Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
Stroud has Slowik in his helmet but "trying to get to Ryans to discuss the play.."
Stefon “I don’t call the plays, idk what we was thinking as a whole but I mean, I just try to do my job”.
It’s irritating. How many times do we see CJ clapping his hands to hurry up the play to beat the clock? I’d like to also see them take more timeouts to avoid a wasted play. It seems they try to rush plays instead of taking the timeout and adjusting when they see something they don’t like.
Perhaps they think that a timeout has more potential value than losing 5 yards. IDKIt’s irritating. How many times do we see CJ clapping his hands to hurry up the play to beat the clock? I’d like to also see them take more timeouts to avoid a wasted play. It seems they try to rush plays instead of taking the timeout and adjusting when they see something they don’t like.
How would we know? We're in new territory here, going where no Texans has gone before. It's probably going to look "wrong" until we get there.I’m trying to be patient and yes we’re 5-2, I’m starting to think this coaching staff doesn’t have what it takes to get us over the hump. I look at the superbowl head coaches like Andy Reid and Bill Belicheck and I never see them smiling after a loss which makes me wonder, why does Demeco still smile in post game press conferences? If we were 2-5, would he still be smiling?
I’d use a timeout if it helps the drive end in points vs punting. I’m not sure if anyone has charted it but it has been pretty obvious when the operation has been rushed (Stroud frantically clapping his hands at center after a last second adjustment) and I don’t recall one of these plays ending well.Perhaps they think that a timeout has more potential value than losing 5 yards. IDK
When I am going anywhere, if things look wrong, I am going to stop and pull over until I know where I am going. Get it right and then can return to the journey. It is beginning to look like our coaches don't know how to get where they want to go.How would we know? We're in new territory here, going where no Texans has gone before. It's probably going to look "wrong" until we get there.
But we aren't driving, we're along for the ride.When I am going anywhere, if things look wrong, I am going to stop and pull over until I know where I am going. Get it right and then can turn the journey. It is beginning to look like our coaches don't know how to get where they want to go.
Stroud is 100% a passenger in Slowick’s engine. So it’s like you want Stroud to grab the steering wheel from Slowick and potentially cause a fatal accident?When I am going anywhere, if things look wrong, I am going to stop and pull over until I know where I am going. Get it right and then can turn the journey. It is beginning to look like our coaches don't know how to get where they want to go.
Belichick didn't win a SB until his 7th year. Reid, 21 years. DeMeco is just in his 2nd.I’m trying to be patient and yes we’re 5-2, I’m starting to think this coaching staff doesn’t have what it takes to get us over the hump. I look at the superbowl head coaches like Andy Reid and Bill Belicheck and I never see them smiling after a loss which makes me wonder, why does Demeco still smile in post game press conferences? If we were 2-5, would he still be smiling?
Yeah but didn’t have a sb roster early on like Demeco has. Demeco in a similar position to Mike Tomlin, who won a superbowl in his 2nd season.Belichick didn't win a SB until his 7th year. Reid, 21 years. DeMeco is just in his 2nd.
Maybe you’re right. Just think the coaching staff has failed this team so far. Did they evaluate players correctly in the preseason camps? Are they in regret about drafting a 1st round line men who’s been a bust and wants to prove to themselves they were right even if it means getting a franchise qb hurt?How would we know? We're in new territory here, going where no Texans has gone before. It's probably going to look "wrong" until we get there.
Yeah but didn’t have a sb roster early on like Demeco has. Demeco in a similar position to Mike Tomlin, who won a superbowl in his 2nd season.
The Texans are the #2 defense right now. Not trying to over criticize this coaching staff but that’s why it’s important for new Hc’s to hire a former hc so that they can give you guidance in the early stages like now. I didn’t like the slowik hire for this reason. On the flip side, it’s a learning experience.
Yeah but didn’t have a sb roster early on like Demeco has. Demeco in a similar position to Mike Tomlin, who won a superbowl in his 2nd season.
The Texans are the #2 defense right now. Not trying to over criticize this coaching staff but that’s why it’s important for new Hc’s to hire a former hc so that they can give you guidance in the early stages like now. I didn’t like the slowik hire for this reason. On the flip side, it’s a learning experience.
Agreed. Stausser (OL coach) must go.When DeMeco gets a SB roster then yeah. I haven't found any confirmation he has one of those yet. And the Texans might be #2 in yards allowed on D, but they're 17th in points allowed. And their red zone D is ranked 30th.
I also find it funny how most everyone was sweating losing Slowik this past offseason and now they want to feed him to sharks with laserbeams attached to their foreheads. Sure, there's times when playcalling seems to be an issue, I mean that last series of downs against the Packers made no sense whatsoever. But this OL, there's just too many times they don't seem to have a clue what they're doing. Might be that they aren't talented enough as well. That's got to put some heat on the OL coach(es) (have no idea who they are), and Nick has got to take some blame as well. Green looks to be a dud. The Howard extension was dumb. Is Juice a talent issue or is he not being coached up? Several things to look at before I go head hunting the OC.
When DeMeco gets a SB roster then yeah. I haven't found any confirmation he has one of those yet. And the Texans might be #2 in yards allowed on D, but they're 17th in points allowed. And their red zone D is ranked 30th.
I also find it funny how most everyone was sweating losing Slowik this past offseason and now they want to feed him to sharks with laserbeams attached to their foreheads. Sure, there's times when playcalling seems to be an issue, I mean that last series of downs against the Packers made no sense whatsoever. But this OL, there's just too many times they don't seem to have a clue what they're doing. Might be that they aren't talented enough as well. That's got to put some heat on the OL coach(es) (have no idea who they are), and Nick has got to take some blame as well. Green looks to be a dud. The Howard extension was dumb. Is Juice a talent issue or is he not being coached up? Several things to look at before I go head hunting the OC.
Maybe you’re right. Just think the coaching staff has failed this team so far. Did they evaluate players correctly in the preseason camps? Are they in regret about drafting a 1st round line men who’s been a bust and wants to prove to themselves they were right even if it means getting a franchise qb hurt?
True, I'm usually an it's the players that win or lose games. But this loss was as much on coaching as it was the players. Not challenging the call before the Packers TD, not figuring out how to stop the same defenses the Vikings were running and the Packers were running the same stuff. This may require new ol playing, because you can't fix stupid. Turtling up on the 12 yd line etc....Stefon “I don’t call the plays, idk what we was thinking as a whole but I mean, I just try to do my job”.
Another way of saying the final play call was a head scratcher. 3 big mistakes on the play. The obv not running out the clock, the 2nd was completing a pass short of the sticks and the 3rd was completing an out pass towards the sideline which would have stopped the clock anyway. Not going cut it. Clear textbook example of calling a play that doesn’t benefit your team in a game winning moment. I’ve been saying since the beginning of the season, Stroud is getting the training wheels treatment. If the goal was to score, give your star qb 3 downs to make a play. Cj can’t save you every 3rd down after you call 2 run plays. The bipolar playcalling might make us miss the playoffs.
I'm afraid of this being a case of you can't fix stupid. Green needs to be replaced. I'm sure Patterson and Kendrick understand the concepts of what to do to pickup stunts on a consistent basisThe Team has got to find an answer to the simulated pressure looks b/c DC’s are going to continue throwing that at them until they prove they can deal with it.
I also think Green HAS to be benched for this team to make any meaningful improvement on the o-line b/c he is just not getting it done. None of the guys are really finishing blocks..including the TE’s…and that speaks to coaching that will hopefully be addressed in the offseason…..But For all of the Tunsil and Howard hate on here, those guys aren’t just killing this o-line right now, it’s Green. He just doesn’t look like an NFL O-lineman in any facet of the game. All the d-line games and stunts…the blitzing from LB’s and DB’s…it’s involving him in some fashion which tells me defense know he’s there guy to expose and get after CJ.
I challenge anyone to sit and watch this dude from snap to snap. Watch how he looks. He’s awful.
True, I'm usually an it's the players that win or lose games. But this loss was as much on coaching as it was the players. Not challenging the call before the Packers TD, not figuring out how to stop the same defenses the Vikings were running and the Packers were running the same stuff. This may require new ol playing, because you can't fix stupid. Turtling up on the 12 yd line etc....
The main issues areWhen DeMeco gets a SB roster then yeah. I haven't found any confirmation he has one of those yet. And the Texans might be #2 in yards allowed on D, but they're 17th in points allowed. And their red zone D is ranked 30th.
I also find it funny how most everyone was sweating losing Slowik this past offseason and now they want to feed him to sharks with laserbeams attached to their foreheads. Sure, there's times when playcalling seems to be an issue, I mean that last series of downs against the Packers made no sense whatsoever. But this OL, there's just too many times they don't seem to have a clue what they're doing. Might be that they aren't talented enough as well. That's got to put some heat on the OL coach(es) (have no idea who they are), and Nick has got to take some blame as well. Green looks to be a dud. The Howard extension was dumb. Is Juice a talent issue or is he not being coached up? Several things to look at before I go head hunting the OC.
I'm afraid of this being a case of you can't fix stupid. Green needs to be replaced. I'm sure Patterson and Kendrick understand the concepts of what to do to pickup stunts on a consistent basis
They were on the 12 yd line call 3 pass plays using 3 or 5 step drops, if the play isn't there (One read) tell Stroud to get what he can with his feet or take a sack on all 3 plays. If you take sacks on all 3 plays because your read is covered then you will have lost about 10 yds while making the Packers use their timeouts and Fairbarin kicking a 40 yd FG. If the read is open on one of those plays you get the TD you're looking for. This isn't difficult. Slowik/Ryans just need to communicate with C.J. better.He could've challenged that lateral pass before the TD, i don't think there was enough there to overturn the call tho...i give him a pass for that one.
The playcalling on the 12yd line...sort of a pass there too. That was just great clock management by Lafluer. We ran it twice and he called TO immediately after each run both times to preserve as much clock as he could for his offense. 2, They knew we'd be running it on both of those 1st 2 downs to burn clock so they were ready for that defensively.........which is why those run plays went no where. 3rd down arrived and Lafluer's TO strategy saved them 1.48. Running the ball there to "force" them to use their last TO, that wasn't necessarily a guarantee to happen. Even if we run it, the most we could've run off the clock was 40-50 secs..... even if you count the FG attempt time. So no matter what, they were going to get the ball back with close to a minute or so left.................& these days on offense, that's more than enough time for them to march down & get into FG position, spike it and go for a GW FG.
You could maybe argue with the playcall being an out route...i would've liked to have seen something short & quick an easy for CJ to see if your guys can pick up the 1st..... or maybe an end zone shot if you insist on throwing it, but other than that....I don't think there would've been a material change in the outcome.
The Packers knew they pretty much had a guaranteed reception in the pass game with whomever Ross was holding & they went to that match up time and time again throughout the game when they needed critical receptions. & that last reception they got against Ross before the FG attempt was just what they'd been doing all game.
He had plenty of athleticism in college. Wonder what happened to it.I'm sure Green does to, he just doesn't have athleticism to execute. I wouldn't be opposed to trying out Patterson or Kendrick Green in Kenyon's place at this point b/c a, they're both vets and b, they can't be much worse.
Kenyon is so bad he's giving me Xavier Su'afilo vibes right now...
Scruggs and Mason are getting burnt by the stunts more than Green and Tunsil. All of them look lost on those stunts though.I'm afraid of this being a case of you can't fix stupid. Green needs to be replaced. I'm sure Patterson and Kendrick understand the concepts of what to do to pickup stunts on a consistent basis
They were on the 12 yd line call 3 pass plays using 3 or 5 step drops, if the play isn't there (One read) tell Stroud to get what he can with his feet or take a sack on all 3 plays. If you take sacks on all 3 plays because your read is covered then you will have lost about 10 yds while making the Packers use their timeouts and Fairbarin kicking a 40 yd FG. If the read is open on one of those plays you get the TD you're looking for. This isn't difficult. Slowik/Ryans just need to communicate with C.J. better.
Yes Green has to be benched but he wasn’t the only one stinking up the joint. I seen Tunsil on several plays either get burnt off the edge or he flat out blew his assignment. Scruggs is also lost when it comes to picking up the stunts and Ive seen him get drove completely out the way so the MLB can get to the quarterback. Howard out there tripping over his own feet, he’s getting pushed back too freaking easy.
And have yall noticed what side Mixon is usually running through. The left side.
Different level up here. He was regarded as a mauler at A&M which is funny to me b/c i don't really see him stonewalling any of the big boys he faces on the d-line. when he's "mauling" someone, its usually a LB or a db on the second level. He has the athleticism moving forward, moving backward in pass pro, he's terrible.He had plenty of athleticism in college. Wonder what happened to it.
Cj didn't have time to pass all game calling run plays there made sense. John Harris tweeted one of those plays where one block would have cleared a lane for Joe to get the 1st & maybe a TD. He talked to Demeco about it during the coaches show & DeMeco confirmed his take.They were on the 12 yd line call 3 pass plays using 3 or 5 step drops, if the play isn't there (One read) tell Stroud to get what he can with his feet or take a sack on all 3 plays. If you take sacks on all 3 plays because your read is covered then you will have lost about 10 yds while making the Packers use their timeouts and Fairbarin kicking a 40 yd FG. If the read is open on one of those plays you get the TD you're looking for. This isn't difficult. Slowik/Ryans just need to communicate with C.J. better.
Difference is I don't care if he gets sacked because I trust Fairbarin to make a 40 yd FG.Cj didn't have time to pass all game calling run plays there made sense. John Harris tweeted one of those plays where one block would have cleared a lane for Joe to get the 1st & maybe a TD. He talked to Demeco about it during the coaches show & DeMeco confirmed his take.
The only difference between your suggestion & what really happened was Cj trusting Tank to catch that ball. He should have taken the sack.
So I don't blame the playcaller but question what S2roud was thinking in that situation. The coaches shouldn't have to spell it out for him.
If I recall, they actually threw at Stingley on the last drive because he was playing soft. He must have learned that from the OLHe could've challenged that lateral pass before the TD, i don't think there was enough there to overturn the call tho...i give him a pass for that one.
The playcalling on the 12yd line...sort of a pass there too. That was just great clock management by Lafluer. We ran it twice and he called TO immediately after each run both times to preserve as much clock as he could for his offense. 2, They knew we'd be running it on both of those 1st 2 downs to burn clock so they were ready for that defensively.........which is why those run plays went no where. 3rd down arrived and Lafluer's TO strategy saved them 1.48. Running the ball there to "force" them to use their last TO, that wasn't necessarily a guarantee to happen. Even if we run it, the most we could've run off the clock was 40-50 secs..... even if you count the FG attempt time. So no matter what, they were going to get the ball back with close to a minute or so left.................& these days on offense, that's more than enough time for them to march down & get into FG position, spike it and go for a GW FG.
You could maybe argue with the playcall being an out route...i would've liked to have seen something short & quick an easy for CJ to see if your guys can pick up the 1st..... or maybe an end zone shot if you insist on throwing it, but other than that....I don't think there would've been a material change in the outcome. I said it during the game that we'd likely left too much time on the clock.
The Packers knew they pretty much had a guaranteed reception in the pass game with whomever Ross was holding & they went to that match up time and time again throughout the game when they needed critical receptions. & that last reception they got against Ross before the FG attempt was just what they'd been doing all game.
Perfect example of situational football would be Frank Ross having Kaimi kick out of bounds unless he can have it fall inside the 5 because Ross knew they’d get it on the 25 instead of 30. Ross is a top tier ST coach. But you’d think offense/defense would be drilling the obscure situational football as well.They were on the 12 yd line call 3 pass plays using 3 or 5 step drops, if the play isn't there (One read) tell Stroud to get what he can with his feet or take a sack on all 3 plays. If you take sacks on all 3 plays because your read is covered then you will have lost about 10 yds while making the Packers use their timeouts and Fairbarin kicking a 40 yd FG. If the read is open on one of those plays you get the TD you're looking for. This isn't difficult. Slowik/Ryans just need to communicate with C.J. better.
Nope you put CJ under center and run 3 step drops with only fades, slants from the wrs and Mixon in the flat. 3 step drops if Stroud got sacked at the longest depth of his drop without CJ picking up a yd which is unlikely would be a 41 yd fg. Again you don't throw the pass unless a guy is open. If he drops it you aren't any worse off than what happened unless they drop 2-3 passes, which is unlikely.Lol, yeah no. CJ had 87 total yards passing....... for the entire game..15-20 of that came on that last drive where there were some really tight throws he converted on...we also couldn't protect him. We were also in the red zone...where defenses tend to get more agressive. So by doing what you're advocating here, not only do we potentially stop the clock each time if there's an incompletion, we also increase the risk for potential TO's...either via a sack fumble or an int...when we're already in position to put points on the board & go ahead with a FG. Sure Fairbarin is 1 of the best kickers in the game, sure there's a high probability that he still makes a longer FG if CJ takes 3 consecutive sacks like you're saying and loses yardage, but you don't wanna make it harder for him either. He had a chip shot already in hand. Furthermore, CJ's losing a helluva lot more that 10 yards if he takes 3 straight sacks...especially considering how much we operate out of the shotgun. The risks greatly outweigh the reward in advocating your strategy. Your defense has played a helluva game...take the points and put it on your defense....which they almost won it for us had Murray's bum ass came up with the int on Love's 1st throw...
Nope you put CJ under center and run 3 step drops with only fades, slants from the wrs and Mixon in the flat. 3 step drops if Stroud got sacked at the longest depth of his drop without CJ picking up a yd which is unlikely would be a 41 yd fg. Again you don't throw the pass unless a guy is open. If he drops it you aren't any worse off than what happened unless they drop 2-3 passes, which is unlikely.
Yeah Love threw a slant on him too on that final drive that would've set them up for a 55-60 yard FG had they not advanced further. & playing off coverage was just what was likely called for in the defensive playcall.If I recall, they actually threw at Stingley on the last drive because he was playing soft. He must have learned that from the OL
Nope you put CJ under center and run 3 step drops with only fades, slants from the wrs and Mixon in the flat. 3 step drops if Stroud got sacked at the longest depth of his drop without CJ picking up a yd which is unlikely would be a 41 yd fg. Again you don't throw the pass unless a guy is open. If he drops it you aren't any worse off than what happened unless they drop 2-3 passes, which is unlikely.
I understand what you are saying, however if Stroud does not agree with Slowik on any play, I hope he does turn to Ryans for input.Stroud is 100% a passenger in Slowick’s engine. So it’s like you want Stroud to grab the steering wheel from Slowick and potentially cause a fatal accident?
Lol.
It doesn’t work like that. Even in real life. If a guy won’t pull over and stop, you -have- to stay buckled in or jump out while it’s moving.
Bottom line… Stroud can’t be taking over the engine -during- the drive, he has to wait for the drive to -STOP- first. As long as Stroud stays buckled in… he’ll survive the impending accident but Slowick won’t. And that’s how it goes in the NFL.
No. In both scenarios Cj gets sacked.Difference is I don't care if he gets sacked because I trust Fairbarin to make a 40 yd FG.
Like I said getting sacked doesn't matter.No. In both scenarios Cj gets sacked.
Totally different situations. Bills were backed up by their EZ. Texans were on the GB 12. Difference is you dont throw the ball if the guys not wide open. Take the sacks if not wide open and kick the FG.Lol is this a Sean McDermott troll account? B/c he did exactly what you're suggesting with his offense 2 games ago against us and it proved to ultimately cost his team the game............ & he was subsequently eviscerated for his in-game management of the situation......as he should've been. Like....... literally he had his QB drop back 3 straight times to pass the ball with no success...which stopped the clock all 3 times for us & then punted & gave us a short field to where we didn't need hardly anything to march down into FG range and win it. His QB was ALSO under stress all game & just like CJ, had the worst passing performance of his career that day.
Yes what you're saying could've worked, but its one of those "in theory"things...hell you might even have some data on it that says you should probably do it.... like those go-for-it-on-every-4th-down nerds. but in practicality & within the flow of a game, its more in line with what you probably shouldn't do in a real live game management situation b/c it'll likely cost you.
Right. Everyone agrees with that.Like I said getting sacked doesn't matter.
To me it makes more sense to run plays that have a chance to score a TD and if they aren't wide open take a sack and make GB use their timeouts than just running the ball up the gut knowing you aren't going to score, then throwing a clock stopping pass on 3rd down, leaving GB with a timeout.Right. Everyone agrees with that.
Except you're asking him to take a sack on 1st & 2nd down... possibly.
Makes more sense to give it to Joe on 1st & 2nd. You end up with 3rd & 15 go ahead & throw it if it's there, or take the sack so the clock keeps running.
Yes, throwing that ball on 3rd down didn't make sense. He should have taken the sack & let the clock run.To me it makes more sense to run plays that have a chance to score a TD and if they aren't wide open take a sack and make GB use their timeouts than just running the ball up the gut knowing you aren't going to score, then throwing a clock stopping pass on 3rd down, leaving GB with a timeout.
View attachment 14736
John Harris said "one person" & mentioned Tytus Howard. But if you watch the clip, especially from this view you can see it would be impossible for Tytus Howard to make that block from where they lined up. The one person, I think, in this play is Shaq. He's got to punch that DT lined up over him to give Tytus the time to get over & make that block... Then yeah, that's a TD.
Then GreenBay would have to go the length of the field to score a TD to win.
LMAO. I see what you did there.Cj didn't have time to pass all game calling run plays there made sense. John Harris tweeted one of those plays where one block would have cleared a lane for Joe to get the 1st & maybe a TD. He talked to Demeco about it during the coaches show & DeMeco confirmed his take.
The only difference between your suggestion & what really happened was Cj trusting Tank to catch that ball. He should have taken the sack.
So I don't blame the playcaller but question what S2roud was thinking in that situation. The coaches shouldn't have to spell it out for him.