected.Listening to Starr's podcast, he addresses this. The media has an agreement to not report sensitive information like who doesn't appear 100% healthy, or trickeration plays, or players changing up positions (like Watt practicing at TE). I guess that's a no-brainer anyway.
If you're thirsty for more knowledge on camp, I recommend Starr's podcast. There's actually a lot of substance, and he explains things that aren't in camp reports. Here are some key points:
- Watson shouldn't be compared to Savage; he should be compared to Fitzpatrick, Hoyer, Osweiler, or rookie Savage. Compared to them, way ahead.
- Watson has a knack for correcting mistakes. One day he threw flat footed, next day his feet and mechanics were improved.
- Past O'Brien camps felt disjointed. This one is tightly controlled and fluid. Players know where to be and what to do.
- One reason for disjointed offensive practices was Godsey. O'Brien runs offensive drills much better. Always yelling, holding guys accountable, correcting mistakes immediately instead of in the film room.
- Most physical camp in last four years. Also less water and shade breaks. This recovers a lot of lost time.
- Treston Decoud is every bit of 6'3", long and rangey. Jams fast receivers off routes. For comparison, Jalon Ramsey is 6'1" and considered huge at CB.
- D'Onta Foreman has exceeded expectations. Surprised at his long speed. He can get into the teeth of the defense, but needs to drop his pad level. If he can one-cut you, he's gone.
- Cunningham needs to quit arm tackling, learn to NFL tackle. But his speed is unparalleled. RB's should not try to bounce outside on him.
- For a weak OT draft class, thoroughly impressed that Houston got Davenport. Coaches are testing him. Needs work in the run game, but can immobilize the best pass rushers using his long arms. Needs a lot of work, but may be rotated in at RT.
- This draft class has way more preseason potential since any he can remember.
- Nick Martin is easily the best offensive lineman in the group. Makes linemen around him better. Opens up holes, could even be better than Duane Brown.
- Hopkins is back to his old self. A lot more focused.
- People have been asking him (like me) why such little reporting about Watt. They're letting him work in positional groups, but in full contact, there's no reason to put him out there.
- They had to yank Clowney from a team drill because the offense couldn't get anything done.
- McKinney is an animal. Lit up Foreman three times to remind him to drop his pad level.
- Riley McCarron is an ideal back up to Braxton Miller. Way more athletic than given credit for. Trucked a DB today after the catch.
Derek Carr scouting report read quite a bit differently than Watson's starting with his arm, accuracy and he didn't have the INT problem, his TD to INT ratio was 6 to 1 NOT < 3 to 1.Not to be argumentative, but wasn't Derek Carr a dink & dunker? Does the college system define the prospect?
Could you kindly support those statements?
I'm not sure who you mean by 'kool aid drinkers' but I am one of the people that disproved most if not all the claims you made. Yes. Disproved. Not excuses. Actual proof that disproved your claims.
If you aren't getting YAC with WR's like Willams/Renfroe/Hopkins/Watkins etc.... there are much deeper issues.
The low ranking says as much about O as it does the QB, most of the passes were < 5 yds, that's pretty cut and dried.
32 INTs is a real head scratcher and a BIG red flag and question about decision making, no denying that.