Wolf said:did you watch any games.. I have seen him get hit in that formation. on a 4 man rush mind you
I
I'm not saying he didn't.......... just saying you can't blame anyone other than the QB for taking a sack from the shotgun.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Wolf said:did you watch any games.. I have seen him get hit in that formation. on a 4 man rush mind you
I
CajunTexan said:The one name that is missing that, IMO, renders this stat useless, is the guy whose team has won 1/3 of the Super bowls since 1996. Tom Brady.
I would also be willing to bet, that if they projected this stat back over the Super Bowl era, there would be some other names that might not be in the "significatley good" catagory either. Bradshaw, Montana and Aikman.
These guys were on teams, during their championship runs, that rarely put them in a postition to need to comeback, little on score in the fourth quarter.
thunderkyss said:you can't blame anyone other than the QB for taking a sack from the shotgun.
The shotgun can also put the RB out of position to pick up the blitz. Lots of gunfire here. I hope it's all because they are happy over the world cup. Heard less in Iraq in '04infantrycak said:That's absurd. The shotgun generally screams to the D, hey this is a passing play pin your ears back. In the meantime it does nothing to get the WR's into their routes and open faster. It also, in contrast to a designed roll out, does not put the QB out of the pocket such that the ball can be thrown away without an intentional grounding penalty. 11 of Peyton's 17 sacks last year came from the shotgun, 9 of 13 sacks the year before. Every QB in the league takes sacks from the shotgun and they aren't all just too stupid to figure out that it should never happen.
thunderkyss said:I'm not saying he didn't.......... just saying you can't blame anyone other than the QB for taking a sack from the shotgun.
Have you checked the immigration staus of said monkeys, and shouldn't there have been some progression in the shotgun offense since its inception? Also,TwinSisters said:yeah Mr.Thunderkyss, that's a losing battle. I would just take a knee and punt on that one. The Shotgun has had critics that date back to the day it started with Red Hickey. Some guys can do it and a lot can't.
DocBar said:Have you checked the immigration staus of said monkeys, and shouldn't there have been some progression in the shotgun offense since its inception?
But what about the monkey's? And only Moon ran an authentic version of the "chuck and duck". Well, maybe that Houston guy who defected to Buffalo did. What is his name? If he's not a Hall of Famer, he should be. Great passer.TwinSisters said:There has.. it's called the spread and the run'n'shoot. And all three suffer from the same criticism: that it gives up too many sacks.
Yet with the right guys it always seems to work well... Starbach, Moon, Elway, Favre, etc.
http://www.packersnews.com/welcome/to/pack_1326618.shtml
even did it with "hands of stone" Corey Bradford.
Matt Haselback sucks to I guess.TwinSisters said:http://www.footballoutsiders.com/2006/06/26/ramblings/stat-analysis/3978/
Nothing really all that telling here, but an interesting article nonetheless.
Billy Joe Tolliver is ranked with Carr... I think I am going to start the Lord's Prayer right now.
You cant?...............Give me a break, it is almost too funny with some of the stuff I read here.thunderkyss said:I'm not saying he didn't.......... just saying you can't blame anyone other than the QB for taking a sack from the shotgun.
[[Gary Kubiak]] said:I agree, the best player to get us wins should start at QB. For now it's Carr.
swtbound07 said:I disagree. I would rather start Sage and take my chances. Carr is terrible. The sooner this franchise realizes this, the better off we will all be.
bigtex77 said:We won't know if Carr is terrible until after this season, now that he has weapons around him and (hopefully) a better offensive line. I am not a big Carr fan, but at the same time I would love to see the Carr haters stand in his shoes for a few games and get their heads taken off repeatedly. Let me put it this way: Carr, Sage, hell even Brady or Manning, take your pick and put them behind the same line and with the same weapons (or lack thereof) that David's had for four years and you get basically the same result - losses.
swtbound07 said:. Every quarterback in the nfl doesn't get gift wrapped a great set of circumstances. .
Wolf said:what would you all 200+ sacks over the years (yes we can debate all day long about if it is his fault or the OL fault).
you tell me another QB could perform with the pass blocking that our team has had?
and yes based on stats, one could say he is getting paid more than what he should
swtbound07 said:I had 4 years of watching him to know that.
bigtex77 said:You are right, you've had 4 years of watching him behind no offensive line and with no weapons, if he doesn't drastically improve this season then I will feel the exact same way that you do.
bigtex77 said:You also don't "know" that David can't win, not for a fact, because of the lack of support. You can have your opinion, but theres no way to know.
swtbound07 said:What has he done to EARN the right to start for a 5th year for the Texans.
Hulk75 said:Matt Haselback sucks to I guess.
I have an idea lets just put up all Joe Montanas records and compare them to Carrs.
bigtex77 said:How about standing in there and taking the freaking beating he's taken for four years? I think he's more than earned a chance to prove he can be successful this season.
swtbound07 said:What has he done to EARN the right to start for a 5th year for the Texans.
Wolf said:you don't know if he has EARNED the right to start year 5, Kubiak is deciding that when TC starts. and yes more than likely David will start but I do recall Kubiak saying no one is getting a free pass (see TJ).
To me in the Capers era, they should have benched Carr when he struggled, just to get Banks in to give Carr some game film to study from Banks (whether good or bad) who was an experienced NFL QB.
At this point I trust Kubiak isn't going to make the same mistake. we wouldn't have had this discussion after the 2004 season,because It is almost safe to say everyone was pleased with the progression Carr was making
swtbound07 said:Yes I do....he has had ample opportunity.....4 seasons worth, and that IS a fact. Fine....dont say he "can't" win, since future prediction is impossible.....lets just say he DOESNT win. That I can prove.
bigtex77 said:That's my point, an "ample" opportunity to what? Get killed? OK David,
1) Here's the worst o-line in the league
2) AJ (oh never mind the fact that he's double covered, you'll never have time to get the ball off anyway)
3) Corey (Hands of Steel) Bradford
Good luck.
Thats like sendiing Lance Armstrong to the Tour de France with a tri-cycle and then saying he sucks because he doesn't win.
Hulk75 said:You cant?...............Give me a break, it is almost too funny with some of the stuff I read here.
Let me put it this way, I just started up playing football again, playing DE. The team we played yesterday had a guy in the Shotgun!!!!!! I jumped the snap, the LT barely got out of his stance, Got my sack IN A SHOTGUN fromation, and that is the QBs fault for only having 2 seconds to throw the ball? AND WE were pressing as well, he had no chance, it was NOT his fault.
swtbound07 said:Excuses. Im tired of excuses for david carr.
bigtex77 said:You can't honestly tell me that David has been given a truly fair chance to win with this organization, before this season. If so, you are kidding yourself.
swtbound07 said:What has he done to EARN the right to start for a 5th year for the Texans.
My sides hurt again.swtbound07 said:The NFL isn't fair. I dont believe he deserves a "fair" chance. I want a qb that wins, and could care less about carr or his feelings or hardship. He controlled his destiny, he took the snaps, he dictated the results. He didn't win. No sympathy over here.
The Pencil Neck said:He convinced Kubiak (and several other coaches) that he should be his starter.
That's all it takes.
Can you explain that?CloakNNNdagger said:Theoretically the shotgun is supposed to give the QB an extra split second to read the D..........that "extra" time goes right out the window when the OL is facing the D secondary instead of the DL..:brickwall
swtbound07 said:Yippy. Kubiak gets a paycheck and we get another sub .500 season. You satisfied with that? Im not.
bigtex77 said:Just read whats underneath your name, I'm done.
NATHANHALE said:"It is almost safe to say everyone was pleased with the progression Carr was making"
Why is it that so few people remember that the 2nd half of 2004 was not good for Carr or the Texans, ending with that horrendous game against the Browns? Carr had more INT's than TD's the 2nd half and we only beat 1 team with a winning record all year (Jags twice)--other 5 victories were against losing teams including the Titans (twice), which means we only beat 3 other teams besides the Jags and Titans.
The Pencil Neck said:He convinced Kubiak (and several other coaches) that he should be his starter.
That's all it takes.
swtbound07 said:That refers to my work in the no-spin zone......I legitimately think Carr is garbage.
Yes for the 2,000,000,000 time we understand, maybe you should write a letter and tell how much you HATE.......oooppps I mean tell them how much you dis-like him.swtbound07 said:That refers to my work in the no-spin zone......I legitimately think Carr is garbage.
Hulk75 said:Yes for the 2,000,000,000 time we understand, maybe you should write a letter and tell how much you HATE.......oooppps I mean tell them how much you dis-like him.![]()
Okay great I really dont care, I just dont know were all the hate comes from, has nothing to do with football, come on now, hate suck garbage idiot...........come on man you can show a little respect to the guy...........I mean what if the guy goes off and and becomes a pro bowler and a Super Bowl Champion, then were does that leave all your comments? I mean there are NFL coaches over at Reliant that think he will be.swtbound07 said:I plan on being a bastion for my position over the offseason Hulk....for every pro-carr post, for every "lets give our buddy carr another chance" post, I'll be there as a counter-view. Its my dedication. You can say hate...I don't mind. I imagine I will sound like a broken record over the next few months...but remember what I said about the draft...it applies here too. Once kickoff starts, I cheer for ALL the Texans. But in the offseason....Carr=overrated.
swtbound07 said:I plan on being a bastion for my position over the offseason Hulk....for every pro-carr post, for every "lets give our buddy carr another chance" post, I'll be there as a counter-view. Its my dedication. You can say hate...I don't mind. I imagine I will sound like a broken record over the next few months...but remember what I said about the draft...it applies here too. Once kickoff starts, I cheer for ALL the Texans. But in the offseason....Carr=overrated.
There is a lot Peyton and Brady (maybe not Brady)NATHANHALE said:IMO, there are 2 primary areas in the passing game that Carr has not mastered-- (1) reading the defense and (2) getting rid of the ball. For whatever reason, Carr came to the pro level without several asapects of the pro game he should have already been doing automatically, like not locking onto his receiver and not running out of bounds with the ball. I still do not understand why the team waste so much of the play clock in the huddle, instead of getting to the line of scrimage to read the defense. How much is the slow reaction to read, react, and throw Carr's fault?
OK, so we improve the pass blocking plus move Carr around to help avoid the rush-we get the TE's involved in the passing game as well as the FB, and we add a #2 WR plus new faces at #3 and #4. Now, instead of a couple reads for Carr, we add several more. Does this mean he will now be able to do what he has never done before? Read. Find. React. Throw...
swtbound07 said:Yippy. Kubiak gets a paycheck and we get another sub .500 season. You satisfied with that? Im not.
Hulk75 said:Can you explain that?
Are you saying a sack that happens in 2 seconds when the QB is in Shotgun is the QBs fault?
Okay I just did not understand the way you put it before.CloakNNNdagger said:Exactly the opposite..........I'm agreeing with you. If the OL isn't holding the the DL, it means the DL is already in the back field, leaving the OL looking unobstructed at the D secondary. In other words the OL's been beaten and hasn't given the extra time to the QB.............thus leading to the sack of the poor schmuck with the ball in his hands.![]()