Glacier
Waterboy
FirstTexansFan said:And you're here why? Sounds like a Troll to me!![]()
typical houston haters. hey, its possible to root for more than one team.
Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍
FirstTexansFan said:And you're here why? Sounds like a Troll to me!![]()
Glacier said:How is it, if the Offensive line is SO horrible, you have had this kind of rushing production, yet your QB gets his *** beaten every game?
TheOgre said:Sanders had more elusiveness, quickness and slightly more speed than DD (although both can get caught from behind). DD might have similar characteristics, but he doesn't have the big play capabilities of Sanders (I'm sure if you looked up the % of 20+, 40+, and 60+ yard plays per attempt by each, and the difference would be drastic).
IMO Sanders is a top 3, if not the best, RB of all time.
Glacier said:typical houston haters. hey, its possible to root for more than one team.
Glacier said:I think that is an over simplified explaination. Look, I understand that David Carr has been "THE GUY" people root for in Houston. I understand he was the first over all pick in the draft. I understand fan loyalty and all that stuff. I really do, but at which point do you finally say, "it smells like a skunk, it looks like a skunk. It must be a skunk?"
thunderkyss said:...First, If we trade down, fine. If we draft Vince, fine. I only think it is a loss, if we Draft Regie Bush, because I think we'll be spin our wheels. I'm under the impression we are interested in Kubiak because of his run blocking system in Denver. His ability to make anybody a 1600yard back. I also think we have the backs to do that. No reason for a RB #1 overall....Kubiak's teams are great at RunBlocking.... then we'll have to teach car how to work behind a line that can't pass block as well as they run block..... hence, Vince Young is a good fit. If David would have gotten himself hurt sometime in the last two years, I'd be with you, we owe him another shot. But he hasn't, we've seen him.......
How is it, if the Offensive line is SO horrible, you have had this kind of rushing production, yet your QB gets his *** beaten every game?
Is Carr coachable or is he another Drew Bledsoe who wants to pat the ball all day until he sees a throw he likes? Is he just slow to make reads and find receivers?
Why all the hype to take Reggie Bush when the production at RB is way better than the production at QB?
Fine, you don't want VY, then why not make a case for taking Wheinhart?
All 5 guys and their back-ups?! I guess you think anything is possible huh?Bobo said:That's easy. Run blocking and pass blocking are two separate things. It is possible to do one thing well and another thing poorly.
STOP THE PRESSES!!!!Glacier said:4 yards per carry is pretty freaking good dude.
If all you did was run on 1, 2, 3rd down averaging 4 yards a carry, your offense never leaves the field and would score every time.
I don't buy it. I understand there is a difference between run and pass blocking; however, these guys have been blocking forever. Something had to be breaking down in pass blocking. Either someone wasn't making the right blocking calls, David Carr stinks at getting rid of the ball quick or, people do not fear David Carr will burn them if they blitz him every down.
There has to be an explaination for why Dominack Davis can be productive behind that line and D Carr can't.
Glacier said:bah, Dallas hasn't always been the better team.
A4toZ said:Bravo, good post. Your point made sense to me and some valid points in my thought process. Personally, I've been more of the "undecided - let the people in charge make the call" group with a slight lean towards Reggie and a sprinkle of "trade down". Till this point, never was towards Young - but you just sparked a little interest in him for me.
Big B Texan Fan said:All 5 guys and their back-ups?! I guess you think anything is possible huh?
thunderkyss said:I don't think Reggie adds anything to this team, that we don't already have.
thunderkyss said:... I don't think Reggie adds anything to this team, that we don't already have.
LBC_Justin said:STOP THE PRESSES!!!!
#3 Dallas sucks. There are few trees there and the trees that are there are small (I'm originally from The Woodlands). Plus there is NO REASON for a city to be in that location. No Ocean, No big Lake, No port, No river, Valley, No mountains...........oh that's right that is where the train tracks crossed and passengers stopped there to take a dump.
Glacier said:I'll say it again: he would be a perfect fit in Philly (puke) or Minnesota.
DRAMA said:or Arizona??
I REALLY want Bush but hey, I'm thinking Fitzgerald, Dansby (or Leonard Davis) and their #1 will pretty much have me trading Bush before you can blink!!!
I mean, a guy can dream, right? We're drafting #1, why not ask for the world and see if someone bites?
Glacier said:woah woah now....
I wouldn't say this at all though. This is simply not accurate. Reggie Bush, with a creative offensive coordinator will create horrible pressure on defenses by lining up out wide, in the slot or in the back field. He is a threat, though, an over hyped threat, given that he played against average talent until he played Texas, at which point, he looked more human....still good, but more human.
If we are going to be a running team then we don't need a guy like Vince Young either. We stick with Carr or draft Leinart or Cutler. Great running teams usually have Pocket Passers to keep the defenders in check.thunderkyss said:Right, just like you said. Reggie within a creative offense. We were anything buy creative last year, or any of the four years we've "competed". And Kubiak( I assume) is going to make us a dominant run threat. I don't believe Reggie adds anything to this team, because we haven't, and won't be running those "fancy" Offenses......... St Louis, San Francisco, Indy, Buffalo.... but not us.... this is not a knock on Reggie, I'm just saying he's a square peg, we're kinda round...
LBC_Justin said:I am starting to lean toward trading down and getting D'Brick. LOL I flip flop back and forth almost on an hourly basis.