I do not believe this story is new. I heard that Reeves would have picked Vince Young at the time that Houston announced that the two final candidates were Williams and Bush. (Heard it through my sports talk addiction so I don't have a link).
Wait, here's a semi link:
link
I believe, at the time he said it, he was no longer acting as consultant. That he said he thought Carr could be a player who could be successful in the league, but he would have picked Vince Young.
Personally, I think you could have picked VY even if you thought DC would have a future in the league. I am pretty sure that Reeves said that DC could have a future in the league--that doesn't preclude someone from deciding to take VY though--it just means that the decision on that was a FEBRUARY decision and not an April draft decision.
The timing of everything was terrible. VY signals he stays in school until he doesn't and hires a ridiculous choice as his agent. He's immediately get slammed for poor performance in a made for TV event, etc. Even VY's best supporters suggest that he is going to be a project in the NFL. Kubiak hired in January. Basically a week and a half then Carr's option has to be addressed.
I am guessing most of the coaching candidates in talking about Carr figure that the math of this means:
Would you rather have Carr + Bush or Vince Young - Carr - Bush?
McNair wants to do things from a purely football perspective. I am guessing nobody was selling VY as a pick from a football perspective even though that easily can be done, stats and results wise. (And Casserly evidently still doesn't think VY is worth much of anything given his list of top QBs). It is not quite as easy to prove in February that he is worth chucking Carr and Bush, but it could have been done.
Personally, I do think that fan support is part of home field advantage and IS part of a football decision, but it is evident that this wasn't put in the pros and cons at all.