Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
The Judys. I have that song on my phone.
A cult leader was mentioned and Guyana Punch was a song about Jim Jones by The Judys out of Pearland back in the early 80's .
I'm extremely excited about Mallet.........not so much about Hoyer.
Not to add any controversy/anxiety to the Hoyer acquisition, but I can't help but being somewhat guarded re. Hoyer after being knocked out of the end of the season with a "shoulder injury" when he was driven into the ground.........of his throwing arm. He tried to throw a week later and could hardly get the ball out of his hand. What did not get widely publicized is that he also suffered a biceps injury during that same play. I certainly hope that Hoyer will be thoroughly checked out medically (including MRI/MRI arthrogram as appropriate) and performance tested before all is finalized. A QB coming back from an ACL can be quite different from a QB trying to come back from some combination shoulder and biceps injuries.
Like they say, he can't hurt the team from the training table.I certainly hope that Hoyer will be thoroughly checked out medically (including MRI/MRI arthrogram as appropriate) and performance tested before all is finalized.
I certainly hope that Hoyer will be thoroughly checked out medically (including MRI/MRI arthrogram as appropriate) and performance tested before all is finalized...
"When I got to Houston it felt like home, and when I entered the facility everyone treated me as if I was family"
--Ryan Mallett
"When I got to Houston it felt like home, and when I entered the facility everyone treated me as if I was family"
--Ryan Mallett
don't worry. The same guy who checked out ed reed for the texans says hoyer is good to go.
I still listen to that
Bean, Walton and drummer Dane Cessac, childhood friends who grew up in Pearland, are assembled at Walton's studio near US 290 and Mangum to drag their arch, keenly satirical, hyper-catchy songs out of mothballs. Those songs, as released on the albums Washarama (1981) and Moo (1985), as well as on various EPs and 7-inch singles, once made the Judy's one of the most popular bands in Texas.
I notice they pluralized their name with an apostrophe even on the cover of their album. They must have been a bunch of damn fools.I still listen to that
I notice they pluralized their name with an apostrophe even on the cover of their album. They must have been a bunch of damn fools.
You know that for a fact, do you? The Temptations, the Platters, the Jordanaires, ad infinitum didn't make that hideous error.Or you don't get it. It's not plural. It was specifically chosen to designate one band rather than a group of members.
You know that for a fact, do you? The Temptations, the Platters, the Jordanaires, ad infinitum didn't make that hideous error.
You know that for a fact, do you? The Temptations, the Platters, the Jordanaires, ad infinitum didn't make that hideous error.
From their own damn website.Basing their name around the graphic elements and images of the 1950s that pervaded the musical movement at the time and recalled a period of naiveté and hope in the future, The Judys (Possessive, singer David Bean points out. We didnt want it to be plural as if we were each a Judy) quickly envisioned a new direction for their musical exploration: a stripped down, minimalist sound that reveled in their limitations as both musicians and humans
Sounds exactly like somebody trying cover up a mistake later, after it was pointed out.The Judys (Possessive, singer David Bean points out. We didnt want it to be plural as if we were each a Judy)
Well, Chris, it most certainly is a grammatical error to pluralize a name with an apostrophe.Yes - the band was asked about it at the time. But continue with your ignorant rant based on an incorrect assumption. The error is yours in the assumption. There is no grammatical error in what they did.
You mean citing groups with proper names like the Carpenters or the Osmonds? I've told you and you still don't see it. What are you, a ?PS - citing bands doing it the other way is foolish. Oh my God a punk band rebelled against the norm, who'd a thunk it.
Well, Chris, it most certainly is a grammatical error to pluralize a name with an apostrophe.
Ryan's Malletts.I want to talk about me yeah me. signed Ryan Mallett.
Punctuation? You're talking punctuation? Punctuation???
Ryan's Malletts.
"I have no doubt."-Mallett on whether or not he thinks he can help take #Texans to playoffs.
"I want to be here at all costs."-Ryan Mallett on what he told agents about staying w/#Texans.
Tania Ganguli ‏@taniaganguliMallett also mentions that it will be good to have the same Head Coach. Didn’t want a third different HC for three straight years. #Texans
“I feel we are building on something here.” Ryan Mallett (says again wanted to be here) #Texans
On why he wanted to be here “I love being a part of this team. I wanted to be here." Ryan Mallett #Texans
“Our football team is base on competition, the quarterback position should be no different.” Ryan Mallett #Texans
“I wanted to be here at all costs.” Ryan Mallett #Texans
“Feels good to know I am going to be here.” Ryan Mallett #Texans
"I feel like we’re really building something here. we got a lot to build on and I want to be a part of it." @Ryan_Mallett_15 #Texans
"Our football team is based on competition, I don’t think quarterback position should be treated any differently" @Ryan_Mallett_15 #Texans
they say it's a competition for qb, but in reality we'd be stupid to not at least give mallett the first shot with his contract of only 2 years.
they say it's a competition for qb, but in reality we'd be stupid to not at least give mallett the first shot with his contract of only 2 years.
Ryan sounded really good on the radio... on point, focused, but relaxed and happy. Easygoing interview.
Just make sure that you're an original owner of a "15" jersey lolI've really been impressed with the guy. It's almost a 'too good to be true' vibe, which my dad always taught me to never trust situations with that kind of vibe to it.
That said, I'm staying optimistic about Mallett until he proves otherwise. He really looked like he had full command of this offense in that Browns game, and his teammates all had positive things to say about him as a leader.
Just make sure that you're an original owner of a "15" jersey lol
I've really been impressed with the guy. It's almost a 'too good to be true' vibe, which my dad always taught me to never trust situations with that kind of vibe to it.
That said, I'm staying optimistic about Mallett until he proves otherwise. He really looked like he had full command of this offense in that Browns game, and his teammates all had positive things to say about him as a leader.
That said, I'm staying optimistic about Mallett until he proves otherwise. He really looked like he had full command of this offense in that Browns game, and his teammates all had positive things to say about him as a leader.
There's no doubt in my mind that Mallett will beat out Hoyer. That's mainly based on seeing more of Hoyer than Mallett. My concern is whether the Texans will surround Mallett with enough talent for him to succeed. Another WR. Or three. A TE. A better backup RB. It will be difficult to find all of that in one draft. Just saying.I'm with you. Mallett is the guy until he proves otherwise.
There's no doubt in my mind that Mallett will beat out Hoyer. That's mainly based on seeing more of Hoyer than Mallett. My concern is whether the Texans will surround Mallett with enough talent for him to succeed. Another WR. Or three. A TE. A better backup RB. It will be difficult to find all of that in one draft. Just saying.
There's no doubt in my mind that Mallett will beat out Hoyer. That's mainly based on seeing more of Hoyer than Mallett. My concern is whether the Texans will surround Mallett with enough talent for him to succeed. Another WR. Or three. A TE. A better backup RB. It will be difficult to find all of that in one draft. Just saying.
I'm going to go on record one more time here to make sure I'm not accused of hindsight in a few months. I think Hoyer is the starter next season and I base that on my perception of how O'Brien views Mallett, which I laid out in detail earlier.
I'm going to agree with Lucky that Mallett wins the job. Which is what bothers me about Hoyer's contract being wasteful.
I agree.....I think Keenum proved last season he can play in this league. I would of rather seen Hoyers money spend on another need.
To you, maybe. Personally, I think he's very lucky to still be in the league.
Isn't that true for 75% of backup QBs?
I'm going to agree with Lucky that Mallett wins the job. Which is what bothers me about Hoyer's contract being wasteful.
I think it is going to be a Hoyer slight lead, but Mallet given every opportunity to win the job situation. My fear is that it is going to be a mess where one or the other 'wins" the job, but gets pulled after a game or two of suckage. that along with an injury or two leads us to ending 21015 without knowing enough about Mallet nor still having a real starting QB.
BTW, I still not sure how I am supposed to conclude that a really smart guy with more recent experience with a system knows less than a dude three or four years removed from a system that was not entirely O'Brien's to begin with. Bill just likes Hoyer more than Fitzpatrick. We can only wait and see if O'Brien is correct in his assessment.
Isn't that true for 75% of backup QBs?
Nailed two of my concerns. Whoever wins the job having fans turn at the drop of a hat and OB getting (not because of the fans necessarily) ansy and not riding things out to a definite conclusion.
Also don't understand how Hoyer's experience 4 seasons ago with no starts trumps Fitz' experience last year with 12 starts.