Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Looking ahead to the Washington Redskins

Interesting fact.

There's no need to hire spies to infiltrate the other camp as the Washington Redskins and Houston Texans prepare to meet Sunday: Both teams already have plenty of inside information.

Ten of the coaches who will be on the sidelines were members of the Denver Broncos coaching staff in 2002. Texans coach Gary Kubiak and Redskins coach Mike Shanahan have a working relationship that goes back to 1985. Kyle Shanahan was Houston's offensive coordinator before leaving for Washington this year to work with his father.

Kyle Shanahan says there's no secret what he likes to run against the Texans defense, having done it in practice for four years. He says, "They know what I like; I know what they like."

link
 
wait, teams are going to dare the league's best passing offense to throw the ball this season because they dont want to be crushed by our new rushing attack? is it sunday yet!?!?!?!??!

We aren't the best passing attack in the NFL currently.

Honestly though, if the Skins are going to be that focused on Foster, and they aren't going to focus a metric ****ton of defensive resources to corraling AJ (And if Hall is manned up on AJ one-on-one then okay, as a Texans fan I'm cool with that) he's going to eat them up way worse than Miles Austin. One thing we didn't bust out too much against the Colts was the playaction (Schaub's pick was on a PA though), and I don't think the Colts were selling out against the run at all in the second half for whatever reason. I can easily see Dennison/Kubiak putting the ball in Schaubs hands a lot and telling him to make AJ proud.

I'm not really that worried about the Skins offense because I'm not a real believer in Santana Moss. He's decent but I'm spoiled by watching Andre work every Sunday. Chris Cooley is good, but we just got finished out scoring Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark. I really hope that Bush puts in the work and finds the seams and the weak spots in the Shanahan offense (Hell Richard Smith did it in 2007, it can't be THAT hard), because from what I saw of their game against the Boys it was a lot of short drops to Cooley.

All that said, I've seen the Texans go on the road and drop a fat deuce right in my eyes when they should've been dropping it on their opponents.
 
I know this thread is about the game on Sunday but I'd just like to point out some stuff regarding McNabb. Overall he has had a great career and should make the HOF. The one thing I think about which has held him back is winning the big game. That day still might come for him but I have always wondered why he has not done as well as I thought he should in the playoffs. I know all about the SB and the NFC game but more recently he has looked great in the season but not so much in the playoffs. I have been trying to figure out why but honestly I do not know. Sorry, did not mean to highjack this thread but I guess I have now lol.
 
Haha! I'm loving it. It's like people completely forgot what this team did last season through the air...for some odd reason. On the Redskins site, a Skins fan just said that his D will hold Foster half the yards he got Sunday and make the Texans beat them through the air. I'm sure we'd be fine with Foster gaining 115 yards and Matt Schaub airing it out. If Miles Austin can do what he did Sunday, imagine what Andre Johnson can do.

I hope the Texans win the game through the air. Should give the Cowboys in week 3 plenty to think about.

I keep hearing about "Foster this and Foster that..." everyone has already forgot about that one guy named Andre Johnson?
 
Interesting fact.



link

Shanny Jr may know how our offense pretty well, and may even know our defense from last year. But I'll guarantee the Bush will have some wrinkles that catches him completely flat footed. This is not the same defense from last year.
 
Shanny Jr may know how our offense pretty well, and may even know our defense from last year. But I'll guarantee the Bush will have some wrinkles that catches him completely flat footed. This is not the same defense from last year.

Yep. The only way the Texans lose is the Texans defeat the Texans. This game is not up to Washington.
 
I liked how Denver used to jump to an early lead, then run, run, run, BAM hit them with the big pass and run up the score.


Which is another reason we need Scahub to star hot, like he did against Seattle, Cincinatti, and Miami. He needs to be able to start games like that especially against good teams.
 
u know i think we are going to try and run but will have to unleash our Air attack i just got that feeling thats how its going to pan out

U know SHanny is a smart dude he will not respect our RUn he knows what kubes will try and do he thinks the texans will flip flop run heavy last week and then Pass crazy this week

What team will be crazy enough to Let OWEN ANDRE and Kevin walter run around and make 20+ yard Catches
 
I hope the Texans win the game through the air. Should give the Cowboys in week 3 plenty to think about.

I keep hearing about "Foster this and Foster that..." everyone has already forgot about that one guy named Andre Johnson?

Nobody sleeps on AJ:





 
Shanny Jr may know how our offense pretty well, and may even know our defense from last year. But I'll guarantee the Bush will have some wrinkles that catches him completely flat footed. This is not the same defense from last year.


I believe that this is actually overstated by many. If you look at the Oline and how it has changed approach and technique from the last two years (as relates to the run game), it has turned from the classic Gibbs to a much more creative and less predictable form. This doesn't even take into account the strengthening of the Oline in general and the addition of the Texans' first successful power/break-away combination RB.........neither which Kubiak had at his disposal in planning his schemes during little Shanny's era.

This "comfort" level on the part of Shanny may very well lull the Skins into a false sense of confidence of their ability to stop our offense. Let 'em eat cake.:)
 
I believe that this is actually overstated by many. If you look at the Oline and how it has changed approach and technique from the last two years (as relates to the run game), it has turned from the classic Gibbs to a much more creative and less predictable form. This doesn't even take into account the strengthening of the Oline in general and the addition of the Texans' first successful power/break-away combination RB.........neither which Kubiak had at his disposal in planning his schemes during little Shanny's era.

This "comfort" level on the part of Shanny may very well lull the Skins into a false sense of confidence of their ability to stop our offense. Let 'em eat cake.:)

The way I feel about it is if Kyle is over there spending his time tutoring Jim Haslett's defense instead of getting his offense ready, point Texans.
 
I'm more of a fan of this gif

35869374.gif
 
Last edited:
Not that predictions by analysts matter, but Inside the NFL on Showtime picked the Skins to win 3 to 1. Warran Sap is who voted us to win.
 
I believe that this is actually overstated by many. If you look at the Oline and how it has changed approach and technique from the last two years (as relates to the run game), it has turned from the classic Gibbs to a much more creative and less predictable form. This doesn't even take into account the strengthening of the Oline in general and the addition of the Texans' first successful power/break-away combination RB.........neither which Kubiak had at his disposal in planning his schemes during little Shanny's era.

This "comfort" level on the part of Shanny may very well lull the Skins into a false sense of confidence of their ability to stop our offense. Let 'em eat cake.:)

I agree it is overstated, but I am trying to give them the most credit possible, and they still don't quite catch up.
 
Not that predictions by analysts matter, but Inside the NFL on Showtime picked the Skins to win 3 to 1. Warran Sap is who voted us to win.

Well Sterling Sharpe, Brian Baldinger, and even Joe "Redskin Homer" Theismann all chose the Texans to win this week on their show Playbook on NFLN.

-Source
 
Nothing mean about what I said. I was telling the truth. Very ignorant statement made by some Redskins fan.

I could care less about the national attention the Texans have gotten...I know enough about every NFL team to not make ignorant comments despite their media coverage...If you don't know something, don't speak on it...Otherwise you'll probably get called out..

Those are not ignorant comments to you?

Since the 06-07:
Daniels: 208 rec, 2510 yds, 12.1 avg, 5.2 YAC, 15 TDs (respectable)
Cooley: 241 rec, 2781 yds, 11.5 avg, 6.4 YAC, 17 TDs

So if there's an edge at all, statistically, it's Cooley. Cooley is also the same height and 15 pounds heavier (it's probably all hair though haha)

Owen Daniels is still recovering from his ACL tear. Chris Cooley is no chump. I don't think its an easy decision between the two.

Anything but an easy decision. I'd take either, but if I had a choice, I'd still take Cooley.


I can understand saying that you think it's a draw but for them to say that their TE group (not just Cooley vs. OD) is better than our TE group just seems crazy to me...

At best I can understand someone saying it's a draw...

Cooley and Fred "Sleepy" Davis are a dream TE set. Who's your second TE? Dreessen? 26 receptions in 11 games for 320 yards in Daniels's absence last season? Compare those to Davis's numbers. 48 recs, 500 yds in 10 games with 6 TDs. If we're goin by numbers, you lose again.

You are aware that Cooley only played in 7 games last season too, right? In 7 games he had 29 receptions and 2 TD's. Daniels, in 7.25 games had 40 receptions and 5 TD's...

No one said that Cooley was a chump. He's just not OD.

Good point, but we also had Jim "Vanilla Yogurt" Zorn and Jason "Captain Mediocre" Campbell running our offense. We didn't have one of the most prolific passing games in the NFL.

You have to ignore it. Whenver I see someone questioning our offense, I automatically know I'm dealing with an un-informed, uneducated, clueless football fan, and I pretty much ignore them.

Your offense is good, probably great. I say probably because until you guys perform like you did last week on a consistent basis, you won't be great. Just because we're not Texan fans doesn't mean we're uninformed. I've had Schaub as my starting fantasy QB in at least two leagues for the last three years, I'm well educated about your offense. I respect it and know what it's capable of. But as a Skins fan, I know our defense and also know what it's capable of, probably more than you are. So before you start calling everyone that questions the effectiveness of your offense against our defense uninformed, uneducated, and clueless, you should give it a second of thought.
 
Jacoby Jones:

Anyone can post highlights, man. Just sayin, I respect the guy, but even our practice squad guys have youtube highlights haha.

Man, I wish we had a Kevin Walter type.

This, damnit. Thanks for nothin, Devin Thomas and Malcom Kelly.

Yea but Okrapo at the end of the game pretty much got the sack because without that hold he kills Romo

And don't lie, we allllllllllllll want to see Romo get pancaked as often as possible.

This whole thread seems to be focused on what areas/positions the Texans are better than the Redskins. Lets be honest, its a few of them. But it would be silly to think that we are the hands down more talented team.
1) WASH secondary is still better at this time. Too many first round picks to ignore.
2) HOU may have the best LB duo in football, but not this weekend with Cushing out. Those guys can fly to the ball.
3) Its the 2nd week of the football season, so Clinton Portis has not hurt himself yet. He can still be a force to reckon with if used properly.

Come on fellow Houston fans. Learn from Hakeem, and show some humility. Sunday should be a fun game to watch. Cant wait!!

1)Not just first round picks, but too much talent. 'Preciate the respect. Going to be VERY interesting to see how our secondary matches up against your ridiculous passing game, I just hope we can get in Schaub's face, throw him off.
2)So technically, you won't have the best LB duo on Sunday :-)
3)FINALLY! Someone giving CP some respect, although he'll have to run better than he did last week, which will be tough.

Haha! I'm loving it. It's like people completely forgot what this team did last season through the air...for some odd reason. On the Redskins site, a Skins fan just said that his D will hold Foster half the yards he got Sunday and make the Texans beat them through the air. I'm sure we'd be fine with Foster gaining 115 yards and Matt Schaub airing it out. If Miles Austin can do what he did Sunday, imagine what Andre Johnson can do.

LAST SEASON! Last season doesn't mean a thing this season, how long is going to take some of you to realize that??? Foster won't get 115 yards. Andre Johnson scares the bejesus out of me though. Our starting safety Kareem Moore is still out and Laron, while he had a monster game against Dallas, makes mistakes sometimes and AJ lives to exploit DB mistakes.

Yep. The only way the Texans lose is the Texans defeat the Texans. This game is not up to Washington.

:lol: yeah ok, buddy.
 
Houston is the better team. Now that doesn't mean they are going to win, we all know the "any given Sunday" saying is quite true. I'm just saying the Texans are the better team. Take that for what it is.
 
I know this thread is about the game on Sunday but I'd just like to point out some stuff regarding McNabb. Overall he has had a great career and should make the HOF. The one thing I think about which has held him back is winning the big game. That day still might come for him but I have always wondered why he has not done as well as I thought he should in the playoffs. I know all about the SB and the NFC game but more recently he has looked great in the season but not so much in the playoffs. I have been trying to figure out why but honestly I do not know. Sorry, did not mean to highjack this thread but I guess I have now lol.

There's no should about it. First ballot, I thought that about him when he was in Philly.

Everyone knows he has issues winning the big game, but to say this game has anywhere near the implications of even a WC playoff game (although, I think some of us think otherwise) is heresy. This is a regular season, non-conference game.

As for the reason he fails to deliver in big games, it's anyone's guess, but I think whatever was holding him back in Philly is not going the be the case in DC. Of course, that's just the opinion of one humble Skins fan :hurrah:
 
Since the 06-07:
Daniels: 208 rec, 2510 yds, 12.1 avg, 5.2 YAC, 15 TDs (respectable)
Cooley: 241 rec, 2781 yds, 11.5 avg, 6.4 YAC, 17 TDs

So if there's an edge at all, statistically, it's Cooley. Cooley is also the same height and 15 pounds heavier (it's probably all hair though haha)



Anything but an easy decision. I'd take either, but if I had a choice, I'd still take Cooley.

Cooley and Fred "Sleepy" Davis are a dream TE set. Who's your second TE? Dreessen? 26 receptions in 11 games for 320 yards in Daniels's absence last season? Compare those to Davis's numbers. 48 recs, 500 yds in 10 games with 6 TDs. If we're goin by numbers, you lose again.

But look at how many times Davis was targeted. He was targeted more than Kevin Walter and more than Randal El! The Redskins don't have as many targets to throw to, and Jason Campbell loves the TEs, so it works against Dreeseen and company, since Schaub spreads the ball around. Talent wise, there isn't a big difference.
 
Not that predictions by analysts matter, but Inside the NFL on Showtime picked the Skins to win 3 to 1. Warran Sap is who voted us to win.

I was hoping to hear the Texans make this game sound like their Super Bowl.

As noted before, that's the way they need to approach every game. If they lay an egg against Washington, I'll be extremely upset.

Even though they are talented, we should throttle them. We need to see our team not play down to the level of our opponents. Washington has a top ten passing D, but that's what our running game is supposed to loosen up for us.
 
As for the reason he fails to deliver in big games, it's anyone's guess, but I think whatever was holding him back in Philly is not going the be the case in DC. Of course, that's just the opinion of one humble Skins fan :hurrah:

Same as Peyton, he's basically the offense. In Philly, he was even pseudo offensive coordinator, like Peyton in Indy. They need to get better talent around him (I know they've tried) & they need a "big-picture" guy running the offense, not the guy on the field.
 
Since the 06-07:
Daniels: 208 rec, 2510 yds, 12.1 avg, 5.2 YAC, 15 TDs (respectable)
Cooley: 241 rec, 2781 yds, 11.5 avg, 6.4 YAC, 17 TDs

So if there's an edge at all, statistically, it's Cooley. Cooley is also the same height and 15 pounds heavier (it's probably all hair though haha)



Anything but an easy decision. I'd take either, but if I had a choice, I'd still take Cooley.




Cooley and Fred "Sleepy" Davis are a dream TE set. Who's your second TE? Dreessen? 26 receptions in 11 games for 320 yards in Daniels's absence last season? Compare those to Davis's numbers. 48 recs, 500 yds in 10 games with 6 TDs. If we're goin by numbers, you lose again.



Good point, but we also had Jim "Vanilla Yogurt" Zorn and Jason "Captain Mediocre" Campbell running our offense. We didn't have one of the most prolific passing games in the NFL.



Your offense is good, probably great. I say probably because until you guys perform like you did last week on a consistent basis, you won't be great. Just because we're not Texan fans doesn't mean we're uninformed. I've had Schaub as my starting fantasy QB in at least two leagues for the last three years, I'm well educated about your offense. I respect it and know what it's capable of. But as a Skins fan, I know our defense and also know what it's capable of, probably more than you are. So before you start calling everyone that questions the effectiveness of your offense against our defense uninformed, uneducated, and clueless, you should give it a second of thought.

:yawn:



Andre "Beast" Johnson > Pigeon > 3 x's Cooley and the rest of the skins offensive weapons
 
Redskins seek to speed up tempo on offense against Texans

The Redskins' offense produced only 250 total net yards and failed to score a touchdown in the season-opening victory over the Cowboys.

Washington plays host to the Houston Texans on Sunday at FedEx Field, and offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan would prefer to see significant improvement from the group.

"I would like to score some more points first of all, but our main goal is to score more then the other team and we have done that so far," Shanahan said. "I really just want to see us be sharper. This was really our first time last week taking three quarters where our whole 11 guys, with our starters, have been together for a game.

"The tempo, it wasn't what we want. It was a little too slow just getting out of the huddle. We want it quicker and we want to get up to the line faster. And hopefully, as we get going, that will happen."

The Redskins were close to breaking some long runs, but "that is how it always is in the run game for pretty much every team," Shanahan said. "Anytime you have an eight-man front, there is a guy in every gap. And one guy gets out of his gap then there is no one else. If they are right on, it is a two-yard run. If one guy got out of his gap, then the next guy you meet is the middle deep safety who is 50 yards away. So, it's a very fine line when you run the ball and commit to the run.

"Usually it happens like that, you have some two-yarders, three-yarders and hopefully you start breaking them down and your guys find the gaps and you start getting the longer ones. It happened to us a little in the fourth quarter and we started getting some longer runs. We started getting it going a little, still not where we wanted, but the zone scheme, everything we are doing, the more we work together and getting guys to move together, the more that one guy, that one mess up, that one weak link, will allow us to get less one-yard carries and more six and eight."

Just as the Texans found in their first years of trying to run the Gibbs system, the very opposite is also true..................it takes a lot for the OL to work together and move together..........and it just takes that one guy (on the OL), that one mess up (on the OL), that one weak link(on the OL) to limit to the production of the run game to one-yard carries. And even if the OL moves in perfect concert, you better have the right RB to consumate the system. The Skins are on shaky grounds at this point in their "development" of their run game...........our DL is not.
 
LAST SEASON! Last season doesn't mean a thing this season, how long is going to take some of you to realize that???
It does when we're talking about the Texans offense. We all talk about needing to be consistent, this season (for Houston) we have to be consistent week in and week out with the same aggressiveness and play a full 60 minutes.

Last season's offense was no fluke. The last two years we've been ranked like the 3rd and 4th best offense in the league. We were the #1 passing team in the league last year, 3rd in 2008. Andre Johnson has been the #1 WR the last two years.

We've got the same passing attack that we've had the last two years, Schaub and the rest of the players are more well versed in their assignments and limiting mistakes, so we as Texans fans have every reason to point to not just LAST season but 2008 as well.
 
There's no should about it. First ballot, I thought that about him when he was in Philly.

*record scratch*

He might get in, no way he goes first ballot. He'd be a first ballot, no problem, slam dunk, auto-cinch if we were talking about the Hall of Really Really Good, but there's no way you can say he's a first ballot guy to Canton with a straight face. He's probably competing with Manning, Brady, maybe Brees, maybe Big Ben, and maybe Kurt Warner. I loved watching McNabb play in Philly and I do think that entire fan base did him dirty for an entire decade, but he just really doesn't have the record breaking stats that HOF voters are going to require for him to get in. You could also blame the Philly organization for never getting him anybody worth throwing to besides T.O. for that one year, but that's not going to convince any sports journalist that he belongs in there.

I think that he probably should go in just because he played extremely well for a fan base that hated him and a team that did him no favors really, but if he does get in, I don't think it's going to be first ballot. Which sucks.

On a different note, why are a lot of 'Skins fans trying to hang their hat on Shanahan Jr and Sr working with Kubiak during their careers? There are a lot of coaches who have worked with each other as their careers get longer and longer, but these teams change a lot almost every off season. I mean, am I expected to believe that Kyle Shanahan knows some super secret to shutting down Andre Johnson that isn't "Get in Matt Schaubs face" that the rest of the NFL hasn't figured out? Really? Or that Kyle (again) is going to be able to say for sure that he knows everything that the Texans defense is going to do in the game? I know that Kyle will have some good points for Haslett on our passing offense (And if Kubiak didn't change anything Shanahan jr installed then he deserves to lose anyway), but the only year Kyle was in charge of passing and running our running game was total ****.

If I were a 'Skins guy I'd be talking a whole lot more about Brian Orakpo (Easily the best player on the 'Skins D), London Fletcher, and how the defense is going to play more than who the coaches are. I'd be hyping up finally having a QB who doesn't wilt under pressure, and Chris Cooley, not "Hey my OC came from this team, this is a lead pipe cinch right here". Maybe I'm jaded, but I never bought into Kubiak knowing Shanahan inside and out when the Texans played the Broncos in 2007, or when we played the Cardinals in 2009 and Frank Bush was still somewhat fresh from his stay in Arizona. I've read Kyle's comments on knowing what the Texans are going to supposedly do, and I've read Fletchers comments thinking that they'll have an edge and that's just grand. I think the actual edges that the 'Skins will need to have though will fall into a few categories: Turnovers, penalties, and points allowed. If they can keep the Texans under 20 then they have a pretty good shot at winning the game, but I'd be really scared of a shoot-out happening because the Texans have a ton of talent on offense (Which includes the O-line in a big big way) and have been playing in the same basic offense since 2007, which is mostly an idea that Kubiak has dreamed up.
 
Yep. The only way the Texans lose is the Texans defeat the Texans. This game is not up to Washington.
:bravo: Couldn't agree more.

wait, teams are going to dare the league's best passing offense to throw the ball this season because they dont want to be crushed by our new rushing attack? is it sunday yet!?!?!?!??!
I think that's funny too. But the way I see it, or the way I'm reading what guys like Orakpo are saying, is that the Redskins have got a great pass rush. Particularly Orakpo. Whenever teams pass the ball, it always exposes the QB and we don't want Schaub getting hit. The more we pass, the more they bring Orakpo and blitzers, the more likely they get turnovers. If we can run hog wild like we did against Indy (who also have GREAT pass rushers) it limits their effectiveness. We control the clock and their biggest asset (Orakpo, Freeney, etc.) is having to chase a ball carrier which isn't their strongsuit.

I hope we can have a balanced offense, win the turnover battle, everyone stays healthy and we walk out of this game with another double digit victory.
 
:bravo: Couldn't agree more.


I think that's funny too. But the way I see it, or the way I'm reading what guys like Orakpo are saying, is that the Redskins have got a great pass rush. Particularly Orakpo. Whenever teams pass the ball, it always exposes the QB and we don't want Schaub getting hit. The more we pass, the more they bring Orakpo and blitzers, the more likely they get turnovers. If we can run hog wild like we did against Indy (who also have GREAT pass rushers) it limits their effectiveness. We control the clock and their biggest asset (Orakpo, Freeney, etc.) is having to chase a ball carrier which isn't their strongsuit.

I hope we can have a balanced offense, win the turnover battle, everyone stays healthy and we walk out of this game with another double digit victory.

The Skins had a great pass rush. Then they switched to the 3-4. Now you've got a pissed off Albert Haynesworth, youve got your DEs rushing from the LB position, and what is the result?

They had to bring CBs rushers against the 'boys who have one of the worst lines in the NFL.

If the skins pass rush was so good, why did they blitz so often? Why not rely on the LBs and DL?
 
The Skins had a great pass rush. Then they switched to the 3-4. Now you've got a pissed off Albert Haynesworth, youve got your DEs rushing from the LB position, and what is the result?

They had to bring CBs rushers against the 'boys who have one of the worst lines in the NFL.

If the skins pass rush was so good, why did they blitz so often? Why not rely on the LBs and DL?

Yep! And that vaunted 'Skins pass rush got a total of 1 sack, and 3 total qb hits going against that shambles of a cowgurl OL. Orakpo got 1 qb hit and Carter none. And there 1 sack was on a blitz by the Ilb. They did have decent pressure, but nothing like what we see when we play the colts and even the tinnbreds.
 
The Skins had a great pass rush. Then they switched to the 3-4. Now you've got a pissed off Albert Haynesworth, youve got your DEs rushing from the LB position, and what is the result?

They had to bring CBs rushers against the 'boys who have one of the worst lines in the NFL.

If the skins pass rush was so good, why did they blitz so often? Why not rely on the LBs and DL?
You know, that's a pretty good point. I had only seen the highlights from last weeks game. I knew Haynesworth is a turd but figured their LBs were getting a lot of pressure. Let's just hope it takes them at least till week 3 to get it together! :winky:
 
You know, that's a pretty good point. I had only seen the highlights from last weeks game. I knew Haynesworth is a turd but figured their LBs were getting a lot of pressure. Let's just hope it takes them at least till week 3 to get it together! :winky:

They were getting most of their pressure with blitzes, usually a corner iirc.
 
On passing plays last week, alot of times we just rushed just 3. On the last play of the game we rushed 3. Alot of our blitzes were corners. I give romo credit for getting rid of the ball quickly. Alot of his throws were rushed or inaccurate.

The cowboys only had 1 sack so is Ware, Spencer and Ratliff all going to suck this year rushing the passer?

As to orakpo and others talking about stopping the run, thats generic defensive player talk in the nfl imo. You always look to stop the run.

But hey, the skins cant win this game, the texans can only lose it. Right. I hope the texans players think the same thing.

Also, I wouldnt assume arian foster is going to continue to light it up. It sounds like you guys think an undrafted 2nd year player is going to rush for 1,500 yds this season based off 1 great game that came in the 1st regular season game against an aging and unreplenished Colts D. I dont know if I would crown foster just yet.
 
LAST SEASON! Last season doesn't mean a thing this season, how long is going to take some of you to realize that??? Foster won't get 115 yards. Andre Johnson scares the bejesus out of me though. Our starting safety Kareem Moore is still out and Laron, while he had a monster game against Dallas, makes mistakes sometimes and AJ lives to exploit DB mistakes.

How do you know that AJ lives to exploit DB mistakes? Because of previous seasons. Why do you have Schaub as a QB in some of your fantasy leagues? Because of performance in previous seasons.

Using Last Season as an indicator of what's going to happen this season isn't that far off as long as there haven't been any major changes. Our offense is essentially the same so we can use last year as a general indicator of how it should perform this season.

Last year, Foster ran the ball well in the last two games, the first two games where he got significant playing time. He ran the ball well last week. Expect him to run the ball well this week but don't expect him to be our primary weapon.

Now, YOUR team? You're basing your expectation that your Redskins have a great defense on its performance last season. Is your defense essentially the same as it was last year? No. Not really. You've switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 and you've changed defensive coordinators. You've got a bunch of guys playing with a bunch of new assignments. You got gashed for a lot of yards by a Cowboy team that hasn't looked good so far this year and got lucky when they melted down in the red zone.
 
On passing plays last week, alot of times we just rushed just 3. On the last play of the game we rushed 3. Alot of our blitzes were corners. I give romo credit for getting rid of the ball quickly. Alot of his throws were rushed or inaccurate.

The cowboys only had 1 sack so is Ware, Spencer and Ratliff all going to suck this year rushing the passer?

As to orakpo and others talking about stopping the run, thats generic defensive player talk in the nfl imo. You always look to stop the run.

But hey, the skins cant win this game, the texans can only lose it. Right. I hope the texans players think the same thing.

Also, I wouldnt assume arian foster is going to continue to light it up. It sounds like you guys think an undrafted 2nd year player is going to rush for 1,500 yds this season based off 1 great game that came in the 1st regular season game against an aging and unreplenished Colts D. I dont know if I would crown foster just yet.

Well, first off, we're not judging Foster just by this game. He's had 3 games where he's had significant time and in those first two (against the Dolphins and Patriots) he ran for 97 and 119 yards.

Secondly, the Colts D bulked up their DTs and this was supposed to make them more stout against the run game.

Thirdly, the Cowboy D is notorious for not starting off fast when it comes to sacks. The past few years, the Cowboys only get 0-1 sacks in their first game. Last year, the Cowboys didn't get their first sack until the third game. Last year, iirc, Jerry Jones had to jump down Phillips' throat to take more control of the defense before it turned around. (Unfortunately, I live in Dallas and have to listen to a lot of Cowgirl news.)

Fourthly, the Cowboy O-Line is a shambles that was missing 2 starters. And that's what you got pressure against. If your defense is that good at rushing the passer, then you should have gotten more.
 
On passing plays last week, alot of times we just rushed just 3. On the last play of the game we rushed 3. Alot of our blitzes were corners. I give romo credit for getting rid of the ball quickly. Alot of his throws were rushed or inaccurate.

The cowboys only had 1 sack so is Ware, Spencer and Ratliff all going to suck this year rushing the passer?

As to orakpo and others talking about stopping the run, thats generic defensive player talk in the nfl imo. You always look to stop the run.

But hey, the skins cant win this game, the texans can only lose it. Right. I hope the texans players think the same thing.

Also, I wouldnt assume arian foster is going to continue to light it up. It sounds like you guys think an undrafted 2nd year player is going to rush for 1,500 yds this season based off 1 great game that came in the 1st regular season game against an aging and unreplenished Colts D. I dont know if I would crown foster just yet.
If yall continue with the corner blitzes Schaub has GOT to be able to anticipate them and get the ball out quick. We cannot afford to let him get hit hard a bunch. What worries me about Foster is his blocking ability. Kubiak's biggest pet peeves are RBs that fumble and/or can't help in pass-pro. So I'm hoping Foster will be able to pick up some of these rushers, that will be important.

I'm hoping the Texans ARE thinking that way. Gone should be the days of us thinking the games are dependant on other teams, that's loser talk. A lot of the players this offseason have said that they know they can beat any team if they play like they're capable of. If they make mistakes, the other team will capitalize on them. Words are words... this is the season to see if our Texans can show us with their actions. If we really are good, the game should be dependant on how WE play, not someone else.

I don't think Foster is going tear it up with 233 yards and 3 TDs every week. But if he stays healthy I think 1,500 yards is attainable. That's like 84 yards per game here on out. And it's not just one game, he's had 3 really good games in a row (dating back to last season). It's the way he's running the ball and seeing the holes. The last two games of last season he had 39 carries for 216 yards (5.5 yd avg) and 3 TDs. We've got a significantly better run blocking OL than last year (primarily due to more experience and health) and I suspect they'll continue opening more holes than they have in the past.

I totally agree on the fact its hard to base things on 1 game againt Indy. Indy was trying to limit our passing attack the hole game and they are an undersized/quick defense... not exactly a strong run defense.
 
I don't think we showed a lot defensively last week...No real exotic blitzes...We just straight up beat the people in front of us...

Now they did have some funky alignments with D-linemen standing up, but nothing too strange...

If I'm not mistaken, We didn't rush more than four for a majority of the game...and sometimes we only sent three..


On offense, all we mostly did was pound the rock straight down their throats...

I think all of that is another thing working against the Skins...Watching last weeks film, they really can't tell what all this team can do because we weren't really forced to do a whole lot...
 
McNabb will have to finish his career very strong to make his case for the HOF. He is not a shoe in just yet.
 
Now, YOUR team? You're basing your expectation that your Redskins have a great defense on its performance last season. Is your defense essentially the same as it was last year? No. Not really. You've switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4 and you've changed defensive coordinators. You've got a bunch of guys playing with a bunch of new assignments. You got gashed for a lot of yards by a Cowboy team that hasn't looked good so far this year and got lucky when they melted down in the red zone.

I think the biggest thing, is that it appeared to me that Haslett was still experimenting with different formations (5 LBs, 1 DLman?).

I think you can do that with a Dallas offense with three backups on the OL. I don't think you can do that with an offense as mature as ours.

& I know Haslett came from Pittsburgh, but when he went to Nawlins' he installed ran a 4-3, and never made any indication that he wanted to change (& I think they had the people to do it). When he was in St. Louis, he ran a 4-3, and didn't look like he wanted to change. So I don't know if he's a real 3-4 guy or not.
 
Wow 18 pages, and most of you focus on what the redskins board is saying.


Anyways, I think a very underrated matchup will be Eric Winston and Duane Brown against Brian Orakpo. Orakpo is the real deal, and a BEAST. I'm not upset we got Cush because clearly he is a bad bad man, but at the time I was really hoping Orakpo would fall to us.
 
Wow 18 pages, and most of you focus on what the redskins board is saying.

Anyways, I think a very underrated matchup will be Eric Winston and Duane Brown against Brian Orakpo. Orakpo is the real deal, and a BEAST. I'm not upset we got Cush because clearly he is a bad bad man, but at the time I was really hoping Orakpo would fall to us.

All the more reason to hope Foster and our OL tear it up again!!!
 
I think the biggest thing, is that it appeared to me that Haslett was still experimenting with different formations (5 LBs, 1 DLman?).

I think you can do that with a Dallas offense with three backups on the OL. I don't think you can do that with an offense as mature as ours.

& I know Haslett came from Pittsburgh, but when he went to Nawlins' he installed ran a 4-3, and never made any indication that he wanted to change (& I think they had the people to do it). When he was in St. Louis, he ran a 4-3, and didn't look like he wanted to change. So I don't know if he's a real 3-4 guy or not.

Seems like you could audible to a run and pound it on 5 lb's and a DT.
 
Back
Top