Kaiser Toro
Native Mod
You don't know what I know and what you don't know is that I am much more knowledgeable than you!
Both
I am sure Lee knows the difference between vertical jump and arm length.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
You don't know what I know and what you don't know is that I am much more knowledgeable than you!
Both
When I hear and read Jimmy Johnson say the team who can accumulate the most draft picks and use them to select the best players will be a team who is more competitive. When I hear Ron Wolf and Ozzie Newsome say don't reach for players, instead stay true to your board, I'm going with their advice over any suggestions made by Molly or Cak.
so you're just being argumentative, you're here for the purpose of arguing, you just want to argue?What suggestion did I make?
What's it like to never have made a mistake? What's it like to make lots of mistakes and not being man enough to admit it?I am sure Lee knows the difference between vertical jump and arm length.
You don't know what I know and what you don't know is that I am much more knowledgeable than you!
Both, if Cowboys trade up for Wentz it's because he's BPA and fills the need long term at the most important position in the game for the next 15 years.
so you're just being argumentative, you're here for the purpose arguing, you just want to argue?
So you're done then?I was simply curious how you evidenced a team going strictly BPA on "their board". You answered that you just go by their word for it. When I simply said ok to that you began getting defensive and telling me what I've asserted to believe, which I hadn't. Not sure why that had to be taken as some argumentative affront to your ego.
So you're done then?
and yet you're still here wanting to have the last word, it's all yours.....I was done back when you said you didn't have any evidence and I said 'ok'. I figured you were too.
You don't know what I know and what you don't know is that I am much more knowledgeable than you!
Both, if Cowboys trade up for Wentz it's because he's BPA and fills the need long term at the most important position in the game for the next 15 years.
Absolutely! You got it, surprised you has to ask.....So by y
So, by your logic, if the cowboys pass on wentz, Ozzie should draft him correct?
So by y
So, by your logic, if the cowboys pass on wentz, Ozzie should draft him correct?
Absolutely! You got it, surprised you has to ask.....
BAL drafts Wentz or Goff, does a sign and trade with Flacco for TWO FIRST RD draft picks and BAL upgrades the most important position in game for the next 15 years....I think you may be getting the hang of this BPA.
Wentz and Goff won't make it to #6 and I don't do silly.There's something called reality. Reality is, the ravens have a great post season, super bowl winning qb who makes 20m a year with accelerated bonus money on the the books. The reality is, they're not gonna take that cap hit anc trade a known for 3 unknowns. As I stated before, best case scenerio is when bpa and need matches, but reality is similar to what billick said. Most times your bpa just so happens to be a need. No coach is looking 15 yrs down the line, they dont care because of job security or lack of. When a team like baltimore or even a team like jacksonville who have their qb,their grades will be different than a team without a qb, its only natural. Thats why if Wentz or Goff falls to Ravens or Jags, they wont draft them. Or are you going to tell me Jags should draft wentz and trade bortles for picks so they can be set for 15 yrs?
Wentz and Goff won't make it to #6 and I don't do silly.
Yep, Rogers was in debate to go 1st and wound up going 21st. Ricky Williams was suppose to go to the Eagles, even after that, he was suppose to be the 1st rb. McNabb went 2nd and the 1st rb was Edge.When guys like Texian speaks opinion like its fact, all i can do is smh.And in the next news, Aaron Rodgers won't make it to 7.
You may not do silly but you have stupid nailed
If over the course of 4 different consecutive drafts, I draft 28 BPA,
Basic common sense and logic. Sticking to BPA philosophy prevents you from reaching and trading 3 draft picks to move up to draft Louis Nix. Capache?
...if Cowboys trade up for Wentz it's because he's BPA...
There's something called reality. Reality is, the ravens have a great post season, super bowl winning qb who makes 20m a year with accelerated bonus money on the the books. The reality is, they're not gonna take that cap hit anc trade a known for 3 unknowns. As I stated before, best case scenerio is when bpa and need matches, but reality is similar to what billick said. Most times your bpa just so happens to be a need. No coach is looking 15 yrs down the line, they dont care because of job security or lack of. When a team like baltimore or even a team like jacksonville who have their qb,their grades will be different than a team without a qb, its only natural. Thats why if Wentz or Goff falls to Ravens or Jags, they wont draft them. Or are you going to tell me Jags should draft wentz and trade bortles for picks so they can be set for 15 yrs?
It's only bpa if Texian likes the player, if not it's reaching. Haven't you learned anything about drafting yet lol
So boys are still upset they cut Louis Nix after giving up a ransom to TRADE UP to get him??
So boys are still upset they cut Louis Nix after giving up a ransom to TRADE UP to get him??
After that Alabama game he wasn't even on my draft board, he was Buyer Beware, not as advertised.They traded up for him because he was BPA on their board at a position of need. Right or wrong. He was BPA
After that Alabama game he wasn't even on my draft board, he was Buyer Beware, not as advertised.
The kid had more games with 0 tackles than he had games with tacklesWere the Texans using your draft board? Maybe they should have been. He was obviously still on the Texans board & there board said he was a value pick, even in trading up to get him.
Wrong. Sure, just don't see how trading up for a player can be seen as not playing your board & reaching. It's not like they said, "We believe he'll be there in the 5th, but we really need a DT. There are several others we grade better, but let's trade up & take him here in the third."
The kid had more games with 0 tackles than he had games with tackles
I think I would trade the farm for Goff.
What about the remaining holes on the team?
I understand. You were right. The Texans were wrong.
Still, they obviously had him graded much higher hence they traded up for the best player on their board.
Now if they passed over a more talented player, say a Jj Watt, for a less talented player... Blaine Gabbert because of need, that would be an example you could use.
You mean like when they passed over Revis to take Okoye?
After that Alabama game he wasn't even on my draft board, he was Buyer Beware, not as advertised.
I was a big, big fan of Revis coming out of college!You mean like when they passed over Revis to take Okoye?
This quote right here proves my point if it's not a player you like, you consider it reaching. It might be a reach on your board, but at the time the team thought he was a great value there and didn't see him lasting to them so they moved up to get him. That's not a reach, most pundits had him as a 2nd rd guy and we got him in the mid 3rd. Sure it didn't work out, but most draft picks dont
So according to you I should not express my opinion or any opinion that differs from your way of thinking. Got it! I should check in with you before posting any message to get your approval. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!This quote right here proves my point if it's not a player you like, you consider it reaching. It might be a reach on your board, but at the time the team thought he was a great value there and didn't see him lasting to them so they moved up to get him. That's not a reach, most pundits had him as a 2nd rd guy and we got him in the mid 3rd. Sure it didn't work out, but most draft picks dont
So according to you I should not express my opinion or any opinion that differs from your way of thinking. Got it! I should check in with you before posting any message to get your approval. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!
Bob McGinn![]()
Carson Wentz, QB, North Dakota State: 6-5, 237. Played behind Waupaca's Brock Jensen until 2014. A wrist injury in '15 limited him to just 23 career starts. "He's a big guy with a big arm," said one scout. "The ball gets there. He's not a scrambler per se but he has speed. He might be the most physically talented of the group. Would I be nervous with this guy? Absolutely. But if you have no quarterback at all, what do you got to lose?" Finished with an NFL passer rating of 105.2. Scored 29 on the 50-question Wonderlic intelligence test. "He's got an arm," another scout said. "But it's such a long way from that level of play to the NFL at any position, let alone quarterback."
Jared Goff*, QB, California: 6-4, 215. Third-year junior with 37 starts. "He might be the most ready," one scout said. "Thing I don't like is his slender build. He did not have a lot of talent around him. Does he have a great arm? No, but it's good enough. I'd be nervous taking him above 10." Posted an NFL passer rating of 98.9. "In terms of arm talent, he'll be like (Jay) Cutler," another scout said. "Skinny kid. Gets hit a bunch. He doesn't see everything. Accuracy is off at times, but he is talented. He can really spin it. Really good feet."
Paxton Lynch*, QB, Memphis: 6-7, 244. Fourth-year junior. "There's stuff he doesn't see but, boy, is he a great athlete for a big guy," one scout said. "He's got good feet and can make all the throws." His NFL passer rating of 93.5 included 110.6 in 2015. "Big production in a lot of games, so-so in some others," another scout said. "Pretty good athlete for a big kid. Excellent size. He's got a big ceiling. It's a weird group of quarterbacks. None of them are just ready-made and none of them show consistency. They're good, solid starters. None of them are Pro Bowl-caliber type quarterbacks. I would take (Jameis) Winston and (Marcus) Mariota over these guys. No question."
Connor Cook, QB, Michigan State: 6-4, 217. Three-year starter with a 34-5 record. "He's got a great winning percentage, an average arm and a quick release," one scout said. "I don't know if his teammates really love him." Wasn't elected as a team captain. "He can make all the throws and he's got some strength to him and he can run," another scout said. "It's all the other stuff. How much he really likes ball and how much he's going to work at it. He likes being a celebrity." NFL passer rating was 95.1. "Cook speaks well and looks good when he speaks, but he's not the sharpest guy," a third scout said. "He's not a high football IQ guy."
Christian Hackenberg*, QB, Penn State: 6-4, 223. Third-year junior. "He's got an incredible amount of talent," one scout said. "There are times he makes incredible throws and times he makes stupid throws. Does the pressure rattle him? That's the key. The changeover in coaches has probably brought him down." Flourished as a freshman (NFL passer rating of 89.0) before coach Bill O'Brien departed for the Texans. His rating in 2014-'15 dipped to 75.6. "After his freshman year people looked at him as the first pick in the draft," another scout said. "He could be as talented as any of these quarterbacks. He's got the arm, the body and is actually a competitor. But the coaches there at Penn State didn't play to his strengths. A premier type talent like that is so hard to find these days. I could see him going latter part of the first round."
So according to you I should not express my opinion or any opinion that differs from your way of thinking. Got it! I should check in with you before posting any message to get your approval. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!!!
Not what i was saying at all, you get argumentative and take everything personally as soon as someone doesnt agree with your way of thinking. In one instance you say a team trading up is taking BPA then in another instance you say it is reaching. Its either one or the other, however when its the player you like its BPA, when its a guy you didnt like it was reaching that my point. you are more than free to posting whatever you want to post just dont get so offended when someone questions your logic behind something, or when they flat out say your wrong. Kind of like i was telling you earlier then off season when you were proclaiming Coker was a first round pick lol
You're confusing argumentative and being wrong with disagreeing. You think trading up for Nix was justifiable because several people said so.
You do realize that you're using the Texans draft board to justify your opinion? I also think I was clear that I was referencing teams that are consistently making the playoffs. If you are saying that the Texans stayed true to their board and Romeo wasn't desperate to fill a BIG hole on his D Line, I disagree.This started because you said the Texans did not stay true to their board, traded up, & reached on Nix.
Now you're arguing if the move was justifiable.
In the first case, no one trades up for a player that is not on their board. Trading up to "reach" doesn't even make sense.
In the second case, in hindsight, you were right. You were able to see Louis Nis was not a football player, Rick Smith didn't have a clue.
Wow...for once I can agree with the member you were quoting and your response to that poster. Nix was just a bad pick, but that's based upon hindsight and intangibles. The big knock on Nix were injuries. Supposing that they healed, his desire to play in the NFL has to be questioned. Nix has answered both questions, as he has passed NFL physicals and shown very little desire to be an NFL player. That's proving to be a trend among very gifted potential player's. Things come to easy for them against lesser competition. Once they reach the NFL, it's all about desire. Do you want it more than the other guy?You do realize that you're using the Texans draft board to justify your opinion? I also think I was clear that I was referencing teams that are consistently making the playoffs. If you are saying that the Texans stayed true to their board and Romeo wasn't desperate to fill a BIG hole on his D Line, I disagree.
You do realize that you're using the Texans draft board to justify your opinion? I also think I was clear that I was referencing teams that are consistently making the playoffs. If you are saying that the Texans stayed true to their board and Romeo wasn't desperate to fill a BIG hole on his D Line, I disagree.
There is nothing wrong with disagreeing, I am of the opinion that OB had an agreement with Romeo to fix the middle of the DL, Romeo wanted Nix and OB told Rick to go get him.Wow...for once I can agree with the member you were quoting and your response to that poster. Nix was just a bad pick, but that's based upon hindsight and intangibles. The big knock on Nix were injuries. Supposing that they healed, his desire to play in the NFL has to be questioned. Nix has answered both questions, as he has passed NFL physicals and shown very little desire to be an NFL player. That's proving to be a trend among very gifted potential player's. Things come to easy for them against lesser competition. Once they reach the NFL, it's all about desire. Do you want it more than the other guy?
Ok. Maybe our definition of "reach" is the problem. I
You have a lot of opinions that I'm on the fence with. You tend more towardsThere is nothing wrong with disagreeing, I am of the opinion that OB had an agreement with Romeo to fix the middle of the DL, Romeo wanted Nix and OB told Rick to go get him.
You're confusing argumentative and being wrong with disagreeing. You think trading up for Nix was justifiable because several people said so. I didn't because I thought being manhandled on the biggest stage in the brightest lights was a disqualifier. That and he had more bad games than he had good games, another major disqualifier. Clearly we disagree. Clearly you don't like being disagreed with. We also have a clear difference of opinion. In this case our disagreement was settled, I was right and you were wrong. You won't admit it because you don't like being wrong or disagreed with.
As for Coker, that is not the first time I've admitted i was wrong. Have you ever admitted you were wrong or do you still believe you're Mr Know-It-All. At the time when Coker was performing admirably on the biggest stages I did say he looked liked he could be 1st RD material. I reserved the right to make a final judgement after the All-Star games, Combine and Pro Days. At the conclusion of the Senior Bowl I had formed the opinion that Coker's processor may not be quick enough for the game on Sunday and publicly stated so. You schmucks always seem to want to forget that when you try to make a point. I was quite clear that I had erred in my early judgement and that Coker was in fact NOT a day 1 draft pick. However I am still not convinved that Coker could be a serviceable backup in the league and one day possibly a starter. He will have to make some dramtic improvements for this to happen.
The biggest difference and disagreement between you and me is you think trading multiple picks to trade up for Nix was a good idea and I don't think Nix should've been on a draft board. You think trading up a franchise QB like Wentz is a reach and I don't because I see 6-7 Pro Bowls and as many playoff appearances in a 10 -12 yr career.