infantrycak
Hall of Fame
Dont know but its out there the Texans contacted the Broncos last year about Osweilers availability
Plenty of smoke
I have no doubt the Texans have interest in Oz. It's the price part I doubt.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Dont know but its out there the Texans contacted the Broncos last year about Osweilers availability
Plenty of smoke
I have no doubt the Texans have interest in Oz. It's the price part I doubt.
Not seeing how any of that is responsive to me.
You doubted the price, I pointed out you dont know the actual price because we dont know the guarantees and then gave an estimate that falls in line with the rest of the league.
What do you doubt?
So you changed what you were talking about......
Dont know but its out there the Texans contacted the Broncos last year about Osweilers availability
Plenty of smoke
Dont know but its out there the Texans contacted the Broncos last year about Osweilers availability
Plenty of smoke
NFL Rumors: Houston Texans interested in trade for Broncos' Brock Osweiler?
by Bryan Rose 104w ago
The Houston Texans are said to be looking hard at drafting a quarterback with the first overall pick in the 2014 NFL Draft.
But do they have something up their sleeve?
According to Peter Burns of 104.3 FM Denver, the Broncos have received multiple trade inquires about backup quarterback Brock Osweiler – one of which has come from the Houston Texans.
"Was told that one of the teams interested in Brock Osweiler was the Houston #Texans…
While that might seem a bit odd on the surface, the Texans are likely simply doing their due diligence in regards to a potential quarterback situation."
It’s also possible the Texans could be looking at Osweiler as a potential backup to a rookie arm, though that seems somewhat unlikely.
The most plausible scenario is the Texans simply exploring every possible avenue in regards to the upcoming draft and Osweiler’s name likely came up in the event Houston decides to pass on drafting a quarterback early.
No deal is imminent and it’s not known how serious the talks were.
The interest in Brock evidently goes way back.
I must have completely skipped over this back then. Good find.
DX-TEX, I apologize.
I'd give him 50 cents in Mexican money and not back out.So how high would you go to get him?
Maybe it is late and my brain is sluggish but I think we should not be overly concerned about how much we spend for Osweiler if team thinks he is real deal. We have cap room and we need to take somewhat of a risk. A QB in free agency allows us to bring in a probable starter @ LT or WR (draft) both will help Os. Despite Collins poor combine, I am still strongly in his corner to replace Foster.
Would you be willing to spend half your cap on Osweiler? That's what a Sam Bradford, Kirk Cousins' tag like deal would cost you.
Don't know where "tag like deal" came from, but I'd rather just go all in for Goff
Cousins was franchised
What does that have to do with the post you quoted and about Osweiler?
That's where "tag like deal" came from.
Maybe it is late and my brain is sluggish but I think we should not be overly concerned about how much we spend for Osweiler if team thinks he is real deal. We have cap room and we need to take somewhat of a risk. A QB in free agency allows us to bring in a probable starter @ LT or WR (draft) both will help Os. Despite Collins poor combine, I am still strongly in his corner to replace Foster.
While I tend to believe that the reports of a 3 year $45 Million deal being on the table are probably correct - or at least close to correct, what hasn't been mentioned is the deal structure and the guaranteed money in that amount.This was LZ's thoughts on the Texans going after Brock. They get a QB that is equal to the QB class in the draft (compared him favorably to Lynch) and spend their draft picks on BPP at need. Also dont forget if they do sign Brock that would more than likely end the relationship with Hoyer so you could add another 5 million to available cap space
Thats not how it works. As Champion just stated the guaranteed money is the key. You can spread out a signing bonus over the life of a contract, it doesnt have to be paid all up front.If they cut Hoyer they should have around 47 mil in cap space. If they want to get Osweiler they will need to give him 20 mil. That leaves around 20 mil they can spend in FA and that should be enough to sign FA's like Green/Miller/Okung etc... and give them 7 mil to sign their draft picks.
This is very doable, the question is Osweiller the man?
While I tend to believe that the reports of a 3 year $45 Million deal being on the table are probably correct - or at least close to correct, what hasn't been mentioned is the deal structure and the guaranteed money in that amount.
The thing that will keep the Texans from signing Osweiler won't be the salary cap implications, or even the cost of the contract itself, but it will either be the Broncos finalizing a deal and succeeding in keeping him from ever hitting the open market, or the Texans not actually thinking as highly of him as those reports would make you believe. I also believe it's very likely that the first of those two things will leave us forever speculating about the second.
They have until tomorrow. Tomorrow we can jump into the bidding war.
Thats not how it works. As Champion just stated the guaranteed money is the key. You can spread out a signing bonus over the life of a contract, it doesnt have to be paid all up front.
And we'll see what happens.They have until tomorrow. Tomorrow we can jump into the bidding war.
If they cut Hoyer they should have around 47 mil in cap space. If they want to get Osweiler they will need to give him 20 mil. That leaves around 20 mil they can spend in FA and that should be enough to sign FA's like Green/Miller/Okung etc... and give them 7 mil to sign their draft picks.
This is very doable, the question is Osweiller the man?
Don't forget our own FA's we need to sign - Brooks, Jones, Crick.If they cut Hoyer they should have around 47 mil in cap space. If they want to get Osweiler they will need to give him 20 mil. That leaves around 20 mil they can spend in FA and that should be enough to sign FA's like Green/Miller/Okung etc... and give them 7 mil to sign their draft picks.
This is very doable, the question is Osweiller the man?
Agreed. Looking at the cap in 2017-18, the Texans are in great shape. So, what do you think? Osweiler for 4 yrs - $70 million, if it takes that?
Don't forget our own FA's we need to sign - Brooks, Jones, Crick.
Agreed. Looking at the cap in 2017-18, the Texans are in great shape. So, what do you think? Osweiler for 4 yrs - $70 million, if it takes that?
The word I'm hearing and reading is that the Texans would like to draft some speed at WR. What I'm reading here is that O doesn't have the arm for the deep passing game. Do we really want such a QB?
I'd much rather have Elliot or Dixon to replace Foster.Maybe it is late and my brain is sluggish but I think we should not be overly concerned about how much we spend for Osweiler if team thinks he is real deal. We have cap room and we need to take somewhat of a risk. A QB in free agency allows us to bring in a probable starter @ LT or WR (draft) both will help Os. Despite Collins poor combine, I am still strongly in his corner to replace Foster.
If they cut Hoyer they should have around 47 mil in cap space. If they want to get Osweiler they will need to give him 20 mil. That leaves around 20 mil they can spend in FA and that should be enough to sign FA's like Green/Miller/Okung etc... and give them 7 mil to sign their draft picks.
This is very doable, the question is Osweiller the man?
Okung????
2010 2nd preseason game suffered high ankle sprain........missed rest of preseason and the first 3 weeks of the season
2010 week 7 recurrent high ankle sprain......missed another 3 games
2011 missed preseason with recurrent high ankle sprain
2011 week 13 right pectoral tendon rupture IRed
2012 week 2 knee bone bruise injury missed one game
2013 week 2 turf toe (plantar plate of the foot rupture) IRDR missed 8 games
2014 offseason turf toe surgery
2014 week 8 calf strain, missed 1 game
2014 week 15 beginning of game chest trauma bruised lung with coughing up blood missed 1 week
2015 week 3 shoulder labrum injury, missed 1 week
2015 week 7 turf toe recurrent injury........then later in the following a practice that week, ankle and calf injury.....missed 1 week.......would ........have been 2 weeks if it were not for the Bye
2015 week 15 calf injury missed 2 weeks
2016 2nd playoff game in Jan shoulder dislocation/ extended labrum tear from 3rd week in 2014
2016 February shoulder surgery (at least a 6 month rehab)
There you go raining on the parade.
I had no idea of his extensive injury history.
Yeah, but I'm sure as he gets older, his durability will improve.He's never played a full season. He missed exactly 25% of Seattle's regular season games during his 6 years there.
Just to clarify, you do mean half of cap space not cap, correct?Would you be willing to spend half your cap on Osweiler? That's what a Sam Bradford, Kirk Cousins' tag like deal would cost you.
Didn't hear LZ but I agree. The risk is not quite as high as with a draft pick--say Lynch and doubtful that Lynch plays much until year two; with OS he should start game one plus bring more of a leadership to huddle than any draft QB.This was LZ's thoughts on the Texans going after Brock. They get a QB that is equal to the QB class in the draft (compared him favorably to Lynch) and spend their draft picks on BPP at need. Also dont forget if they do sign Brock that would more than likely end the relationship with Hoyer so you could add another 5 million to available cap space
They are ranked Elliott, Collins and Dixon. I agree with that and would be good with any one of them. Elliott goes first round and other two in second.I'd much rather have Elliot or Dixon to replace Foster.
You and me both, Brother. Or what if we smash through the franchise tag, get Cousins, and accept the consequences? At least it would be a way to avoid Osweiler, who would be another in a long list of QB acquisition failures.gotcha... again, I'd rather go all in for Goff than pay that kind of money to an Osweiler
Well we find out today.
I kinda figured the "rumors" to take off yesterday... even this morning, it's pretty quite.
well profootballtalk is always there to monger a rumor for you
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...expected-to-call-brock-osweilers-agent-today/
It’s clear why Houston would be interested, as they’re a a quarterback away from being a real contender with their base of defensive talent and a star receiver in the making in DeAndre Hopkins. And because of their success at overcoming their quarterback position last year, they’re picking 22nd, likely too low to acquire the kind of passer who could make an immediate difference.
Well we find out today.
Not until Wednesday, right? Today starts the "legal tampering" period where free agents can start actively talking to teams, but those talks can't be finalized (except if it's with their original team) until Wednesday... unless I'm mistaken.
During the two-day negotiating period, all clubs may negotiate all aspects of an NFL Player Contract with the certified agent of any prospective UFA,” explains the March 2 memo to all teams, a copy of which PFT has obtained. “However, a new club may not execute an NFL Player Contract with a prospective UFA until 4:00 p.m., New York time, on March 9, when the player’s 2015 contract expires.”
The memo then explains that “the only valid, binding and enforceable employment agreement between an NFL player and an NFL club is an NFL Player Contract that has been fully executed by the parties in compliance with all applicable League rules and the CBA,” and that any discussions regarding possible employment or terms of employment “are non-binding and are unenforceable by the player or the club.”
The memo next lists specific things that cannot be done. Teams cannot execute an NFL contract, execute an agreement in principle or other similar document, announce that an agreement in principle or other similar agreement has been reached, or reach agreement on any undisclosed terms. Also, teams cannot make travel arrangements with a prospective free agent before the launch of free agency, at 4:00 p.m. ET on Wednesday.
Osweiler would have to want to leave the Broncos if the Texans have any chance. I would think the Broncos would match anything that's offered, so the choice would be Broncos or Texans. The Broncos, who just won the Super Bowl. Or, the Texans, who tend to hover the line of average. Tough choice
The Broncos have nothing at the position after Manning and O. If the Broncos didn't match the offer then what does that say about the player?